Skip to content

An Extension Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod (FTY720) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

An Extension of the 6-month, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of FTY720 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00670449
Enrollment
143
Registered
2008-05-01
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2013-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

FTY720, multiple sclerosis, MS

Brief summary

This study was an extension study of NCT00537082. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term administration of 0.5 mg or 1.25 mg of fingolimod (FTY720) to relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Detailed description

A decision was made to switch all patients on fingolimod 1.25 mg/day to fingolimod 0.5 mg/day in an amendment to the study protocol. The study became open-label with all patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg/day on 22 Feb 2010. The efficacy data for Months 0-6 in this study report is from the core study NCT00537082.

Interventions

DRUGFingolimod

Fingolimod was supplied in capsules.

Sponsors

Tanabe Pharma Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who completed 6 months of treatment with the study drug and the Month 6 visit in the core study NCT00537082. * Females of childbearing potential who have a negative pregnancy test in the core study NCT00537082.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who permanently discontinued study drug treatment prior to the Month 6 visit in the core study NCT00537082. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonths 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48To ensure consistency, MRI scans were evaluated centrally at the Institute of Neurotherapeutics in Kyoto, Japan. After checking the scans for completeness and quality, all scans were analyzed by blinded readers (experienced neurologists). The number of Gd-enhanced T1 weighted MRI lesions were counted and recorded. Lesions expanding through several slices were counted as only 1 lesion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonths 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-18, 18-24, 24-36,36-48, and 48 to the end of the study (up to 4 years)To ensure consistency, MRI scans were evaluated centrally at the Institute of Neurotherapeutics in Kyoto, Japan. After checking the scans for completeness and quality, all scans were analyzed by blinded readers (experienced neurologists). The number of new or newly enlarged T2 weighted MRI lesions were counted and recorded. New lesions were identified by comparing each lesion with previous scans. Lesions expanding through several slices were counted as only 1 lesion.
Aggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonths 0-6, 6-12, 12-24, 24-36, 36-48, and 48 to the end of the study (up to 4 years)The ARR was defined as the total number of relapses for all patients in the treatment arm / total number of days in the study for all patients in the treatment arm for the specific period of time × 365.25. General definition of relapse: Appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from the onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\< 37.5°C) or infection. A relapse was to be confirmed by a neurologist trained on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). A relapse must be accompanied by an increase of at least half a step (0.5) on the EDSS or an increase of 1 point on 2 different Functional Systems (FS) of the EDSS or 2 points on 1 of the FS (excluding Bowel/Bladder or Cerebral FS).
Percentage of Patients Relapse-free at the End of the StudyBaseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years)Patients who did not experience any relapses confirmed by a neurologist during the study were regarded as relapse-free patients.
Percentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentBaseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years)Disability progression was measured by the EDSS score. A trained neurologist grades the multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of the patient on a scale of 0-5 (no to severe disability) in 8 Functional Systems (FS): Pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral (or mental), and other. The EDSS score ranges from 0-10 (normal to dead) with higher scores indicating greater disability. A 3-month confirmed disability progression was defined as a 3-month sustained increase from baseline in the EDSS score, that is, every EDSS score obtained (scheduled or unscheduled) within 3-months after the first progression met the following progression criteria: One point (1) increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point (0.5) increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. A 6-month confirmed disability progression was defined exactly the same except that the sustained progression had to last 6 months.
Change From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreBaseline to Months 12, 24, 36, 48, and end of study (up to 4 years)Disability progression was measured by the EDSS score. A trained neurologist grades the multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of the patient on a scale of 0-5 (no to severe disability) in 8 Functional Systems (FS): Pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral (or mental), and other. The EDSS score ranges from 0-10 (normal to dead) with higher scores indicating greater disability. A 3-month confirmed disability progression was defined as a 3-month sustained increase from baseline in the EDSS score, that is, every EDSS score obtained (scheduled or unscheduled) within 3-months after the first progression met the following progression criteria: One point (1) increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point (0.5) increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. A 6-month confirmed disability progression was defined exactly the same except that the sustained progression had to last 6 months.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fingolimod 0.5 mg
Patients who received fingolimod 0.5 orally once daily in the core study continued on the same dose in this extension study.
47
Fingolimod 1.25 mg
Patients who received fingolimod 1.25 mg orally once daily in the core study continued on the same dose in this extension study.
46
Placebo-fingolimod 0.5 mg
Patients who were randomized to placebo in the core study were re-randomized to either fingolimod 0.5 or 1.25 mg (1:1) orally once daily in this extension study.
27
Placebo-fingolimod 1.25 mg
Patients who were randomized to placebo in the core study were re-randomized to either fingolimod 0.5 or 1.25 mg (1:1) orally once daily in this extension study.
23
Total143

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAbnormal Laboratory Value(s)0200
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems0201
Overall StudyAdverse Event6285
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation1201
Overall StudySubject Withdrew Consent0201
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect2010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFingolimod 0.5 mgFingolimod 1.25 mgPlacebo-fingolimod 0.5 mgPlacebo-fingolimod 1.25 mgTotal
Age Continuous34.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.95
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.81
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44
35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants31 Participants19 Participants14 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants15 Participants8 Participants9 Participants46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 4642 / 4721 / 2325 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 468 / 475 / 231 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions

To ensure consistency, MRI scans were evaluated centrally at the Institute of Neurotherapeutics in Kyoto, Japan. After checking the scans for completeness and quality, all scans were analyzed by blinded readers (experienced neurologists). The number of Gd-enhanced T1 weighted MRI lesions were counted and recorded. Lesions expanding through several slices were counted as only 1 lesion.

Time frame: Months 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Core full analysis set (FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb- 2010). (approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 9 (N=44, 39, 41)90.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 24 (N=38, 39, 33)94.7 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 18 (N=42, 40, 37)92.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 6 (N=44, 48, 50)88.6 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 22)92.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 12 (N=44, 42, 36)97.7 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 18 (N=42, 40, 37)92.5 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 6 (N=44, 48, 50)97.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 9 (N=44, 39, 41)94.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 12 (N=44, 42, 36)97.6 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 24 (N=38, 39, 33)94.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 22)85.7 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)75.0 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 24 (N=38, 39, 33)90.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 9 (N=44, 39, 41)92.7 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 22)90.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 18 (N=42, 40, 37)94.6 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 12 (N=44, 42, 36)88.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of Gd-enhanced T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) LesionsMonth 6 (N=44, 48, 50)58.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Aggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed Relapses

The ARR was defined as the total number of relapses for all patients in the treatment arm / total number of days in the study for all patients in the treatment arm for the specific period of time × 365.25. General definition of relapse: Appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from the onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\< 37.5°C) or infection. A relapse was to be confirmed by a neurologist trained on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). A relapse must be accompanied by an increase of at least half a step (0.5) on the EDSS or an increase of 1 point on 2 different Functional Systems (FS) of the EDSS or 2 points on 1 of the FS (excluding Bowel/Bladder or Cerebral FS).

Time frame: Months 0-6, 6-12, 12-24, 24-36, 36-48, and 48 to the end of the study (up to 4 years)

Population: Core full analysis set (FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb- 2010). (approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 0 to 6 (N=57, 54, 57)0.539 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 6 to 12 (N=47, 46, 50)0.227 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 12 to 24 (N=44, 43, 39)0.166 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 24 to 36 (N=41, 40, 34)0.191 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 36 to 48 (N=28, 23, 23)0.164 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 0.5 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 48 to end of study (N=8, 6, 3)0.000 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 48 to end of study (N=8, 6, 3)0.000 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 0 to 6 (N=57, 54, 57)0.404 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 24 to 36 (N=41, 40, 34)0.058 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 36 to 48 (N=28, 23, 23)0.075 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 6 to 12 (N=47, 46, 50)0.284 Relapses per year
Fingolimod 1.25 mgAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 12 to 24 (N=44, 43, 39)0.223 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 6 to 12 (N=47, 46, 50)0.232 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 12 to 24 (N=44, 43, 39)0.222 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 48 to end of study (N=8, 6, 3)0.000 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 24 to 36 (N=41, 40, 34)0.162 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 0 to 6 (N=57, 54, 57)1.131 Relapses per year
Placebo-fingolimodAggregate Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Based on Confirmed RelapsesMonth 36 to 48 (N=28, 23, 23)0.309 Relapses per year
Secondary

Change From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score

Disability progression was measured by the EDSS score. A trained neurologist grades the multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of the patient on a scale of 0-5 (no to severe disability) in 8 Functional Systems (FS): Pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral (or mental), and other. The EDSS score ranges from 0-10 (normal to dead) with higher scores indicating greater disability. A 3-month confirmed disability progression was defined as a 3-month sustained increase from baseline in the EDSS score, that is, every EDSS score obtained (scheduled or unscheduled) within 3-months after the first progression met the following progression criteria: One point (1) increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point (0.5) increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. A 6-month confirmed disability progression was defined exactly the same except that the sustained progression had to last 6 months.

Time frame: Baseline to Months 12, 24, 36, 48, and end of study (up to 4 years)

Population: Core full analysis set (FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. • The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb- 2010). (approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fingolimod 0.5 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)1.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.764
Fingolimod 0.5 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 23)0.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.441
Fingolimod 0.5 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 12 (N=45, 43, 40)-0.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.464
Fingolimod 0.5 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 24 (N=42, 40, 35)-0.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.723
Fingolimod 0.5 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreEnd of study (N=37, 36, 32)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.225
Fingolimod 1.25 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 23)-0.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.912
Fingolimod 1.25 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 12 (N=45, 43, 40)-0.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.831
Fingolimod 1.25 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 24 (N=42, 40, 35)-0.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.033
Fingolimod 1.25 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)-0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.946
Fingolimod 1.25 mgChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreEnd of study (N=37, 36, 32)-0.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.902
Placebo-fingolimodChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreEnd of study (N=37, 36, 32)-0.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Placebo-fingolimodChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 48 (N=3, 4, 1)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo-fingolimodChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 12 (N=45, 43, 40)-0.23 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo-fingolimodChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 36 (N=25, 21, 23)-0.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.678
Placebo-fingolimodChange From Core Study Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreMonth 24 (N=42, 40, 35)-0.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.789
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Assessment

Disability progression was measured by the EDSS score. A trained neurologist grades the multiple sclerosis (MS) disability of the patient on a scale of 0-5 (no to severe disability) in 8 Functional Systems (FS): Pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel and bladder, visual, cerebral (or mental), and other. The EDSS score ranges from 0-10 (normal to dead) with higher scores indicating greater disability. A 3-month confirmed disability progression was defined as a 3-month sustained increase from baseline in the EDSS score, that is, every EDSS score obtained (scheduled or unscheduled) within 3-months after the first progression met the following progression criteria: One point (1) increase from baseline in patients with baseline EDSS score from 0 to 5.0; or half a point (0.5) increase in patients with baseline EDSS score of 5.5 or above. A 6-month confirmed disability progression was defined exactly the same except that the sustained progression had to last 6 months.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years)

Population: Core full analysis set (FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb- 2010). (approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 3-month confirmed disability progression74.3 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 6-month confirmed disability progression87.1 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 3-month confirmed disability progression82.4 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 6-month confirmed disability progression90.7 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 3-month confirmed disability progression90.6 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free From 3-month and 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression at Their Last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) AssessmentFree from 6-month confirmed disability progression92.3 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI Lesions

To ensure consistency, MRI scans were evaluated centrally at the Institute of Neurotherapeutics in Kyoto, Japan. After checking the scans for completeness and quality, all scans were analyzed by blinded readers (experienced neurologists). The number of new or newly enlarged T2 weighted MRI lesions were counted and recorded. New lesions were identified by comparing each lesion with previous scans. Lesions expanding through several slices were counted as only 1 lesion.

Time frame: Months 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-18, 18-24, 24-36,36-48, and 48 to the end of the study (up to 4 years)

Population: Core full analysis set(FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. Study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day. The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb-2010). (approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 24 to 36 (N=25, 21, 22)92.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 9 to 12 (N=44, 42, 35)93.2 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 3 to 6 (N=43, 47, 48)86.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 18 to 24 (N=39, 39, 33)94.9 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 12 to 18 (N=43, 40, 37)88.4 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 0 to 3 (N=49, 50, 51)69.4 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 36 to 48 (N=3, 4, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 6 to 9 (N=44, 39, 40)88.6 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 48 to end of study (N=3, 3, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 48 to end of study (N=3, 3, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 0 to 3 (N=49, 50, 51)60.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 3 to 6 (N=43, 47, 48)91.5 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 6 to 9 (N=44, 39, 40)92.3 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 9 to 12 (N=44, 42, 35)95.2 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 12 to 18 (N=43, 40, 37)90.0 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 18 to 24 (N=39, 39, 33)92.3 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 24 to 36 (N=25, 21, 22)90.5 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 36 to 48 (N=3, 4, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 18 to 24 (N=39, 39, 33)87.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 6 to 9 (N=44, 39, 40)70.0 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 0 to 3 (N=49, 50, 51)45.1 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 24 to 36 (N=25, 21, 22)90.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 3 to 6 (N=43, 47, 48)43.8 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 48 to end of study (N=3, 3, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 12 to 18 (N=43, 40, 37)91.9 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 9 to 12 (N=44, 42, 35)85.7 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Free of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Weighted MRI LesionsMonth 36 to 48 (N=3, 4, 1)100.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Relapse-free at the End of the Study

Patients who did not experience any relapses confirmed by a neurologist during the study were regarded as relapse-free patients.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years)

Population: Core full analysis set (FAS): All patients who were randomized in the core study and received at least 1 dose of core study drug. The study became open-label with all patients receiving FTY720 0.5 mg/day (by 22-Feb- 2010).(approximately 22 months before study completion)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Fingolimod 0.5 mgPercentage of Patients Relapse-free at the End of the Study45.2 Percentage of patients
Fingolimod 1.25 mgPercentage of Patients Relapse-free at the End of the Study62.1 Percentage of patients
Placebo-fingolimodPercentage of Patients Relapse-free at the End of the Study48.3 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026