Skip to content

Travoprost New Formulations in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Comparison of Safety and IOP-Lowering Efficacy of Three Alternative Travoprost Formulations to Vehicle and TRAVATAN® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00670033
Enrollment
158
Registered
2008-05-01
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2014-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Hypertension, Open-angle Glaucoma

Keywords

IOP, Open-angle glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and IOP-lowering efficacy of Travoprost New Formulations compared to TRAVATAN® and to vehicle in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Interventions

DRUGTravoprost ophthalmic solution (new formulation)
DRUGVehicle

Inactive ingredients used as a placebo

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Satisfy all informed consent requirements; * Diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension; * Able to discontinue use of all IOP-lowering medications for a minimum of 5 to 28 days prior to the Eligibility 1 Visit; * IOP measurements in at least 1 eye as specified in protocol; * Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Females of childbearing potential if pregnant, breastfeeding, or not using highly effective birth control measures; * Any form of glaucoma other than open-angle glaucoma; * Severe central visual field loss in either eye; * Chronic, recurrent or severe inflammatory eye disease; * Clinically relevant or progressive retinal disease such as retinal degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, or retinal detachment, in the opinion of the Investigator; * Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 0.60 logarithm of the miniminum angle of resolution (logMAR); * Intraocular surgery within the past 6 months; * Ocular laser surgery within the past 3 months; * Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry; * Severe illness or any other conditions which would make the patient, in the opinion of the Investigator, unsuitable for the study; * Other protocol-specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean change from baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP)Baseline, Up to Week 4IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean intraocular pressureBaseline, Up to Week 4IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage).
Mean percent change from baseline in IOPBaseline, Up to Week 4IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative percent change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026