Skip to content

Copper T380 IUD Versus Oral Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception vs. Plan B for Emergency Contraception

A Pilot Study of Copper T380A IUDs Versus Oral Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00669396
Enrollment
57
Registered
2008-04-30
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2014-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

contraception, emergency contraception, pregnancy prevention after unprotected intercourse

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) are willing to accept the copper intrauterine device (IUD). This study will also compare the use of effective methods of contraception between women who selected the copper IUD or Plan B 6 months after they received EC.

Detailed description

This study seeks to estimate the acceptance of Copper IUD use amongst people presenting for EC. This will be accomplished by offering all women who present for EC at participating Planned Parenthood Association of Utah (PPAU) clinics during the study period the option of having the copper IUD or Plan B. Women who agree to study participation will be followed for 6 months. The primary outcome for the study is the use of a reliable method of contraception 6 months after presenting for EC. Secondary outcomes measured will be pregnancies, abortions, repeat Plan B use, presence of gonorrhea or Chlamydia infection at the time of presentation for EC, number of days to first bleeding episode and duration of that bleeding episode, further bleeding patterns, frequency of unprotected intercourse, use of a barrier method for prevention of sexually transmitted infections, patient satisfaction with the chosen method and symptoms possibly related to contraception use. Patients selecting the IUD will be assessed for IUD expulsion, perforation, and removal.

Interventions

Copper T380 IUD

DRUGlevonorgestrel

1.5 mg

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women 18-45 years old, in need of EC (had unprotected intercourse within 120 hours), willing to give consent for participation in research, willing to comply with the study requirements, and accessible by telephone. * Patients selecting the IUD need to identify themselves as desiring long-term contraception.

Exclusion criteria

* Current pregnancy, * Had pelvic inflammatory disease or a septic abortion within the past 3 months or gonorrheal or chlamydial infection in the last 60 days, * Current behavior suggesting a high risk for pelvic inflammatory disease * Allergy to copper, or Wilson's disease (for patients selecting Paragard) or allergy to levonorgestrel (for patients selecting Plan B) * Intracavitary of symptomatic uterine fibroids, and abnormalities of the uterus that distort the uterine cavity, * Mucopurulent cervicitis, * A previously placed IUD that has not been removed * Genital bleeding of unknown etiology * Ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer, * Small uterine cavity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use of an Effective Method of Contraception at 6 Months After Requesting Emergency Contraception6 monthsUse of a method of contraception with a typical efficacy rate \>= to 92%. This includes combined hormonal contraception (combined oral contraceptive pills, the contraceptive patch and ring), sterilization, IUDs, Depo-provera, and contraceptive implants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pregnancy6 monthspositive urine pregnancy test at anytime within 6 months of presenting for emergency contraception.
Infection6 monthsdiagnosis and treatment for pelvic inflammatory disease
IUD Expulsion, Removal, or Perforation6 monthspatient reports IUD expulsion, removal, or perforation OR one of these events was documented at the clinic where patient received care.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Copper T380 IUD
IUD
23
Levonorgestrel
Oral levonorgestrel
34
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1012

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLevonorgestrelCopper T380 IUDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants23 Participants57 Participants
Age, Continuous23.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
24.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
23.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
34 participants23 participants57 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants23 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Use of an Effective Method of Contraception at 6 Months After Requesting Emergency Contraception

Use of a method of contraception with a typical efficacy rate \>= to 92%. This includes combined hormonal contraception (combined oral contraceptive pills, the contraceptive patch and ring), sterilization, IUDs, Depo-provera, and contraceptive implants.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Copper T380 IUDUse of an Effective Method of Contraception at 6 Months After Requesting Emergency Contraception9 participants
LevonorgestrelUse of an Effective Method of Contraception at 6 Months After Requesting Emergency Contraception13 participants
Secondary

Infection

diagnosis and treatment for pelvic inflammatory disease

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Copper T380 IUDInfection0 participants
LevonorgestrelInfection0 participants
Secondary

IUD Expulsion, Removal, or Perforation

patient reports IUD expulsion, removal, or perforation OR one of these events was documented at the clinic where patient received care.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Copper T380 IUDIUD Expulsion, Removal, or Perforation5 participants
LevonorgestrelIUD Expulsion, Removal, or Perforation0 participants
Secondary

Pregnancy

positive urine pregnancy test at anytime within 6 months of presenting for emergency contraception.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Copper T380 IUDPregnancy0 participants
LevonorgestrelPregnancy2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026