Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
MDD, Depression, Pediatrics, Major Depressive Disorder
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR) in child and adolescent outpatients with major depressive disorder. A secondary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DVS SR in the treatment of child and adolescent outpatients with major depressive disorder in an exploratory manner.
Interventions
* tablet * subjects randomly assigned to 10-200 mg/day by age group * 6 month treatment period(\ 182 days)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Outpatients who have completed 8-weeks of treatment in the preceding study, 3151A6-2000, and who, in the opinion of the investigator, would benefit from long-term treatment. * Study participants who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal must agree and commit to the use of a reliable method of birth control for the duration of the study and for 15 days after the last dose of test article. Sexually active study participants must agree and commit to the use of condoms in addition to other contraceptive methods.
Exclusion criteria
* Clinically important abnormalities on baseline physical examination or any clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory test results, or vital signs recorded before the final study day (day 56 visit) of the preceding study 3151A6-2000. * Unresolved clinically significant adverse events or serious adverse events in the preceding study 3151A6-2000. * Poor compliance with the preceding study 3151A6-2000, as assessed by the investigator and the medical monitor. * Other
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Baseline (Extension study) up to Extension study Week 29 Follow up visit | AEs are any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given study treatment. The event does not need to be causally related to the study treatment. SAEs are adverse events that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, result in cancer, or result in a congenital anomaly or birth defect. |
| Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Postbaseline (≥Day 1 in Core study NCT00619619) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: Completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than one category. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29) | HAM-D17 is a clinician-rated interview to measure presence of depressive symptoms in 17 areas (symptoms such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, suicide, sleep disturbances, anxiety levels, and weight loss). Total score ranges from 0 to 52; higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29) | CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29) | CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Scores above 4 reflect worsening of illness state as compared to baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29) | CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Participant with response is defined as having a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study) | Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Female pubertal development staged by pubic hair development and breast size (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category. |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study) | Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Male pubertal development staged by size of the genitalia and development of pubic hair (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category. |
| Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 26 and >Week 26 (up to Week 29 or early termination) | CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | Vitals signs meeting the PCI criteria for weight categorized according to an increase of ≥7 percent or a decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight. |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | PCI criteria for females: supine pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<63 or \>121 at age 12 to \<54 or \>110 at age 17; pulse from \<50 or \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: pulse ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<58 or \>116 at age 12 to \<50 or \>104 at age 17; pulse from \<45 or \>99 at age 18. Vitals signs meeting criteria for PCI categorized as Low or as postural change in pulse (increase in pulse ≥20 bpm for last supine to first standing pulse \[supine to standing\]). |
| Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | ECG results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as PR interval ≥200 milliseconds (msec); QT interval ≥480msec; QRS interval ≥120 msec; corrected QT (QTc) ≥500 msec ); \>450 msec for males and \>470 msec for females or increase of ≥60 msec or ≥30 msec change from baseline QTcB=QT corrected using Bazett formula; QTcF=QT corrected using the Fridericia formula. |
| Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low) | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | PCI criteria for females: heart rate (bpm) ranges from \<68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate from \<63 and \>121 at age 12 to \<54 and \>110 at age 17; heart rate \<50 and \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: heart rate ranges from \< 68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate \<58 and \>116 at age 12 up \<50 and \>104 at age 17; heart rate \<45 and \>99 at age 18. Heart rates meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as low (less than the lower limit specified for age). |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | Laboratory test results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as bicarbonate increase or decrease from baseline of ≥4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L); hematocrit \<0.32 or \>0.50 (females) or \<0.37 or \>0.55 (males) liters per liter (L/L); high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) decrease \>0.21 mmol/L and test value ≥1.16 mmol/L; triglycerides (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) ≥2.258 mmol/L or increase ≥1.13 mmol/L and test value ≥3.39 mmol/L; urine specific gravity \<1.001 or \>1.035; and positive urinalysis result for protein (albumin), hemoglobin, or ketones. |
| Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study) | PCI criteria for females: systolic BP \[SBP\] ranges from \>110 and diastolic BP \[DBP\] \>73 (\>110/73) at age 6 up to BP \>124/81 at age 11; BP from \>121/79 at age 12 up to BP \>132/86 at age 17. Criteria for males: BP ranges from \>112/73 at age 6 up to BP \>123/82 at age 10; BP from \>119/79 at age 11 up to BP \>140/89 at age 17. Vitals signs meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as BP elevation for 3 consecutive visits or as postural change in BP (decrease in SBP ≥20 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] or in DBP ≥15 mmHg for the last supine to first standing BP \[supine to standing\]). |
| Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29) | CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission defined as a CDRS-R total score ≤28 (coded value of 1). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Eligible participants transitioned from preceding Core study NCT00619619 (3151A6-2000 \[B2061012\]) on Day 56 to this Extension study NCT00669110 (3151A6-2001 \[B2061013\]) to continue treatment on a flexible dose schedule. A total of 8 participants (Children n=2 and Adolescent n=6) discontinued during Taper/post-study or Follow-up phase of Core study.
Pre-assignment details
Baseline (Day-1) in the Extension study = Week 8 (Day 56) in the Core study. However, Baseline for the Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) = Inpatient Day 1 through 4 in the Core study and Baseline for the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) = Day-1 in the Core study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release (DVS SR) formulation tablet(s) by mouth (PO) administered as flexible dosing adjusted by the investigator as clinically indicated. Total daily dose will be flexible between 10 milligrams (mg), 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg for children 7 to 11 years of age at baseline in the preceding Core study NCT00619619. | 20 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release (DVS SR) formulation tablet(s) by mouth (PO) administered as flexible dosing adjusted by the investigator as clinically indicated. Total daily dose will be flexible between 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg for adolescents 12 to 17 years of age at baseline in the preceding Core study NCT00619619. | 20 |
| Total | 40 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Caregiver request | 3 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | DVS SR - Children | DVS SR - Adolescents | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 9.65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31 | 13.55 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 | 11.60 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46 |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Breasts Stage 1 | 4 participants | 0 participants | 4 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Breasts Stage 2 | 4 participants | 1 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Breasts Stage 3 | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Breasts Stage 4 | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Breasts Stage 5 | 0 participants | 7 participants | 7 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Pubic hair Stage 1 | 6 participants | 0 participants | 6 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Pubic hair Stage 2 | 3 participants | 2 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Pubic hair Stage 3 | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Pubic hair Stage 4 | 0 participants | 2 participants | 2 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females Pubic hair Stage 5 | 0 participants | 5 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Penis Stage 1 | 5 participants | 0 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Penis Stage 2 | 3 participants | 2 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Penis Stage 3 | 1 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Penis Stage 4 | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Penis Stage 5 | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Pubic hair Stage 1 | 6 participants | 0 participants | 6 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Pubic hair Stage 2 | 2 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Pubic hair Stage 3 | 1 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Pubic hair Stage 4 | 0 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Pubic hair Stage 5 | 0 participants | 2 participants | 2 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Testes Stage 1 | 5 participants | 0 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Testes Stage 2 | 2 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Testes Stage 3 | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Testes Stage 4 | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males Testes Stage 5 | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 20 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories
C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: Completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than one category.
Time frame: Postbaseline (≥Day 1 in Core study NCT00619619) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Core study) includes all treatment assigned participants with at least 1 dose of study treatment during Core study NCT00619619 and Extension study NCT00669110.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Completed suicide: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicide attempt: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Preparatory acts - imminent suicidal behavior: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicidal ideation: Yes | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicidal ideation: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation: Yes | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Completed suicide: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicidal ideation: No | 17 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicide attempt: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation: No | 17 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Preparatory acts - imminent suicidal behavior: No | 20 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation: Yes | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories | Suicidal ideation: Yes | 3 participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs are any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given study treatment. The event does not need to be causally related to the study treatment. SAEs are adverse events that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, result in cancer, or result in a congenital anomaly or birth defect.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Extension study Week 29 Follow up visit
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study) includes all treatment assigned participants with at least 1 dose of study treatment during Extension study NCT00669110.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Adverse events | 13 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious adverse events | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Adverse events | 15 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious adverse events | 0 participants |
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit
CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 26 and >Week 26 (up to Week 29 or early termination)
Population: Intent to Treat population (ITT): all treatment assigned participants with a baseline primary efficacy evaluation, at least 1 dose of study treatment, and at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose in Extension study NCT00669110. Last observation carried forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Baseline mean | 32.40 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.61 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 26 | -1.85 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week >26 | -1.85 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.51 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Baseline mean | 33.70 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.34 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 26 | -1.95 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.85 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week >26 | -1.70 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.67 |
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score
HAM-D17 is a clinician-rated interview to measure presence of depressive symptoms in 17 areas (symptoms such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, suicide, sleep disturbances, anxiety levels, and weight loss). Total score ranges from 0 to 52; higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)
Population: ITT population; LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Baseline mean | 5.15 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.01 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 10 | -1.30 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 2 | -0.50 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 14 | -0.45 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 26 | -1.65 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 18 | -1.65 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 4 | -0.40 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 22 | -1.05 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.26 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 1 | 0.53 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week >26 | -1.65 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 6 | -0.45 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week >26 | -2.10 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.37 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Baseline mean | 7.45 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 1 | 1.79 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.97 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 2 | 0.70 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.01 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 4 | -0.95 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 6 | -0.70 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 10 | -1.40 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 14 | -1.65 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 18 | -2.45 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 26 | -2.35 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score | Change from Bsl Outpatient Week 22 | -2.15 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.22 |
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females
Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Female pubertal development staged by pubic hair development and breast size (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study); N=number of participants with evaluable data at observation. No participants had a change of 3 stages or change of 4 stages reported, therefore only changes for 0 stages through 2 stages are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 0=no stage change | 5 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 1=change of 1 stage | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 0=no stage change | 6 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 0=no stage change | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 0=no stage change | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 1=change of 1 stage | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Pubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females | Breasts: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males
Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Male pubertal development staged by size of the genitalia and development of pubic hair (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study); N=number of participants with evaluable data at observation. No participants had a change of 3 stages or change of 4 stages reported, therefore only changes for 0 stages through 2 stages are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 1=change of 1 stage | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 0=no stage change | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 0=no stage change | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 2=change of 2 stages | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 1=change of 1 stage | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 2=change of 2 stages | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 0=no stage change | 4 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 0=no stage change | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 1=change of 1 stage | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Penis: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 0=no stage change | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Pubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 0=no stage change | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males | Testes: 1=change of 1 stage | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)
ECG results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as PR interval ≥200 milliseconds (msec); QT interval ≥480msec; QRS interval ≥120 msec; corrected QT (QTc) ≥500 msec ); \>450 msec for males and \>470 msec for females or increase of ≥60 msec or ≥30 msec change from baseline QTcB=QT corrected using Bazett formula; QTcF=QT corrected using the Fridericia formula.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable ECG data. Participants may be represented in \>1 category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | PR interval ≥200 msec | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QRS interval ≥120 msec | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcF interval ≥30 msec change from baseline | 5 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval ≥30 msec change from baseline | 6 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval ≥60 msec change from baseline | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval >470 or increase ≥60 msec (females) | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval ≥60 msec change from baseline | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | PR interval ≥200 msec | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval ≥30 msec change from baseline | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QRS interval ≥120 msec | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcB interval >470 or increase ≥60 msec (females) | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | QTcF interval ≥30 msec change from baseline | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low)
PCI criteria for females: heart rate (bpm) ranges from \<68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate from \<63 and \>121 at age 12 to \<54 and \>110 at age 17; heart rate \<50 and \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: heart rate ranges from \< 68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate \<58 and \>116 at age 12 up \<50 and \>104 at age 17; heart rate \<45 and \>99 at age 18. Heart rates meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as low (less than the lower limit specified for age).
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable ECG data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low) | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low) | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)
Laboratory test results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as bicarbonate increase or decrease from baseline of ≥4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L); hematocrit \<0.32 or \>0.50 (females) or \<0.37 or \>0.55 (males) liters per liter (L/L); high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) decrease \>0.21 mmol/L and test value ≥1.16 mmol/L; triglycerides (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) ≥2.258 mmol/L or increase ≥1.13 mmol/L and test value ≥3.39 mmol/L; urine specific gravity \<1.001 or \>1.035; and positive urinalysis result for protein (albumin), hemoglobin, or ketones.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable laboratory data. Participants may be represented in \>1 category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Bicarbonate: decrease | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine specific gravity: high | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | HDL cholesterol: decrease | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine protein albumin: positive result | 9 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Hematocrit: low | 4 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine ketones: positive result | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Triglycerides: high | 4 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine hemoglobin: positive result | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Bicarbonate: increase | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine hemoglobin: positive result | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Bicarbonate: increase | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Bicarbonate: decrease | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Hematocrit: low | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | HDL cholesterol: decrease | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Triglycerides: high | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine specific gravity: high | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine protein albumin: positive result | 9 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) | Urine ketones: positive result | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)
PCI criteria for females: systolic BP \[SBP\] ranges from \>110 and diastolic BP \[DBP\] \>73 (\>110/73) at age 6 up to BP \>124/81 at age 11; BP from \>121/79 at age 12 up to BP \>132/86 at age 17. Criteria for males: BP ranges from \>112/73 at age 6 up to BP \>123/82 at age 10; BP from \>119/79 at age 11 up to BP \>140/89 at age 17. Vitals signs meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as BP elevation for 3 consecutive visits or as postural change in BP (decrease in SBP ≥20 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] or in DBP ≥15 mmHg for the last supine to first standing BP \[supine to standing\]).
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Elevated supine SBP, 3 consecutive visits | 4 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Decrease SBP ≥20 mmHg supine to standing | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Decrease DBP ≥15 mmHg supine to standing | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Elevated supine SBP, 3 consecutive visits | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Decrease SBP ≥20 mmHg supine to standing | 0 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP) | Decrease DBP ≥15 mmHg supine to standing | 3 participants |
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate
PCI criteria for females: supine pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<63 or \>121 at age 12 to \<54 or \>110 at age 17; pulse from \<50 or \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: pulse ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<58 or \>116 at age 12 to \<50 or \>104 at age 17; pulse from \<45 or \>99 at age 18. Vitals signs meeting criteria for PCI categorized as Low or as postural change in pulse (increase in pulse ≥20 bpm for last supine to first standing pulse \[supine to standing\]).
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate | Low supine pulse rate | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate | Increase in pulse rate ≥20 mmHg supine to standing | 14 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate | Low supine pulse rate | 2 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate | Increase in pulse rate ≥20 mmHg supine to standing | 12 participants |
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight
Vitals signs meeting the PCI criteria for weight categorized according to an increase of ≥7 percent or a decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight.
Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)
Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight | Increase ≥7 percent in body weight | 11 participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight | Decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight | 1 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight | Decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight | 3 participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight | Increase ≥7 percent in body weight | 4 participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Scores above 4 reflect worsening of illness state as compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)
Population: ITT population; LOCF. No participants had a CGI-I score of 6 or 7 (much worse, very much worse), therefore only scores 1 through 5 (very much improved to minimally worse) are reported. CGI-I data for Inpatient Days 1 to 4 reported in Core study NCT00619619.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: very much improved | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: minimally improved | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: very much improved | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: much improved | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: very much improved | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: minimally improved | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: no change | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: very much improved | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: very much improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: very much improved | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: much improved | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: minimally worse | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: much improved | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: very much improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: much improved | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: much improved | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: minimally improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: minimally improved | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: much improved | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: very much improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: no change | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: minimally improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: minimally worse | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: minimally worse | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: minimally worse | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: very much improved | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1: minimally improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: very much improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: much improved | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2: minimally improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: very much improved | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: much improved | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4: minimally improved | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: very much improved | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: much improved | 65 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: very much improved | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: much improved | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10: no change | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14: no change | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: very much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26: minimally improved | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: very much improved | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26: much improved | 45 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score
CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.
Time frame: Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)
Population: ITT population; LOCF. No participants had a CGI-S score of 5, 6 or 7 (markedly, severely, or extremely ill), therefore only scores 1 through 4 (normal to moderately ill) are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: mildly ill | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: not ill at all | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: borderline ill | 53.3 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: mildly ill | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: moderately ill | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: borderline ill | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: borderline ill | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: mildly ill | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: moderately ill | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: borderline ill | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: mildly ill | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: not ill at all | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: borderline ill | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: mildly ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: borderline ill | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: mildly ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: borderline ill | 70 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: mildly ill | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: borderline ill | 60 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: mildly ill | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: borderline ill | 75 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: mildly ill | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: borderline ill | 75 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: mildly ill | 15 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: borderline ill | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: not ill at all | 10.5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: mildly ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: borderline ill | 10.5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: borderline ill | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: mildly ill | 57.9 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 1: moderately ill | 21.1 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: mildly ill | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: borderline ill | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: mildly ill | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 14: moderately ill | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 2: moderately ill | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: borderline ill | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: mildly ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: borderline ill | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 4: moderately ill | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: mildly ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: borderline ill | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: borderline ill | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: mildly ill | 50 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 18: moderately ill | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 6: moderately ill | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week >26: mildly ill | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: not ill at all | 10 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: not ill at all | 5 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: borderline ill | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 26: mildly ill | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: mildly ill | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 22: borderline ill | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Outpatient Week 10: moderately ill | 10 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Participant with response is defined as having a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
Time frame: Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)
Population: ITT population; LOCF. CGI-I data for Inpatient Days 1 to 4 reported in Core study NCT00619619.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14 | 75 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6 | 70 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10 | 70 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 10 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 1 | 55 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 2 | 70 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 4 | 75 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 6 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week >26 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 14 | 80 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 18 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 22 | 85 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Outpatient Week 26 | 85 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)
CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission defined as a CDRS-R total score ≤28 (coded value of 1).
Time frame: Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)
Population: ITT population; LOCF.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 1 | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 2 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 4 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 6 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 10 | 45 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 14 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 18 | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 22 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 26 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Children | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week >26 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 22 | 35 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 1 | 21.1 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 14 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 2 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week >26 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 4 | 20 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 18 | 40 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 6 | 25 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 26 | 30 percentage of participants |
| DVS SR - Adolescents | Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Outpatient Week 10 | 25 percentage of participants |