Skip to content

Study Evaluating Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release Tablets (DVS SR) In The Treatment Of Child and Adolescent Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

6-Month, Multicenter, Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Study To Evaluate Safety, Efficacy, And Tolerability Of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release Tablets In The Treatment Of Child And Adolescent Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00669110
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-04-29
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

MDD, Depression, Pediatrics, Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR) in child and adolescent outpatients with major depressive disorder. A secondary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DVS SR in the treatment of child and adolescent outpatients with major depressive disorder in an exploratory manner.

Interventions

* tablet * subjects randomly assigned to 10-200 mg/day by age group * 6 month treatment period(\ 182 days)

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatients who have completed 8-weeks of treatment in the preceding study, 3151A6-2000, and who, in the opinion of the investigator, would benefit from long-term treatment. * Study participants who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal must agree and commit to the use of a reliable method of birth control for the duration of the study and for 15 days after the last dose of test article. Sexually active study participants must agree and commit to the use of condoms in addition to other contraceptive methods.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically important abnormalities on baseline physical examination or any clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory test results, or vital signs recorded before the final study day (day 56 visit) of the preceding study 3151A6-2000. * Unresolved clinically significant adverse events or serious adverse events in the preceding study 3151A6-2000. * Poor compliance with the preceding study 3151A6-2000, as assessed by the investigator and the medical monitor. * Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline (Extension study) up to Extension study Week 29 Follow up visitAEs are any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given study treatment. The event does not need to be causally related to the study treatment. SAEs are adverse events that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, result in cancer, or result in a congenital anomaly or birth defect.
Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPostbaseline (≥Day 1 in Core study NCT00619619) up to Week 26 (Extension study)C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: Completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than one category.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreBaseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)HAM-D17 is a clinician-rated interview to measure presence of depressive symptoms in 17 areas (symptoms such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, suicide, sleep disturbances, anxiety levels, and weight loss). Total score ranges from 0 to 52; higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.
Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreExtension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.
Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreBaseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Scores above 4 reflect worsening of illness state as compared to baseline.
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreBaseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Participant with response is defined as having a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBaseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Female pubertal development staged by pubic hair development and breast size (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesBaseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Male pubertal development staged by size of the genitalia and development of pubic hair (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitBaseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 26 and >Week 26 (up to Week 29 or early termination)CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): WeightBaseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)Vitals signs meeting the PCI criteria for weight categorized according to an increase of ≥7 percent or a decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse RateBaseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)PCI criteria for females: supine pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<63 or \>121 at age 12 to \<54 or \>110 at age 17; pulse from \<50 or \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: pulse ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<58 or \>116 at age 12 to \<50 or \>104 at age 17; pulse from \<45 or \>99 at age 18. Vitals signs meeting criteria for PCI categorized as Low or as postural change in pulse (increase in pulse ≥20 bpm for last supine to first standing pulse \[supine to standing\]).
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)ECG results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as PR interval ≥200 milliseconds (msec); QT interval ≥480msec; QRS interval ≥120 msec; corrected QT (QTc) ≥500 msec ); \>450 msec for males and \>470 msec for females or increase of ≥60 msec or ≥30 msec change from baseline QTcB=QT corrected using Bazett formula; QTcF=QT corrected using the Fridericia formula.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low)Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)PCI criteria for females: heart rate (bpm) ranges from \<68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate from \<63 and \>121 at age 12 to \<54 and \>110 at age 17; heart rate \<50 and \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: heart rate ranges from \< 68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate \<58 and \>116 at age 12 up \<50 and \>104 at age 17; heart rate \<45 and \>99 at age 18. Heart rates meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as low (less than the lower limit specified for age).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)Laboratory test results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as bicarbonate increase or decrease from baseline of ≥4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L); hematocrit \<0.32 or \>0.50 (females) or \<0.37 or \>0.55 (males) liters per liter (L/L); high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) decrease \>0.21 mmol/L and test value ≥1.16 mmol/L; triglycerides (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) ≥2.258 mmol/L or increase ≥1.13 mmol/L and test value ≥3.39 mmol/L; urine specific gravity \<1.001 or \>1.035; and positive urinalysis result for protein (albumin), hemoglobin, or ketones.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)PCI criteria for females: systolic BP \[SBP\] ranges from \>110 and diastolic BP \[DBP\] \>73 (\>110/73) at age 6 up to BP \>124/81 at age 11; BP from \>121/79 at age 12 up to BP \>132/86 at age 17. Criteria for males: BP ranges from \>112/73 at age 6 up to BP \>123/82 at age 10; BP from \>119/79 at age 11 up to BP \>140/89 at age 17. Vitals signs meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as BP elevation for 3 consecutive visits or as postural change in BP (decrease in SBP ≥20 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] or in DBP ≥15 mmHg for the last supine to first standing BP \[supine to standing\]).
Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission defined as a CDRS-R total score ≤28 (coded value of 1).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible participants transitioned from preceding Core study NCT00619619 (3151A6-2000 \[B2061012\]) on Day 56 to this Extension study NCT00669110 (3151A6-2001 \[B2061013\]) to continue treatment on a flexible dose schedule. A total of 8 participants (Children n=2 and Adolescent n=6) discontinued during Taper/post-study or Follow-up phase of Core study.

Pre-assignment details

Baseline (Day-1) in the Extension study = Week 8 (Day 56) in the Core study. However, Baseline for the Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) = Inpatient Day 1 through 4 in the Core study and Baseline for the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) = Day-1 in the Core study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DVS SR - Children
Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release (DVS SR) formulation tablet(s) by mouth (PO) administered as flexible dosing adjusted by the investigator as clinically indicated. Total daily dose will be flexible between 10 milligrams (mg), 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg for children 7 to 11 years of age at baseline in the preceding Core study NCT00619619.
20
DVS SR - Adolescents
Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release (DVS SR) formulation tablet(s) by mouth (PO) administered as flexible dosing adjusted by the investigator as clinically indicated. Total daily dose will be flexible between 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg for adolescents 12 to 17 years of age at baseline in the preceding Core study NCT00619619.
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event43
Overall StudyCaregiver request32
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation05
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDVS SR - ChildrenDVS SR - AdolescentsTotal
Age, Continuous9.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
13.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
11.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Breasts Stage 1
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Breasts Stage 2
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Breasts Stage 3
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Breasts Stage 4
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Breasts Stage 5
0 participants7 participants7 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Pubic hair Stage 1
6 participants0 participants6 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Pubic hair Stage 2
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Pubic hair Stage 3
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Pubic hair Stage 4
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Females
Pubic hair Stage 5
0 participants5 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Penis Stage 1
5 participants0 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Penis Stage 2
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Penis Stage 3
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Penis Stage 4
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Penis Stage 5
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Pubic hair Stage 1
6 participants0 participants6 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Pubic hair Stage 2
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Pubic hair Stage 3
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Pubic hair Stage 4
0 participants4 participants4 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Pubic hair Stage 5
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Testes Stage 1
5 participants0 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Testes Stage 2
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Testes Stage 3
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Testes Stage 4
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Number of participants for Tanner Assessment: Males
Testes Stage 5
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2015 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories

C-SSRS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Yes/No responses are mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) categories: Completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behavior, or no suicidal intent. A participant could have a yes or no response in more than one category.

Time frame: Postbaseline (≥Day 1 in Core study NCT00619619) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Core study) includes all treatment assigned participants with at least 1 dose of study treatment during Core study NCT00619619 and Extension study NCT00669110.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesCompleted suicide: No20 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicide attempt: No20 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPreparatory acts - imminent suicidal behavior: No20 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicidal ideation: Yes0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicidal ideation: No20 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesAny suicidal behavior and/or ideation: Yes0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesAny suicidal behavior and/or ideation: No20 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSelf-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent: No20 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSelf-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent: No20 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesCompleted suicide: No20 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicidal ideation: No17 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicide attempt: No20 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesAny suicidal behavior and/or ideation: No17 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPreparatory acts - imminent suicidal behavior: No20 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesAny suicidal behavior and/or ideation: Yes3 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants for Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) According to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesSuicidal ideation: Yes3 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs are any untoward, undesired, or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a person given study treatment. The event does not need to be causally related to the study treatment. SAEs are adverse events that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, result in cancer, or result in a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Extension study Week 29 Follow up visit

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study) includes all treatment assigned participants with at least 1 dose of study treatment during Extension study NCT00669110.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse events13 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious adverse events1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse events15 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious adverse events0 participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy Visit

CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 26 and >Week 26 (up to Week 29 or early termination)

Population: Intent to Treat population (ITT): all treatment assigned participants with a baseline primary efficacy evaluation, at least 1 dose of study treatment, and at least 1 primary efficacy evaluation after first dose in Extension study NCT00669110. Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitBaseline mean32.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.61
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 26-1.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitChange from Bsl Outpatient Week >26-1.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.51
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitBaseline mean33.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 26-1.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.85
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Final On-therapy VisitChange from Bsl Outpatient Week >26-1.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total Score

HAM-D17 is a clinician-rated interview to measure presence of depressive symptoms in 17 areas (symptoms such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, suicide, sleep disturbances, anxiety levels, and weight loss). Total score ranges from 0 to 52; higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)

Population: ITT population; LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreBaseline mean5.15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 10-1.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 2-0.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 14-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 26-1.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 18-1.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 4-0.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 22-1.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 10.53 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week >26-1.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 6-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week >26-2.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreBaseline mean7.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 11.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 20.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 4-0.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 6-0.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 10-1.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 14-1.65 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 18-2.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 26-2.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline (Bsl) in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAM-D17) Total ScoreChange from Bsl Outpatient Week 22-2.15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Females

Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Female pubertal development staged by pubic hair development and breast size (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study); N=number of participants with evaluable data at observation. No participants had a change of 3 stages or change of 4 stages reported, therefore only changes for 0 stages through 2 stages are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 0=no stage change5 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 1=change of 1 stage1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 0=no stage change6 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 0=no stage change1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 0=no stage change2 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 1=change of 1 stage1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesPubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: FemalesBreasts: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: Males

Tanner Children and Adolescent Pubertal Staging questionnaire used to document the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics. Male pubertal development staged by size of the genitalia and development of pubic hair (test categories). Rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Change categories: 0=no change in stage, 1=change of 1 stage, 2=change of 2 stages, 3=change of 3 stages, and 4=change of 4 stages. Participants may be represented in more than 1 test category.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study), Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study); N=number of participants with evaluable data at observation. No participants had a change of 3 stages or change of 4 stages reported, therefore only changes for 0 stages through 2 stages are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 1=change of 1 stage1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 0=no stage change2 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 0=no stage change3 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 2=change of 2 stages0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 1=change of 1 stage2 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage3 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 2=change of 2 stages0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 0=no stage change4 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 0=no stage change3 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 1=change of 1 stage0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPenis: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 0=no stage change2 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 1=change of 1 stage1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesPubic hair: 2=change of 2 stages1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 0=no stage change3 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsChange From Baseline in Number of Participants for Tanner Assessment at Week 26: MalesTestes: 1=change of 1 stage0 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)

ECG results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as PR interval ≥200 milliseconds (msec); QT interval ≥480msec; QRS interval ≥120 msec; corrected QT (QTc) ≥500 msec ); \>450 msec for males and \>470 msec for females or increase of ≥60 msec or ≥30 msec change from baseline QTcB=QT corrected using Bazett formula; QTcF=QT corrected using the Fridericia formula.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable ECG data. Participants may be represented in \>1 category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)PR interval ≥200 msec0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QRS interval ≥120 msec0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcF interval ≥30 msec change from baseline5 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval ≥30 msec change from baseline6 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval ≥60 msec change from baseline1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval >470 or increase ≥60 msec (females)1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval ≥60 msec change from baseline0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)PR interval ≥200 msec1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval ≥30 msec change from baseline1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QRS interval ≥120 msec1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcB interval >470 or increase ≥60 msec (females)0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)QTcF interval ≥30 msec change from baseline1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low)

PCI criteria for females: heart rate (bpm) ranges from \<68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate from \<63 and \>121 at age 12 to \<54 and \>110 at age 17; heart rate \<50 and \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: heart rate ranges from \< 68 and \>126 at age 6 to \<63 and \>121 at age 11; heart rate \<58 and \>116 at age 12 up \<50 and \>104 at age 17; heart rate \<45 and \>99 at age 18. Heart rates meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as low (less than the lower limit specified for age).

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable ECG data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low)0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Heart Rate (Low)2 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)

Laboratory test results meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as bicarbonate increase or decrease from baseline of ≥4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L); hematocrit \<0.32 or \>0.50 (females) or \<0.37 or \>0.55 (males) liters per liter (L/L); high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) decrease \>0.21 mmol/L and test value ≥1.16 mmol/L; triglycerides (fasting or nonfasting / unknown) ≥2.258 mmol/L or increase ≥1.13 mmol/L and test value ≥3.39 mmol/L; urine specific gravity \<1.001 or \>1.035; and positive urinalysis result for protein (albumin), hemoglobin, or ketones.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study). N=number of participants with analyzable laboratory data. Participants may be represented in \>1 category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Bicarbonate: decrease0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine specific gravity: high3 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)HDL cholesterol: decrease2 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine protein albumin: positive result9 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Hematocrit: low4 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine ketones: positive result0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Triglycerides: high4 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine hemoglobin: positive result0 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Bicarbonate: increase2 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine hemoglobin: positive result1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Bicarbonate: increase0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Bicarbonate: decrease1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Hematocrit: low2 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)HDL cholesterol: decrease1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Triglycerides: high1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine specific gravity: high3 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine protein albumin: positive result9 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)Urine ketones: positive result1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)

PCI criteria for females: systolic BP \[SBP\] ranges from \>110 and diastolic BP \[DBP\] \>73 (\>110/73) at age 6 up to BP \>124/81 at age 11; BP from \>121/79 at age 12 up to BP \>132/86 at age 17. Criteria for males: BP ranges from \>112/73 at age 6 up to BP \>123/82 at age 10; BP from \>119/79 at age 11 up to BP \>140/89 at age 17. Vitals signs meeting the criteria for PCI categorized as BP elevation for 3 consecutive visits or as postural change in BP (decrease in SBP ≥20 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] or in DBP ≥15 mmHg for the last supine to first standing BP \[supine to standing\]).

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Elevated supine SBP, 3 consecutive visits4 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Decrease SBP ≥20 mmHg supine to standing2 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Decrease DBP ≥15 mmHg supine to standing0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Elevated supine SBP, 3 consecutive visits0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Decrease SBP ≥20 mmHg supine to standing0 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Blood Pressure (BP)Decrease DBP ≥15 mmHg supine to standing3 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse Rate

PCI criteria for females: supine pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]) ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<63 or \>121 at age 12 to \<54 or \>110 at age 17; pulse from \<50 or \>104 at age 18. Criteria for males: pulse ranges from \<68 or \>126 at age 6 to pulse \<63 or \>121 at age 11; pulse from \<58 or \>116 at age 12 to \<50 or \>104 at age 17; pulse from \<45 or \>99 at age 18. Vitals signs meeting criteria for PCI categorized as Low or as postural change in pulse (increase in pulse ≥20 bpm for last supine to first standing pulse \[supine to standing\]).

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse RateLow supine pulse rate1 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse RateIncrease in pulse rate ≥20 mmHg supine to standing14 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse RateLow supine pulse rate2 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Pulse RateIncrease in pulse rate ≥20 mmHg supine to standing12 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): Weight

Vitals signs meeting the PCI criteria for weight categorized according to an increase of ≥7 percent or a decrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight.

Time frame: Baseline (Extension study) up to Week 26 (Extension study)

Population: Safety population (Baseline=Extension study).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): WeightIncrease ≥7 percent in body weight11 participants
DVS SR - ChildrenNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): WeightDecrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight1 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): WeightDecrease of ≥3.5 percent in body weight3 participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsNumber of Participants With Vital Sign Results of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI): WeightIncrease ≥7 percent in body weight4 participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Scores above 4 reflect worsening of illness state as compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)

Population: ITT population; LOCF. No participants had a CGI-I score of 6 or 7 (much worse, very much worse), therefore only scores 1 through 5 (very much improved to minimally worse) are reported. CGI-I data for Inpatient Days 1 to 4 reported in Core study NCT00619619.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: very much improved35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: minimally improved20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: very much improved25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: much improved50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: very much improved25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: minimally improved20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: no change5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: very much improved25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: very much improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: very much improved35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: much improved55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: minimally worse5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: much improved35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: very much improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: much improved55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: much improved50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: minimally improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: minimally improved20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: much improved55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: very much improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: no change0.0 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: minimally improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: minimally worse0.0 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: minimally worse5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: minimally worse0.0 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: very much improved10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: minimally improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: very much improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: much improved55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: minimally improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: very much improved20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: much improved55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: minimally improved25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: very much improved20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: much improved65 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: very much improved30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: much improved50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: no change5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: no change5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: very much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: much improved45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: minimally improved15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: very much improved40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: much improved45 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) Score

CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1=normal, not ill at all, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill, 7=among the most extremely ill patients. Higher scores reflect higher severity of current illness states.

Time frame: Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)

Population: ITT population; LOCF. No participants had a CGI-S score of 5, 6 or 7 (markedly, severely, or extremely ill), therefore only scores 1 through 4 (normal to moderately ill) are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: mildly ill45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: not ill at all13.3 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: borderline ill53.3 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: mildly ill26.7 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: moderately ill6.7 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: borderline ill40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: borderline ill50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: mildly ill30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: moderately ill10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: borderline ill40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: mildly ill45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: not ill at all15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: borderline ill45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: mildly ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: borderline ill55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: mildly ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: borderline ill70 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: mildly ill20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: borderline ill60 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: mildly ill30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: borderline ill75 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: mildly ill15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: borderline ill75 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: mildly ill15 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: borderline ill50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: not ill at all10.5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: mildly ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: borderline ill10.5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: borderline ill55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: mildly ill57.9 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 1: moderately ill21.1 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: mildly ill30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: borderline ill20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: mildly ill45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 14: moderately ill10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 2: moderately ill25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: borderline ill30 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: mildly ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: borderline ill55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 4: moderately ill25 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: mildly ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: borderline ill20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: borderline ill50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: mildly ill50 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 18: moderately ill5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 6: moderately ill20 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week >26: mildly ill40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: not ill at all10 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: not ill at all5 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: borderline ill35 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 26: mildly ill40 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: mildly ill45 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 22: borderline ill55 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Categorical Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreOutpatient Week 10: moderately ill10 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, to 7=very much worse. Participant with response is defined as having a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).

Time frame: Baseline (Core study NCT00619619), Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)

Population: ITT population; LOCF. CGI-I data for Inpatient Days 1 to 4 reported in Core study NCT00619619.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 480 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1475 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 280 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1885 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 670 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2280 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 180 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2685 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1070 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >2685 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1080 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 155 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 270 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 475 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 685 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week >2685 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1480 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 1885 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2285 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With a Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreOutpatient Week 2685 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)

CDRS-R total score: scale measures 17 depressive symptoms, of which 3 are rated 1 to 5 and 14 are rated 1 to 7 (1 = no symptom difficulties; 5 to 7 = severe clinically significant difficulties) for a total score range of 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission defined as a CDRS-R total score ≤28 (coded value of 1).

Time frame: Extension study Outpatient Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and >26 (up to Week 29)

Population: ITT population; LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 126.7 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 230 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 430 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 625 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1045 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1425 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1835 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 2230 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 2630 percentage of participants
DVS SR - ChildrenPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week >2630 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 2235 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 121.1 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1425 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 225 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week >2625 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 420 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1840 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 625 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 2630 percentage of participants
DVS SR - AdolescentsPercentage of Participants With Remission (Total Score ≤28) Based on Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R)Outpatient Week 1025 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026