Skip to content

Faculty Development to Improve Mini-CEX Ratings

Effect of Faculty Development on Mini-CEX Score Reliability and Accuracy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00667940
Enrollment
52
Registered
2008-04-28
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2007-06-30
Last updated
2008-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Faculty Development

Keywords

Medical education, faculty development, rater training, clinical competence, assessment

Brief summary

We will conduct a faculty development workshop with intent to improve interrater reliability and rater accuracy. Outcomes will include interrater reliability, accuracy, and workshop evaluations.

Detailed description

Hypothesis: An intervention for training faculty preceptors on the use of the mini-CEX will improve inter-rater reliability and classification accuracy. Methods. We will develop a faculty development workshop aimed at improving the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores. To evaluate the workshop we will conduct a randomized, controlled trial. Preceptors will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed workshop. The primary outcome will be inter-rater reliability of mini-CEX scores as preceptors rate videotaped resident-patient encounters before and four weeks after the workshop. We will also evaluate the accuracy of performance classifications. We will also collect mini-CEX ratings of actual resident-patient interactions one year preceding and one year following the workshop, and calculate interrater reliability. Statistical methods. Inter-rater reliability will be determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and corresponding confidence intervals. ICC will be used to determine chance-corrected agreement (accuracy). Discrimination (differences in mean scores among scripted levels of performance) will also be evaluated as a measure of accuracy. Scientific basis. Clinical performance assessments constitute a key element of resident education. The effect of rater training on the inter-rater reliability of mini-CEX scores is unknown. This workshop will utilize methods (rater error and field of reference training) shown to be effective in improving rater accuracy in non-medical fields. Inclusion criteria. All internal medicine residency continuity clinic preceptors are eligible.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRater training workshop

Rater training workshop: rater error training, performance dimension training, behavioral observation training, and frame of reference training using lecture, video, and facilitated discussion

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Internal medicine residency continuity clinic preceptor at Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Interrater reliability (videotaped resident-patient encounters)April-June 2006

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rater accuracy (agreement with scripted levels of performance on videotaped resident-patient encounters): percent agreement, chance-corrected agreement, mean scoresApril-June 2006
Interrater reliability (actual resident-patient encounters)March 2005 (historical) to June 2007

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026