Skip to content

Opioid Titration Order Sheet or Standard Care in Treating Patients With Cancer Pain

Phase III Randomized Trial of an Opioid Titration Order Sheet Compared to Standard of Care in Patients With Cancer Related Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00666211
Enrollment
98
Registered
2008-04-24
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2012-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lymphoproliferative Disorder, Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Pain, Precancerous Condition, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Keywords

pain, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, acute undifferentiated leukemia, adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission, adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission, adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities, adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL negative, blastic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, mast cell leukemia, meningeal chronic myelogenous leukemia, progressive hairy cell leukemia, initial treatment, prolymphocytic leukemia, recurrent adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, recurrent adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, refractory hairy cell leukemia, relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage II adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage III adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage IV adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia, T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia, stage I adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, cutaneous B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage I cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage I mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage II mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage III mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage IV mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis, adult nasal type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, splenic marginal zone lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma, stage I adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage I adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage I grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage I mantle cell lymphoma, stage I marginal zone lymphoma, stage I small lymphocytic lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II small lymphocytic lymphoma, stage III adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage III adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III mantle cell lymphoma, stage III marginal zone lymphoma, stage III small lymphocytic lymphoma, stage IV adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV mantle cell lymphoma, stage IV marginal zone lymphoma, stage IV small lymphocytic lymphoma, recurrent adult Burkitt lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, recurrent adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis, recurrent adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, recurrent adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, recurrent grade 1 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 2 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma, recurrent mantle cell lymphoma, recurrent marginal zone lymphoma, recurrent small lymphocytic lymphoma, intraocular lymphoma, primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin lymphoma, primary central nervous system Hodgkin lymphoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, primary myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, extramedullary plasmacytoma, isolated plasmacytoma of bone, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, stage I multiple myeloma, stage II multiple myeloma, stage III multiple myeloma, primary systemic amyloidosis, refractory multiple myeloma, de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes, secondary myelodysplastic syndromes, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable, recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: An Opioid Titration Order Sheet that allows healthcare providers to adjust the dose and schedule of pain medication may help improve pain treatment for patients with cancer. It is not yet known whether the use of an Opioid Titration Order Sheet is more effective than standard care in treating pain caused by cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying an Opioid Titration Order Sheet to see how well it works compared with standard care in treating patients with cancer pain.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * To examine the effect of an opioid titration order sheet on pain outcomes. * To examine the effect of an opioid titration order sheet on secondary outcomes of function, mood, and quality of life. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Participating centers are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I (usual care): After completion of baseline assessments, patients undergo a standardized pain education program over approximately 15 minutes. The program consists of standard written materials about communicating pain to providers, opioids and side effect management, as well as a tailored discussion about patient concerns and specific information about prescribed opioid medications. Patients are also instructed in the use of the daily pain diary. Patients are then discharged from the clinic with instructions to contact the treating physician (through standard procedures) for problems with pain or side effects. The study staff conducts weekly telephone interviews to prevent changes in patient pain management practice. The treating physician continues to manage pain in their usual manner. * Arm II (opioid titration order sheet): After completion of baseline assessments, patients undergo the standardized pain education program and are instructed in the use of the daily pain diary as described in arm I. The treating physician signs an Opioid Titration Order Sheet (OTOS) providing a baseline dose and schedule. The OTOS is faxed to study staff and verified. Patients are then discharged from the clinic with instructions to contact the research nurse for problems with pain or side effects. The treating physician also contacts the study staff if he/she is made aware of any problems pertaining to the patient's pain control. The research nurse, in consultation with study physician, manages pain according to the OTOS and manages opioid side effects using standing orders. Referral to the treating physician is made as needed. Patients' pain is managed on study for 8 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, pain crisis, or new site of pain. Patients complete a demographic questionnaire at baseline and other questionnaires at 2, 4, and 6 weeks (over the telephone) and at 8 weeks (at site or by telephone), including the Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire (FASQ), the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference (PPI-I), The Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF), and the Quality of life (FACT-G) questionnaire. Patients also complete a pain diary recording daily measures of pain dimensions, analgesic use (i.e., fixed dose opioids, rescue doses, and non-opioids), adjuvant medications, and side effects that prevented the patient from taking medications. Data in the pain diary is transcribed over the telephone on a weekly basis. Clinical data, including the type of cancer, stage of disease, time since diagnosis, current treatment for cancer, type of pain, time since onset of pain, and time of first opioid prescription, as well as information regarding analgesics (opioid and non-opioid), adjuvant medications, and medications to manage side effects prescribed during the study is collected from patients' medical records. Anticancer and palliative treatment received during the study is monitored via treating physician records. The physician charts are reviewed after study completion to determine whether pain, treatment, and response are adequately documented and treated. The documentation in the physician charts is compared to the documentation obtained by the study staff during the study.

Interventions

OTHEReducational intervention

Participants will be educated on pain management.

OTHERTitrated pain management

Pain will be Monitored and Medication Titrated

OTHERquestionnaire administration

Participants will be given questionnaires to complete.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed carcinoma * Cancer-related pain requiring fixed-dose opioid therapy * Has received ≥ 1 week of fixed-dose opioid therapy AND meets any of the following criteria: * Inadequate pain control as defined by the patient * Requires 2 or more rescue doses per day * Requires adjustments in pain regimen (either fixed or breakthrough dosing) * No pain crisis that requires hospitalization or immediate anesthetic or neurosurgical intervention * No predominantly neuropathic pain (e.g., peripheral neuropathy) as assessed by the treating physician PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * ECOG performance status 0-2 * ANC \> 1,500/mm³ * Platelet count \> 100,000/mm³ * Serum bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL * Serum creatinine \< 2.5 mg/dL * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * Nutritional, pulmonary, and cardiac status must be considered adequate to tolerate the proposed study therapy * Must be available for active follow-up * No documented active psychiatric disorder (i.e., psychosis or major depression) that would preclude informed consent or the patient's ability to comply with study procedures * No significant infection * No concerns about compliance with medication regimens or medical follow-up * No excessive alcohol use PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * Concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy allowed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain IntensityBaseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8: 1. Average daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale 2. Worst daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale
Pain-related DistressBaseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8. Pain-related distress scale is from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Pain Durationat 9 weeksPain duration in hours 0 to 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ability to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.The Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire (FASQ) scale is used, scored at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The FASQ consists of 15 questions about ability to perform ADL with minimum score of 1 (easy to perform) to a maximum score of 5 (N/A, meaning someone else performs this activity for the patient or else the patient chooses not to do it). A summary mean score is generated with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5.
Quality of Life9 weeksEach patient in each arm is scored on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) at baseline + week 8 with 4 related sub-scales (physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being. To generate sub-scale scores, physical and emotional items are reverse coded & items are then summed, such that higher values indicate better quality of life. Thus, each sub-scale score ranges from 0 (not at all, worse outcome) to 4 (very much, better outcome) with a minimum total score of 0 (worst quality of life) to a maximum of 16 (good quality of life).
Interference in Daily Life Due to Pain9 weeksPatients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale: baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The BPI consists of 7 questions about interference of pain in daily life, answered on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The summary score is the average from the 7 questions, with higher score indicating greater interference due to pain.
Mood Disturbance9 weeksPatients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF): baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The POMS-SF consists of 37 questions, querying 6 mood states (anxiety, depression, anger, confusion, fatigue, and vigor), with responses on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). To generate a summary score, questions on vigor state are first recoded to reverse the scale, so that higher summary scores consistently indicate greater mood disturbance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study opened to accrual May 2005 through May 2010. Although 99 patients were consented one was determined ineligible, thus only 98 went on study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care
Standard pain control drugs.
42
Opioid Titration
Pain will be Monitored and Medication Titrated
56
Total98

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall Studydisease progression18
Overall Studyhospital admission05
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall Studyoff tx for other complicating disease01
Overall Studypatient non-compliant66
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall Studytoxicity02
Overall Studywent off medication, no more pain10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStandard of CareOpioid Titration
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
82 Participants33 Participants49 Participants
Age Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Region of Enrollment
United States
98 participants42 participants56 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants19 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
59 Participants23 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 4227 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 428 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Duration

Pain duration in hours 0 to 24

Time frame: at 9 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CarePain Duration8.40 hoursStandard Deviation 6.06
Opioid TitrationPain Duration11.31 hoursStandard Deviation 7.78
Primary

Pain Intensity

Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8: 1. Average daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale 2. Worst daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale

Time frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CarePain IntensityWorst Daily Pain Intensity5.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Standard of CarePain IntensityAverage Daily Pain Intensity5.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Opioid TitrationPain IntensityAverage Daily Pain Intensity6.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Opioid TitrationPain IntensityWorst Daily Pain Intensity5.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Primary

Pain-related Distress

Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8. Pain-related distress scale is from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CarePain-related Distress3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Opioid TitrationPain-related Distress4.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Secondary

Ability to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

The Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire (FASQ) scale is used, scored at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The FASQ consists of 15 questions about ability to perform ADL with minimum score of 1 (easy to perform) to a maximum score of 5 (N/A, meaning someone else performs this activity for the patient or else the patient chooses not to do it). A summary mean score is generated with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5.

Time frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 22.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Standard of CareAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 62.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Standard of CareAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 41.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Standard of CareAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 81.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Standard of CareAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Baseline2.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Opioid TitrationAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 81.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Opioid TitrationAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Baseline1.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Opioid TitrationAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 22.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Opioid TitrationAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 41.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Opioid TitrationAbility to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Week 62.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Interference in Daily Life Due to Pain

Patients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale: baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The BPI consists of 7 questions about interference of pain in daily life, answered on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The summary score is the average from the 7 questions, with higher score indicating greater interference due to pain.

Time frame: 9 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 24.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Standard of CareInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 63.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Standard of CareInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 44.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Standard of CareInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 83.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Standard of CareInterference in Daily Life Due to PainBaseline4.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Opioid TitrationInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 83.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Opioid TitrationInterference in Daily Life Due to PainBaseline4.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Opioid TitrationInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 24.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Opioid TitrationInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 43.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
Opioid TitrationInterference in Daily Life Due to PainWeek 63.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Secondary

Mood Disturbance

Patients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF): baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The POMS-SF consists of 37 questions, querying 6 mood states (anxiety, depression, anger, confusion, fatigue, and vigor), with responses on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). To generate a summary score, questions on vigor state are first recoded to reverse the scale, so that higher summary scores consistently indicate greater mood disturbance.

Time frame: 9 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareMood DisturbanceBaseline1.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Standard of CareMood DisturbanceWeek 81.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Standard of CareMood DisturbanceWeek 61.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Standard of CareMood DisturbanceWeek 21.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Standard of CareMood DisturbanceWeek 41.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Opioid TitrationMood DisturbanceWeek 81.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Opioid TitrationMood DisturbanceBaseline1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Opioid TitrationMood DisturbanceWeek 21.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Opioid TitrationMood DisturbanceWeek 41.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Opioid TitrationMood DisturbanceWeek 61.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Secondary

Quality of Life

Each patient in each arm is scored on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) at baseline + week 8 with 4 related sub-scales (physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being. To generate sub-scale scores, physical and emotional items are reverse coded & items are then summed, such that higher values indicate better quality of life. Thus, each sub-scale score ranges from 0 (not at all, worse outcome) to 4 (very much, better outcome) with a minimum total score of 0 (worst quality of life) to a maximum of 16 (good quality of life).

Time frame: 9 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareQuality of LifePhysical at baseline1.94 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Standard of CareQuality of LifeEmotional at baseline2.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Standard of CareQuality of LifeSocial/family at baseline3.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Standard of CareQuality of LifeEmotional at week 82.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Standard of CareQuality of LifePhysical at week 82.18 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Standard of CareQuality of LifeSocial/family at week 83.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Standard of CareQuality of LifeFunctional well-being at week 81.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Standard of CareQuality of LifeFunctional well-being at baseline1.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeFunctional well-being at week 81.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifePhysical at baseline2.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifePhysical at week 82.34 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeSocial/family at baseline3.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeSocial/family at week 82.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeEmotional at baseline2.93 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeEmotional at week 82.42 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Opioid TitrationQuality of LifeFunctional well-being at baseline1.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026