Skip to content

Comparative Trial of Micafungin Versus Fluconazole for Treating Esophageal Candidiasis

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Trial of Micafungin Versus Fluconazole for the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00666185
Enrollment
523
Registered
2008-04-24
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2004-02-29
Last updated
2014-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candidiasis, Oral

Keywords

Micafungin, Esophageal Candidiasis, Fluconazole

Brief summary

To determine the efficacy and safety of IV Micafungin versus IV Fluconazole in the treatment of patients with Esophageal Candidiasis

Interventions

DRUGMicafungin

IV

DRUGFluconazole

IV

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of esophageal candidiasis confirmed by endoscopy * Negative pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or nursing * Evidence of liver disease * Presence of another active opportunistic fungal infection and/or receiving acute systemic therapy for an opportunistic fungal infection * Concomitant esophagitis caused by herpes simplex virus or cytomegalovirus * Receipt of an oral or topical antifungal agent within 48 hours or a systemic agent within 72 hours of first dose of study drug * Non-responsive to therapy in any prior systemic antifungal clinical trail * History of \> 2 episodes of esophageal candidiasis requiring systemic antifungal therapy * History of anaphylaxis attributed to azole compounds or echinocandin class of antifungals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Endoscopic cure rate, defined as a mucosal grade of zero at the end of the therapyEnd of Therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical response at end of therapy of cleared or improvedEnd of Therapy
Mucosal response at end of therapy of cleared or improvedEnd of Therapy

Countries

Brazil, Peru, South Africa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026