Skip to content

TMC125-TiDP35-C213: Safety and Antiviral Activity of Etravirine (TMC125) in Treatment-Experienced, HIV Infected Children and Adolescents

A Phase II, Open-label Trial, to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Antiviral Activity of TMC125 in Antiretroviral Experienced HIV-1 Infected Children and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00665847
Enrollment
103
Registered
2008-04-24
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2015-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1

Keywords

HIV-1, TMC125-TiDP35-C213, TMC125-C213

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and antiviral activity of etravirine in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected children and adolescents.

Detailed description

The study design is a single arm treatment (all patients assigned to receive etravirine), open label (patients will know the identity of the treatments they are receiving) safety and antiviral activity of Etravirine (TMC125) in treatment-experienced, HIV infected children and adolescents 6 to 17 years of age. Etravirine is a new drug belonging to the NNRTI (a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) drug class that slows down the growth of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This drug has been tested for safety and effectiveness in adults, however, there is no data on the drug's long-term safety and antiviral activity in children and adolescents. This study will last for a maximum of 48 weeks. A total of 100 ptients will receive etravirine tablets based on body weight and an investigator selected optimized background regimen (OBR) of at least 2 antiretrovirals (ARVs), consisting of a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) (NRTI\[s\]). Use of enfuvirtide is optional. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGEtravirine (TMC125)

Patients will be dosed by body weight , i.e. 5.2 mg/kg twice daily (b.i.d.) up to a maximum of 200 mg b.i.d. for 48 weeks.

An investigator-selected optimized background regimen (OBR) comprising of a low-dose ritonavir (rtv)-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) (either lopinavir \[LPV\], darunavir \[DRV\], atazanavir \[ATV\] or saquinavir \[SQV\]) in combination with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) (N\[t\]RTIs) to be dosed according to the drugs individual package inserts for 48 weeks.

Sponsors

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infected * Body weight according to age within the 10-90th percentile of CDC growth chart * On steady antiretroviral therapy regimen for at least 8 weeks at screening and willing to remain on that regimen until baseline * HIV viral load of 1,000 copies/ml or greater at study entry * Parent or legal guardian willing to provide informed consent, if necessary

Exclusion criteria

* The Key

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)48 weeksA treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that occurred in the 48-week treatment period during which it emerged (i.e. started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute), and not in the subsequent study periods, even if the event continued to be present. Adverse events were graded from 1 to 4 in severity using the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome severity scale (grade 1 being less severe and grade 4 being more severe). ETR=etravirine/TMC125; OBR=optimized background regimen
The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)48 weeksThe percentage of patients with a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (defined as an event that occurred in the 48-week treatment period during which it emerged \[i.e. started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute\], and not in the subsequent study periods, even if the event continued to be present\] are provided below. Adverse events were graded from 1 to 4 in severity using the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome severity scale (grade 1 being less severe and grade 4 being more severe). ETR=etravirine/TMC125; OBR=optimized background regimen

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Week 4Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) Cmax was approximated for each individual using the median value of plasma ETR concentrations taken 4 hours postdose (± 1 hour), when available, on the day of the Week 4 visit as shown in the table below.
Percentage of Patients With Virologic Response at Week 24Week 24Virologic response was defined as the percentage of patients with plasma viral load \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 calculated according to the non-completer=failure (NC=F) imputation method.
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 12 Hours at Steady-state (AUC12h)Weeks 4-48The AUC12h is a Bayesian estimation based on a population pharmacokinetic model and sparse samples collected at each visit over the duration of trial. For each sparse sample taken, the time blood sample was recorded as well as the time of etravirine intake just prior to the time of blood sample.
The Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts Over TimeBaseline, Week 48
The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic FailuresBaseline and Endpoint (up to Week 48)Virologic failure (lack of response) was defined as: plasma viral load decline of \< 0.5 log10 from Baseline by Week 8 and/or plasma viral load decline of \<1.0 log10 from Baseline by Week 12. Virologic failure (loss of response) was defined as 2 consecutive measurements of plasma viral load \> 0.5 log10 above the nadir after a minimum of 12 weeks of treatment. The table below provides data for 41 viologic failures of which 30 had mutation data available. In the table below, only the 4 most frequently emerging mutations are presented (emerging in at least 3 patients).
Change From Baseline in Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) in Plasma Over TimeBaseline, Week 48
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Trough Plasma Concentration (C0h)Week 48

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Netherlands, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In total, 41 investigators in 13 countries enrolled patients in study TMC125-C213. A total of 103 patients were documented as being enrolled in the study, however 2 patients were randomized in error. Therefore, 101 patients were enrolled and treated with etravirine (ETR) also known as TMC125 and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TMC125
TMC125 dosed according to body weight (kg) from 100 mg to 200 mg twice a day
101
Total101

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event8
Overall StudyResistance to TMC1251
Overall StudySubject ineligible to continue the trial1
Overall StudySubject non-compliant8
Overall StudySubject reached a virologic endpoint4
Overall StudySwitch to Commercial Medication1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTMC125
Age, Continuous12.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
Age Customized
>=12 to <18 years
60 participants
Age Customized
>=6 to <12 years
41 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
70 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that occurred in the 48-week treatment period during which it emerged (i.e. started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute), and not in the subsequent study periods, even if the event continued to be present. Adverse events were graded from 1 to 4 in severity using the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome severity scale (grade 1 being less severe and grade 4 being more severe). ETR=etravirine/TMC125; OBR=optimized background regimen

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: The safety analysis was done on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of investigational medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE89 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were fatal0 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were serious5 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were grade 3 or 4 in severity14 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to temporary ETR discontinuation8 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to permanent ETR discontinuation8 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs possibly related to ETR23 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs probably related to ETR14 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs very likely related to ETR3 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs at least possibly related to ETR33 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs possibly related to OBR27 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs probably related to OBR12 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs very likely related to OBR5 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs at least possibly related to OBR36 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of at least grade 2 in severity21 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of at least grade 3 in severity3 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: Skin event31 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: Rash23 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: severe cutaneous reactions7 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: angioedema4 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: neuropsychiatric events2 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: hepatic events0 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: cardiac events0 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: pancreatic events1 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: lipid-related events6 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: neoplasms1 Patients
TMC125The Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: bleeding events0 Patients
Primary

The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The percentage of patients with a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (defined as an event that occurred in the 48-week treatment period during which it emerged \[i.e. started or worsened in severity, relation, or other attribute\], and not in the subsequent study periods, even if the event continued to be present\] are provided below. Adverse events were graded from 1 to 4 in severity using the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome severity scale (grade 1 being less severe and grade 4 being more severe). ETR=etravirine/TMC125; OBR=optimized background regimen

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: The safety analysis was done on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of investigational medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE88.1 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were fatal0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were serious5.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs that were grade 3 or 4 in severity13.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to temporary ETR discontinuation7.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to permanent ETR discontinuation7.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs possibly related to ETR22.8 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs probably related to ETR13.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs very likely related to ETR3.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs at least possibly related to ETR32.7 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs possibly related to OBR26.7 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs probably related to OBR11.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs very likely related to OBR5.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs at least possibly related to OBR35.6 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of at least grade 2 in severity20.8 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of at least grade 3 in severity3.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: Skin event30.7 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: Rash22.8 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: severe cutaneous reactions6.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: angioedema4.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: neuropsychiatric events2.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: hepatic events0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: cardiac events0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: bleeding events0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: pancreatic events1.0 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: lipid-related events5.9 Percentage of patients
TMC125The Percentage of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs of interest: neoplasms1.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) in Plasma Over Time

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TMC125Change From Baseline in Human Immunodeficiency Virus - Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) in Plasma Over Time-1.53 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.132
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Virologic Response at Week 24

Virologic response was defined as the percentage of patients with plasma viral load \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 calculated according to the non-completer=failure (NC=F) imputation method.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TMC125Percentage of Patients With Virologic Response at Week 2452.5 Percentage of Patients
95% CI: [42.7, 62.2]
Secondary

Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 12 Hours at Steady-state (AUC12h)

The AUC12h is a Bayesian estimation based on a population pharmacokinetic model and sparse samples collected at each visit over the duration of trial. For each sparse sample taken, the time blood sample was recorded as well as the time of etravirine intake just prior to the time of blood sample.

Time frame: Weeks 4-48

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken ETR at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis. The table below shows results for Overall (children and adolescents combined).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TMC125Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 12 Hours at Steady-state (AUC12h)5216 ng.h/mLStandard Deviation 4305
Secondary

Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) Cmax was approximated for each individual using the median value of plasma ETR concentrations taken 4 hours postdose (± 1 hour), when available, on the day of the Week 4 visit as shown in the table below.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TMC125Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)589 ng/mLStandard Deviation 486
Secondary

Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Trough Plasma Concentration (C0h)

Time frame: Week 48

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken ETR at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis. The table below shows results for Overall (children and adolescents combined).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TMC125Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Estimates of Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR): Trough Plasma Concentration (C0h)346 ng/mLStandard Deviation 342
Secondary

The Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts Over Time

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients who had been enrolled and taken Etravirine/TMC125 (ETR) at least once, regardless of their compliance with the protocol was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TMC125The Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Counts Over Time156 10E6 cells/LStandard Error 22.7
Secondary

The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic Failures

Virologic failure (lack of response) was defined as: plasma viral load decline of \< 0.5 log10 from Baseline by Week 8 and/or plasma viral load decline of \<1.0 log10 from Baseline by Week 12. Virologic failure (loss of response) was defined as 2 consecutive measurements of plasma viral load \> 0.5 log10 above the nadir after a minimum of 12 weeks of treatment. The table below provides data for 41 viologic failures of which 30 had mutation data available. In the table below, only the 4 most frequently emerging mutations are presented (emerging in at least 3 patients).

Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (up to Week 48)

Population: The patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population classified as virologic failures were used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TMC125The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic FailuresV90I3 Patients
TMC125The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic FailuresL100I3 Patients
TMC125The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic FailuresE138A3 Patients
TMC125The Emergence of Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations (NNRTI RAMs) in Patients Classified as Virologic FailuresY181C8 Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026