Skip to content

Pilot Test for a Newly Developed Nutrition Screening Method: Pediatric Subjective Global Assessment

Pilot Test for a Newly Developed Nutrition Screening Method: Pediatric Subjective Global Assessment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00665691
Enrollment
132
Registered
2008-04-24
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2017-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Compare Two Nutrition Screening Tools

Keywords

All Malignancies

Brief summary

Researchers are studying ways to predict if cancer patients are at risk for poor nutrition during their chemotherapy treatment. They hope to identify children with nutrition problems early in treatment. This may help prevent weight loss and other nutrition problems later in treatment.

Detailed description

The PEDSGA is a newly developed nutrition tool that includes a training manual that be used to teach health care professionals to identify at-risk patients by doing a nutrition physical exam. The PEDSGA also includes questions that the patient/caregiver answers regarding appetite, recent treatment, and activity level. This method of screening is new and may be able to identify at-risk patients better than the standard method. This study will use both methods and evaluate the two, in hope of determining which method works best to identify at-risk patients.

Interventions

OTHERNutritional Screening Tools

To compare the nutrition risk identification abilities of two nutrition screening tools: PEDSGA tool and the standard assessment tool.

Sponsors

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* St. Jude Children's Research Hospital patient between 2 and 16 years of age who is actively receiving treatment for a hematologic or solid tumor malignancy * Patient is not admitted to the transplant service * Patient is able to read English or Spanish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the ability of two nutrition screening tools to identify nutritionally at risk patientsWithin 90 days of study completion

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026