Skip to content

BAY38-9456, 5/10/20mg, vs.Placebo in Erectile Dysfunction

Multi-centre, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of Vardenafil and Its Influence on Self-esteem and Self Confidence in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00665054
Enrollment
160
Registered
2008-04-23
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2005-08-31
Last updated
2014-12-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction

Keywords

Vardenafil, Erectile dysfunction, SSES-E (sexual self-efficacy scale - erectile function)

Brief summary

Purpose of the study is:- To assess the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil in male subjects suffering from erectile dysfunction as compared to placebo- To assess the influence of vardenafil on the self-esteem and self-confidence of subjects suffering from erectile dysfunction following treatment with vardenafil as compared to placebo

Interventions

DRUGLevitra (Vardenafil, BAY38-9456)

5, 10, or 20 mg Vardenafil tablets orally prior to sexual activity

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo tablets orally prior to sexual activity

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men with heterosexual relationships aged 18 - 64 years suffering from ED for more than 6 months according to the NIH Consensus Statement (i.e. inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance). * At least 4 attempts at sexual intercourse (according to the question in the subject diary) on 4 separate days during the 4-week untreated baseline period. At least 50% of attempts during this period had to be unsuccessful according to the subject diary.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of penile anatomical abnormalities (eg penile fibrosis or Peyronie's disease) that in the investigator's opinion would significantly impair sexual performance. * Primary hypoactive sexual desire.-Spinal cord injury-History of surgical prostatectomy (transurethral interventions not excluded). * Unstable angina pectoris. * History of myocardial infarction, stroke or life-threatening arrhythmia within the prior 6 months. * Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation/flutter at screening visit (ventricular response rate \>100 BPM).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
LOCF improved compared to baseline GAQ results at the end of the studybaseline versus visit 2 visit 5 or premature termination visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
OF, SD, IS scores in IIEF Questionnairevisits 2, 3, 4, 5 or at premature termination visit
Scores of all individual questions on IIEF questionnairevisits 2, 3, 4, 5 or at premature termination visit
Subject's diary responsebaseline and after randomization per visit period
IIEF scoresvisits 3, 4 and 5
Summary score from the responses to SSES-Evisits 2 and 5 or premature termination visit
Response scores and summary score from the responses to the SF-36visits 2 and 5 or premature termination visit
SSES-E scoresvisits 2 and 5 or premature termination visit

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026