Skip to content

Evaluating the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Heart Disease and Behavior

BioBehavioral Studies of Cardiovascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00663871
Enrollment
272
Registered
2008-04-22
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2021-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Inflammation, Mood Disorders

Keywords

Fish Oil, Omega-3 fatty acids, Affect, Depression, Anger, Nutrition, Impulsivity, Aggression, Cognition, Behavior

Brief summary

Omega-3 fatty acids are a certain kind of fish fat that has recently been shown to have health benefits. This study will examine the effectiveness of fish oil supplementation for reducing the early signs of heart disease risk and for improving mood, impulsivity, and anger levels.

Detailed description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a broad term that includes diseases that affect the heart and blood vessels, including coronary heart disease, heart failure, high blood pressure, stroke and vascular dementia. CVD is the leading cause of death in the United States, resulting in 700,000 deaths each year. Preliminary research has shown that increased consumption of fish, specifically the omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oil, has beneficial effects in people with CVD. Fish oil may also have positive effects on the psychological health and well-being of people with psychiatric disorders. However, more research is needed to confirm the positive physical and psychological effects of fish oil in healthy adults. The purpose of this study is to explore potentail effects of fish oil supplementation on CVD mechanisms and risk markers, and on depressive symptoms, antagonistic disposition, and levels of impulsivity and aggression. This study will enroll healthy adults who habitually consume low quantities of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either fish oil supplements or placebo on a daily basis for 4 months. Study visits will occur at baseline and Months 2 and 4. At the baseline and Month 4 visits, participants will undergo the following measures as primary study aims: blood collection for inflammatory markers; heart rate and variability measurements; and interviews, psychological tests, and questionnaires to assess mood, disposition, impulsivity, and aggression. As secondary aims, we will test for any effects of fish oil on cognitive performance and, if a main effect on inflammatory markers is found, we will test for moderation by select genetic polymorphisms. As an exploratory aim, we will test for any effects of fish oil on structural or functional brain imaging. (This exploratory aim was mistakenly listed as a secondary aim at the time of trial registration.)

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTFish Oil

Participants will take 2 grams (1400 mg EPA and DHA) of fish oil supplements on a daily basis.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSoybean Oil (Placebo)

Participants will take 2 grams of soybean oil supplements on a daily basis.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Currently employed at least 25 hours a week, but does not regularly work the third shift (i.e., night shift) * English is primary language * Consumes less than 300 mg/day of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious allergy to fish (e.g., anaphylaxis, bronchospasm, serious skin reaction) * History of atherosclerotic disease (e.g., myocardial infarction) or treatment of angina or claudication (e.g., angioplasty) * Reported history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder * Long-term hepatitis * Kidney failure * Stroke or other neurological disorder * Lung disease requiring drug treatment * Stage 2 high blood pressure, defined as systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or greater and diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or greater * Alcohol consumption of more than five drinks per day each week (i.e., more than 35 alcoholic drinks each week) * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Currently taking any cardiovascular, psychotropic, glucocorticoid, lipid-lowering, insulin, or weight loss medications * Currently taking fish oil supplements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
High Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced Respirationbaseline and month 4High frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed paced respiration in Hertz units (Hz)
Total Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced Respirationbaseline and month 4Total power (0 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed paced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units.
Mean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respirationbaseline and month 4Mean successive difference in inter-beat intervals natural log transformed unpaced respiration in milliseconds (msec)
High Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respirationbaseline and month 4High frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed unpaced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units
Total Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respirationbaseline and month 4Total power (0 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed unpaced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units
Circulating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline and Month 4Systemic inflammation: fasting serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
C-reactive Protein (CRP)baseline and month 4fasting serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Negative Affectbaseline and month 4Negative affect questions adapted from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form administered via ecological momentary assessment. The minimum value is 1, and the maximum value is 6. A higher score are worse (more negative affect).
Impulsivitybaseline and month 4Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. The minimum value is 34, and the maximum value is 120. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Aggressionbaseline and month 4Bus-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. The minimum value is 14, and the maximum value is 53. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Hostility, Barefoot Scorebaseline and month 4The 27-item Barefoot Hostility Scale. The minimum value is 1, and the maximum value is 30. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Trait Angerbaseline and month 4State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. The minimum value is 10, and the maximum value is 40. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Anger Expressionbaseline and month 4State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 72. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Type A, Total Scorebaseline and month 4Structured Interview - Type A Behavior Pattern using the Interpersonal Hostility Assessment Technique (IHAT). The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 12. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.
Mean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced Respirationbaseline and month 4Mean successive difference in inter-beat intervals natural log transformed paced respiration in milliseconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Executive FunctionBaseline and Month 4Executive function was comprised of trail making B - A time, digit span forward and digit span backward completions. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.
Learning / Episodic MemoryBaseline and Month 4Learning/episodic memory was comprised of d' from the four word memory task and the average performance across all trials of the Rey auditory verbal learning test. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.
Psychomotor SpeedBaseline and Month 4Psychomotor speed was comprised of trail making A time, Stroop word-only time and color-only time. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.
Fluid IntelligenceBaseline and Month 4This outcome was based upon matrix reasoning task raw score, block design task raw score and spatial span forward raw score. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.
Moderation of Effects of Fish Oil on Inflammatory Markers by Select Genetic PolymorphismsMeasured at Month 4Circulating serum concentrations of IL6 and CRP before and after supplementation with fish oil or placebo.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Structural & Functional MRIBaseline and month 4Measures of brain structure and function from magnetic resonance imaging

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fish Oil
Participants will take fish oil supplements daily for 4 months. Fish Oil: Participants will take 2 grams (1400 mg EPA and DHA) of fish oil supplements on a daily basis.
134
Placebo
Participants will take soybean oil (placebo) supplements daily for 4 months. Soybean Oil (Placebo): Participants will take 2 grams of soybean oil supplements on a daily basis.
138
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up55
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFish OilPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
134 Participants138 Participants272 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
132 Participants136 Participants268 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
109 Participants116 Participants225 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
134 participants138 participants272 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants78 Participants154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants60 Participants118 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
61 / 13417 / 138
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1340 / 138

Outcome results

Primary

Aggression

Bus-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. The minimum value is 14, and the maximum value is 53. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilAggressionBaseline28.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.32
Fish OilAggressionMonth 427.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
PlaceboAggressionBaseline27.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.51
PlaceboAggressionMonth 427.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.72
p-value: 0.6395% CI: [-1.57, 0.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Anger Expression

State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 72. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilAnger ExpressionBaseline24.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
Fish OilAnger ExpressionMonth 422.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
PlaceboAnger ExpressionBaseline24.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
PlaceboAnger ExpressionMonth 423.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
p-value: 0.5295% CI: [-1.83, 0.92]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Circulating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

Systemic inflammation: fasting serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: 11 participants had chronic inflammatory conditions at baseline and were excluded, leaving 129 in fish oil and 132 in placebo groups.~The 17 subjects who did not finish the study were retained through use of single-imputation analysis. Any subject missing both baseline and 4-month data could not be retained. TThis applied to 2 fish oil and 1 placebo participants for IL-6, leaving 127 and 131, respectively in the analysis population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Fish OilCirculating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)baseline1.13 pg/mL
Fish OilCirculating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Month 40.88 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)baseline1.01 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Month 40.81 pg/mL
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-0.27, 0.19]ANOVA
Primary

C-reactive Protein (CRP)

fasting serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per liter (mg/L)

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: 11 participants had chronic inflammatory conditions at baseline and were excluded, leaving 129 in fish oil and 132 in placebo groups.~The 17 subjects who did not finish the study were retained through use of single-imputation analysis. Any subject missing both baseline and 4-month data could not be retained. This applied to 4 fish oil and 3 placebo participants for CRP, leaving 125 and 129, respectively, in the analysis population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Fish OilC-reactive Protein (CRP)baseline1.00 mg/L
Fish OilC-reactive Protein (CRP)month 40.94 mg/L
PlaceboC-reactive Protein (CRP)baseline0.67 mg/L
PlaceboC-reactive Protein (CRP)month 40.64 mg/L
p-value: 0.2195% CI: [-0.24, 0.19]ANOVA
Primary

High Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced Respiration

High frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed paced respiration in Hertz units (Hz)

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline5.93 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.52
Fish OilHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 45.74 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline6.15 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.38
PlaceboHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 46.13 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.28
p-value: 0.1695% CI: [-0.41, 0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

High Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respiration

High frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed unpaced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline5.37 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.4
Fish OilHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 45.29 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline5.61 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboHigh Frequency (.12 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 45.51 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.21
p-value: 0.7495% CI: [-0.18, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Hostility, Barefoot Score

The 27-item Barefoot Hostility Scale. The minimum value is 1, and the maximum value is 30. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilHostility, Barefoot ScoreMonth 413.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
Fish OilHostility, Barefoot ScoreBaseline13.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
PlaceboHostility, Barefoot ScoreBaseline12.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
PlaceboHostility, Barefoot ScoreMonth 412.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-1.25, 0.61]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Impulsivity

Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. The minimum value is 34, and the maximum value is 120. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilImpulsivityBaseline60.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
Fish OilImpulsivityMonth 460.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
PlaceboImpulsivityBaseline59.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.44
PlaceboImpulsivityMonth 459.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.97
p-value: 0.8695% CI: [-1.21, 1.44]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Mean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced Respiration

Mean successive difference in inter-beat intervals natural log transformed paced respiration in milliseconds

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data..

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline2.99 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.77
Fish OilMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 42.92 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline3.13 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 43.08 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.63
p-value: 0.6895% CI: [-0.16, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Mean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respiration

Mean successive difference in inter-beat intervals natural log transformed unpaced respiration in milliseconds (msec)

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline2.97 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.71
Fish OilMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 42.95 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline3.11 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.67
PlaceboMean Successive Difference in Inter-beat Intervals Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 43.03 ln(milliseconds)Standard Deviation 0.59
p-value: 0.3595% CI: [-0.06, 0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Negative Affect

Negative affect questions adapted from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form administered via ecological momentary assessment. The minimum value is 1, and the maximum value is 6. A higher score are worse (more negative affect).

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Fish OilNegative AffectBaseline1.76 units on a scale
Fish OilNegative AffectMonth 41.73 units on a scale
PlaceboNegative AffectBaseline1.69 units on a scale
PlaceboNegative AffectMonth 41.59 units on a scale
p-value: 0.9295% CI: [0.69, 1.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Total Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced Respiration

Total power (0 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed paced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline7.02 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.1
Fish OilTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 46.94 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationBaseline7.21 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.97
PlaceboTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Paced RespirationMonth 47.18 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.92
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-0.24, 0.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Total Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced Respiration

Total power (0 to .40 Hz) heart rate variability natural log transformed unpaced respiration in Hertz (Hz) units

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: One participant in placebo group was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 46.98 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.97
Fish OilTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline7.05 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.98
PlaceboTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationMonth 47.15 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.87
PlaceboTotal Power (0 to .40 Hz) Heart Rate Variability Natural Log Transformed Unpaced RespirationBaseline7.13 ln(hertz)Standard Deviation 0.97
p-value: 0.2895% CI: [-0.27, 0.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Trait Anger

State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. The minimum value is 10, and the maximum value is 40. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilTrait AngerBaseline16.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
Fish OilTrait AngerMonth 415.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.32
PlaceboTrait AngerBaseline16.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
PlaceboTrait AngerMonth 415.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-0.23, 0.88]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Type A, Total Score

Structured Interview - Type A Behavior Pattern using the Interpersonal Hostility Assessment Technique (IHAT). The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 12. A higher score suggests a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline and month 4

Population: All randomized participants were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Fish OilType A, Total ScoreBaseline1.0 units on a scale
Fish OilType A, Total ScoreMonth 41.0 units on a scale
PlaceboType A, Total ScoreBaseline1.0 units on a scale
PlaceboType A, Total ScoreMonth 41.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.5295% CI: [0.67, 2.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Executive Function

Executive function was comprised of trail making B - A time, digit span forward and digit span backward completions. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: One participant in placebo group was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilExecutive Functionbaseline-0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.57
Fish OilExecutive FunctionMonth 40.07 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.62
PlaceboExecutive Functionbaseline0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboExecutive FunctionMonth 40.03 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.63
p-value: 0.7695% CI: [-0.09, 0.39]Repeated Measures MANOVA
Secondary

Fluid Intelligence

This outcome was based upon matrix reasoning task raw score, block design task raw score and spatial span forward raw score. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: One participant in placebo group was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilFluid Intelligencebaseline-0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.85
Fish OilFluid IntelligenceMonth 4-0.005 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.82
PlaceboFluid Intelligencebaseline0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboFluid IntelligenceMonth 40.05 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.83
p-value: 0.5495% CI: [-0.3, 0.18]Repeated Measures MANOVA
Secondary

Learning / Episodic Memory

Learning/episodic memory was comprised of d' from the four word memory task and the average performance across all trials of the Rey auditory verbal learning test. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: One participant in placebo group was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilLearning / Episodic Memorybaseline0.01 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.87
Fish OilLearning / Episodic MemoryMonth 40.18 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.85
PlaceboLearning / Episodic Memorybaseline-0.01 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboLearning / Episodic MemoryMonth 40.12 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.87
p-value: 0.6295% CI: [-0.18, 0.3]Repeated Measures MANOVA
Secondary

Moderation of Effects of Fish Oil on Inflammatory Markers by Select Genetic Polymorphisms

Circulating serum concentrations of IL6 and CRP before and after supplementation with fish oil or placebo.

Time frame: Measured at Month 4

Population: This aim was conditional and was not completed per the protocol.

Secondary

Psychomotor Speed

Psychomotor speed was comprised of trail making A time, Stroop word-only time and color-only time. Performance scores on each task were converted into Z-scores, and then averaged across tasks. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate higher function (better outcome). The analysis compared changes in Z-scores between the two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 4

Population: One participant in placebo group was excluded from the analysis due to missing both at baseline and 4-month data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fish OilPsychomotor Speedbaseline0.04 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.63
Fish OilPsychomotor SpeedMonth 40.13 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.54
PlaceboPsychomotor Speedbaseline-0.04 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboPsychomotor SpeedMonth 40.007 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.57
p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-0.21, 0.26]Repeated Measures MANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Structural & Functional MRI

Measures of brain structure and function from magnetic resonance imaging

Time frame: Baseline and month 4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026