Skip to content

Study Of The Effect Of Fragmin In The Treatment Of Neuroischaemic Foot Ulcers In Diabetic Patients

A 6 Month, Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multiple Center Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fragmin In The Treatment Of Chronic Neuroischaemic Foot Ulcers In Diabetic Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00662831
Acronym
FEENICS
Enrollment
276
Registered
2008-04-21
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2018-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

Diabetic Foot Ulcers Neuroischaemic

Brief summary

The purpose of the study isto see the effect of Fragmin on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers by determining the number of subjects with ≥50% reduction in ulcer surface area including intact skin healing.

Interventions

DRUGFragmin/ Dalteparin Sodium

Pre-filled syringes containing a single dose of 5000 IU Fragmin/ Dalteparin Sodium.

DRUGPlacebo for Fragmin/ Dalteparin Sodium

Pre-filled syringes containing a single dose of placebo for 5000 IU Fragmin/ Dalteparin Sodium.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects 18 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. * Subjects with peripheral occlusive arterial disease (PAOD) and a neuropathy disability score (NDS) of \>3

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have undergone vascular reconstruction or angioplasty less than 1 month prior to randomization. Subjects with an ulcer grading of 0 or 3 and staging of A, B or D according to the University of Texas wound classification system. * Subjects with a known bleeding disorder or evidence of active bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingWeek 24 [end of treatment (EOT)] or early terminationUniversity of Texas (UT) system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. UT Wound Classification (1C/2C) was based on grade (0= healed site to 3= penetrating wound to bone or joint) and stage (A= clean wounds to D= ischaemic infected wounds) of wounds. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who DiedWeek 24 (EOT) or early termination
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
11-point Likert Pain ScaleBaseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)The 11 point Likert pain scale which used a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) point rating system was used to assess participant's pain score. No distinction was made between neuropathy and inflammatory (nociceptive) pain.
Transcutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)Transcutaneous pO2 was assessed at the dorsum of the foot in the first intermetatarsal space using an appropriately calibrated instrument. The skin oxygen partial pressure was determined by measuring the oxygen reduction current by means of a measuring cell.
Number of Participants With Intact Skin HealingWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationIntact skin healing was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation. UT system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.
Number of Participants Who Underwent Any AmputationWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationAny amputation included both major and minor amputations. A major amputation was defined as above the ankle and was reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. A minor amputation was defined as below the ankle amputation.
Number of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor AmputationWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationA major amputation was defined as above the ankle and was reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. A minor amputation was defined as below the ankle amputation.
Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationUniversity of Texas (UT) system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. UT Wound Classification (1C/2C) was based on grade (0= healed site to 3= penetrating wound to bone or joint) and stage (A= clean wounds to D= ischaemic infected wounds) of wounds. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.
Number of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Disease Events (MCVE)Week 24 (EOT) or early terminationMajor cardiovascular events were defined as death due to vascular cause; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) excluding procedure related to MI; coronary revascularization procedures not related to MIs; hospitalization for unstable angina or non-fatal stroke.
Time to Intact Skin HealingWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationMedian time taken to achieve intact skin healing which was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation.
Median Time to First AmputationWeek 24 (EOT) or early termination
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility ScoreBaseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. It assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial HemorrhagesWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationClinically relevant minor (non-major) bleeding was defined as any bleeding compromising hemodynamics, leading to hospitalization, subcutaneous haematoma more than 25 cm\^2, intramuscular haematoma, epistaxis lasting for more than 5 minutes, spontaneous gingival bleeding, macroscopic hematuria and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (including at least 1 episode of melaena or hematemesis), rectal blood loss, hemoptysis, and any other bleeding with clinical consequences. Trivial bleeding was defined as all minor bleeding that did not meet the definition of clinically relevant minor bleeding.
Number of Major and Minor HemorrhagesWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationMajor hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin more than or equal to 20 gram (g)/litre (L) (2 g/ decilitre \[dL\]), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of more than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular). Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.
Number of All HemorrhagesWeek 24 (EOT) or early terminationMajor hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin more than or equal to 20 gram (g)/litre (L) (2 g/ decilitre \[dL\]), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of more than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular). Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dalteparin
Dalteparin 5000 International Units (IU) (0.2 mL) subcutaneously (s.c.) once daily for 24 weeks or early termination (ET).
184
Placebo
Placebo (0.2 mL normal saline) administered s.c. once daily for 24 weeks or ET.
92
Total276

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2316
Overall StudyDeath41
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy66
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyOther6231
Overall StudyProtocol Violation84
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDalteparinPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants30 Participants93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
121 Participants62 Participants183 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 18436 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 18418 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin Healing

University of Texas (UT) system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. UT Wound Classification (1C/2C) was based on grade (0= healed site to 3= penetrating wound to bone or joint) and stage (A= clean wounds to D= ischaemic infected wounds) of wounds. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.

Time frame: Week 24 [end of treatment (EOT)] or early termination

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)21 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)23 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)9 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)68 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Including Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)31 participants
Secondary

11-point Likert Pain Scale

The 11 point Likert pain scale which used a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) point rating system was used to assess participant's pain score. No distinction was made between neuropathy and inflammatory (nociceptive) pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dalteparin11-point Likert Pain ScaleBaseline4.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Dalteparin11-point Likert Pain ScaleEOT (n= 155, 75)2.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Placebo11-point Likert Pain ScaleBaseline4.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Placebo11-point Likert Pain ScaleEOT (n= 155, 75)2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Secondary

36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. This was calculated only when more than half of the questions within dimension were answered. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Bodily Pain (n= 156, 76)47.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Mental Health (n= 156, 76)41.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Physical Functioning34.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.06
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Role-Physical35.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Bodily Pain42.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.19
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: General Health42.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.52
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Visibility48.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Social Functioning33.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.49
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Role-Emotional39.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.48
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Mental Health41.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.57
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Physical (PCS)38.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.42
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Mental (MCS)42.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Physical Functioning (n= 156, 76)37.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.71
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Role-Physical (n= 155, 76)39.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: General Health (n= 156, 76)42.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Visibility (n= 156, 76)48.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Social Functioning (n= 152, 73)33.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Role-Emotional (n= 155, 76)41.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.44
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Physical (PCS) (n= 151, 73)41.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.04
Dalteparin36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Mental (MCS) (n= 151, 73)42.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.89
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Role-Emotional (n= 155, 76)38.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.48
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Bodily Pain (n= 156, 76)45.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.73
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Physical (PCS)36.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Mental Health (n= 156, 76)42.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Visibility (n= 156, 76)48.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Physical Functioning32.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Mental (MCS)42.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.37
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Role-Physical35.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.41
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Mental (MCS) (n= 151, 73)41.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.46
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Bodily Pain40.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.52
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Physical Functioning (n= 156, 76)35.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: General Health42.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Social Functioning (n= 152, 73)32.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.83
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Visibility48.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.02
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Role-Physical (n= 155, 76)37.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Social Functioning33.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: Physical (PCS) (n= 151, 73)40.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Role-Emotional38.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.49
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEOT: General Health (n= 156, 76)42.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
Placebo36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBaseline: Mental Health41.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.72
Secondary

Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. It assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were only considered when all items contributing to the score had been answered. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalteparinEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility ScoreBaseline0.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
DalteparinEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility ScoreEOT (n= 154, 74)0.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
PlaceboEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility ScoreBaseline0.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboEuro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Utility ScoreEOT (n= 154, 74)0.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were only considered when all items contributing to the score had been answered. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalteparinEuro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline60.20 mmStandard Deviation 18.68
DalteparinEuro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EOT (n= 157, 76)63.30 mmStandard Deviation 18.76
PlaceboEuro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline55.30 mmStandard Deviation 19.72
PlaceboEuro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)EOT (n= 157, 76)60.70 mmStandard Deviation 18.02
Secondary

Median Time to First Amputation

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: The data was not analyzed as planned because the study enrollment was terminated before the planned number of randomized participants was obtained.

Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants Who Died4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Died3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Underwent Any Amputation

Any amputation included both major and minor amputations. A major amputation was defined as above the ankle and was reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. A minor amputation was defined as below the ankle amputation.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Any Amputation8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Underwent Any Amputation2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor Amputation

A major amputation was defined as above the ankle and was reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. A minor amputation was defined as below the ankle amputation.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor AmputationMajor amputation2 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor AmputationMinor amputation7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor AmputationMajor amputation1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Underwent Major and Minor AmputationMinor amputation1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin Healing

University of Texas (UT) system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. UT Wound Classification (1C/2C) was based on grade (0= healed site to 3= penetrating wound to bone or joint) and stage (A= clean wounds to D= ischaemic infected wounds) of wounds. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. LOCF method was used. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)33 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)8 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)13 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50 Percent Reduction in Ulcer Surface Area Excluding Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)10 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Intact Skin Healing

Intact skin healing was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation. UT system assesses ulcer depth, wound infection and clinical signs of lower-extremity ischemia. Participants were evaluated at 4 stratums: Stratum 1: Toe pressure\>30 mm of mercury (mmHg) and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 2: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 1C. Stratum 3: Toe pressure\>30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C. Stratum 4: Toe pressure\<=30 mmHg and UT grade and stage 2C.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. LOCF method was used. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)35 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)15 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)8 participants
DalteparinNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 4 (n= 19, 10)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 1 (n= 97, 49)16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 3 (n= 29, 14)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intact Skin HealingStratum 2 (n= 39, 19)4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Disease Events (MCVE)

Major cardiovascular events were defined as death due to vascular cause; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) excluding procedure related to MI; coronary revascularization procedures not related to MIs; hospitalization for unstable angina or non-fatal stroke.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: The data was not analyzed as planned because the study enrollment was terminated before the planned number of randomized participants was obtained.

Secondary

Time to Intact Skin Healing

Median time taken to achieve intact skin healing which was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: The data was not analyzed as planned because the study enrollment was terminated before the planned number of randomized participants was obtained.

Secondary

Transcutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)

Transcutaneous pO2 was assessed at the dorsum of the foot in the first intermetatarsal space using an appropriately calibrated instrument. The skin oxygen partial pressure was determined by measuring the oxygen reduction current by means of a measuring cell.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT or early termination)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were analyzed at selected sites only, based on availability. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalteparinTranscutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)Baseline31.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.29
DalteparinTranscutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)EOT (n= 32, 19)38.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.58
PlaceboTranscutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)Baseline36.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.11
PlaceboTranscutaneous Local Tissue Oxygenation (pO2)EOT (n= 32, 19)39.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Other Pre-specified

Number of All Hemorrhages

Major hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin more than or equal to 20 gram (g)/litre (L) (2 g/ decilitre \[dL\]), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of more than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular). Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who were known to have taken at least one dose of the study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of All Hemorrhages10 hemorrhages
PlaceboNumber of All Hemorrhages2 hemorrhages
Other Pre-specified

Number of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial Hemorrhages

Clinically relevant minor (non-major) bleeding was defined as any bleeding compromising hemodynamics, leading to hospitalization, subcutaneous haematoma more than 25 cm\^2, intramuscular haematoma, epistaxis lasting for more than 5 minutes, spontaneous gingival bleeding, macroscopic hematuria and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (including at least 1 episode of melaena or hematemesis), rectal blood loss, hemoptysis, and any other bleeding with clinical consequences. Trivial bleeding was defined as all minor bleeding that did not meet the definition of clinically relevant minor bleeding.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who were known to have taken at least one dose of the study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial HemorrhagesClinically relevant minor hemorrhages5 hemorrhages
DalteparinNumber of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial HemorrhagesTrivial hemorrhages3 hemorrhages
PlaceboNumber of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial HemorrhagesClinically relevant minor hemorrhages1 hemorrhages
PlaceboNumber of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages and Trivial HemorrhagesTrivial hemorrhages1 hemorrhages
Other Pre-specified

Number of Major and Minor Hemorrhages

Major hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin more than or equal to 20 gram (g)/litre (L) (2 g/ decilitre \[dL\]), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of more than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular). Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.

Time frame: Week 24 (EOT) or early termination

Population: Safety analysis population included all participants who were known to have taken at least one dose of the study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DalteparinNumber of Major and Minor HemorrhagesMajor hemorrhages2 hemorrhages
DalteparinNumber of Major and Minor HemorrhagesMinor hemorrhages8 hemorrhages
PlaceboNumber of Major and Minor HemorrhagesMajor hemorrhages0 hemorrhages
PlaceboNumber of Major and Minor HemorrhagesMinor hemorrhages2 hemorrhages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026