Skip to content

Halt Growth of Liver Tumors From Uveal Melanoma With Closure of Liver Artery Following Injection of GM-CSF

Immuno-embolization of Hepatic Artery With Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00661622
Enrollment
53
Registered
2008-04-18
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Metastases, Uveal Melanoma

Brief summary

Patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver will be treated with embolization of the hepatic artery every 4 weeks. GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony simulating factor) or normal saline will be injected into one of the liver arteries with an oily contrast dye, Ethiodol. This is followed by blockage of the artery with small pieces of gelatin sponge (embolization). It is hoped with this novel approach that: * tumor cells will die due to a loss of their blood supply, * local inflammatory reactions induced by GM-CSF will kill remaining tumor cells, and * a systemic immune response against tumor cells may develop.

Detailed description

Patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver will be treated with embolization of the hepatic artery every 4 weeks. GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony simulating factor) or normal saline will be injected into one of the liver arteries with an oily contrast dye, Ethiodol. This is followed by blockage of the artery with small pieces of gelatin sponge (embolization).

Interventions

DRUGGM-CSF

2,000 mcg injected into the liver every 4 weeks alternating between right or left lobe when tumors present throughout liver.

PROCEDUREEmbolization

A catheter will be introduced to one of the hepatic arteries by way of the femoral artery (groin) to allow injection of GM-CSF in combination with ethiodized oil and gelatin sponge providing a temporary blockage of the blood supply from the hepatic (liver) artery

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Metastatic uveal melanoma in the liver with histological confirmation * Ability/willingness to give informed consent * ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 * Adequate renal, liver and bone marrow function

Exclusion criteria

* Solitary liver metastasis that is amenable to surgical removal * Presence of symptomatic liver failure including ascites and hepatic encephalopathy * Presence of extra-hepatic metastases * Untreated brain metastases * Uncontrolled hypertension or congestive heart failure or acute myocardial infarction within 6 months of entry * Presence of any other medical complication that imply survival of less than six months * Uncontrolled sever bleeding tendency or active GI bleeding * Significant allergic reaction to contrast dye or GM-CSF * Immunosuppressive treatments such as systemic steroids, radiation to pelvis or systemic chemotherapy within 4 weeks * Previous embolization of the hepatic artery or intrahepatic arterial chemotherapy of liver metastasis * Active hepatitis with serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) greater than 5 x normal * HIV infection positive by ELISA * Pregnancy or breast feeding women * Biliary obstruction, biliary stent or prior biliary surgery except cholecystectomy * Significant arteriovenous shunt identified on angiography of the hepatic artery * Occlusion of main portal vein or inadequate collateral flow around an occluded portal vein

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response of Liver MetastasesEvery 8 weeksComplete response: Disappearance of all target and non-target liver lesions Partial response: \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) relative to baseline sum LD with at least stable non-target liver lesions Stable disease: Absence of change which would qualify as response or progression Progression: \>= 20% increase in the sum LD in target liver lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target liver lesions in the treated lobe(s) or appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s)
Overall Response RateBaseline then 3 to 4 weeks after every 2 treatmentsClinical response in the liver metastases will be evaluated after every two embolizations using CT scans or MRI of the abdomen. The sum of the longest diameter (LD) of up to 6 target lesions will be used to determine response. Target indicator lesions will be identified and measured as baseline prior to the first embolization. The same target lesions will then be measured 3 to 4 weeks after every two treatments. The sum of the baseline LDs will be compared to the sum of the LDs after every two treatments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalBaseline to deathMeasured from the start of the treatment to death of patients
Median Progression Free SurvivalBaseline to time of progressionMeasured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).
Systemic Progression Free SurvivalBaseline to time of progressionMeasured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immunoembolization
Liver embolization treatment with injection of GM-CSF. GM-CSF: 2,000 mcg injected into the liver every 4 weeks alternating between right or left lobe when tumors present throughout liver. Embolization: A catheter will be introduced to one of the hepatic arteries by way of the femoral artery (groin) to allow injection of GM-CSF in combination with ethiodized oil and gelatin sponge providing a temporary blockage of the blood supply from the hepatic (liver) artery
25
Plain Embolization
Liver embolization with normal saline injected in place of GM-CSF Embolization: A catheter will be introduced to one of the hepatic arteries by way of the femoral artery (groin) to allow injection of normal saline in combination with ethiodized oil and gelatin sponge providing a temporary blockage of the blood supply from the hepatic (liver) artery
27
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalImmunoembolizationPlain Embolization
Age, Continuous58 years56 years62 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants25 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants25 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
52 participants25 participants27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants15 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants10 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 2623 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 265 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Response Rate

Clinical response in the liver metastases will be evaluated after every two embolizations using CT scans or MRI of the abdomen. The sum of the longest diameter (LD) of up to 6 target lesions will be used to determine response. Target indicator lesions will be identified and measured as baseline prior to the first embolization. The same target lesions will then be measured 3 to 4 weeks after every two treatments. The sum of the baseline LDs will be compared to the sum of the LDs after every two treatments.

Time frame: Baseline then 3 to 4 weeks after every 2 treatments

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ImmunoembolizationOverall Response Rate21.2 percentage of participants
Plain EmbolizationOverall Response Rate16.7 percentage of participants
Primary

Response of Liver Metastases

Complete response: Disappearance of all target and non-target liver lesions Partial response: \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) relative to baseline sum LD with at least stable non-target liver lesions Stable disease: Absence of change which would qualify as response or progression Progression: \>= 20% increase in the sum LD in target liver lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target liver lesions in the treated lobe(s) or appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s)

Time frame: Every 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ImmunoembolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesComplete response (CR)0 participants
ImmunoembolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesPartial response (PR)5 participants
ImmunoembolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesStable disease (SD)12 participants
ImmunoembolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesProgression (PD)8 participants
Plain EmbolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesProgression (PD)5 participants
Plain EmbolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesComplete response (CR)0 participants
Plain EmbolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesStable disease (SD)19 participants
Plain EmbolizationResponse of Liver MetastasesPartial response (PR)3 participants
Secondary

Median Progression Free Survival

Measured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).

Time frame: Baseline to time of progression

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ImmunoembolizationMedian Progression Free Survival3.9 months
Plain EmbolizationMedian Progression Free Survival5.9 months
Secondary

Overall Survival

Measured from the start of the treatment to death of patients

Time frame: Baseline to death

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ImmunoembolizationOverall Survival21.5 months
Plain EmbolizationOverall Survival17.2 months
Secondary

Systemic Progression Free Survival

Measured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).

Time frame: Baseline to time of progression

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ImmunoembolizationSystemic Progression Free Survival10.4 months
Plain EmbolizationSystemic Progression Free Survival7.1 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026