Skip to content

SAFEty of Two Strategies of ICD Management at Implantation

SAFEty of Two Strategies of ICD Management at Implantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00661037
Acronym
SAFE-ICD
Enrollment
2120
Registered
2008-04-18
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sudden Cardiac Death, Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Flutter

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the safety, over a follow-up of 2 years, of two strategies, consisting in performing or not performing defibrillation testing(DT) during first implant of implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Detailed description

The standardized requirements for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) include defibrillation testing (DT), consisting in induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF). An effective DT has historically been considered part of standard procedures at implant. Nevertheless, implant techniques and technology have evolved during years and nowadays deviations are frequent in clinical practice mainly due to the fact that physicians are seriously concerned about the risk of severe complications related to DT. However, the practice of not performing DT is arbitrary and its safety is yet unproven. This observational study will assess the safety of the two strategies adopted at ICD implant: induction (including patients who undergo DT at implant) and non-induction (including patients who do not undergo DT at implant. No deviation from the centres' current practice in choosing to perform or not perform DT is introduced by this study protocol. The study considers consecutive patients undergoing first implant of ICD

Interventions

Implantable defibrillator to reduce ventricular arrhythmias via shock.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first implantation of ICD or CRT-D * Patients undergoing upgrade to ICD or CRT-D from pacemaker * Patients undergoing upgrade to CRT-D from CRT * Age 18 or above, or legal age to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not give consent to treat their data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up2 years* Severe implant-related\* complications at ICD implants among the following: * Survival from cardiopulmonary arrest due to VF requiring 3 or more consecutive external shocks for termination or due to electro-mechanical dissociation. * Transient ischemic attack or stroke, * Cardiogenic shock, * Pulmonary edema, * Embolic events, * Anoxic coma * Pericardial tamponade * Death. * Events at follow up: * Sudden cardiac death (defined as witnessed unexpected death occurring \<1 hour from symptoms onset or unwitnessed during sleep) * Resuscitation after ineffective documented appropriate ICD shocks * Implant related events are considered as those listed above, occurring during the implant procedure in the timeframe betweend device poket insertion and patient exit from the cath-lab, as well as those events occurring after the patient exit from the cath-lab that, after review from the event adjudication committee, have been classified as related to the implant procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severe Intra-operative ComplicationsAcute (ICD implant)including: cardiopulmonary arrest, transient ischemic attack or stroke, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, embolic event, anoxic coma, pericardial tamponade,death
Sudden Cardiac Death at Follow up or Resusciation After Ineffective Documented Appropriate ICD Shocks at Follow up2 years

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VF Induction
Patients having VF induction with shock termination at implant (Implantable defibrillator: Implantable defibrillator to reduce ventricular arrhythmias via shock)
836
no VF Induction
Patients not having VF induction at implant or during follow-up (Implantable defibrillator: Implantable defibrillator to reduce ventricular arrhythmias via shock)
1,284
Total2,120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVF Inductionno VF InductionTotal
Age, Continuous66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
Italy
836 participants1284 participants2120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
152 Participants268 Participants420 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
684 Participants1016 Participants1700 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
108 / 836188 / 1,284
other
Total, other adverse events
120 / 83690 / 1,284
serious
Total, serious adverse events
209 / 836177 / 1,284

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up

* Severe implant-related\* complications at ICD implants among the following: * Survival from cardiopulmonary arrest due to VF requiring 3 or more consecutive external shocks for termination or due to electro-mechanical dissociation. * Transient ischemic attack or stroke, * Cardiogenic shock, * Pulmonary edema, * Embolic events, * Anoxic coma * Pericardial tamponade * Death. * Events at follow up: * Sudden cardiac death (defined as witnessed unexpected death occurring \<1 hour from symptoms onset or unwitnessed during sleep) * Resuscitation after ineffective documented appropriate ICD shocks * Implant related events are considered as those listed above, occurring during the implant procedure in the timeframe betweend device poket insertion and patient exit from the cath-lab, as well as those events occurring after the patient exit from the cath-lab that, after review from the event adjudication committee, have been classified as related to the implant procedure.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VF InductionNumber of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up18 Participants
no VF InductionNumber of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up16 Participants
Secondary

Severe Intra-operative Complications

including: cardiopulmonary arrest, transient ischemic attack or stroke, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, embolic event, anoxic coma, pericardial tamponade,death

Time frame: Acute (ICD implant)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VF InductionSevere Intra-operative Complications8 Participants
no VF InductionSevere Intra-operative Complications4 Participants
Secondary

Sudden Cardiac Death at Follow up or Resusciation After Ineffective Documented Appropriate ICD Shocks at Follow up

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VF InductionSudden Cardiac Death at Follow up or Resusciation After Ineffective Documented Appropriate ICD Shocks at Follow up10 Participants
no VF InductionSudden Cardiac Death at Follow up or Resusciation After Ineffective Documented Appropriate ICD Shocks at Follow up12 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026