Skip to content

The Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Sponge in Diabetic Patients With Moderately Infected Foot Ulcers

A Randomized, Controlled, Open Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge Combined With An Antibiotic Compared to Antibiotic Therapy Alone in Diabetic Patients With Moderately Infected Foot Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00659646
Enrollment
56
Registered
2008-04-16
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2022-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

Diabetes, ulcers, ulcerations, infection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge when combined with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin) is safe and effective in treating moderately infected skin ulcers compared to treatment only with standard daily wound care and an oral antibiotic (levofloxacin).

Detailed description

Infected skin ulcers with diabetes can be very debilitating because they are difficult to heal. Diabetic ulcers are responsible for frequent health care visits, and are a major predictor of amputation. Diabetic ulcers can be caused by a patient's inability to sense pain or warmth as well as peripheral vascular disease, which causes diminished blood flow to the foot. Early aggressive treatment is necessary to treat infection and ultimately prevent the need for amputation. Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When applied to an open ulcer, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released into the ulcer, but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of gentamicin in the open infected ulcer may help treat the infection. In this study, all subjects will be given the necessary supplies and taught how to take care their foot ulcer. All subjects will also receive oral an antibiotic (levofloxacin). Additionally, subjects who are randomly assigned to receive the gentamicin-collagen sponge will place a gentamicin-collagen sponge on their ulcer during daily wound care.

Interventions

DRUGgentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin

Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: 10 × 10 cm in size And 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours.

DRUGLevofloxacin only

levofloxacin, 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours

Sponsors

Premier Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Innocoll
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is a man or woman aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years. * Has diabetes mellitus, according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. * Has a single infected skin ulcer below the knee, defined as moderate by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) Guidelines for whom, in the Investigator's opinion, intravenous (IV) or oral antimicrobial therapy is appropriate * Has had an x ray of the infected area within the 2 days immediately preceding or at Visit 1 (Baseline/Randomization) to document the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. Patients with osteomyelitis must receive appropriate surgical intervention to remove all necrotic and infected bone and otherwise meet enrollment criteria before being enrolled in the study. * Meets certain minimal laboratory criteria * Has an ankle brachial index (ABI) \> or = 0.7 and ≤ 1.3. (Note: Patients with ABI \< 0.7 or \> 1.3 may be included if they have either a transcutaneous oxygen pressure or a toe pressure \> or = 40 mm Hg on limb with ulcer.) * If female, is nonpregnant (negative pregnancy test results at the Baseline/Randomization Visit) and nonlactating. * If female, is either not of childbearing potential (defined as postmenopausal for ≥ 1 year or surgically sterile \[bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy\]) or practicing a medically acceptable methods of birth control and agrees to continue with the regimen throughout the study * Willing to return to the study facility for the Final Study Visit. * Must be able to fluently speak and understand English and be able to provide meaningful written informed consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Has a known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin (or other systemic aminoglycosides) or levofloxacin or drugs in the same class, or any of the test article or reference product components. * Has a known hypersensitivity to bovine collagen. * Has any uncontrolled illnesses that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with interpreting the results of the study. * Has a target ulcer with a wound size \> 10 × 10 cm. * Has gangrenous tissue of the affected limb that cannot be removed with a single debridement. * Has wound known to contain isolates resistant to levofloxacin. * Has a wound associated with prosthetic material or device. * Received any topical or systemic antimicrobial therapy within the 2 weeks prior to study entry (Visit 1 \[Day 1\]). * If severely immunocompromised, may be excluded at the discretion of the Investigator. * Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the past 12 months. * Has serum creatinine \> 3 mg/dL, is undergoing dialysis (renal or peritoneal) or has a history of kidney transplant. * Has a history of myasthenia gravis or other neurological condition where gentamicin use is contraindicated as determined by the Investigator. * Has a history of epilepsy * Has a history of tendon disorders related to fluoroquinolone administration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)Day 7 of treatmentNumber of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Day 3, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication
Number of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitDay 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 & 28
Change From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.
Number of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointDay 3, 7, 10,14, 21, 28 and 42Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of clinical cure or clinical improvement in each treatment group at/by each time point
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentDay 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.
Lipsky Wound ScoreDays 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is 3 and the highest score possible is 64.
Time to Clinical CureDays 1 through 49clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Investigative medical sites

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gentamicin Sponge
Gentamicin sponge applied into wound plus levofloxacin, 750 mg by mouth (po) or intravenous (IV) every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing gentamicin-collagen sponge and levofloxacin: Topical Gentamicin Collagen Sponge: 10 × 10 cm in size And 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours.
26
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin, 750 mg po or IV every 24 hours or, if ulcer culture results show resistance to levofloxacin, alternative antimicrobial therapy as determined by susceptibility testing Levofloxacin only: levofloxacin, 750 mg tablet po every 24 hours or 750 mg IV administered by slow infusion over 90 minutes every 24 hours
10
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall Studyprotocol noncompliance after randomized10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation128

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGentamicin SpongeLevofloxacinTotal
Age, Continuous61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.17
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 Participants10 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants8 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 381 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 381 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)

Number of participants with a clinical cure in each treatment group at Visit 3 (Day 7). Clinical Cure is defined as positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication.

Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

Population: modified intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)0 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Visit 3 (Day 7)3 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2

Wound Surface Area was measured in cm² Actual Values Total wound surface area was compared across treatments using 2-sample t-tests. Wound tracings were obtained at study visits by trained study personnel who were blinded to the patient data and regimen. A centralized imaging facility provided both wound perimeter and area measurements.

Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 2 Day 34.50 cm^2Standard Deviation 8.53
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 7 Day 282.67 cm^2Standard Deviation 5.474
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Final Study Visit Day 423.73 cm^2Standard Deviation 9.047
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 4 Day 104.31 cm^2Standard Deviation 8.73
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 6 Day 212.93 cm^2Standard Deviation 5.517
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 3 Day 74.47 cm^2Standard Deviation 8.19
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 5 Day 144.14 cm^2Standard Deviation 9.041
Gentamicin SpongeChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 1 Day 15.11 cm^2Standard Deviation 9.249
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 7 Day 28.93 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.606
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 1 Day 11.24 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.998
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 3 Day 7.76 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.707
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 4 Day 101.14 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.76
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 5 Day 140.95 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.656
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 6 Day 211 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.671
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Final Study Visit Day 42.64 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.846
LevofloxacinChange From Baseline in Total Wound Surface Area Measured in cm^2Visit 2 Day 3.92 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.78
Secondary

Lipsky Wound Score

The Lipsky wound scoring scale consists of scoring categories for purulent drainage, non-purulent drainage, erythema, induration, tenderness, pain, local warmth and wound measurements. This wound scoring system allows us to take the size and depth of the wound into consideration as well as all signs and symptoms of inflammation and infection. A quantitative score that assess wounds both at baseline and during therapy to compare wound scores over time. The higher the score the worse the inflammation and/or infection is. The Lowest score possible is 3 and the highest score possible is 64.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 1 Day 117.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.498
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 5 Day 148.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.315
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 2 Day 313.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.373
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 3 Day 710.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.364
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 4 Day 109.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.108
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 6 Day 217.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.97
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 7 Day 285.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Gentamicin SpongeLipsky Wound ScoreFinal Study Visit Day 426.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.239
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreFinal Study Visit Day 424.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.251
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 4 Day 108.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.147
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 3 Day 77.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 5 Day 145.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.633
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 7 Day 283.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.155
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 1 Day 113.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.043
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 6 Day 214.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.309
LevofloxacinLipsky Wound ScoreVisit 2 Day 311 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.771
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)

clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

Time frame: Day 3, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 5 Day 1410 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 6 Day 214 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Final Visit Day 4222 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 2 Day 30 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 4 Day 101 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 7 Day 289 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 7 Day 281 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 5 Day 143 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 4 Day 100 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 6 Day 210 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Final Visit Day 427 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Clinical Cure at Each Visit Except Visit 3 (Day 7)Visit 2 Day 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time Point

Number of patients with positive clinical response, defined as those with a clinical outcome of clinical cure or clinical improvement in each treatment group at/by each time point

Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10,14, 21, 28 and 42

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointFinal Study Visit Day 4222 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 2 Day 324 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 4 Day 1025 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 3 Day 726 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 6 Day 2114 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 7 Day 2810 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 5 Day 1424 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointFinal Study Visit Day 4210 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 4 Day 107 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 5 Day 146 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 7 Day 283 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 2 Day 39 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 6 Day 213 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With a Positive Clinical Response at Each Time PointVisit 3 Day 710 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by Visit

Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 & 28

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 2 Day 320 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 7 Day 285 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 3 Day 724 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 4 Day 1023 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 5 Day 1418 Participants
Gentamicin SpongeNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 6 Day 2112 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 5 Day 142 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 4 Day 102 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 7 Day 280 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 2 Day 31 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 6 Day 210 Participants
LevofloxacinNumber of Participants With Pathogen Eradication by VisitVisit 3 Day 72 Participants
Secondary

Time to Clinical Cure

clinical cure is defined as having a positive clinical response and with pathogen eradication

Time frame: Days 1 through 49

Population: mITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Gentamicin SpongeTime to Clinical Cure21 Days
LevofloxacinTime to Clinical Cure14 Days
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment

Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours \* the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100\* the number of hours in that period.

Time frame: Day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 & 42

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 2 Day 327.6 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 32.22
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 4 Day 1017.2 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 23.34
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 6 Day 2122.9 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 34.2
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 7 Day 2814.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 30.96
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentFinal Study Visit Day4217.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 28.84
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 1 Day 139.2 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 36.79
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 3 Day 717.5 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 23.58
Gentamicin SpongeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 5 Day 1413.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 20.99
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentFinal Study Visit Day422.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 28.84
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 1 Day 126.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 21.77
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 4 Day 1013.6 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 20.98
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 2 Day 318.7 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 19.6
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 6 Day 2114.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 22.28
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 5 Day 1413.2 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 21.45
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 7 Day 289.3 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 10.07
LevofloxacinVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain AssessmentVisit 3 Day 712.6 score on a scale*daysStandard Deviation 19.67

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026