Skip to content

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia (Carl Koller Grant)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00659633
Enrollment
10
Registered
2008-04-16
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

lidocaine, allodynia, chronic regional pain syndrome, pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to study if lidocaine, given intravenously, reduces pain.

Detailed description

Clinicians use lidocaine intravenously in a fashion that suggests that it might have analgesic effects. Therefore, we test the hypothesis that lidocaine reduces pain intensity in response to experimental pain.

Interventions

DRUGlidocaine

intravenous, effect site concentration: 2mcg/ml, 15-20 min infusion, once

Sponsors

American Society of Regional Anesthesia
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome diagnostic criteria by the Work Safe BC. vi

Exclusion criteria

* History of Substance abuse * Other Medications: CRPS patients are expected to be treated for chronic pain, whether the current treatment regimen interferes with sensory motor testing will be determined on a case by case basis. * Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): unstable * Congestive Heart Failure (CHF): unstable * Heart Arrhythmia: symptomatic * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) * Lidocaine Allergy * Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Rev IV): Axis I: Common Axis I disorders include depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, ADHD, and schizophrenia. Axis II: borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and mild mental retardation. * Presence of Contraindications for MRI * Presence of electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants * Electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants * Ferromagnetic or electronically operated active devices like automatic cardioverter defibrillators * Cardiac pacemakers * Metallic splinters in the eye * Ferromagnetic haemostatic clips in the central nervous system (CNS) * Claustrophobia * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain PerceptionParticipants will be followed from baseline through 128 minutesAssessing heat pain perception (pain intensity) before, during, and after lidocaine infusion by means of patient self-report using a mechanical slide algometer. The mechanical slide algometer \[Price et al. (1994)\] looks like a ruler that exposes a red bar with the end-points: no pain (left) and most pain imaginable (right). The use the slider to express their perceived pain. On the back of the ruler a numerical scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) translates the patient's rating into a numeric scale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lidocaine
Intravenous lidocaine for neuropathic pain lidocaine: intravenous, effect site concentration: 2mcg/ml, 15-20 min infusion, once
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLidocaine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Perception

Assessing heat pain perception (pain intensity) before, during, and after lidocaine infusion by means of patient self-report using a mechanical slide algometer. The mechanical slide algometer \[Price et al. (1994)\] looks like a ruler that exposes a red bar with the end-points: no pain (left) and most pain imaginable (right). The use the slider to express their perceived pain. On the back of the ruler a numerical scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) translates the patient's rating into a numeric scale.

Time frame: Participants will be followed from baseline through 128 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LidocainePain PerceptionBaseline5.40303 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72232
LidocainePain PerceptionInfusion5.1457 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7205
LidocainePain PerceptionAfter Infusion5.13171 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72141

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026