Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Due to AMD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00658619
Enrollment
119
Registered
2008-04-15
Start date
2008-05-01
Completion date
2011-04-08
Last updated
2018-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

Stage 1 is a patient-masked, dose-escalation, safety evaluation of brimonidine intravitreal implant. Patients will receive implant in one eye and sham treatment (meaning no treatment) in the fellow eye. Stage 2 will begin after 1 month of safety has been evaluated for Stage 1. Stage 2 is a randomized, double-masked, dose-response, sham-controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of brimonidine intravitreal implant in patients with geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years.

Interventions

Sham in one or both eyes on Day 1 and Month 6.

400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye on Day 1 and Month 6.

200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye on Day 1 and Month 6.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Geographic atrophy in both eyes due to age-related macular degeneration * Visual acuity between 20/40 to 20/320

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to brimonidine * Uncontrolled systemic disease or infection of the eye * Recent eye surgery or injections in the eye * Female patients who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 18, Month 24Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline, 24 MonthsBCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeBaseline, 24 MonthsChange from baseline in contrast sensitivity in the study eye is measured using a Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart at 1 meter. The contrast sensitivity chart contains letters that are darkest at the top and then get progressively lighter. Scores range from 0 to 48 and are based on the number of letters read correctly. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening in contrast sensitivity and a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeBaseline, 24 MonthsChange from baseline in reading speed in the study eye is assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Patients read the chart for 2 minutes and the numbers of words read correctly per minute are totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicates an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicates a worsening.

Countries

Australia, Germany, Italy, Philippines, Portugal, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Stage 1 of the study was a patient-masked, dose-escalation, paired-eye comparison and the Investigator was not masked. Stage 2 was a parallel-group, sham-controlled, paired-eye comparison. Investigators were masked as to dose received for patients in the active treatment groups. No patients from Stage 1 were enrolled in Stage 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1
Stage 1: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
3
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1
Stage 1: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
3
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2
Stage 2: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
41
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2
Stage 2: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
49
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2
Stage 2: sham in both eyes on Day 1 and Month 6.
23
Total119

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Total
Age, Continuous85.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.61
79.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
75.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78
77.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13
78.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
77.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants27 Participants28 Participants12 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants14 Participants21 Participants11 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 4347 / 5120 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 4320 / 519 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye

Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat: All randomized patients who participated in Stage 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline6.219 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 3.9524
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 120.898 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.752
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 121.006 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.7858
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline6.897 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 4.6397
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline5.526 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 4.789
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 121.239 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.1645
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Population: Intent-to-Treat: All randomized patients who participated in Stage 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline54.8 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 12.89
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-5.0 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 13.77
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline52.1 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 13.91
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-3.2 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 12.87
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline53.7 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 10.71
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-3.3 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 12.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study Eye

Change from baseline in contrast sensitivity in the study eye is measured using a Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart at 1 meter. The contrast sensitivity chart contains letters that are darkest at the top and then get progressively lighter. Scores range from 0 to 48 and are based on the number of letters read correctly. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening in contrast sensitivity and a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Population: Intent-to-Treat: All randomized patients who participated in Stage 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeBaseline23.7 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 5.6
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-0.9 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 4.33
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeBaseline22.1 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 5.76
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months1.1 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 7.22
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeBaseline21.7 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 7.56
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months0.6 Number of Letters Read CorrectlyStandard Deviation 7.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study Eye

Change from baseline in reading speed in the study eye is assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Patients read the chart for 2 minutes and the numbers of words read correctly per minute are totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicates an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Population: Intent-to-Treat: All randomized patients who participated in Stage 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeBaseline10.21 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 8.532
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-1.15 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 5.527
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeBaseline9.62 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 9.224
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months-0.28 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 7.035
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeBaseline8.72 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 6.832
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at 24 Months0.45 Words per Minute (wpm)Standard Deviation 4.705
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye

Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm\^2).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 18, Month 24

Population: Intent-to-Treat: All randomized patients who participated in Stage 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline6.219 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 3.9524
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 30.182 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.3353
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 60.482 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.6325
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 90.641 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.6847
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 181.306 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.0164
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 241.744 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.401
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 241.991 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.4469
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline6.897 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 4.6397
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 90.798 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.6424
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 181.413 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.0291
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 30.117 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.6612
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 60.570 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.5749
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 30.399 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.3713
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 60.609 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.5474
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 242.178 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.7042
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 90.857 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 0.7267
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeBaseline5.526 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 4.789
Sham (no Implant) Stage 2Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study EyeChange from Baseline at Month 181.697 Disc AreaStandard Deviation 1.4185

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026