Skip to content

A Study of Safety and Efficacy of Pimavanserin (ACP-103) in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00658567
Enrollment
123
Registered
2008-04-15
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two dose levels of pimavanserin (ACP-103) compared to placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis.

Interventions

10 mg, tablet, once daily by mouth, for six weeks

Sponsors

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with a minimum duration of 1 year * Presence of visual and/or auditory hallucinations, and/or delusions, occurring during the four weeks prior to study screening * Psychotic symptoms must have developed after Parkinson's disease diagnosis was established * Subject must be on stable dose of anti-Parkinson's medication for 1 month prior to Study Day 1 (Baseline) and during the trial * Subject that has received stereotaxic surgery for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation must be at least 6 months post surgery and the stimulator settings must have been stable for at least 1 month prior to Study Day 1 (Baseline) and must remain stable during the trial * The subject is willing and able to provide consent * Caregiver is willing and able to accompany the subject to all visits

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a history of significant psychotic disorders prior to or concomitantly with the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease including, but not limited to, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder * Subject has received previous ablative stereotaxic surgery (i.e., pallidotomy and thalamotomy) to treat Parkinson's disease * Subject has current evidence of a serious and or unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hematologic or other medical disorder * Subject has had a myocardial infarction in last six months * Subject has any surgery planned during the screening, treatment or follow-up periods Patients will be evaluated at screening to ensure that all criteria for study participation are met. These evaluations will include specific measures of psychosis severity, delirium, dementia, cardiovascular condition, and pregnancy status. Patients may be excluded from the study based on these assessments (and specifically if it is determined that their baseline health and psychiatric condition do not meet all protocol-specified entry criteria).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antipsychotic EfficacyEach study visit (i.e. Days 1, 8, 15, 29 and 42)Antipsychotic efficacy was defined as a decrease in the severity and/or frequency of hallucinations and/or delusions. This is measured as the change from baseline (Day 1) to Day 42 in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms - Hallucinations and Delusions scales (SAPS-H+D) score for the ITT Analysis Set. The possible total score is 1 to 100 and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Analysis Method: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and missing data was imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Each study visit (i.e. Days 1, 8, 15, 29 and 42)Motor symptoms were measured using the change from baseline (Day 1) to Day 42 in the combined score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II (Activities of Daily Living) and Part III (Motor Examination). The total possible score is 0 to 160 and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Analysis Method: ANCOVA, and missing data was imputed using LOCF method. The UPDRS Parts II+III score was analyzed by constructing 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on the difference between each pimavanserin dose group and placebo mean change from baseline. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the CI was less than or equal to 5.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo tablet, once daily by mouth, 6 weeks
39
10 mg
Pimavanserin tartrate (ACP-103) 10 mg, tablet, once daily by mouth, 6 weeks
41
20 mg
Pimavanserin tartrate (ACP-103) 20 mg, tablet, once daily by mouth, 6 weeks
41
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event523
Overall StudyAt Discretion of Sponsor111
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyVoluntary Withdrawal of Consent202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo10 mg20 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
32 Participants34 Participants34 Participants100 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Age, Continuous73.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
71.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.44
72.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15
72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82
Region of Enrollment
Europe
21 participants24 participants23 participants68 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants17 participants18 participants53 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants15 Participants17 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants26 Participants24 Participants77 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 394 / 418 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 393 / 411 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Antipsychotic Efficacy

Antipsychotic efficacy was defined as a decrease in the severity and/or frequency of hallucinations and/or delusions. This is measured as the change from baseline (Day 1) to Day 42 in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms - Hallucinations and Delusions scales (SAPS-H+D) score for the ITT Analysis Set. The possible total score is 1 to 100 and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Analysis Method: Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and missing data was imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: Each study visit (i.e. Days 1, 8, 15, 29 and 42)

Population: This is the Intent to Treat population, defined as patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had both the baseline SAPS assessment and at least one post-baseline SAPS assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboAntipsychotic EfficacyChange from Baseline-4.4 Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
PlaceboAntipsychotic EfficacyDifference of Least Squares Mean versus PlaceboNA Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
Pimavanserin 10 mgAntipsychotic EfficacyChange from BaselineNA Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
Pimavanserin 10 mgAntipsychotic EfficacyDifference of Least Squares Mean versus PlaceboNA Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
Pimavanserin 20 mgAntipsychotic EfficacyChange from Baseline-6.5 Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
Pimavanserin 20 mgAntipsychotic EfficacyDifference of Least Squares Mean versus Placebo-2.1 Scores on the SAPS H+D scale
Secondary

Motor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)

Motor symptoms were measured using the change from baseline (Day 1) to Day 42 in the combined score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II (Activities of Daily Living) and Part III (Motor Examination). The total possible score is 0 to 160 and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Analysis Method: ANCOVA, and missing data was imputed using LOCF method. The UPDRS Parts II+III score was analyzed by constructing 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on the difference between each pimavanserin dose group and placebo mean change from baseline. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the CI was less than or equal to 5.

Time frame: Each study visit (i.e. Days 1, 8, 15, 29 and 42)

Population: This is the Intent to Treat population, defined as patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had both the baseline SAPS assessment and at least one post-baseline SAPS assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Change from Baseline-1.8 Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.
PlaceboMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Difference of Least Squares Mean versus PlaceboNA Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.
Pimavanserin 10 mgMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Change from BaselineNA Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.
Pimavanserin 10 mgMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Difference of Least Squares Mean versus PlaceboNA Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.
Pimavanserin 20 mgMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Change from Baseline-3.9 Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.
Pimavanserin 20 mgMotor Symptoms Change From Baseline (Negative = Improvement)Difference of Least Squares Mean versus Placebo-2.1 Score on UPDRS-II+III scale.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026