Skip to content

A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Valdecoxib 40 mg Versus Rofecoxib 50 mg in Treating the Symptoms of Ankle Sprain

A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter Randomized Study Of The Efficacy And The Tolerability Of Valdecoxib 40mg Vs Rofecoxib 50mg In The Symptomatic Treatment Of Patients With Ankle Sprain

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00657449
Enrollment
45
Registered
2008-04-14
Start date
2003-06-04
Completion date
2004-10-05
Last updated
2018-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Keywords

sprains and strains

Brief summary

The study compares valdecoxib 40 mg once daily vs. rofecoxib 50 mg one daily in treating the signs and symptoms of acute first- or second-degree ankle sprain. The study also evaluated the disability status, tolerability and safety of these treatments.

Detailed description

A3471007 terminated early (30Sep2004) due to safety concerns about continued usage of rofecoxib after worldwide withdrawal of rofecoxib by Merck & Co Inc

Interventions

valdecoxib 80 mg (two 40 mg tablets) by mouth on Day 1 and valdecoxib 40 mg tablet once daily on Days 2-8

rofecoxib 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) by mouth once daily for 8 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients had sustained, no more than 48 hours prior to the first dose of study medication, a first- or second-degree ankle sprain of the lateral ligament, specifically: anterior talofibular ligament and/or posterior talofibular ligament and/or calcaneofibular ligament * At presentation, all patients were to have Patient's Assessment of Ankle Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-100mm) of ≥45 mm in the orthostatic position on full weight bearing (ie, moderate to severe pain), had a minimum rating of 2 on the Patient's Global Assessment of Ankle Injury and Patient's Assessment of Normal Function/Activity * Tthe investigator opinion was that each patient required, and was eligible for, therapy with an anti-inflammatory agent and/or analgesics to control symptoms

Exclusion criteria

None reported

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
change from baseline in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensityDay 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
patient's assessment of ankle pain VAS (0-100 mm)Days 1, 4 and 8
patient's and physician's global assessment of ankle injuryDays 1, 4 and 8
patient's and physician's satisfaction assessmentsDay 8
patient's assessment of normal function/activityDays 1, 4 and 8
adverse events, physical examinations, and baseline clinical laboratory valuesAdverse Events: Days 1, 4 and 8; Physical examinations: days 1 and 8; Lab tests: day 1

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026