Skip to content

Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (ALTENS) or Pilocarpine in Treating Early Dry Mouth in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase II/III Study Comparing Acupuncture-like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (ALTENS) Versus Pilocarpine in Treating Early Radiation-Induced Xerostomia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00656513
Enrollment
196
Registered
2008-04-11
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Xerostomia

Keywords

hypopharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, lip and oral cavity cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, salivary gland cancer, metastatic squamous neck cancer with occult primary, xerostomia, tongue cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) and pilocarpine may help to relieve chronic xerostomia (dry mouth). It is not yet known which remedy is more effective in treating chronic dry mouth caused by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying ALTENS to see how well it works compared with pilocarpine in treating chronic dry mouth caused by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the feasibility of successfully delivering acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) using the Codetron™ unit in a cooperative group setting in head and neck cancer patients with early radiotherapy-induced xerostomia. (phase II) * Compare the efficacy of ALTENS treatment vs pilocarpine hydrochloride in these patients in reducing overall xerostomia burden, as measured by the University of Michigan 15-item Xerostomia-Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS) at 9 months after randomization. (phase III) Secondary * Evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall xerostomia burden at 6 months after study entry in these patients. (phase II) * Compare the efficacy of these treatments in these patients in reducing overall xerostomia burden at 4, 6, and 15 months after randomization. (phase III) * Compare the efficacy of these treatments in these patients in reducing symptom burden, as measured by the four domains of the XeQOLS (i.e., physical functioning, social functioning, personal/psychological functioning, and pain/discomfort) at 4, 6, 9, and 15 months after randomization. (phase III) * Compare the efficacy of these treatments in these patients in increasing stimulated (i.e., citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP), as measured by sialometry, at 4, 6, 9, and 15 months after randomization. (phase III) * Compare the efficacy of these treatments in these patients in increasing unstimulated (i.e., basal primed) WSP, as measured by sialometry at 4, 6, 9, and 15 months after randomization. (phase III) * Compare adverse events associated with these treatments in these patients. (phase III) OUTLINE: This is a phase II followed by a phase III multicenter study. * Phase II:Patients undergo placement of surface electrodes at the following acupuncture points: large intestine, spleen, stomach, and conception vessel. Patients then undergo acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) to each of these points using the Codetron™ unit for 20 minutes twice weekly for 12 weeks. No further treatment is given after 12 weeks. * Phase III:Patients are stratified according to prior use of pilocarpine (no vs yes) and length of time from completion of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (3-6 months vs 6-12 months vs \> 12 months). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive oral pilocarpine three times daily for up to 12 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II: Patients undergo ALTENS treatment using the Codetron™ unit twice weekly for up to 12 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo quality of life (QOL) assessment at baseline and at 6 months after registration in phase II. In phase III patients complete assessments for basal and stimulated whole salivary production, xerostomia burden, and QOL at baseline and at 4, 6, 9, and 15 months after study entry. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 3 months. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 45 patients will be accrued to the phase II portion and 144 patients to the phase III portion of this study.

Interventions

DRUGPilocarpine

5mg by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks

PROCEDUREALTENS

Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
NRG Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One arm Phase II followed by a two-arm Phase III

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of head and neck cancer * No clinical evidence of disease recurrence by ear, nose, and throat exam with a nasopharyngeal scope, if indicated, 8 weeks prior to registration * Completed radiotherapy (i.e., standard or intensity-modulated radiotherapy) with or without chemotherapy ≥ 3 months and up to 2 years prior to study entry * Grade 1-2 radiotherapy-induced xerostomia according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v.3.0 and the dry mouth/salivary gland xerostomia scale * Must have evidence of residual salivary function with unstimulated (basal) whole salivary production ≥ 0.1 ml/min after having refrained from eating or drinking oral fluid for 2 hours * No patients with normal saliva production (i.e., no salivary gland changes or no xerostomia) * No history of serious adverse events after prior treatment with and discontinuation of pilocarpine * No chronic lymphocytic leukemia PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * See Disease Characteristics * Zubrod performance status of 0-2 * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No other invasive malignancy except non-melanomatous skin cancer or cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for at least 3 years (e.g., carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix) * No concurrent contraindications to pilocarpine (e.g., uncontrolled asthma, miosis, or hypersensitivity) * No severe, active co-morbidity, including any of the following: * Unstable cardiac disease or requirement for a pacemaker in-situ * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the past 6 months * Transmural myocardial infarction within the past 6 months * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy within 30 days prior to registration * Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects * No Sjögren syndrome PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * At least 2 weeks since prior pilocarpine or cevimeline and no concurrent use for ophthalmic or non-ophthalmic indications * No concurrent regular medications that induce xerostomia (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines with anticholinergic effects, or narcotics) * No concurrent oral stimulating agents or salivary gland medical stimulants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients)Randomization to 12 weeksPatients completing at least 19 out of 24 ALTENS therapy sessions were categorized as compliant. Fleming's two-stage was used, assuming a successful target compliance rate of 80%, statistical power of 0.87, and a type I error rate of 0.13. If fewer than 9 of the first 13 patients were compliant, then treatment delivery will be deemed not feasible. If there were between 9-12 compliant patients, the second stage analysis would be required to determine feasibility of treatment delivery. If all 13 patients are compliant, treatment delivery will immediately be deemed feasible. The second stage analysis required at least 31 compliant out of 39 overall patients for the treatment delivery to be deemed feasible.
Phase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 MonthsBaseline (randomization) and 9 monthsXerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomizationSymptom burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning. The domain score is the average of all responses on a given domain and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased symptom burden. Change in symptom burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the symptom burden.
Change From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomizationStimulated (citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. Stimulation is elicited by asking patients to rinse 5 ml of 2% citric acid solution in the mouth for 15 seconds and then completely expectorating the citric acid. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected.
Phase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment ResponsePre-treatment and 6 months from registrationThis secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall radiation-induced xerostomia burden by looking at treatment response. Treatment response was determined by a reduction of at least 20% from baseline to 6 months in the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased xerostomia burden. This scale has high reproducibility and sensitivity. For the first and second stage analyses, 4 and 10 patients, respectively, must respond to treatment in order to proceed to the phase III component.
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase IIIBaseline and 9 months from randomization.The UWHNSS includes ten categories-pain, disfigurement, activity, recreation/entertainment, employment, eating, saliva, taste, speech, mucus/phlegm. Patient scores on the UWHNSS range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating declining quality of life. Change in total score was calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up , thus a positive change score indicates a worsening while a negative change score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)Pre-treatment to 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomizationBasal whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected.
Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)Baseline, 4, 6, and 15 months from randomizationXerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ALTENS: Phase II
Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit
47
Pilocarpine: Phase III
5mg pilocarpine by mouth 3 times a day for 12 weeks
73
ALTENS: Phase III
Acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) twice weekly for 12 weeks via a Codetron unit
73
Total193

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath001
Overall StudyIncomplete treatment300
Overall StudyMissing baseline form055
Overall StudyMissing data0119
Overall StudyProtocol Violation102
Overall StudyTreatment completed outside of timeframe031
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0114

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicALTENS: Phase IIPilocarpine: Phase IIIALTENS: Phase IIITotal
Age, Continuous60 years59 years58 years58 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants10 Participants11 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants63 Participants62 Participants165 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 4751 / 7327 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 470 / 731 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Phase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months

Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden.

Time frame: Baseline (randomization) and 9 months

Population: Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and 9 month XeQOLS scores

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIPhase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months-0.27 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIPhase III: Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 9 Months-0.53 units on a scale
Comparison: An effect size of 0.50 was chosen for sample size calculation. On the basis of a 2-sided t test with alpha= 0.05 and 1 interim analysis, 130 patients were required for 80% statistical power. Adjustment by 10% for loss to follow-up and retrospective ineligibility of recruited study participants yielded a sample size of 144 patients. Actual power given only 96 patients was 68.6%p-value: 0.45Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Phase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients)

Patients completing at least 19 out of 24 ALTENS therapy sessions were categorized as compliant. Fleming's two-stage was used, assuming a successful target compliance rate of 80%, statistical power of 0.87, and a type I error rate of 0.13. If fewer than 9 of the first 13 patients were compliant, then treatment delivery will be deemed not feasible. If there were between 9-12 compliant patients, the second stage analysis would be required to determine feasibility of treatment delivery. If all 13 patients are compliant, treatment delivery will immediately be deemed feasible. The second stage analysis required at least 31 compliant out of 39 overall patients for the treatment delivery to be deemed feasible.

Time frame: Randomization to 12 weeks

Population: Eligible patients starting protocol treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALTENS: Phase IIPhase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients)First Stage12 Participants
ALTENS: Phase IIPhase II: Treatment Compliance (Number of Compliant Patients)Second Stage (Overall)44 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)

Xerostomia burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased xerostomia burden. Change in xerostomia burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the xerostomia burden.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 6, and 15 months from randomization

Population: Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6,15 months) XeQOLS scores.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months-0.47 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months-0.27 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months-0.47 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months-0.4 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Overall Xerostomia Burden at 4, 6, and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months-0.6 units on a scale
p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.31Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.21Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Stimulated (citric acid primed) whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. Stimulation is elicited by asking patients to rinse 5 ml of 2% citric acid solution in the mouth for 15 seconds and then completely expectorating the citric acid. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

Population: Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) WSP measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months0.03 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months0.2 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9 months0.99 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months0.3 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months0.20 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months0.2 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9 months0.60 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Stimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months0.40 ml/min
p-value: 0.97Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.83Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.28Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.89Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Symptom burden is measured by the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning. The domain score is the average of all responses on a given domain and can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased symptom burden. Change in symptom burden is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 9-month score such that a negative change indicates an improvement of the symptom burden.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

Population: Eligible patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) XeQOLS scores.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Social Functioning0 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Social Functioning-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Pain/Discomfort-0.25 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Social Functioning0 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Pain/Discomfort-0.25 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.25 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Pain/Discomfort-0.25 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Social Functioning-0.66 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Pain/Discomfort-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.25 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Social Functioning-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Pain/Discomfort-0.375 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Pain/Discomfort-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6-month Social Functioning-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Pain/Discomfort-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Social Functioning-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Physical Functioning-0.75 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Pain/Discomfort-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.75 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Social Functioning-0.33 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9-month Personal/Psychological Functioning-0.75 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Symptom Burden at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4-month Physical Functioning-0.5 units on a scale
p-value: 0.35Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.78Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.12Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.28Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.98Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.28Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.13Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.58Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.88Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.09Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.49Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.45Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.45Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.3Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.48Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.68Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)

Basal whole salivary production (WSP) was measured by expectoration weight, with one gram of saliva produced considered as one ml of saliva. WSP is expressed in ml/min calculated by dividing the measured weight or volume of WSP by five. Procedure: Patients refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking at least two hours prior to each measurement. For each measurement, patients are asked to expectorate continuously into a pre-weighed dry plastic container over a 5-minute period without swallowing. The collected saliva with the plastic container will be weighed (total weight) immediately after each collection. The total weight minus the weight of the container is the weight or volume of whole saliva collected.

Time frame: Pre-treatment to 4, 6, 9 and 15 months from randomization

Population: Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and respective follow-up (4,6, 9,15 months) WSP measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months0 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months0 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9 months0.056 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months0.13 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)15 months0.192 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)4 months0 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)9 months0.04 ml/min
ALTENS: Phase IIIChange From Baseline in Unstimulated Whole Salivary Production (WSP) at 4, 6, 9 and 15 Months (Phase III)6 months0.02 ml/min
p-value: 0.54Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.99Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.56Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.58Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Phase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment Response

This secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ALTENS treatment on overall radiation-induced xerostomia burden by looking at treatment response. Treatment response was determined by a reduction of at least 20% from baseline to 6 months in the University of Michigan Xerostomia Related Quality of Life Scale (XeQOLS). The XeQOLS is a validated patient-reported 15-item assessment scale with 4 domains: physical functioning,pain/discomfort, personal/psychologic functioning, and social functioning.The score is the average of all responses of all domains and can range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate increased xerostomia burden. This scale has high reproducibility and sensitivity. For the first and second stage analyses, 4 and 10 patients, respectively, must respond to treatment in order to proceed to the phase III component.

Time frame: Pre-treatment and 6 months from registration

Population: Eligible patients who started treatment and have both baseline and 6-month XeQOLS scores

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ALTENS: Phase IIPhase II: Pecentage of Patients With Beneficial Treatment Response85.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III

The UWHNSS includes ten categories-pain, disfigurement, activity, recreation/entertainment, employment, eating, saliva, taste, speech, mucus/phlegm. Patient scores on the UWHNSS range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating declining quality of life. Change in total score was calculated by subtracting baseline from follow-up , thus a positive change score indicates a worsening while a negative change score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and 9 months from randomization.

Population: Eligible randomized patients with both baseline and 9-month UWHNSS total scores.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ALTENS: Phase IIQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III-3.64 units on a scale
ALTENS: Phase IIIQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the University of Washington Head and Neck Questionnaire (UWHNSS) Phase III-7.27 units on a scale
p-value: 0.14t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026