Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Isolagen TherapyTM in Treatment of Interdental Papillary Insufficiency

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00655889
Enrollment
13
Registered
2008-04-10
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interdental Papillary Insufficiency

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and the treatment effect of Isolagen TherapyTM in subjects with maxillary lesions who were treated in a previous study (IT-G-002, no NCT identification number)

Interventions

1. Collection of biopsy from palate 2. Papillary priming procedure 3. Seven injection treatments to target sites 4. Performance of study assessments (investigator and subject)

Sponsors

Castle Creek Biosciences, LLC.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must be 18-70 years of age * Subject was treated in IT-G-002 (no NCT identification number) * Subject has maxillary interproximal recession defects * Natural teeth must be present on both sides of each area to be treated * Negative pregnancy test and use of acceptable birth control (females of childbearing age)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who participated in other clinical trials within 30 days prior to enrollment * Interproximal spaces including root grooves or furcations must not be involved * Subjects with poor oral hygiene * Subjects with a systemic condition, which would preclude periodontal treatment * Subjects with acute infectious lesions in the treatment areas * Subjects with open interproximal contact at study sites * Subjects who must receive prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures * Subjects on chronic antibiotic or steroidal therapy * Subjects with interproximal probing depths \> 3 mm around study lesions * Subjects who smoke * Subjects taking medications associated with the development of drug induced gingival hyperplasia * Subjects with radiographic evidence of pathology * Subjects with tooth mobility exceeding a score of 1 * Subjects with parafunctional habits and not wearing bite guard * Subjects with interproximal spaces associated with teeth without an adequate zone of keratinized tissue * Subjects where the etiology of the interproximal papillary recession has not been controlled * Subjects who have received a crown or pontic on one or both teeth involved in the interproximal space to be treated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Responders Based on the Average Investigator Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatmentA patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average Investigator's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.
Number of Responders Based on the Average Patient Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatmentA patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average patient's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited between July 17, 2006 to September 11, 2006.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Autologous Fibroblasts
Patients received autologous fibroblasts to maxillary interdental papillary recessions that were treated with fibroblasts or placebo in a previous study.
13
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyInadequate cell growth1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAutologous Fibroblasts
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Responders Based on the Average Investigator Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)

A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average Investigator's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment

Population: Subjects who received at least one treatment during the study were included in the Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Autologous FibroblastsNumber of Responders Based on the Average Investigator Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)10 participants
Primary

Number of Responders Based on the Average Patient Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)

A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average patient's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment

Population: Subjects who received at least one treatment during the study were included in the Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Autologous FibroblastsNumber of Responders Based on the Average Patient Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)9 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026