Skip to content

Ethnic Differences in Response to Topical Capsaicin: A Psychophysical Study on Healthy Subjects

Ethnic Differences in Response to Topical Capsaicin: A Psychophysical Study on Healthy Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00655811
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-04-10
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Healthy volunteers

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to study how people respond differently to capsaicin in different racial groups and the effect it has on your pain levels. Capsaicin is a natural product made from hot chili peppers that is useful for treating the itch symptoms of skin disease.

Detailed description

To comprehensively evaluate the ethnic differences in response to topical capsaicin and its effect on thermal sensory thresholds.

Interventions

DRUGCapsaicin

Topical application, 0.1%, Capzasin HP; Chattem Inc., Chattanooga, TN, U.S.A

DRUGPlacebo moisturizing cream

Placebo moisturizing cream with no active ingredient (Cetaphil; Galderma Laboratories LP, Fort Worth, TX, U.S.A.)

Sponsors

Wake Forest University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult men and women who are between 18 and 50 years of age. * Subjects must be in general good health with no skin disease, disease state or physical condition which would impair evaluation of pain perception or which would increase their health risk by study participation as determined by the investigators. * Women of childbearing potential will be required to have a negative pregnancy test in order to enroll in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Adults over age 50. * Children less than 18 years of age. * Unable to complete the required measures. * Diagnosis of diseases that would affect the measurement of pain perception. * Currently enrolled in any investigational study in which the subject is receiving any type of drug, biologic, or non-drug therapy and subjects undergoing treatment with another investigational drug or approved therapy for investigational use within 30 days prior to study participation. * Use of oral analgesic or other medications known to interfere with pain perception in the week prior to the study. * Use of emollient on the forearms on the day of the study visit. * Use of medicated topical preparations on the forearms for the week prior to the study. * Known history of neuropathy causing diseases such as uremia. * Known history of uncontrolled thyroid disease. * Known history of diabetes mellitus. * Allergy to capsaicin. * Pregnant women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ethnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical Capsaicin1 dayThe primary endpoint is to test the burning pain effect of topical capsaicin by using an continuous visual analog scale (CoVAS) intensity scale as an outcome measure. Participants will rate burning pain intensity after topical capsaicin application. The burning or pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any nonpainful sensation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ethnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal Thresholds1 dayA secondary endpoint is to see if topical capsaicin has an effect on warm and heat pain thresholds. Quantitative thermosensory testing was carried out using the Medoc TSA 2001 (Medoc Ltd). The probe baseline temperature was 32 °C and the contact area was 12 cm2. The probe warmed the skin surface at a linear rate of 0·4 °C per second, up to a cut-off of 50 °C. Thermal thresholds were measured in the following order: warmth sensation threshold was measured followed by heat pain detection threshold; each of them was determined four times by the ascending method of limits.
The Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.1 dayThis secondary outcome is to see if subjects rated burning/pain differently between the topical capsaicin or placebo application. Participants will rate burning/pain intensity after topical capsaicin and placebo application. The burning/pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable burning/pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any non-burning/-painful sensation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Capsaicin and Placebo
0.1% Topical Capsaicin cream was appled to one forearm and a placebo moisturizing cream with no active ingredient (Cetaphil; Galderma Laboratories LP, Fort Worth, TX, U.S.A.) was applied to the other forearm. A volume of 0·3 mL cream was applied in a thin layer of virtually equal thickness, on a 4 × 4 cm area, around midline. The creams were applied at a 40-min interval in a random order to minimize an order effect. The creams were randomized for right and left arm application.
40
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCapsaicin and Placebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African Americans
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasians
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asians
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Ethnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical Capsaicin

The primary endpoint is to test the burning pain effect of topical capsaicin by using an continuous visual analog scale (CoVAS) intensity scale as an outcome measure. Participants will rate burning pain intensity after topical capsaicin application. The burning or pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any nonpainful sensation.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
African AmericansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinCapsaicin0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
African AmericansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinPlacebo0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
CaucasiansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinPlacebo0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
CaucasiansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinCapsaicin4.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.61
East AsiansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinCapsaicin17.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.8
East AsiansEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinPlacebo0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
HispanicsEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinCapsaicin13.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.67
HispanicsEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical CapsaicinPlacebo0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Comparison: One-way anova was used to compare the mean COVAS values between groups.p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: 0.55t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.005t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.027t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Ethnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal Thresholds

A secondary endpoint is to see if topical capsaicin has an effect on warm and heat pain thresholds. Quantitative thermosensory testing was carried out using the Medoc TSA 2001 (Medoc Ltd). The probe baseline temperature was 32 °C and the contact area was 12 cm2. The probe warmed the skin surface at a linear rate of 0·4 °C per second, up to a cut-off of 50 °C. Thermal thresholds were measured in the following order: warmth sensation threshold was measured followed by heat pain detection threshold; each of them was determined four times by the ascending method of limits.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
African AmericansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsHeat pain detection threshold change-2.11 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 1.12
African AmericansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsWarmth sensation threshold change2.36 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.93
CaucasiansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsWarmth sensation threshold change-0.68 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.68
CaucasiansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsHeat pain detection threshold change-6.10 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 1.36
East AsiansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsHeat pain detection threshold change-5.01 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 1.09
East AsiansEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsWarmth sensation threshold change0.56 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.059
HispanicsEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsHeat pain detection threshold change-7.24 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.57
HispanicsEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal ThresholdsWarmth sensation threshold change-3.15 Change in degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.93
p-value: 0.012t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

The Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.

This secondary outcome is to see if subjects rated burning/pain differently between the topical capsaicin or placebo application. Participants will rate burning/pain intensity after topical capsaicin and placebo application. The burning/pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable burning/pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any non-burning/-painful sensation.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
African AmericansThe Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.8.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
CaucasiansThe Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026