Skip to content

Begin With The Right Patients With Dual-Inhibition Action Therapy Through Vytorin for Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients (0653A-172)(COMPLETED)

Begin With The Right Patients With Dual-Inhibition Action Therapy Through Vytorin for Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00654628
Acronym
BRAVO
Enrollment
173
Registered
2008-04-08
Start date
2007-08-01
Completion date
2009-07-01
Last updated
2024-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of ezetimibe/simvastatin in patients newly diagnosed with dyslipidemia.

Interventions

Vytorin 10/20 (ezetimibe 10 mg /simvastatin20 mg) tablet once daily consecutively for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male Or Female Patient, 20 Through 79 Years Of Age * Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1) Intermediate Risk (\>2 Risk Factors) With Total Cholesterol level above 200 mg/dL Or Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) level\> 130 mg/dLwho failed a 3-Month diet control period, or 2) High Risk Patients with history of Coronary artery disease Or diabetes and having a total Cholesterol\> 200 mg/dL Or LDL-C level\> 130 mg/dL * Willing To Follow An National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes (TLC) Or Similar Cholesterol-Lowering Diet For The Duration Of The Study * Female Patients Receiving Hormone Therapy (Including Hormone Replacement Therapy, And Estrogen Antagonist/Agonist, Or Oral Contraceptives) If Maintained On A Stable Dose And Regimen For At Least 8 Weeks Prior To Visit 1 And If Willing To Continue The Same Regimen Throughout The Study

Exclusion criteria

* Women Who Are Pregnant Or Lactating * Has A History Of Cancer Within The Past 5 Years (Except For Dermatological Basal Cell Or Squamous Cell Carcinoma) * Patients Hypersensitive To Simvastatin Or Ezetimibe * Any Condition Or Situation Which, In The Opinion Of The Investigator, Might Pose A Risk To The Patient Or Confound The Results Of The Study * History Of Mental Instability, Drug/Alcohol Abuse Within The Past 5 Years, Or Major Psychiatric Illness Not Adequately Controlled By Pharmacotherapy * Nephritic Syndrome Or Other Clinically Significant Renal Disease Resulting In Impaired Renal Function, Defined As Serum Creatinine ≧ 1.5 Mg/Dl * Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), And Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) above 1.5 X Upper Limit Of Normal (Uln) Or With Active Liver Disease * Congestive Heart Failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) III Or IV), Uncontrolled Cardiac Arrythmias, Uncontrolled Hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \>160 mm Hg Or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) \>100 mm Hg), Unstable Angina Pectoris Or Severe Peripheral Artery Disease, Or Experienced Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, Angioplasty Within 3 Months * Unstable Diabetes Mellitus Patient (Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \> 8.5%) Or Newly Diagnosed (Within 3 Months) Or A Change In Anti-Diabetic Pharmacotherapy Within 3 Months Of Screening * Secondary Dyslipidemia (E.G., Hypothyroidism) * Disorders Of The Hematologic, Digestive, Or Central Nervous Systems Including Cerebrovascular Disease And Degenerative Disease That Would Limit Study Evaluation Or Participation * History Of Active Or Chronic Hepatobiliary Disease Or Cholelithiasis But Have Not Undergone Cholecystectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 6-week Treatment.Baseline and week 6Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 6-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (\>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level \>130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol \>200 mg/dl or LDL-C level \>130 mg/dl.
The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 12-week Treatment.Baseline and week 12Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 12-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (\>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level \>130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol \>200 mg/dl or LDL-C level \>130 mg/dl.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 12Baseline and week 12
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 6Baseline and week 6
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12Baseline and week 12
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12Baseline and week 12
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6Baseline and week 6
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 6Baseline and week 6
Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 6Baseline and week 6
Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 12Baseline and week 12

Other

MeasureTime frame
Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12Baseline and week 12
Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6Baseline and week 6

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited between August 2007 and July 2009. In one site, 60 patients among the total 152 study population entered into the 6-week extension period after completing the base period for longer follow-up as per IRB requirement in that site.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg tablet, once daily for the 6-week period
173
Total173

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
6-week Active Treatment PeriodAdverse Event9
6-week Active Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up10
6-week Active Treatment PeriodOut of window period1
6-week Active Treatment PeriodTransferred to branch hospital1
6 -Week Extension Period (Single Site)Adverse Event4
6 -Week Extension Period (Single Site)Lost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEzetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mg
Age, Continuous57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Baseline value of High Density Lipoprotein-C47.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Baseline value of Low Density Lipoprotein-C156.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.8
Baseline value of Total Cholesterol243.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.9
Baseline value of Triglycerides145 mg/dL
Body Mass Index25.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants
Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure78.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure133.3 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 173
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 173

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 12-week Treatment.

Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 12-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (\>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level \>130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol \>200 mg/dl or LDL-C level \>130 mg/dl.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat (ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgThe Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 12-week Treatment.87.8 Percentage of participants
Primary

The Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 6-week Treatment.

Goal attainment percentage of LDL-C after 6-week treatment. LDL-C goal attainment was based on National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines (2004). Newly Diagnosed Dyslipidemia Patients Including: 1)Intermediate Risk (\>2 Risk Factors) with Total Cholesterol above 200 mg/dL or Low Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) level \>130 who failed a 3-month diet control period, or 2) high risk patients with a history of coronary artery disease or diabetes having a total cholesterol \>200 mg/dl or LDL-C level \>130 mg/dl.

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat (ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgThe Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Density Lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) Treatment Goal After 6-week Treatment.90.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 129.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 20.5
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of High Density Lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) at Week 64.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.8
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-53.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.7
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6-51.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 12-39.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change From Baseline of Total-Cholesterol (TC) at Week 6-38.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 11.3
Secondary

Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 12-24.7 Percent Change
Secondary

Mean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Percent Change of Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 6-22.2 Percent Change
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12-85.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.7
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Intention-To-Treat(ITT) approach which included all participants who have baseline measurement, have taken at least one dose of the study drug, and have at least one post-baseline measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin 10/20 mgMean Change From Baseline of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 6-82.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026