Skip to content

Pramipexole in Out-patients With Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Dose Titration Trial With 0.125-0.75 mg Pramipexole (Sifrol®) Orally q.n. to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy in Out-patients With Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome for 6 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00654498
Enrollment
306
Registered
2008-04-08
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2014-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Restless Legs Syndrome

Brief summary

To determine efficacy and safety of Pramipexole 0.125mg to 0.75mg daily for 6 weeks compared to placebo in the treatment of idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)

Interventions

DRUGPramipexole
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) / Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation given prior to any study procedures. 2. Ability and willingness to comply with study treatment regimen and to attend study assessments. 3. Male or female out-patients aged 18-80 years. 4. Diagnosis of idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) according to the clinical Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) criteria of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) All four criteria must be present to fulfil the diagnosis of RLS: * An urge to move the legs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs. (Sometimes the urge to move is present without the uncomfortable sensations and sometimes the arms or other body parts are involved in addition to the legs). * The urge to move or unpleasant sensations begin or worsen during periods of rest or inactivity such as lying or sitting. * The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues. * The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are worse in the evening or night than during the day or only occur in the evening or night. (When symptoms are very severe, the worsening at night may not be noticeable but must have been previously present). 5. Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)rating scale for severity total score \>15. 6. Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) symptoms present at least 2 to 3 days per week during the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

1. Women of child-bearing potential (i.e. premenopausal women, or postmenopausal women less than 2 years after last menses) who do not use during the clinical trial an adequate method of contraception such as: hormonal therapy (combined oral contraceptives, injectables, or subcutaneous implants), hormonal intrauterine devices, sexual abstinence, surgical sterilization of patient and/or partner, hysterectomy, bilateral ovariectomy or partners vasectomy 2. Any woman of child-bearing potential not having a negative pregnancy test at screening 3. Patients who are breastfeeding 4. Concomitant or previous pharmacologically therapy of RLS as follows: * Any intake of levodopa within 5 days prior to baseline visit (V2) * Any intake of dopamine agonists within 14 days prior to baseline visit (V2) 5. Current (less than 14 days before treatment with trial medication or concomitant) treatment with medication or dietary supplements, which could significantly influence RLS symptoms, e.g. dopaminergic (other than levodopa or dopamine agonists) or anti-dopaminergic drugs, non-selective Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, sympathomimetics, neuroleptics, anti-depressants, hypnotics, any benzodiazepines, antiepileptics, opioids, clonidine, magnesium, ferrous salts, Folic acid, vitamin B12, antihistaminics, lithium, metoclopramide or Withdrawal symptoms caused by stopping any of the drugs above 6. Confirmed diagnose of diabetic nephropathy or clinically significant renal disease 7. Creatinine higher than upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening 8. Clinical significant hepatic disease or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2 times the upper limit of normal range at screening 9. Clinical or laboratory signs of microcytic anaemia, or ferritin in serum below the lower bound of the reference range 10. Any of the following lab results at screening: * Basal Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), T3 or T4 clinically significantly (at the investigators discretion) out of normal range at screening (if not caused by substitution therapy according the investigators opinion) * Patients with any clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters at screening at the investigators discretion 11. Other clinically significant metabolic-endocrine, haematological, gastro-intestinal disease or pulmonary disease (such as severe COPD). Poorly controlled cardiovascular disease (including hypotension and severe coronary artery disease) 12. History or clinical signs of peripheral neuropathy (PNP) of any origin in physical, neuro-logical examination, myelopathy or multiple sclerosis or any other neurological disease, with potential to secondarily cause RLS symptoms 13. Presence of any other sleep disorder, such as, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder, narcolepsy or sleep apnoea syndrome 14. History of Schizophrenia or any psychotic disorder, history of mental disorders due to a general medical condition or any present axis I psychiatric disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM IV) requiring any medical therapy 15. History of alcohol abuse or drug addiction within the last 2 years before screening 16. Participation in a drug study within two months prior to the start of this study 17. History of or clinical signs for any form of epilepsy or seizures apart from fever related seizures in early childhood 18. History of or clinical signs of malign neoplasm 19. Patients on a shift-work-schedule, or who are otherwise unable to follow a regular sleep-wake cycle enabling use of study medication at times indicated 20. Any other conditions that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the evaluation of the results or constitute a health hazard for the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Total Score of Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale for Severity of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLS).Baseline and 6 weeks of treatmentThe IRLS was a 10-item self patient's rating scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst possible symptoms).
The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Global Impressions -Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Assessment of Much Improved and Very Much Improved6 weeks of treatmentCGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved)and 2 (much improved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Proportion of Patients With Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Categorised >10week 6 of treatmentThe ESS is a self-administered instrument to assess the patients likelihood of falling asleep in various activities of daily living; the maximum score is 24 indicating a very high level of daytime sleepiness and a high likelihood of falling asleep.
the Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Satisfaction of Sleep at Night of RLS-6 Rating ScalesBaseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions Satisfaction of sleep is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the satisfaction of sleep.
The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS at Time of Falling Sleep of RLS-6 Rating Scales.Baseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS at time of falling sleep is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS at time of falling sleep
The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales.Baseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the night is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the night.
The Proportion of IRLS Responders6 weeks of treatmentresponders is defined as the total score in IRLS changed ≥ 50%from baseline calculated in the full analysis set population.
The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Activities at Day of RLS-6 Rating ScaleBaseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the activities at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the activity at day.
The Mean Change From Baseline in the Intensity of Tiredness and Sleepiness at Day of RLS-6 Rating ScaleBaseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The intensity of tiredness and sleepiness at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the intensity of tiredness and sleepiness at day.
The Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS)Baseline and 6 weeks of treatmentVAS is for assessment of RLS-associated pain. The patient was asked How severe was your RLS associated pain in legs or arms during the past week?. No pain:0; very worst pain:10
The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Rest at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scales.Baseline and 6 weeks of treatmentRLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the test at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the rest at day.
The Proportion of Patient Global Impression(PGI) Responders6 weeks of treatmentPGI was a one-question scale with 7 degrees to assess patient's overall condition, ranging from very much better to very much worse. The responder are defined as patients with their assessment of much better or very much better.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pramipexole202
Placebo103
Total305

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event61
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up15
Overall StudyNot Treated10
Overall StudyOther reason not defined above45
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPramipexolePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56.46 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88
56.86 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.89
56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87
Sex: Female, Male
Female
122 Participants75 Participants197 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
80 Participants28 Participants108 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
81 / 20225 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2020 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

The Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Total Score of Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale for Severity of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLS).

The IRLS was a 10-item self patient's rating scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst possible symptoms).

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), All patients randomized, treated, having data for primary endpoint

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Total Score of Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale for Severity of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLS).-15.87 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboThe Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Total Score of Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale for Severity of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLS).-11.35 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.58, -2.46]ANCOVA
Primary

The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Global Impressions -Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Assessment of Much Improved and Very Much Improved

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved)and 2 (much improved.

Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PramipexoleThe Proportion of Patients With Clinical Global Impressions -Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Assessment of Much Improved and Very Much Improved0.819 Proportion of Patients
PlaceboThe Proportion of Patients With Clinical Global Impressions -Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Assessment of Much Improved and Very Much Improved0.543 Proportion of Patients
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

The Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS)

VAS is for assessment of RLS-associated pain. The patient was asked How severe was your RLS associated pain in legs or arms during the past week?. No pain:0; very worst pain:10

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS)2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboThe Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS)3.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

The Mean Change From Baseline in the Intensity of Tiredness and Sleepiness at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The intensity of tiredness and sleepiness at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the intensity of tiredness and sleepiness at day.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Intensity of Tiredness and Sleepiness at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale-2.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Intensity of Tiredness and Sleepiness at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale-2.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
p-value: 0.004895% CI: [-1.2, -0.22]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS at Time of Falling Sleep of RLS-6 Rating Scales.

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS at time of falling sleep is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS at time of falling sleep

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS at Time of Falling Sleep of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-4.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
PlaceboThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS at Time of Falling Sleep of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-3.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.99, -0.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Activities at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the activities at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the activity at day.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Activities at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale-0.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Activities at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scale-0.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
p-value: 0.077195% CI: [-0.69, 0.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales.

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the night is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the night.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-4.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
PlaceboThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-3.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2, -0.72]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Rest at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scales.

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions. The severity of RLS during the test at day is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the severity of RLS during the rest at day.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Rest at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboThe Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of RLS During the Rest at Day of RLS-6 Rating Scales.-2.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
p-value: 0.040295% CI: [-1.06, -0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

the Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Satisfaction of Sleep at Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales

RLS-6 rating scales comprises 6 questions Satisfaction of sleep is one of the 6 questions. The patient should give a rate between 0 (none/Not at all) to 10 (very severe) for the satisfaction of sleep.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexolethe Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Satisfaction of Sleep at Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales-4.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Placebothe Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Satisfaction of Sleep at Night of RLS-6 Rating Scales-3.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.14, -0.83]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Proportion of IRLS Responders

responders is defined as the total score in IRLS changed ≥ 50%from baseline calculated in the full analysis set population.

Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PramipexoleThe Proportion of IRLS Responders0.738 Proportion of Patients
PlaceboThe Proportion of IRLS Responders0.489 Proportion of Patients
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

The Proportion of Patient Global Impression(PGI) Responders

PGI was a one-question scale with 7 degrees to assess patient's overall condition, ranging from very much better to very much worse. The responder are defined as patients with their assessment of much better or very much better.

Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PramipexoleThe Proportion of Patient Global Impression(PGI) Responders0.686 Proportion of participants
PlaceboThe Proportion of Patient Global Impression(PGI) Responders0.435 Proportion of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

The Proportion of Patients With Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Categorised >10

The ESS is a self-administered instrument to assess the patients likelihood of falling asleep in various activities of daily living; the maximum score is 24 indicating a very high level of daytime sleepiness and a high likelihood of falling asleep.

Time frame: week 6 of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PramipexoleThe Proportion of Patients With Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Categorised >100.108 Proportion of Patients
PlaceboThe Proportion of Patients With Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Categorised >100.054 Proportion of Patients
p-value: 0.1386Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026