Skip to content

CAMEO: Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome Study

Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome Study: An Open Label Randomized Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate Versus Etanercept Alone in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMEO)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00654368
Enrollment
258
Registered
2008-04-08
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2014-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Amgen

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with or without methotrexate treatment over a 24 month period

Detailed description

This noninferiority study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients who did not have an adequate response to methotrexate (MTX) had etanercept (50 mg/week subcutaneously \[SC\]) added to existing MTX therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses of MTX) at baseline and were followed for 6 months. After 6 months of therapy, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment arms: either discontinue MTX (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone or continue both etanercept plus MTX for an additional 18 months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEtanercept

Commercially available etanercept administered subcutaneously at 50 mg/week.

DRUGMethotrexate

Commercially available methotrexate administed orally, subcutaneously or intramuscularly 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses)

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older at the baseline visit * An American College of Rheumatology(ACR) diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with onset of symptoms of at least 6 months * Active disease of at least 3 swollen joints from the Disease Activity Severity 28 at the baseline visit * A Disease Activity Severity 28 score of ≥ 3.2 at the baseline visit * Have not previously received etanercept therapy * Able to start etanercept therapy per the approved product monograph * Able to continue methotrexate therapy per the approved product monograph and have received a dose of at least 15 mg/wk (or 10 mg/wk in the case of documented intolerance to higher doses) for at least 12 weeks and this dose has been stable at least 4 weeks before the baseline visit * The patient or legally acceptable representative must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test and who do not have a documented course of anti-tuberculosis therapy. Patients with a positive PPD skin test (equal to or greater than 5 mm), a negative chest x-ray at screening which should be repeated if indicated during of the study, at low risk based on exposure and travel and have initiated a course of anti-tuberculosis therapy of which at least 8 weeks have been completed would be eligible for the study. The full course of anti-tuberculosis therapy must be completed * Patients who have previously received infliximab or adalimumab * Active infections within 2 weeks of the baseline visit or during the study period * Any history of human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection, untreated tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cytopenia, prior or current use of cyclophosphamide or malignancy (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix) in the past 5 years * Women who are pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential who are not using adequate contraception * Receipt of any investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the initiation of study medication or during the study period * Presence of any significant and uncontrolled medical condition, which in the investigator's opinion precludes the use of etanercept, as outlined in the product monograph * Participants not available for follow-up assessment or unable to comply with study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Drug PersistenceMonth 6, 12, 18 and 24Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion ScoreBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space NarrowingBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6, 12, 18 and 24The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Month 6, 12, 18 and 24The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Month 6, 12, 18 and 24The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination.
Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Month 6, 12, 18 and 24This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.
Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Month 6, 12, 18 and 24The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)25 monthsA serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Month 6, 12, 18 and 24The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient was enrolled 28 June 2008 and last patient was enrolled 07 November 2010.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 258 participants were enrolled, of whom 205 were randomized after 6 months and 53 were not randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-randomized
Enrolled participants received treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) but discontinued prior to completing this 6 months of treatment.
53
Etanercept Alone
After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to discontinue methotrexate (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone for an additional 18 months.
98
Etanercept + Methotrexate
After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to continue both etanercept plus methotrexate for an additional 18 months.
107
Total258

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event1496
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyDisease progression213113
Overall StudyIneligibility determined600
Overall StudyNon-compliance212
Overall StudyOther023
Overall StudyPhysician Decision002
Overall StudyPregnancy002
Overall StudyProtocol deviation321
Overall StudyRequirement for alternative therapy111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject522

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-randomizedTotalEtanercept + MethotrexateEtanercept Alone
Age, Continuous56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR)
<= 5.1
20 participants104 participants41 participants43 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR)
> 5.1
33 participants154 participants66 participants55 participants
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis
< 2 years
11 participants57 participants23 participants23 participants
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis
>= 2 years
42 participants201 participants84 participants75 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Aborigine
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 participants3 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 participants3 participants3 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
47 participants246 participants103 participants96 participants
Reimbursement type
Combination/Other
14 participants46 participants15 participants17 participants
Reimbursement type
Private
23 participants126 participants55 participants48 participants
Reimbursement type
Public
16 participants86 participants37 participants33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants197 Participants84 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants61 Participants23 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 5356 / 9873 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 5311 / 9817 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.

Time frame: Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12

Population: The per protocol population defined as all randomized participants with DAS28 measurements both at the 6- and 12-month visit.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)-0.39 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)0.02 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
95% CI: [-0.75, -0.06]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat; LOCF. The number of participants with available data at Month 6 was 95 and 105 in each treatment group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 61.97 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 121.43 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 181.35 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to End of Study1.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to End of Study1.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 61.97 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 182.01 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Change from Baseline to Month 121.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score

X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a Baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion ScoreChange from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion ScoreChange from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion ScoreChange from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion ScoreChange from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing

X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Joint Space NarrowingChange from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Joint Space NarrowingChange from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space NarrowingChange from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Joint Space NarrowingChange from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Etanercept AloneChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)

The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat analysis set; LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to Month 120.148 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.354
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to Month 180.179 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.452
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to End of Study0.198 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.448
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to Month 120.026 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to Month 18-0.004 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.485
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)Change from Month 6 to End of Study0.016 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.539
Secondary

Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to month 127.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to month 188.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to end of study8.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to end of study5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to month 122.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Change from month 6 to month 181.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Secondary

Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available SF-36 data at month 6; LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at Month 12-1.74 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.87
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at Month 18-3.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at End of Study-3.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.95
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at 12 Months-1.16 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.29
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at 18 Months-0.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at End of Study-1.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.47
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at 18 Months-0.92 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.34
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at Month 12-0.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at 12 Months-1.27 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at Month 18-0.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health Component: Change at End of Study0.08 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component: Change at End of Study-0.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.42
Secondary

Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)

The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; LOCF. n indicates the number of participants with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: Month 12 (n=98, 107)-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: Month 18 (n=98, 107)-7.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: End of Study (n=98, 107)-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: Month 12 (n= 97, 106)2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: Month 18 (n=97, 106)-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: End of Study (n=97, 106)0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: Month 12 (n=97, 107)0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: Month 18 (n=97, 107)0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: End of Study (n=97, 107)2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: Month 12 (n=97, 107)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: Month 18 (n=97, 107)-6.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: End of Study (n=97, 107)-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: Month 18 (n=97, 107)-1.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: Month 12 (n=98, 107)-1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: Month 12 (n=97, 107)0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: Month 18 (n=98, 107)-1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: Month 12 (n=97, 107)1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Effectiveness: End of Study (n=98, 107)-1.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: Month 18 (n=97, 107)-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: Month 12 (n= 97, 106)0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Global Satisfaction: End of Study (n=97, 107)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: Month 18 (n=97, 106)0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Convenience: End of Study (n=97, 107)-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Side Effects: End of Study (n=97, 106)1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Secondary

Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)

This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; Work time missed and work impairment scores are only calculated for participants who were employed at the time. LOCF imputation was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: Month 12 (n=45, 44)-4.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: Month 18 (n=42, 43)-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: End of Study (n=42, 44)-3.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 46)5.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 45)7.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 46)10.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 44)3.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 43)4.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 44)8.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: Month 12 (n=98, 107)6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: Month 18 (n=98, 107)7.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
Etanercept AloneChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: End of Study (n=98, 107)9.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: Month 18 (n=98, 107)0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: Month 12 (n=45, 44)-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 44)-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: Month 18 (n=42, 43)0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: Month 12 (n=98, 107)4.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Time Missed: End of Study (n=42, 44)-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 43)-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 46)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Activity Impairment: End of Study (n=98, 107)1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 45)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Overall Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 44)-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 46)-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Secondary

Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to treat population (all randomized participants); Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used. At Month 6 data were available for 95 and 105 participants in each treatment group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Remission30.5 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Low16.8 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Moderate41.1 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: High11.6 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Remission19.4 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Low10.2 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Moderate49.0 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: High21.4 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Remission21.4 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Low12.2 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Moderate41.8 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: High24.5 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Remission21.4 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Low8.2 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Moderate45.9 Percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: High24.5 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: High16.8 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Remission25.7 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Remission32.7 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Low19.0 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Remission29.9 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: Moderate41.9 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Low19.6 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 6: High13.3 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Moderate39.3 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Remission23.4 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: Moderate34.6 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Low19.6 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseEnd of Study: Low14.0 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: Moderate44.9 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 18: High13.1 Percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 ResponseMonth 12: High12.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Drug Persistence

Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

Population: Intent to Treat Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept AloneDrug PersistenceMonth 6100 percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDrug PersistenceMonth 1293.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDrug PersistenceMonth 1881.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept AloneDrug PersistenceMonth 2451.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDrug PersistenceMonth 2469.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDrug PersistenceMonth 6100 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDrug PersistenceMonth 1878.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateDrug PersistenceMonth 1287.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

Time frame: 25 months

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event86 participants
Etanercept AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event11 participants
Etanercept AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AEs leading to withdrawal from study drug9 participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event92 participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event17 participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AEs leading to withdrawal from study drug6 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026