Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Amgen
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with or without methotrexate treatment over a 24 month period
Detailed description
This noninferiority study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients who did not have an adequate response to methotrexate (MTX) had etanercept (50 mg/week subcutaneously \[SC\]) added to existing MTX therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses of MTX) at baseline and were followed for 6 months. After 6 months of therapy, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment arms: either discontinue MTX (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone or continue both etanercept plus MTX for an additional 18 months.
Interventions
Commercially available etanercept administered subcutaneously at 50 mg/week.
Commercially available methotrexate administed orally, subcutaneously or intramuscularly 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older at the baseline visit * An American College of Rheumatology(ACR) diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with onset of symptoms of at least 6 months * Active disease of at least 3 swollen joints from the Disease Activity Severity 28 at the baseline visit * A Disease Activity Severity 28 score of ≥ 3.2 at the baseline visit * Have not previously received etanercept therapy * Able to start etanercept therapy per the approved product monograph * Able to continue methotrexate therapy per the approved product monograph and have received a dose of at least 15 mg/wk (or 10 mg/wk in the case of documented intolerance to higher doses) for at least 12 weeks and this dose has been stable at least 4 weeks before the baseline visit * The patient or legally acceptable representative must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test and who do not have a documented course of anti-tuberculosis therapy. Patients with a positive PPD skin test (equal to or greater than 5 mm), a negative chest x-ray at screening which should be repeated if indicated during of the study, at low risk based on exposure and travel and have initiated a course of anti-tuberculosis therapy of which at least 8 weeks have been completed would be eligible for the study. The full course of anti-tuberculosis therapy must be completed * Patients who have previously received infliximab or adalimumab * Active infections within 2 weeks of the baseline visit or during the study period * Any history of human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection, untreated tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cytopenia, prior or current use of cyclophosphamide or malignancy (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix) in the past 5 years * Women who are pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential who are not using adequate contraception * Receipt of any investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the initiation of study medication or during the study period * Presence of any significant and uncontrolled medical condition, which in the investigator's opinion precludes the use of etanercept, as outlined in the product monograph * Participants not available for follow-up assessment or unable to comply with study procedures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28) | Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12 | The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Drug Persistence | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. |
| Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) | Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24 | The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score | Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24 | X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing | Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24 | X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination. |
| Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | 25 months | A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard. |
| Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Month 6, 12, 18 and 24 | The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination. |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Recruitment details
First patient was enrolled 28 June 2008 and last patient was enrolled 07 November 2010.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 258 participants were enrolled, of whom 205 were randomized after 6 months and 53 were not randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Non-randomized Enrolled participants received treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) but discontinued prior to completing this 6 months of treatment. | 53 |
| Etanercept Alone After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to discontinue methotrexate (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone for an additional 18 months. | 98 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to continue both etanercept plus methotrexate for an additional 18 months. | 107 |
| Total | 258 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 14 | 9 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression | 21 | 31 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Ineligibility determined | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol deviation | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Requirement for alternative therapy | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Non-randomized | Total | Etanercept + Methotrexate | Etanercept Alone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 | 54.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 | 54.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 54.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 |
| Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) <= 5.1 | 20 participants | 104 participants | 41 participants | 43 participants |
| Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) > 5.1 | 33 participants | 154 participants | 66 participants | 55 participants |
| Duration of rheumatoid arthritis < 2 years | 11 participants | 57 participants | 23 participants | 23 participants |
| Duration of rheumatoid arthritis >= 2 years | 42 participants | 201 participants | 84 participants | 75 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Aborigine | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 2 participants | 3 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 0 participants | 3 participants | 3 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White or Caucasian | 47 participants | 246 participants | 103 participants | 96 participants |
| Reimbursement type Combination/Other | 14 participants | 46 participants | 15 participants | 17 participants |
| Reimbursement type Private | 23 participants | 126 participants | 55 participants | 48 participants |
| Reimbursement type Public | 16 participants | 86 participants | 37 participants | 33 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 41 Participants | 197 Participants | 84 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 61 Participants | 23 Participants | 26 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 53 | 56 / 98 | 73 / 107 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 53 | 11 / 98 | 17 / 107 |
Outcome results
Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)
The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.
Time frame: Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12
Population: The per protocol population defined as all randomized participants with DAS28 measurements both at the 6- and 12-month visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28) | -0.39 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28) | 0.02 scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.26 |
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat; LOCF. The number of participants with available data at Month 6 was 95 and 105 in each treatment group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 6 | 1.97 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 12 | 1.43 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 18 | 1.35 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 1.37 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.32 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 1.86 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 6 | 1.97 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 18 | 2.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) | Change from Baseline to Month 12 | 1.91 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.61 |
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score
X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a Baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing
X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | -0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Population: Radiographic Analysis Set - All randomized participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline radiographic assessment. LOCF imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | 0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) | Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102) | 0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) | Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104) | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)
The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat analysis set; LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to Month 12 | 0.148 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.354 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to Month 18 | 0.179 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.452 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to End of Study | 0.198 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.448 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to Month 12 | 0.026 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to Month 18 | -0.004 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.485 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) | Change from Month 6 to End of Study | 0.016 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.539 |
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to month 12 | 7.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to month 18 | 8.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to end of study | 8.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to end of study | 5.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to month 12 | 2.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from month 6 to month 18 | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available SF-36 data at month 6; LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at Month 12 | -1.74 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.87 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at Month 18 | -3.28 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at End of Study | -3.08 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.95 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at 12 Months | -1.16 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.29 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at 18 Months | -0.30 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at End of Study | -1.30 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.47 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at 18 Months | -0.92 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.34 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at Month 12 | -0.30 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at 12 Months | -1.27 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at Month 18 | -0.10 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.61 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Mental Health Component: Change at End of Study | 0.08 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) | Physical Component: Change at End of Study | -0.75 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.42 |
Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; LOCF. n indicates the number of participants with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: Month 12 (n=98, 107) | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: Month 18 (n=98, 107) | -7.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: End of Study (n=98, 107) | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: Month 12 (n= 97, 106) | 2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: Month 18 (n=97, 106) | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: End of Study (n=97, 106) | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: Month 12 (n=97, 107) | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: Month 18 (n=97, 107) | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: End of Study (n=97, 107) | 2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: Month 12 (n=97, 107) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: Month 18 (n=97, 107) | -6.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: End of Study (n=97, 107) | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: Month 18 (n=97, 107) | -1.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: Month 12 (n=98, 107) | -1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: Month 12 (n=97, 107) | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: Month 18 (n=98, 107) | -1.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.4 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: Month 12 (n=97, 107) | 1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Effectiveness: End of Study (n=98, 107) | -1.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.7 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: Month 18 (n=97, 107) | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: Month 12 (n= 97, 106) | 0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Global Satisfaction: End of Study (n=97, 107) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: Month 18 (n=97, 106) | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Convenience: End of Study (n=97, 107) | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) | Side Effects: End of Study (n=97, 106) | 1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)
This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat analysis set with available data; Work time missed and work impairment scores are only calculated for participants who were employed at the time. LOCF imputation was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: Month 12 (n=45, 44) | -4.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: Month 18 (n=42, 43) | -5.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: End of Study (n=42, 44) | -3.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 46) | 5.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 45) | 7.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 46) | 10.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 44) | 3.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 43) | 4.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 44) | 8.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: Month 12 (n=98, 107) | 6.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.2 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: Month 18 (n=98, 107) | 7.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Etanercept Alone | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: End of Study (n=98, 107) | 9.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: Month 18 (n=98, 107) | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.3 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: Month 12 (n=45, 44) | -0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 44) | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: Month 18 (n=42, 43) | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.5 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: Month 12 (n=98, 107) | 4.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Time Missed: End of Study (n=42, 44) | -0.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 43) | -2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 46) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Activity Impairment: End of Study (n=98, 107) | 1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 45) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Overall Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 44) | -1.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) | Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 46) | -1.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response
The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to treat population (all randomized participants); Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used. At Month 6 data were available for 95 and 105 participants in each treatment group respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Remission | 30.5 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Low | 16.8 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Moderate | 41.1 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: High | 11.6 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Remission | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Low | 10.2 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Moderate | 49.0 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: High | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Remission | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Low | 12.2 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Moderate | 41.8 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: High | 24.5 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Remission | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Low | 8.2 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Moderate | 45.9 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: High | 24.5 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: High | 16.8 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Remission | 25.7 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Remission | 32.7 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Low | 19.0 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Remission | 29.9 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: Moderate | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Low | 19.6 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 6: High | 13.3 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Moderate | 39.3 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Remission | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: Moderate | 34.6 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Low | 19.6 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | End of Study: Low | 14.0 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: Moderate | 44.9 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 18: High | 13.1 Percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response | Month 12: High | 12.1 Percentage of participants |
Drug Persistence
Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Population: Intent to Treat Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Drug Persistence | Month 6 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Drug Persistence | Month 12 | 93.2 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Drug Persistence | Month 18 | 81.9 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Drug Persistence | Month 24 | 51.4 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Drug Persistence | Month 24 | 69.5 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Drug Persistence | Month 6 | 100 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Drug Persistence | Month 18 | 78.8 percentage of participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Drug Persistence | Month 12 | 87.6 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.
Time frame: 25 months
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etanercept Alone | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Any adverse event | 86 participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Serious adverse event | 11 participants |
| Etanercept Alone | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | AEs leading to withdrawal from study drug | 9 participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Any adverse event | 92 participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Serious adverse event | 17 participants |
| Etanercept + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | AEs leading to withdrawal from study drug | 6 participants |