Skip to content

Biofeedback and Cortical Excitability

Modifications of the Anal Muscle Cortical Excitability Area After Biofeedback Training

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00653887
Acronym
Biofeedback
Enrollment
24
Registered
2008-04-07
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2012-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation, Incontinence

Keywords

Biofeedback, anal sphincter, cortical excitability, magnetic stimulation, incontinence, constipation

Brief summary

Looking for a modification of the cortical excitability of the motor area corresponding to the external anal sphincter after biofeedback sessions.

Detailed description

Introduction: Nervous control of pelvic floor is not much known. The dysfunction of this musculature, and particularly of the external anal sphincter, is a frequent cause of anal incontinence and/or dyschesia. Biofeedback training is often offered to patients suffering from incontinence or constipation. However, its mechanisms of action is still controversial. Objective of the study: to compare excitability of the cortical area responsible for control volunteer of the external anal sphincter in healthy subjects before and after 4 biofeedback sessions. Subjects and methodology: we offer to perform two groups of 12 healthy subjects (one active and one control group) without any neurological or digestive disease and having never performed biofeedback. In each group, cortical excitability will be evaluated by cortical magnetic stimulation (curve intensity/amplitude, silent period, inter-stimulus period, motor threshold) before and after 4 biofeedback sessions (one session by week) in active group or 4 placebo sessions (placebo group). We hope to show a modification of cortical excitability in subjects performing biofeedback compared to others.

Interventions

OTHERBiofeedback

4 sessions of biofeedback one session each week

OTHERPlacebo

4 sessions, one each week, of discussion about anorectal disease

Sponsors

Coloplast A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy volunteers between 18 years old and 35 years old * Right handed\*

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Pace-maker or other metallic piece implanted in the body * Neurological disease * Epilepsy * Digestive disease * Traumatic delivery * Anorectal surgery * Biofeedback * Psychiatric disease * Treatment anti-epileptic, hypnotic, psychotropic * Participation to a previous protocol within 1 month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
external anal sphincter motor threshold silent period double-pulse stimulation: inter-stimulus interval amplitude and duration of external anal sphincter contractionfinal

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026