Skip to content

Polaris - Crestor 40 mg vs Atorvastatin 80 mg for 26 Weeks

A 26-Week, Double Blind, Randomised, Multi-Centre, Phase IIIb, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin (40 mg) With Atorvastatin (80 mg) in Subjects With Hypercholesterolaemia and Coronary Heart Disease or CHD Risk Equivalents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00653588
Acronym
POLARIS
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-04-07
Start date
2003-04-30
Completion date
2004-09-30
Last updated
2009-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease, Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

Cholesterol, low density lipoproteins, Hypercholesterolemia, Coronary Heart Disease, Rosuvastatin, Crestor, Atorvastatin, Lipitor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of 8 weeks of treatment with Rosuvastatin with 8 weeks of treatment with Atorvastatin on low density lipoprotein cholesterol level in subjects with hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease (CHD) or at high risk of CHD..

Interventions

DRUGRosuvastatin

40mg

DRUGAtorvastatin

80mg

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A history of CHD or clinical evidence of atherosclerosis or multiple risk factors that confer a high risk as defined in the protocol. * Fasting LDL-C concentrations at Visit 1 as defined in the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* History of statin induced serious side effects, or serious hypersensitivity reaction to other statins. * Subjects considered to be unstable by the investigator after the following events: a myocardial infarction (heart attack), unstable angina, myocardial revascularisation or another revascularisation procedure or a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke. * Severe congestive cardiac failure (as defined by the protocol - Appendix I). * Subjects awaiting a planned myocardial revascularisation prior to starting the study (i.e. planned prior to visit 1).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin by assessing the percentage change from baseline to week 8 in LDL-C concentrations in subjects with hypercholesterolaemia and CHD or CHD risk equivalents.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin in modifying other lipids and lipoproteins at week 8

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026