Skip to content

Cisplatin With or Without Sodium Thiosulfate in Treating Young Patients With Stage I, II, or III Childhood Liver Cancer

A Multi-centre Open-label Randomised Phase III Trial of the Efficacy of Sodium Thiosulphate in Reducing Ototoxicity in Patients Receiving Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Standard Risk Hepatoblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00652132
Acronym
SIOPEL6
Enrollment
116
Registered
2008-04-03
Start date
2007-12-15
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2018-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cancer, Ototoxicity

Keywords

ototoxicity, childhood hepatoblastoma, stage I childhood liver cancer, stage II childhood liver cancer, stage III childhood liver cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Chemoprotective drugs, such as sodium thiosulfate, may protect normal cells from the side effects of chemotherapy. It is not yet known whether giving sodium thiosulfate is effective in reducing hearing damage caused by cisplatin in treating young patients with liver cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well sodium thiosulfate works to decrease hearing loss caused by cisplatin in treating young patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III childhood liver cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To assess the efficacy of sodium thiosulfate (STS) to reduce the hearing impairment caused by cisplatin chemotherapy. Secondary * To carefully monitor any potential impact of STS on response to cisplatin and survival. * To assess the short- and long-term tolerability of the combination of STS and cisplatin * To prospectively evaluate and validate biological, radiological and pathological features of standard-risk hepatoblastoma for future risk adapted management * To investigate the effect of STS on the formation of cisplatin-DNA adducts. * To prospectively collect patient DNA specifically for the analysis of possible genetic factors that may contribute to the development of treatment-related ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to country, median age (\< 15 months vs ≥ 15 months), and PRETEXT tumor classification (I vs II vs III). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I (Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin): Patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II (Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin and sodium thiosulphate): Patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (beginning 6 hours after completion of cisplatin) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (as in neoadjuvant therapy) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsies periodically for biological and pharmacological studies consisting of biomarker analysis, gene expression profiling, IHC, proteomic analysis, and gene rearrangement analysis. Patients undergo auditory evaluations at baseline, and at the completion of study treatment or at an age of at least 3.5 years to measure ototoxicity and hearing impairment. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGcisplatin
DRUGsodium thiosulfate

Sponsors

Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group - SIOPEL
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Histologically confirmed newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma * Standard risk hepatoblastoma (Pretext I,II,III) * Age ≤ 18 years and \> 1 month * Written informed consent and national/local ethics committee and regulatory approval * Centre/country willing and able to organise audiometry at the minimum required quality standard and to provide the contact details of the Consultant Audiologist or Ear Nose and Throat Surgeon who will take the responsibility for seeing that this is done * Ability to comply with requirements for submission of material for central review * For females of child-bearing potential, a negative pregnancy test prior to study treatment is required. * Any patient who is of reproductive age should agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of the trial. Exclusion: High risk hepatoblastoma * Hepatocellular carcinoma * Treatment starting more than 15 days from written biopsy report * Abnormal renal function * Any previous chemotherapy * Recurrent disease * Previous hypersensitivity to STS * Patient unable to follow the protocol for any reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Brock grade ≥ 1 hearing lossEnd of trial treatment or at an age of 3.5 years, whichever is laterTo investigate if the administration of sodium thiosulfate simultaneously with the administration of Cisplatin significantly reduces the hearing impairment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete resectionWithin 2 weeks after surgery.Total macroscopic removal of the tumour as reported by the surgeon and pathologist. In case of any doubt the lack of residual tumour must be confirmed with imaging studies performed
Complete remissionEnd of trial treatmentLack of evidence of residual disease and normal (for age) alpha-foetal protein (AFP). To establish a complete remission all of the following requirements must be fulfilled: * No evidence of tumour intra-abdominally: negative abdominal (including hepatic) ultrasound or CT scan or Magnetic resonance imaging * No evidence of metastases: clear chest X-ray (PA and lateral) for non-metastatic patients. (Normal lung CT scan for patients with lung metastasis at diagnosis, who are high-risk by definition and not treated according to SIOPEL 6). * Serum AFP level either normal or compatible with age for at least 4 weeks after normalisation.
Event-free survival (EFS)Until first event or up to 5 yearsCalculated from the time of randomisation to the first of the following events: progression, relapse, secondary primary malignancy or death.
Response to preoperative chemotherapyFollowing completion of preoperative chemotherapyDefined as: Complete response (CR): no evidence of disease and normal serum AFP value (for age). Partial response (PR): any tumour volume shrinkage associated with a decreasing serum AFP value, \> 1 log below the original measurement. Stable disease (SD): no tumour volume change and no change, or \< 1 log fall of the serum AFP concentration. Progressive disease (PD): unequivocal increase in 1 or more dimensions and/or any unequivocal increase of the serum AFP concentration (three successive 1-2 weekly determinations) even without clinical (physical and/or radiological) evidence of tumour re-growth.
Toxicity as graded by CTCAE v 3.030 days post treatmentAdverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events, which are possibly, probably or definitely related to the trial treatment. They will be assessed according to NCI CTCAE v 3.0.
Long-term renal clearanceUntil event or up to 5 yearsBy clearance method either EDTA, iohexol or inulin.
Feasibility of central audiology reviewEnd of trial treatment or at an age of 3.5 years, whichever is laterThe feasibility of central review
Overall survival (OS)Until event or up to 5 yearsCalculated from the time of randomisation to death.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026