Skip to content

Investigate Impact of Yasmin vs Microgynon on Hemostasis Parameters in Healthy Women

Single Center, Double Blind, Randomized, Crossover Study to Investigate the Impact of the Oral Contraceptive Yasmin (30 µg EE / 3 mg DRSP) Compared to Microgynon (30 µg / 150 LNG) on Hemostasis Parameters in 40 Female Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00651846
Enrollment
43
Registered
2008-04-03
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2005-02-28
Last updated
2014-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Contraception, Hemostasis, Blood Coagulation

Brief summary

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the oral contraceptive YASMIN (containing: drospirenone 3 mg/ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg) in comparison with the oral contraceptive MICROGYNON (containing: levonorgestrel 150 mcg/ethinyl estradiol 30mcg) on factors of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in female subjects

Interventions

DRUGYasmin (DRSP 3mg/EE 0.03 mg)

The study medication was packaged in 21-tablet blister packs. Each subject kit contained 7 blister packs plus 1 reserve blister pack.Subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group received 21 consecutive days of hormonally active tablets (3mg DRSP/0.03 mgEE). In each treatment cycle 21 tablets (1 tablet daily) have to be taken in sequence, followed by a pill-free interval of 7 days. The treatment period was 7 cycles (28 days per cycle).

DRUGMicrogynon (LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg)

The study medication was packaged in 21-tablet blister packs. Each subject kit contained 7 blister packs plus 1 reserve blister pack.Subjects randomly assigned to the treatment group received 21 consecutive days of hormonally active tablets (LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg). In each treatment cycle 21 tablets (1 tablet daily) have to be taken in sequence, followed by a pill-free interval of 7 days. The treatment period was 7 cycles (28 days per cycle).

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically normal safety laboratory results

Exclusion criteria

* Standard contraindications for use of combined oral contraceptives (class label). Including: * Presence or history of thromboembolic process in veins (such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) or arteries (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction) or a known genetic component (homozygous), venous thromboembolic event in a close relative (parents or siblings) at younger age (\</= 40 years) * Acute and chronic severe liver dysfunction or disease. There should be an interval of at least 6 months between the subsidence of a viral hepatitis (normalization of the liver parameters) and the start of the study medication. * Use of preparations where experience shows affect on the activity of hepatic enzymes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pro-coagulatory parameters: Factor VIII (activity), FibrinogenAt baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
Anti-coagulatory parameters: Protein C (activity), Antithrombin III(activity), APC resistance (factor V mutation)At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rosing test: APC sensitivity ratioAt baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods
Pro-coagulatory parameters: Factor VIII (activity), Activation markers: D-dimer, Prothrombin fragment 1+2At baseline and after wash out (period 2); after 7 cycles of treatment in each of the two study periods

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026