Skip to content

Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Radiography for Diagnosis of Nasal Fractures

Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Radiography for Diagnosis of Nasal Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00650650
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-04-02
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2009-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Fracture

Brief summary

The standard imaging procedure to diagnose a nasal fracture still is radiography (lateral nasal view and occipitomental view). But technological advances in ultrasonography during the last few decades have made high-resolution ultrasound devices available to the majority of medical centers. It has been shown that the bony structures of the nose can be well examined by ultrasound in the last few years. The hypothesis: Is ultrasound of equal diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing nasal fractures as radiography is being tested in the investigators' study. Patients with suspected nasal fracture undergo ultrasound examination in addition to the routine x-ray imaging. After completion of treatment, the readings of both ultrasound and radiographs are compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose nasal fractures.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen, Grosshadern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* suspected nasal fracture

Exclusion criteria

* further fractures * pregnancy * unstable condition * refusal to undergo ultrasound examination

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026