Skip to content

Randomized, Double Blind, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Valdecoxib 40 mg Once Daily Compared With Diclofenac 75 mg Twice Daily in Acute Low Back Pain

Randomized, Double Blind, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Valdecoxib 40 mg Once Daily vs. Diclofenac 75 mg Twice Daily in Subjects With Acute Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00649610
Enrollment
340
Registered
2008-04-01
Start date
2002-11-30
Completion date
2003-05-31
Last updated
2008-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

acute low back pain

Brief summary

The pain relief, safety, and tolerability of valdecoxib 40 mg once daily compared with diclofenac 75 mg twice daily for acute low back pain was studied. The effect of valdecoxib on the patient's level of disability and quality of life was also studied.

Interventions

valdecoxib 40 mg QD for 7 days with a second dose of 40 mg the first day

DRUGdiclofenac

diclofenac 75 mg twice daily (BID) for 7 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute low back pain, defined as either class 1a or class 2a according to the Quebec Task Force Classification and categorized as moderate-severe in the Pain Intensity Categorical Scale and Visual analogue score (VAS) greater or equal to 50 mm * Acute low back pain was to have started at least 72 hours prior to inclusion in the trial and more than 6 weeks after the last episode of acute low back pain * History of at least 1 reported episode of acute low back pain in the last 5 years

Exclusion criteria

* History of inflammatory arthritis, chronic pain, metastasis, Paget's disease, or other diseases known to cause pain * Moderate to severe scoliosis * Back pain due to major trauma or visceral disorder * Unwilling to refrain from commencing concomitant physiotherapy * Active or suspected esophageal, gastric pyloric channel, or duodenal ulceration or bleeding within 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication * Any known laboratory abnormality, which in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate study participation * Subject was pregnant or lactating woman , or was a woman of childbearing potential not using an acceptable method of contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Subject-rated VAS Pain Intensity (0 - 100 mm), which was evaluated using the change from baselineDay 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subject's functional capacity as measured by the Oswestry Low Back Pain and Disability QuestionnaireDay 7
Subject's quality of life as measured by the Acute short form (SF)-36 (8 domains)Day 7
Pain ReliefDay 3 and Day 7
Patient global evaluationDay 3 and Day 7
VAS Pain Intensity (0-100 mm)Day 7
Categorical Pain IntensityDay 3 and Day 7
Composite Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) Tolerability was calcluated. A subject had a UGI event if the subject reported at least 1 of the following: moderate or severe nausea, or moderate or severe abdominal pain, or moderate or severe dyspepsiaDay 7

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026