Skip to content

Comparative Study of AESCULAP Optilene® Mesh Elastic Versus Ethicon Ultrapro® Mesh in Incisional Hernia Repair

A Randomised, Multi-center, Prospective, Observer and Patient Blind Study to Evaluate AESCULAP Optilene® Mesh Elastic Versus Ethicon Ultrapro® Mesh in Incisional Hernia Repair

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00646334
Acronym
Optilene
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-03-28
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2015-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia Repair

Keywords

Large Pore Size Propylene Mesh, Incisional Hernia, Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study

Brief summary

Optilene® Mesh Elastic and Ultrapro® Mesh will be used for incisional hernia repair. The primary objective of this clinical study is to demonstrate that Optilene® Mesh Elastic is superior to Ultrapro® Mesh in incisional hernia repair in matter of the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire 21 days after mesh insertion. Secondary objectives include the patient's daily activity, the rating of patients pain and the wound assessment determined on several occasions during the six months observation time.

Interventions

An elective incisional Hernia repair is performed by using Optilene® Mesh Elastic, a lightweight and large pore mesh, knitted from monofilament polypropylene. Due to the multidirectional elasticity the mesh is able to adapt to all movements taking place in the abdominal wall.

Sponsors

Aesculap AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female or male patients \>=18 years * Female patients are incapable of pragnancy or must be using adequate contraception and are not in lactation * Patients wiht vertical aponeurotic incisions only * Incisional hernia with hernia size \>= 3 cm * Patient is capable to understand and to follow the instructions * written informed consent * no mesh implantation at the same site during a previous operation * immune competence of patient

Exclusion criteria

* Simultanous participation in an investigational drug or medical device study * Patients \< 18 years old * Incisional Hernia withe a hernia size \< 3 cm * Repair of an acute incarcerated hernia * Previous mesh repair at the same site * Patient with other than vertical aponeurotic incisions * Enterotomy to be performed during hernia repair at Surgery * Patient is on anti-coagulations-therapy * Patient is known or assessed to be non-compliant * Additional surgical treatment at the same time (e.g. cholecystectomy) * Immune incompetence of patient (e.g. chemotherapy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Physical function score of the SF-36 questionnaire21 days after insertion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire6 months postoperatively
patient's daily activity6 months postoperatively
patient's pain6 months postoperatively
wound assessment6 months postoperatively

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026