Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment

Clinical Evaluation of the Phototoxic Potential of Xenaderm Ointment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00644917
Enrollment
38
Registered
2008-03-27
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2014-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

wound healing, phototoxicity, Healthy Subjects

Brief summary

The product is being tested to see if exposure to light causes toxic reactions on the skin.

Interventions

20mg under Finn chambers

DRUGPlacebo

20mg under Finn chambers

Sponsors

Healthpoint
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy subjects

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin Reaction Score48 hoursScores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This phase 1 study was conducted at one investigational site (Research Laboratory) located in the US, and conducted on healthy adult subjects of either gender, and skin-type I, II, or III, who were 18 years of age and older, from 19-Feb-2008 to 29-Feb-2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Xenaderm vs. Vehicle - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Subjects received duplicate 20 mg applications of Xenaderm Ointment and Xenaderm vehicle contained in Finn Chambers, to the left sides of their backs
38
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicXenaderm vs. Vehicle - Subjects Acted as Own Comparator
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Age, Continuous37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Skin Reaction Score

Scores for phototoxic skin irritation were used to evaluate safety. In this study, irritation was graded using a scale that ranged from 0 (no reaction) to 7 (large vesiculo-bullous reaction) in whole units.

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xenaderm Ointment - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 at patch removal0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Xenaderm Ointment - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Xenaderm Ointment - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Xenaderm Ointment - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 immediately post UV radiation0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Xenaderm Vehicle - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Xenaderm Vehicle - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 immediately post UV radiation0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Xenaderm Vehicle - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 at patch removal0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Xenaderm Vehicle - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Control - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 immediately post UV radiation0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Control - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 at patch removal0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Control - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Control - IrradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 immediately post UV radiation0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 at patch removal0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Xenaderm Ointment - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 4 - 48 hours post UV radiation0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 at patch removal0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 2 immediately post UV radiation0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Xenaderm Vehicle - Non-irradiatedSkin Reaction ScoreDay 3 - 24 hours post UV radiation0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026