Skip to content

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Azithromycin SR Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Symptoms of Chronic Bronchitis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparative Trial of Azithromycin SR Versus Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis (AECB)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00644449
Enrollment
551
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2004-03-31
Last updated
2011-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchitis, Chronic

Brief summary

This study was performed to confirm that a single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin SR is at least as effective as 7 days of levofloxacin 500 mg/day in adults with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis Secondary objectives: To assess safety and the bacteriologic efficacy of both treatment regimens

Interventions

OTHERplacebo

placebo

azithromycin 2.0 g by mouth in the form of a slurry for 1 dose

DRUGlevofloxacin

500 mg (two 250 mg capsules) by mouth once daily for 7 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients with a history of chronic bronchitis (i.e., chronic cough and sputum production on most days for 3 consecutive months for more than 2 years) and current evidence of an acute bacterial exacerbation of their disease, as demonstrated by production of purulent sputum and the presence of at lest 2 of the following signs and symptoms, were included: increased sputum production, increased dypsnea, increased cough, or increased sputum purulence.

Exclusion criteria

Key

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sponsor assessment of clinical response in the Clinical Per Protocol populationTest of Cure (TOC) visit (Day 14-21)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
bacteriological response on a per pathogen basis for the Bacteriological Per Protocol populationTOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response in the Clinical Per Protocol populationLong-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) visit (Day 28-35)
Summary of baseline susceptibilitiesStudy Endpoint
investigator assessment of clinical response in the Clinical Per Protocol populationTOC visit
clinical laboratory testsBaseline and EOT visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response in the remaining study populationsTOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response by baseline pathogen for the Bacteriological Per Protocol populationEOT visit and TOC visit
adverse eventsContinuous

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, India, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026