Skip to content

Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Omega-3 Fatty Acids and PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00644423
Enrollment
18
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2008-09-22
Completion date
2010-07-15
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

PTSD, Cognition, Fish Oil, Omega-3 Fatty Acid

Brief summary

An increasing literature shows that omega-3 fatty acids provide numerous health benefits, including a variety of psychiatric symptoms and disorders including stress, anxiety, cognitive impairment, mood disorders (major depression and bipolar disorder) and schizophrenia. Omega-3 fatty acids may additionally represent a promising treatment strategy in patients with PTSD. Moreover, given its beneficial cardiovascular effects, adjunctive omega-3 fatty acids may also benefit the general health status of these veterans, who frequently present with a variety of comorbid medical disorders.

Detailed description

See brief summary

Interventions

DRUGOmega-3 Fatty Acid

One capsule three times per day x 1 day (325mg EPA/225mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) tid) Two capsules three times per day x 1 day (650mg EPA/450mg DHA tid) Three capsules three times per day thereafter (975mg EPA/675mg DHA tid)

DRUGPlacebo

Matching Placebo

Sponsors

Durham VA Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Veterans 18-65 years of age, any ethnic group, either sex. 2. Ability to participate fully in the informed consent process. 3. Current diagnosis of PTSD . 4. No anticipated need to alter medications for the 10-week duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious unstable medical illness, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes, or history of cerebrovascular accident, prostate or breast cancer. 2. Current active suicidal and/or homicidal ideation, intent or plan. 3. Use of aspirin, warfarin or other anticoagulant therapy, as omega-3 fatty acids may increase bleeding time. Other concomitant medications for medical conditions will be addressed on a case-by-case base and determined if exclusionary. 4. Regular use of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation within the last 3 months (cod liver oil, other fish oil, flaxseed). 5. Regular consumption of more than one serving of fatty fish per week. 6. Substance dependence within the last 4 weeks (other than nicotine dependence). 7. Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, or cognitive disorder due to a general medical condition other than TBI. 8. Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding. 9. Known allergy to study medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Scores may range from 0 (no symptoms) to 136 (severe symptoms; score of 136 is based on the first 17 CAPS items administered). A reduced CAPS score indicates a reduction in (improvement) PTSD symptoms, while an increase in CAPS score indicates an increase (worsening) in PTSD symptoms.
Brief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A)Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores to assess cognitive changes (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The BAC-A includes brief assessments of executive functions, verbal fluency, attention, verbal memory, working memory and motor speed. Z-scores are calculated from composite scores. Higher z-scores are indicative of better cognitive performance, lower z-scores are indicative of lower cognitive performance. Range of z-scores anticipated to be between -3 and 3. Mean change scores from week 2 and week 10 (Week 2 minus Week 10).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous Performance Test (CPT)Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in inpulsivity (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Computer test. Patient is to press button if target appears, but not at non-target. Impulsivity variables during test: CE=percent of response to non-target; ANT=percent of responses prior to target presentation. Results are converted to Q-scores (age and sex-adjusted normalized scores with a mean=0 and standard deviation=1 in the general population, expressing the probability determined by the Gamma function in terms of standard deviation of Gaussian density). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in depressive symptomatology (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The QIDS total scores range from 0 to 27. Total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the nine symptom domains of the DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) criteria: depressed mood,loss of interest or pleasure,concentration/decision making,self-outlook,suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep,weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. Each item is rated 0-3 (0=least or no severity, 3=greatest severity). Higher values reflect more severe symptoms.
Trail Making BWeek 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in attention and cognition (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Trail Making Test is a measure used to assess cognition and attention. Trail Making, Part B is a timed test that consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper with both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The respondent is asked to draw a line from number one, and so on,in correct numerical/alphabetical order, until they reach number 13. Results are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Trail Making AWeek 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in cognition and attention (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Trail Making Test is a measure used to assess cognition and attention. Trail Making, Part A is a timed test that consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper with the numbers 1-25 written randomly in circles. The respondent is asked to draw a line from number one, and so on, in correct numerical order, until they reach number 25. Results are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)Mean change scores in resiliency (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The CD-RISC was developed and tested as (i) a measure of degree of resilience, (ii) as a predictor of outcome to treatment with medication or psychotherapy, stress management and resilience-building, (iii) as a marker of progress during treatment, and (iv) as a marker of biological changes in the brain. The scale comprises 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4) for a total range of 0-100, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

18 participants enrolled; 11 participants started (randomized at Week 2) after a 2-week placebo lead in

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omega-3 Fatty Acid
Omega-3 Fatty Acid: One capsule three times per day x 1 day (325mg EPA/225mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) tid) Two capsules three times per day x 1 day (650mg EPA/450mg DHA tid) Three capsules three times per day thereafter (975mg EPA/675mg DHA tid)
6
Placebo
Placebo: Matching Placebo
5
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboOmega-3 Fatty AcidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Age, Continuous43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.83
36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.67
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.65
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 65 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A)

Mean change scores to assess cognitive changes (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The BAC-A includes brief assessments of executive functions, verbal fluency, attention, verbal memory, working memory and motor speed. Z-scores are calculated from composite scores. Higher z-scores are indicative of better cognitive performance, lower z-scores are indicative of lower cognitive performance. Range of z-scores anticipated to be between -3 and 3. Mean change scores from week 2 and week 10 (Week 2 minus Week 10).

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidBrief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A)0.2583 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.2078
PlaceboBrief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A)0.2860 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.1652
Primary

Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

Mean change scores in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Scores may range from 0 (no symptoms) to 136 (severe symptoms; score of 136 is based on the first 17 CAPS items administered). A reduced CAPS score indicates a reduction in (improvement) PTSD symptoms, while an increase in CAPS score indicates an increase (worsening) in PTSD symptoms.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidClinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)-6.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.124
PlaceboClinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)-18.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.961
Secondary

Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)

Mean change scores in resiliency (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The CD-RISC was developed and tested as (i) a measure of degree of resilience, (ii) as a predictor of outcome to treatment with medication or psychotherapy, stress management and resilience-building, (iii) as a marker of progress during treatment, and (iv) as a marker of biological changes in the brain. The scale comprises 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4) for a total range of 0-100, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidConnor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)-2.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.759
PlaceboConnor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)1.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.986
Secondary

Continuous Performance Test (CPT)

Mean change scores in inpulsivity (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Computer test. Patient is to press button if target appears, but not at non-target. Impulsivity variables during test: CE=percent of response to non-target; ANT=percent of responses prior to target presentation. Results are converted to Q-scores (age and sex-adjusted normalized scores with a mean=0 and standard deviation=1 in the general population, expressing the probability determined by the Gamma function in terms of standard deviation of Gaussian density). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

Population: Missing CPT scores from 2 participants in the Omega-3 Fatty Acid arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidContinuous Performance Test (CPT)0.6920 Q-scoreStandard Error 0.3369
PlaceboContinuous Performance Test (CPT)0.6198 Q-scoreStandard Error 0.2911
Secondary

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)

Mean change scores in depressive symptomatology (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). The QIDS total scores range from 0 to 27. Total score is obtained by adding the scores for each of the nine symptom domains of the DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) criteria: depressed mood,loss of interest or pleasure,concentration/decision making,self-outlook,suicidal ideation, energy/fatigability, sleep,weight/appetite change, and psychomotor changes. Each item is rated 0-3 (0=least or no severity, 3=greatest severity). Higher values reflect more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidQuick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)1.167 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.056
PlaceboQuick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)-1.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Secondary

Trail Making A

Mean change scores in cognition and attention (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Trail Making Test is a measure used to assess cognition and attention. Trail Making, Part A is a timed test that consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper with the numbers 1-25 written randomly in circles. The respondent is asked to draw a line from number one, and so on, in correct numerical order, until they reach number 25. Results are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidTrail Making A-3.140 secondsStandard Error 2.112
PlaceboTrail Making A-11.14 secondsStandard Error 1.57
Secondary

Trail Making B

Mean change scores in attention and cognition (Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization) minus Week 2 (Baseline)). Trail Making Test is a measure used to assess cognition and attention. Trail Making, Part B is a timed test that consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper with both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The respondent is asked to draw a line from number one, and so on,in correct numerical/alphabetical order, until they reach number 13. Results are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame: Week 2 (Baseline) and Week 10 (Week 8 Post-Randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3 Fatty AcidTrail Making B-20.84 secondsStandard Error 11.77
PlaceboTrail Making B-30.65 secondsStandard Error 24.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026