Skip to content

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparative Trial of Azithromycin Sustained Release Versus 3-Day Azithromycin for the Treatment of Strep Throat in Adolescents and Adults

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparative Trial of Azithromycin SR Versus Three-Day Azithromycin for the Treatment of Group A β-Hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngitis/Tonsillitis in Adolescents and Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00644293
Enrollment
598
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2004-04-30
Last updated
2011-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis

Brief summary

To determine if a single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin SR is at least as effective as a 3-day course of azithromycin (500 mg once daily for 3 days) when used to treat adolescents and adults with strep throat, and to assess efficacy and safety for both treatment regimens.

Interventions

azithromycin 500 mg tablet by mouth once daily for 3 days

DRUGplacebo

placebo

azithromycin SR 2.0 g by mouth as an oral slurry for 1 dose

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with evidence of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) pharyngitis/tonsillitis and a positive rapid antigen detection test or positive culture of the pharynx or tonsils for GABHS

Exclusion criteria

* Patients were excluded if they had treatment with any systemic antibiotic within the previous 7 days, a history of rheumatic fever, a peritonsillar abcess, or were known carriers of GABHS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
bacteriologic response in the Bacteriologic per Protocol populationTest of Cure (TOC) visit (Days 24-28)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
bacteriologic response for the remaining study populationsTOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response for the Bacteriologic per Protocol populationLong-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) visit (Days 38-45)
sponsor assessment of clinical response in the Bacteriologic per Protocol populationTOC visit
summary of baseline susceptibilitiesStudy endpoint
adverse eventsContinuous
bacteriologic response for the Bacteriologic per Protocol populationTOC visit

Countries

Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026