Skip to content

Post-operative Epidural Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Fusion

Post-operative Epidural Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Fusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00644111
Enrollment
32
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2013-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion, Postoperative analgesia, Epidural, Lumbar

Brief summary

Minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar decompression and fusion is a new procedure that aims to reduce post-operative pain, opioid consumption and related side effects, and length of hospital stay. Current research demonstrates a modest improvement in these areas beginning on the third post-operative day. MIS fusion, however, incurs significant cost as the average time of the procedure is approximately one third greater (from 148 minutes to 191 on average). Epidural analgesia has clearly demonstrated benefits for conventional open laminectomy. In order to fully maximize the benefits of an MIS technique, early post-operative analgesia/pain must be improved. The aim of this study is to combine two techniques to ultimately improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. This will be a randomized trial involving 32 patients undergoing MIS decompression and fusion with half the study group receiving active epidural and IV-PCA and the other half receiving epidural placebo and IV-PCA. The hypothesis is that epidural analgesia will reduce post-operative opioid consumption, improve pain scores, and decrease time to ambulation as well as discharge from hospital after MIS decompression and fusion.

Interventions

DRUGBupivicaine, Hydromorphone

0.1% Bupivicaine with 0.015mg hydromorphone per mL at 6 mL per hour in Arm 2

DRUGSaline Placebo

Saline placebo continuous epidural infusion of 6 mL per hour in Arm 1

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients scheduled to undergo minimally invasive lumbar decompression and fusion at the Toronto Western Hospital * both genders * ASA I to III * BMI less than 35

Exclusion criteria

* refuses treatment randomization * inability to give informed consent * language barrier * local anesthetic allergy * allergy to shellfish or eggs * bleeding diathesis * sickle cell disease or trait * pregnancy * drug addiction * psychiatric history * severe intercurrent illness (ASA IV or V) * patients requiring anesthesia of other surgical sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in opioid consumption in the first 48 hours post-operatively48 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in time to dischargeDuration of Admission
Reduction in VRS pain scoresDuration of Admission
Reduction in total opioid consumptionDuration of Admission
Reduction in opioid related side effectsDuration of Admission

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026