Skip to content

Multicenter, Open, Randomized Comparative Trial To Compare The Efficacy Of Azithromycin Versus Amoxicillin In Children With Strep Throat

Multicenter, Open, Randomized Comparative Trial To Compare Bacteriological And Clinical Efficacy Of Azithromycin Versus Amoxicillin In Children With Streptococcus Tonsillitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00643539
Enrollment
360
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2002-12-31
Completion date
2003-07-31
Last updated
2008-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tonsillitis

Brief summary

The primary objective was to compare the bacteriological efficacy at Day 10 of azithromycin pediatric suspension (20 mg/kg/day once daily for 3 consecutive days) versus amoxicillin pediatric suspension (50 mg/kg/day in 2 doses for 6 consecutive days) in children aged 3-15 years with Group A streptococcal acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Secondary objectives were assessments of bacteriological efficacy at Day 30 and clinical efficacy at Day 10 and Day 30.

Interventions

azithromycin (Zithromax) pediatric suspension formulation (200 mg/5 ml) administered as an oral suspension at a dose of 20 mg/kg once a day (maximal dose 500 mg/day) for 3 consecutive days

DRUGClamoxyl

Amoxicillin (Clamoxyl) pediatric formulation (500 mg/5 ml) administered as an oral suspension at a dose of 25 mg/kg twice daily (maximal dose 2 g/day) for 6 consecutive days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Outpatients with an acute pharyngitis erythematous or erythematopultaceous with modification of pharynx aspect and fever of ≥38° C, and patients either with or without spontaneous pharyngeal pain or upon swallowing and enlargement of the cervical lymph node (mandibular area) were eligible for inclusion. All subjects should have had a positive rapid strep test and a positive culture for Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with pseudomembranous, vesicular, ulcerous or ulceronecrotic pharyngitis were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bacteriologic success (Eradication: elimination of the original GABS; or Colonization: elimination of the original GABS but isolation of another stain of GABS) or failure (Persistence: presence of original GABS on repeated culture samples) rateDay 10

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bacteriological success or failure rateDay 30
Clinical success (resolution of signs and symptoms, or sufficient improvement; no additional antibacterial therapy indicated) or failure (insufficient improvement or worsening of signs and symptoms; additional antibacterial therapy indicated) rateDay 10
Clinical success or failure rateDay 30
Serious and non-serious adverse events (AEs) ratescontinuous
Rate of poststreptococcal complications and new disease occurrence since Day 10Day 30

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026