Skip to content

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Azithromycin SR Compared With Clarithromycin Extended Release for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Adult Patients

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparative Trial of Azithromycin SR Versus Clarithromycin Extended Release for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00643227
Enrollment
504
Registered
2008-03-26
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2004-03-31
Last updated
2008-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia

Brief summary

The study was performed to confirm that a single, 2.0 g oral dose of azithromycin sustained release (SR) at least as effective as 7 days of clarithromycin extended release (ER), 1.0 g by mouth once daily, when used to treat adults with mild to moderate community acquired pneumonia (CAP), and that both treatments were safe.

Interventions

DRUGclarithromycin extended release (ER)

7 days of clarithromycin extended release (ER), 1.0 g by mouth once daily

Single, 2.0 g oral dose of azithromycin sustained release (SR) by mouth once daily

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Outpatients with a diagnosis of pneumonia, as demonstrated by a productive cough and at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: rales and/or evidence of pulmonary consolidation; dyspnea or tachypnea; elevated body temperature; or elevated total peripheral white blood cell count (WBC \>10,000/mm3) or greater than 15% immature neutrophils were included. Patients were to have a chest radiograph demonstrating evidence of a new infiltrate or consolidation, and a Modified Fine Risk score of ≤ 70 (Fine Class I and II).

Exclusion criteria

Patients who were treated with any systemic antibiotic of greater than 1 dose or 1 combination dose (such as cephalosporin and macrolide) within the previous 7 days, or the likelihood of receiving other systemic antibiotics during participation in the study; were hospitalized in the previous 14 days or had an infection acquired in the hospital, and who were residents of a long-term care facility were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sponsor assessment of clinical response (clinical cure rate) in the Clinical Per Protocol populationTest of Cure (TOC) visit (Day 14-21)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
investigator assessment of clinical response in the Clinical Per Protocol populationTOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response by baseline pathogenEnd of Treatment (EOT) visit (Day 8-11) and TOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical response in the non-primary populationEOT visit and TOC visit
sponsor assessment of clinical responses in the Clinical Per Protocol populationEOT visit and Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) visit (Day 28-35)
bacteriologic response (eradication rate) in the Bacteriological Per Protocol populationTOC visit
adverse eventsContinuous
vital signsBaseline, On-Treatment (OT) visit (Day 3-5), and TOC visit
physical examinationBaseline
clinical laboratory assessments (blood chemistry and hematology)Baseline and TOC visit
susceptibilities of baseline pathogensStudy endpoint

Countries

Argentina, Canada, Estonia, India, Lithuania, Russia, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026