Skip to content

STABIL Study: National Study With Mircera for Maintenance of Hemoglobin Level in Dialysis Patients

A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Intravenous C.E.R.A. for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00642850
Enrollment
188
Registered
2008-03-25
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2016-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of intravenous Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in dialysis participants with chronic renal anemia. Participants will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, at a starting dose of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms, according to the dose of epoetin administered in the week preceding first study drug administration. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGmethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv monthly (starting dose)

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic renal anemia; * Continuous stable intravenous maintenance epoetin therapy during previous month; * Regular long-term hemodialysis therapy with the same mode of dialysis for previous 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months; * Poorly controlled hypertension, that is, sitting blood pressure exceeding 170/100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) despite medication; * Significant acute or chronic bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target RangeWeek 17 up to Week 24Percentage of participants maintaining their mean hemoglobin concentration in g/dL within plus or minus (+/-) 1 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value, and between the target range of 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP). The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the Stability Verification Period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference (SVP) and EEPWeek -4 up to Week -1 and Week 17 up to Week 24The mean change of the time adjusted average of hemoglobin from reference value obtained during the SVP (Week -4 up to Week -1) and the value during EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was assessed.
Mean Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEPWeek 17 up to Week 24Mean time spent by participants with hemoglobin concentration in the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range During EEPWeek 17 up to Week 24Percentage of participants maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the StudyWeek -4 up to Week 28Number of participant who underwent red blood cell transfusion during the study was reported.
Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin AntibodyWeek -4 and at early withdrawal or Week 28
Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose AdjustmentWeek 1 to Week 16 and Week 17 to Week 24Percentage of participants requiring adjustment in the dose of study drug during the dose titration period (DTP: Week 1 to Week 16) and EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was reported.

Countries

Czechia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
C.E.R.A.
Adult participants with chronic renal disease and who had received intravenous epoetin maintenance treatment, received intravenous C.E.R.A. at starting dose of 120, 200, or 360 mcg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
188
Total188

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyBlood transfusion6
Overall StudyDeath7
Overall StudyKidney transplantation8
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyOther reasons7
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicC.E.R.A.
Age, Continuous64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
104 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 188
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 188

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range

Percentage of participants maintaining their mean hemoglobin concentration in g/dL within plus or minus (+/-) 1 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value, and between the target range of 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP). The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the Stability Verification Period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.

Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

Population: Per protocol (PP) population included all participants in the safety population with the exception of participants with less than 3 recorded hemoglobin values, missing administrations of C.E.R.A., withdrawal, inadequate iron status in Weeks 16-24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range53.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference (SVP) and EEP

The mean change of the time adjusted average of hemoglobin from reference value obtained during the SVP (Week -4 up to Week -1) and the value during EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame: Week -4 up to Week -1 and Week 17 up to Week 24

Population: The Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A. (Week 0) and for whom data for at least 1 follow-up variable had been available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference (SVP) and EEP0.0 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.21
Secondary

Mean Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP

Mean time spent by participants with hemoglobin concentration in the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Mean Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP32 daysStandard Deviation 18.4
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin Antibody

Time frame: Week -4 and at early withdrawal or Week 28

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin AntibodyWeek -40 participants
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin AntibodyEarly Withdrawal or Week 280 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study

Number of participant who underwent red blood cell transfusion during the study was reported.

Time frame: Week -4 up to Week 28

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study9 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range During EEP

Percentage of participants maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range During EEP57.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment

Percentage of participants requiring adjustment in the dose of study drug during the dose titration period (DTP: Week 1 to Week 16) and EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was reported.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 16 and Week 17 to Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose AdjustmentDTP (n = 186)75.0 percentage of participants
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose AdjustmentEEP (n = 165)32.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026