Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) who have an inadequate clinical response to NSAIDs and corticosteroids. In Part I of the study patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive iv infusions of RoActemra/Actemra (8mg/kg iv for patients \>=30kg, or 12mg/kg for patients \<30kg) or placebo, every 2 weeks. Stable NSAIDs and methotrexate will be continued throughout. After 12 weeks of double-blind treatment, all patients will have the option to enter Part II of the study to receive open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra for a further 92 weeks, followed by a 3-year continuation of the study in Part III in which, for patients who meet specific criteria, an optional alternative dosing schedule decreasing the study drug administration frequency will be introduced. Anticipated time on study treatment is up to 5 years.
Interventions
8mg/kg (patients\>=30kg) or 12mg/kg (patients \<30kg) iv every 2 weeks. In Part III, administration frequency may be reduced to every 3 and every 4 weeks, respectively, according to an optional alternative dosing schedule.
iv every 2 weeks for 12 weeks
as prescribed
as prescribed
orally, as prescribed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 2-17 years of age * Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with \>= 6 months persistent activity * Presence of active disease (\>=5 active joints, or \>=2 active joints + fever + steroids) * Inadequate clinical response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids due to toxicity or lack of efficacy
Exclusion criteria
* Wheelchair-bound or bed-ridden * Any other autoimmune, rheumatic disease or overlap syndrome other than systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis * Intravenous long-acting corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks of baseline, or throughout study * Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), other than methotrexate * Previous treatment with tocilizumab
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever | Baseline, Week 12 | Percentage of participants with ≥30% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. Absence of fever was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding seven days. |
| Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104 | Baseline, Week 104 | Percentage of participants with ≥20 percent, ≥50 percent, ≥75 percent and ≥90 percent decreases in oral corticosteroid dose (mg/kg/day) from baseline. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being | Baseline, Week 12 | The Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being is a VAS. The scale is a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (i.e. maximum arthritis disease activity). This item is completed by the patient or parent/guardian as appropriate. |
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis | Baseline, Week 12 | The maximum number of joints with active arthritis is 71 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with: swelling present or pain present and limitation of motion. The joint assessment is performed by an independent assessor, who is not the treating physician, blinded to all other aspects of the patient's efficacy and safety data. |
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement | Baseline, Week 12 | The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'. |
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Baseline, Week 12 | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is an acute phase reactant measured in mm/hour. |
| Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Fever free was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding fourteen days. |
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) | Baseline, Week 12 | Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). |
| Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Percentage of participants with a change from an elevated hsCRP value at baseline to a normal hsCRP value at week 12; a change from anemia (low Hemoglobin) at baseline to a normal hemoglobin value at week 12; a change from thrombocytosis (elevated platelets) at baseline to a normal platelet value at week 12; a change from leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) at baseline to a normal white blood cell count at week 12. |
| Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction | Week 6 or Week 8, Week 12 | The percentage of participants receiving oral corticosteroids(CS) with a JIA ACR70 response at week 6 or Week 8 who reduced their oral CS dose by at least 20% without subsequent JIA ACR30 flare or occurrence of systemic symptoms at week 12. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70 response is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%. |
| Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Participants rated their pain by placing a horizontal line on a Visual Analog Scale on a scale of 0 (no pain)- 100 mm (severe pain). The score at 12 weeks minus the score at baseline. A negative number indicates improvement. |
| Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Percentage of patients who had at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from Baseline to Week 12. The CHAQ-DI questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). |
| Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | Percentage of participants who had a rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days prior to the baseline visit but no rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days preceding the Week 12 visit day. |
| Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12 | Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12 | Part I: Percentage of patients who had anemia (hemoglobin \<lower level normal based on sex and age) at Baseline and a ≥10 g/L increase in hemoglobin at Week 6 and at Week 12. |
| Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104 | Baseline, Week 104 | The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1)Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2)Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%. |
| Part II: Number of Active Joints at Week 104 | Week 104 | Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The mean number of joints with signs of active arthritis is reported. |
| Part II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 104 | Week 104 | Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The percentage of participants with no signs of active arthritis is reported. |
| Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR30/50/70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 30%/50%/70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%. |
| Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104 | Baseline, Week 104 | Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). |
| Part II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 104 | Baseline, Week 104 | Percentage is based on only those participants who were on oral corticosteroid at baseline and reached a nominal visit day on which dose was calculated. |
| Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | 104 Weeks | Rate of SAEs, Rate of Serious Infection AEs, Rate of Related SAEs (remotely, possibly, probably) to Tocilizumab (TCZ), Rate of Macrophage Activation Syndrome, Rate of AEs leading to withdrawal and Rate of deaths per 100 patient years (PY) were calculated using the formula: Number of Patient Events / Duration in study (years) \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same AE in one individual are counted. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260 | Percentage of participants with ≥30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260 | JIA ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. |
| Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Baseline and Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260 | Oral corticosteroid values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the the visit of withdrawal and all subsequent visits. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment. Data presented up to entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to Week 260 | Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260 | Participants who previously withdrew are excluded. Responders are participants who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260 | Patients who previously withdrew are excluded Responders are patients who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at all visits in the 6 months (180 days) prior to and including the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. iv. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260 | There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260 | There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260 | There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260 | Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260 | Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study. |
| Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. | Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260 | Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study. |
| Part II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 104 | Week 104 | Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1\) No joints with active arthritis, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (\<20 mm/hour), 4) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) indicates no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS). |
| Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Baseline, Week 12 | Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is a Visual Analog Scale. The scale is 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. This item is completed by the treating physician. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
This study consists of 3 parts. Part I: a 12 week double-blind placebo controlled study followed by Part II: a 92 week single arm open-label extension study followed by Part III: a 3 year open label continuation study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (for patients ≥30 kg) or 12 mg/kg (for patients \<30 kg) intravenous (iv) every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in Part 1.
Participants remained on their prescribed standard of care treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and corticosteroids if applicable. | 75 |
| Placebo Placebo iv every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in Part 1.
Participants remained on their prescribed standard of care treatment with NSAIDs, methotrexate and corticosteroids if applicable. | 37 |
| Total | 112 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part I: 12 Week Double-Blind | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part I: 12 Week Double-Blind | Refused Treatment | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Administrative reason | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Insufficient therapeutic response | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Refused treatment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 |
| Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Administrative reasons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Adverse Event | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Death | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Failure to return | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Insufficient therapeutic response | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92 | Refused treatment | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo | Tocilizumab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 13 to 17 | 37 years | 11 years | 26 years |
| Age, Customized 2 to 5 | 27 years | 11 years | 16 years |
| Age, Customized 6 to 12 | 48 years | 15 years | 33 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 56 Participants | 17 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 56 Participants | 20 Participants | 36 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 112 / 112 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 48 / 112 |
Outcome results
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104
Percentage of participants with ≥20 percent, ≥50 percent, ≥75 percent and ≥90 percent decreases in oral corticosteroid dose (mg/kg/day) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Population: Includes only participants on oral corticosteroids at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104 | ≥20 percent decrease | 76 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104 | ≥50 percent decrease | 73 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104 | ≥75 percent decrease | 62 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104 | ≥90 percent decrease | 47 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever
Percentage of participants with ≥30% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. Absence of fever was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding seven days.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all participants who had at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever | 85.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever | 24.3 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12
Participants rated their pain by placing a horizontal line on a Visual Analog Scale on a scale of 0 (no pain)- 100 mm (severe pain). The score at 12 weeks minus the score at baseline. A negative number indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population who had Pain VAS data available at baseline and week 12. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing pain VAS at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12 | -41.0 mm |
| Placebo | Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12 | -1.1 mm |
Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104
Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who withdrew have been excluded at post withdrawal visits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104 | Baseline (n=112) | 1.68 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104 | Week 104 (n=57) | 0.55 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids
Oral corticosteroid values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the the visit of withdrawal and all subsequent visits.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 116 (n=42,46) | 0.022 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0464 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 164 (n=28,25) | 0.018 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0349 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 236 (n=17,18) | 0.018 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0283 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 176 (n=25,23) | 0.019 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0383 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 128 (n=41,42) | 0.022 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0449 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 0.020 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0366 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 104 (n=45,48) | 0.020 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0455 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 200 (n=20,20) | 0.017 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0284 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 140 (n=34,38) | 0.031 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0625 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 212 (n=19,19) | 0.016 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0274 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Baseline (n=53,59) | 0.203 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1572 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 248 (n=16,18) | 0.020 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.029 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 152 (n=28,31) | 0.021 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0388 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 260 (n=16,18) | 0.019 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0282 |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 224 (n=18,19) | 0.017 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0279 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 260 (n=16,18) | 0.079 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1486 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 224 (n=18,19) | 0.075 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1399 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 236 (n=17,18) | 0.077 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1436 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Baseline (n=53,59) | 0.356 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1397 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 104 (n=45,48) | 0.047 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0869 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 116 (n=42,46) | 0.046 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.0831 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 128 (n=41,42) | 0.058 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1635 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 140 (n=34,38) | 0.051 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1112 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 152 (n=28,31) | 0.060 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1125 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 164 (n=28,25) | 0.068 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1179 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 176 (n=25,23) | 0.073 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1327 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 0.075 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1275 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 200 (n=20,20) | 0.083 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1397 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 212 (n=19,19) | 0.077 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1449 |
| Placebo | Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids | Week 248 (n=16,18) | 0.076 mg/kg/day | Standard Deviation 0.1429 |
Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission
Patients who previously withdrew are excluded Responders are patients who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at all visits in the 6 months (180 days) prior to and including the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. iv. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 32.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 34.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 25.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 15.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 116 (n=41,47) | 14.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 116 (n=41,47) | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 9.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 23.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 11.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 25.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 23.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 16.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 13.6 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits
There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 15.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 15.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 4.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 9.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260
Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment. Data presented up to entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Time frame: Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 140 (n=31,36) | 68 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 188 (n=18,21) | 61.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 236 (n=14,18) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 200 (n=17,20) | 59.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 152 (n=25,30) | 64.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 212 (n=16,19) | 56.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 128 (n=35,40) | 69.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 164 (n=25,24) | 68.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 248 (n=13,18) | 46.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 260 (n=13,18) | 46.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 104 (n=38,46) | 66.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 176 (n=22,22) | 68.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 116 (n=36,44) | 67.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 224 (n=15,19) | 53.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 116 (n=36,44) | 68.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 224 (n=15,19) | 63.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 260 (n=13,18) | 61.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 128 (n=35,40) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 140 (n=31,36) | 67 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 152 (n=25,30) | 57.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 164 (n=25,24) | 58.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 176 (n=22,22) | 64.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 188 (n=18,21) | 57.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 200 (n=17,20) | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 212 (n=16,19) | 63.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 236 (n=14,18) | 61.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 248 (n=13,18) | 61.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260 | Week 104 (n=38,46) | 67.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits
There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 28.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 10.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 18.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 11.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 32.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 23.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 18.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 12.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 20.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 12.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 9.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 4.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 11.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 23.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 17.6 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits
There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 3.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 4.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 18.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 3.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 7.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 11.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 212 (n=18,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260
Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.
Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.
Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.
Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week
JIA ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.
Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260
Population: The Part III ITT3 population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 104 JIA ACR 50 (n=89) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 104 JIA ACR 90 (n=89) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 164 JIA ACR90 (n=51) | 56.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 176 JIA ACR30 (n=44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 176 JIA ACR70 (n=44) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 188 JIA ACR70 (n=42) | 88.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 212 JIA ACR90 (n=36) | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 260 JIA ACR70 (n=30) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 104 JIA ACR 70 (n=89) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 104 JIA ACR 30 (n=89) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 116 JIA ACR 30 (n=86) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 116 JIA ACR 50 (n=86) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 116 JIA ACR 70 (n=86) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 116 JIA ACR 90 (n=86) | NA percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 128 JIA ACR 90 (n=80) | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 140 JIA ACR30 (n=71) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 140 JIA ACR50 (n=71) | 98.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 140 JIA ACR70 (n=71) | 93.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 140 JIA ACR90 (n=71) | 66.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 152 JIA ACR30 (n=55) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 152 JIA ACR50 (n=55) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 152 JIA ACR70 (n=55) | 94.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 128 JIA ACR 30 (n=80) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 152 JIA ACR90 (n=55) | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 164 JIA ACR30 (n=51) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 164 JIA ACR50 (n=51) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 164 JIA ACR70 (n=51) | 92.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 128 JIA ACR 50 (n=80) | 98.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 128 JIA ACR 70 (n=80) | 91.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 224 JIA ACR50 (n=35) | 94.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 224 JIA ACR70 (n=35) | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 224 JIA ACR90 (n=35) | 68.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 236 JIA ACR30 (n=33) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 236 JIA ACR50 (n=33) | 93.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 236 JIA ACR70 (n=33) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 236 JIA ACR90 (n=33) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 248 JIA ACR30 (n=32) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 248 JIA ACR50 (n=32) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 248 JIA ACR70 (n=32) | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 248 JIA ACR90 (n=32) | 65.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 260 JIA ACR30 (n=30) | 96.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 260 JIA ACR50 (n=30) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 260 JIA ACR90 (n=30) | 56.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 176 JIA ACR50 (n=44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 176 JIA ACR90 (n=44) | 52.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 188 JIA ACR30 (n=42) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 188 JIA ACR50 (n=42) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 188 JIA ACR90 (n=42) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 200 JIA ACR30 (n=38) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 200 JIA ACR50 (n=38) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 200 JIA ACR70 (n=38) | 86.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 200 JIA ACR90 (n=38) | 52.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 212 JIA ACR30 (n=36) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 212 JIA ACR50 (n=36) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 212 JIA ACR70 (n=36) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week | Week 224 JIA ACR30 (n=35) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits
Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment.
Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to Week 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >70% decrease (n=17,20) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >50% decrease (n=38,46) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >20% decrease (n=35,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 94.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >20% decrease (n=34,39) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >50% decrease (n=34,39) | 88.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >20% decrease (n=37,46) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >50% decrease (n=37,46) | 91.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >75% decrease (n=37,46) | 83.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >90% decrease (n=37,46) | 70.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >20% decrease (n=37,45) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >50% decrease (n=37,45) | 89.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >75% decrease (n=37,45) | 81.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >90% decrease (n=37,45) | 70.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 80.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 80.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 80.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >50% decrease (n=35,44) | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >75% decrease (n=35,44) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >90% decrease (n=35,44) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >20% decrease (n=34,39) | 97.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >50% decrease (n=34,39) | 91.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >75% decrease (n=34,39) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >90% decrease (n=34,39) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >75% decrease (n=34,39) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >90% decrease (n=34,39) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >75% decrease (n=38,46) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >90% decrease (n=38,46) | 71.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >50% decrease (n=29,36) | 86.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >75% decrease (n=29,36) | 72.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >90% decrease (n=29,36) | 69.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >20% decrease (n=29,36) | 93.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >50% decrease (n=29,36) | 86.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >20% decrease (n=28,36) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >75% decrease (n=29,36) | 72.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >50% decrease (n=28,36) | 89.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >75% decrease (n=28,36) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >90% decrease (n=28,36) | 67.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >20% decrease (n=28,36) | 96.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >90% decrease (n=29,36) | 72.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >50% decrease (n=28,36) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >75% decrease (n=28,36) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >90% decrease (n=28,36) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >20% decrease (n=27,35) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >50% decrease (n=27,35) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >75% decrease (n=27,35) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >90% decrease (n=27,35) | 74.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >20% decrease (n=25,35) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >50% decrease (n=25,35) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >20% decrease (n=29,36) | 93.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >75% decrease (n=25,35) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >90% decrease (n=25,35) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >20% decrease (n=24,24) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >50% decrease (n=24,24) | 95.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >75% decrease (n=24,24) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >90% decrease (n=24,24) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >20% decrease (n=24,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >50% decrease (n=24,22) | 95.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >75% decrease (n=24,22) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 97.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122>75% decrease (n=35,43) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 94.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 94.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 77.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >90% decrease (n=24,22) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >20% decrease (n=24,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >50% decrease (n=24,22) | 95.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >75% decrease (n=24,22) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >90% decrease (n=24,22) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 77.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >75% decrease (n=17,20) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 70.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >75% decrease (n=17,20) | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 70.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >20% decrease (n=38,46) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 70.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >20% decrease (n=16,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >50% decrease (n=16,20) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >75% decrease (n=16,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >90% decrease (n=16,20) | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >20% decrease (n=16,20) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >50% decrease (n=16,20) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >75% decrease (n=16,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >90% decrease (n=16,20) | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >20% decrease (n=16,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >50% decrease (n=16,19) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >75% decrease (n=16,19) | 81.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >90% decrease (n=16,19) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 92.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >20% decrease (n=38,46) | 97.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >20% decrease (n=16,20) | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >20% decrease (n=34,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 182 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >50% decrease (n=16,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >90% decrease (n=38,46) | 71.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >20% decrease (n=37,46) | 97.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 86.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >50% decrease (n=37,46) | 91.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >75% decrease (n=16,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >75% decrease (n=37,46) | 82.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 106 >90% decrease (n=37,46) | 71.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >20% decrease (n=37,45) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 184 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >50% decrease (n=37,45) | 91.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 206 >90% decrease (n=16,20) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >75% decrease (n=37,45) | 84.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >20% decrease (n=18,22) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 108 >90% decrease (n=37,45) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >50% decrease (n=18,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 93.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >20% decrease (n=16,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 110 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 84.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >75% decrease (n=18,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 186 >90% decrease (n=18,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 81.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 112 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 90.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >20% decrease (n=36,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >50% decrease (n=16,20) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >50% decrease (n=36,44) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 90.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >75% decrease (n=36,44) | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 114 >90% decrease (n=36,44) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >20% decrease (n=35,44) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 71.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >50% decrease (n=35,44) | 93.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >75% decrease (n=16,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >75% decrease (n=35,44) | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 188 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 61.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 116 >90% decrease (n=35,44) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 95.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 87.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 208 >90% decrease (n=16,20) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 85.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 134 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >20% decrease (n=34,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >50% decrease (n=34,39) | 89.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >20% decrease (n=16,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >75% decrease (n=34,39) | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 190 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 61.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 136 >90% decrease (n=34,39) | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >50% decrease (n=34,39) | 89.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >75% decrease (n=34,39) | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >20% decrease (n=18,21) | 95.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 138 >90% decrease (n=34,39) | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >50% decrease (n=38,46) | 91.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >50% decrease (n=16,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 104 >75% decrease (n=38,46) | 82.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >20% decrease (n=29,36) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >50% decrease (n=29,36) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >75% decrease (n=29,36) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 142 >90% decrease (n=29,36) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >20% decrease (n=29,36) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >50% decrease (n=29,36) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >75% decrease (n=16,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >20% decrease (n=28,36) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 234 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >75% decrease (n=29,36) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >50% decrease (n=28,36) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >75% decrease (n=28,36) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 144 >90% decrease (n=28,36) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 210 >90% decrease (n=16,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >20% decrease (n=28,36) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 246 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >50% decrease (n=28,36) | 86.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >75% decrease (n=28,36) | 80.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 140 >90% decrease (n=29,36) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 146 >90% decrease (n=28,36) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >20% decrease (n=27,35) | 97.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >50% decrease (n=27,35) | 85.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 236 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >75% decrease (n=27,35) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 148 >90% decrease (n=27,35) | 65.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >20% decrease (n=25,35) | 97.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 248 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >50% decrease (n=25,35) | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >75% decrease (n=25,35) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 150 >90% decrease (n=25,35) | 68.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 85.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 152 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 63.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 250 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >50% decrease (n=18,21) | 81.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 154 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >75% decrease (n=18,21) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 85.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 192 >90% decrease (n=18,21) | 61.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 254 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 156 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 95.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >50% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 158 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 85.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 160 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >20% decrease (n=25,27) | 96.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >50% decrease (n=25,27) | 81.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >75% decrease (n=25,27) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 194 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 162 >90% decrease (n=25,27) | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 252 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >20% decrease (n=24,24) | 95.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >50% decrease (n=24,24) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 258 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >75% decrease (n=24,24) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 164 >90% decrease (n=24,24) | 70.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >20% decrease (n=24,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 218 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >50% decrease (n=24,22) | 81.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >75% decrease (n=14,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >75% decrease (n=24,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 93.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 118 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 256 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 93.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 83.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 220 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 120 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 212 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 93.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122>75% decrease (n=35,43) | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 122 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 93.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 83.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 222 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 124 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >20% decrease (n=35,43) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >50% decrease (n=35,43) | 90.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 238 >90% decrease (n=14,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >75% decrease (n=35,43) | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 126 >90% decrease (n=35,43) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 226 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 224 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 89.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 260 >90% decrease (n=13,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 128 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 89.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >75% decrease (n=35,39) | 87.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 166 >90% decrease (n=24,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 196 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >20% decrease (n=24,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >50% decrease (n=24,22) | 81.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >20% decrease (n=18,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >75% decrease (n=24,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 168 >90% decrease (n=24,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >50% decrease (n=18,20) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >50% decrease (n=15,19) | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 81.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >75% decrease (n=18,20) | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 228 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 170 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 198 >90% decrease (n=18,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 244 >20% decrease (n=13,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 130 >90% decrease (n=35,39) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >20% decrease (n=14,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >20% decrease (n=35,39) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 132 >50% decrease (n=35,39) | 87.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >75% decrease (n=15,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >75% decrease (n=17,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 172 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >20% decrease (n=22,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 200 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >50% decrease (n=22,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >50% decrease (n=14,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >75% decrease (n=22,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 174 >90% decrease (n=22,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 240 >50% decrease (n=13,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >75% decrease (n=14,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >75% decrease (n=17,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 176 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 214 >90% decrease (n=15,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 202 >90% decrease (n=17,20) | 65.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 230 >90% decrease (n=14,19) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >20% decrease (n=17,20) | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 178 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 242 >75% decrease (n=13,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >50% decrease (n=17,20) | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >20% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 232 >20% decrease (n=14,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >50% decrease (n=19,22) | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 204 >70% decrease (n=17,20) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >75% decrease (n=19,22) | 68.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 216 >20% decrease (n=15,19) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits | Week 180 >90% decrease (n=19,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR
Percentage of participants with ≥30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.
Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260
Population: The Part III intent-to-treat (ITT3) population consists of all participants who entered into Part III of the study and received at least one administration of tocilizumab during Part III.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR30 (n=18,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR70 (n=39,41) | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR50 (n=41,45) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR30 (n=34,37) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR90 (n=18,18) | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR50 (n=34,37) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR70 (n=34,37) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR70 (n=27,24) | 92.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR30 (n=27,28) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR30 (n=16,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR50 (n=27,28) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR90 (n=39,41) | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR70 (n=16,17) | 93.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR30 (n=27,24) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR90 (n=27,24) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR30 (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR90 (n=34,37) | 73.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR30 (n=15,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR70 (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR50 (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR90 (n=22,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR30 (n=20,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR90 (n=15,17) | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR50 (n=20,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR70 (n=27,28) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR70 (n=20,22) | 95.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR30 (n=19,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR50 (n=19,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR30 (n=15,15) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR90 (n=27,28) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR90 (n=19,19) | 63.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR50 (n=15,15) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR50 (n=18,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR50 (n=42,47) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR70 (n=18,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR90 (n=20,22) | 45.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR30 (n=17,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR70 (n=42,47) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR50 (n=17,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR30 (n=41,45) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR70 (n=17,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR90 (n=42,47) | 81.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR90 (n=17,18) | 64.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR70 (n=41,45) | 95.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR50 (n=16,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR50 (n=27,24) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR90 (n=16,17) | 68.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR90 (n=41,45) | 82.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR50 (n=15,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR30 (n=39,41) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR70 (n=15,17) | 86.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR70 (n=19,19) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR70 (n=15,15) | 86.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR50 (n=39,41) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR90 (n=15,15) | 60.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR30 (n=42,47) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR90 (n=15,15) | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR30 (n=42,47) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR70 (n=42,47) | 95.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR90 (n=42,47) | 72.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR50 (n=41,45) | 97.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR90 (n=41,45) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR90 (n=39,41) | 82.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR50 (n=34,37) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR70 (n=34,37) | 94.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR90 (n=27,28) | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR50 (n=27,24) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR70 (n=27,24) | 95.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR90 (n=27,24) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR90 (n=22,22) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR70 (n=20,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR90 (n=20,22) | 72.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR30 (n=19,19) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR30 (n=18,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR90 (n=18,18) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR30 (n=16,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR70 (n=16,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR90 (n=16,17) | 88.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR70 (n=15,17) | 94.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR90 (n=15,17) | 70.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR30 (n=15,15) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 104 JIA ACR50 (n=42,47) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR30 (n=41,45) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 116 JIA ACR70 (n=41,45) | 97.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR30 (n=39,41) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR50 (n=39,41) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 128 JIA ACR70 (n=39,41) | 97.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR30 (n=34,37) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 140 JIA ACR90 (n=34,37) | 75.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR30 (n=27,28) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR50 (n=27,28) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 152 JIA ACR70 (n=27,28) | 96.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 164 JIA ACR30 (n=27,24) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR30 (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR50 (n=22,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 176 JIA ACR70 (n=22,22) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR30 (n=20,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 188 JIA ACR50 (n=20,22) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR50 (n=19,19) | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR70 (n=19,19) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 200 JIA ACR90 (n=19,19) | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR50 (n=18,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 212 JIA ACR70 (n=18,18) | 94.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR30 (n=17,18) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR50 (n=17,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR70 (n=17,18) | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 224 JIA ACR90 (n=17,18) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 236 JIA ACR50 (n=16,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR30 (n=15,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 248 JIA ACR50 (n=15,17) | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR50 (n=15,15) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR | Week 260 JIA ACR70 (n=15,15) | 93.3 percentage of participants |
Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease
Participants who previously withdrew are excluded. Responders are participants who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260
Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 104 (n=42,47) | 45.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 48.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 55.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 55.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 37.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 41.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 23.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 42.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 212 (n=18,18 | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 43.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 46.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 224 (n=17,18) | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 104 (n=42,47) | 46.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 188 (n=21,22) | 31.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 116 (n=41,46) | 43.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 248 (n=15,17) | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 128 (n=40,43) | 48.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 200 (n=19,21) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 140 (n=38,40) | 45.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 236 (n=16,17) | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 152 (n=27,35) | 54.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 212 (n=18,18 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 164 (n=27,25) | 28.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 260 (n=15,15) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 176 (n=24,22) | 36.4 percentage of participants |
Part II: Number of Active Joints at Week 104
Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The mean number of joints with signs of active arthritis is reported.
Time frame: Week 104
Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached this time point. No data imputation is applied and patients with missing data are excluded.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Number of Active Joints at Week 104 | 1.9 Active Joints | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 104
Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1\) No joints with active arthritis, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (\<20 mm/hour), 4) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) indicates no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS).
Time frame: Week 104
Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached time point plus patients who withdrew because of insufficient therapeutic response and are assumed to have been nonresponders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 104 | 26.7 Percentage of Participants |
Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104
The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1)Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2)Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached the time point plus patients who withdrew because of insufficient therapeutic response and are assumed to have been non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104 | JIA ACR90 response | 61.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104 | JIA ACR70 response | 76.0 Percentage of Participants |
Part II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 104
Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The percentage of participants with no signs of active arthritis is reported.
Time frame: Week 104
Population: The Intent to Treat population in Part II includes 112 participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Only those participants who reached this time point are included in the analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 104 | 47.4 Percentage of Participants |
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 104
Percentage is based on only those participants who were on oral corticosteroid at baseline and reached a nominal visit day on which dose was calculated.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who withdrew have been excluded at post withdrawal visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 104 | 60 Percentage of Participants |
Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104
Rate of SAEs, Rate of Serious Infection AEs, Rate of Related SAEs (remotely, possibly, probably) to Tocilizumab (TCZ), Rate of Macrophage Activation Syndrome, Rate of AEs leading to withdrawal and Rate of deaths per 100 patient years (PY) were calculated using the formula: Number of Patient Events / Duration in study (years) \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same AE in one individual are counted.
Time frame: 104 Weeks
Population: Safety Population- all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had 1 post-baseline safety assessment. Includes all safety data in the database up to the week 104 infusion based on the date of randomization for each patient. (Last date was 31 May 2011)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | SAEs | 23.3 Events per 100 patient year |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | SAEs related to TCZ | 7.4 Events per 100 patient year |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | Macrophage activation syndrome | 1.5 Events per 100 patient year |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | Serious infection AEs | 10.9 Events per 100 patient year |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | AEs leading to withdrawal | 3.0 Events per 100 patient year |
| Tocilizumab | Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104 | Deaths | 1.5 Events per 100 patient year |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)
Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) | -45.6 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) | -10.3 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is an acute phase reactant measured in mm/hour.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | -88.2 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | 33.6 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis
The maximum number of joints with active arthritis is 71 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with: swelling present or pain present and limitation of motion. The joint assessment is performed by an independent assessor, who is not the treating physician, blinded to all other aspects of the patient's efficacy and safety data.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis | -70.6 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis | -37.2 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement
The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement | -51.6 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement | -22.5 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being
The Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being is a VAS. The scale is a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (i.e. maximum arthritis disease activity). This item is completed by the patient or parent/guardian as appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being | -65.8 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being | -1.4 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is a Visual Analog Scale. The scale is 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. This item is completed by the treating physician.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -69.6 Percentage change |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -41.1 Percentage change |
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12
Percentage of participants with a change from an elevated hsCRP value at baseline to a normal hsCRP value at week 12; a change from anemia (low Hemoglobin) at baseline to a normal hemoglobin value at week 12; a change from thrombocytosis (elevated platelets) at baseline to a normal platelet value at week 12; a change from leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) at baseline to a normal white blood cell count at week 12.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. 'n' in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available at baseline and week 12 for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Platelets (n=52,26) | 90.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Hemoglobin (n=50,29) | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | hsC-Reactive Protein (n=72,34) | 98.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Leukocytes (n=28,21) | 75.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | hsC-Reactive Protein (n=72,34) | 5.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Leukocytes (n=28,21) | 9.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Hemoglobin (n=50,29) | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12 | Platelets (n=52,26) | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction
The percentage of participants receiving oral corticosteroids(CS) with a JIA ACR70 response at week 6 or Week 8 who reduced their oral CS dose by at least 20% without subsequent JIA ACR30 flare or occurrence of systemic symptoms at week 12. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70 response is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Week 6 or Week 8, Week 12
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug) who were taking oral corticosteroids.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction | 24.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12
Fever free was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding fourteen days.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug) who had a fever due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12 | 85.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12 | 20.8 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12
The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR30/50/70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 30%/50%/70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR30 response | 90.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR70 response | 70.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR50 response | 85.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR90 response | 37.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR90 response | 5.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR70 response | 8.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR30 response | 24.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12 | JIA ACR50 response | 10.8 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12
Part I: Percentage of patients who had anemia (hemoglobin \<lower level normal based on sex and age) at Baseline and a ≥10 g/L increase in hemoglobin at Week 6 and at Week 12.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population for whom hemoglobin data available. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.~LOCF rule applied to missing hemoglobin values at Week 6 and Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12 | Week 6 | 88.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12 | Week 12 | 88.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12 | Week 6 | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12 | Week 12 | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12
Percentage of patients who had at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from Baseline to Week 12. The CHAQ-DI questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat Population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.~LOCF rule applied to missing CHAQ-DI Scores at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | 77.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12 | 18.9 Percentage of participants |
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12
Percentage of participants who had a rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days prior to the baseline visit but no rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days preceding the Week 12 visit day.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population for whom data was available. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12 | 63.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12 | 11.1 Percentage of participants |