Skip to content

A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Active Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Tocilizumab on Disease Response in Patients With Active Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA), With an Open-label Extension to Examine the Long Term Use of Tocilizumab

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00642460
Enrollment
112
Registered
2008-03-25
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2016-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) who have an inadequate clinical response to NSAIDs and corticosteroids. In Part I of the study patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive iv infusions of RoActemra/Actemra (8mg/kg iv for patients \>=30kg, or 12mg/kg for patients \<30kg) or placebo, every 2 weeks. Stable NSAIDs and methotrexate will be continued throughout. After 12 weeks of double-blind treatment, all patients will have the option to enter Part II of the study to receive open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra for a further 92 weeks, followed by a 3-year continuation of the study in Part III in which, for patients who meet specific criteria, an optional alternative dosing schedule decreasing the study drug administration frequency will be introduced. Anticipated time on study treatment is up to 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8mg/kg (patients\>=30kg) or 12mg/kg (patients \<30kg) iv every 2 weeks. In Part III, administration frequency may be reduced to every 3 and every 4 weeks, respectively, according to an optional alternative dosing schedule.

DRUGPlacebo

iv every 2 weeks for 12 weeks

DRUGmethotrexate

as prescribed

DRUGcorticosteroids

orally, as prescribed

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 2-17 years of age * Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with \>= 6 months persistent activity * Presence of active disease (\>=5 active joints, or \>=2 active joints + fever + steroids) * Inadequate clinical response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids due to toxicity or lack of efficacy

Exclusion criteria

* Wheelchair-bound or bed-ridden * Any other autoimmune, rheumatic disease or overlap syndrome other than systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis * Intravenous long-acting corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks of baseline, or throughout study * Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), other than methotrexate * Previous treatment with tocilizumab

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of FeverBaseline, Week 12Percentage of participants with ≥30% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. Absence of fever was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding seven days.
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104Baseline, Week 104Percentage of participants with ≥20 percent, ≥50 percent, ≥75 percent and ≥90 percent decreases in oral corticosteroid dose (mg/kg/day) from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-beingBaseline, Week 12The Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being is a VAS. The scale is a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (i.e. maximum arthritis disease activity). This item is completed by the patient or parent/guardian as appropriate.
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active ArthritisBaseline, Week 12The maximum number of joints with active arthritis is 71 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with: swelling present or pain present and limitation of motion. The joint assessment is performed by an independent assessor, who is not the treating physician, blinded to all other aspects of the patient's efficacy and safety data.
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of MovementBaseline, Week 12The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'.
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation RateBaseline, Week 12Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is an acute phase reactant measured in mm/hour.
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Fever free was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding fourteen days.
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)Baseline, Week 12Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Percentage of participants with a change from an elevated hsCRP value at baseline to a normal hsCRP value at week 12; a change from anemia (low Hemoglobin) at baseline to a normal hemoglobin value at week 12; a change from thrombocytosis (elevated platelets) at baseline to a normal platelet value at week 12; a change from leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) at baseline to a normal white blood cell count at week 12.
Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid ReductionWeek 6 or Week 8, Week 12The percentage of participants receiving oral corticosteroids(CS) with a JIA ACR70 response at week 6 or Week 8 who reduced their oral CS dose by at least 20% without subsequent JIA ACR30 flare or occurrence of systemic symptoms at week 12. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70 response is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Participants rated their pain by placing a horizontal line on a Visual Analog Scale on a scale of 0 (no pain)- 100 mm (severe pain). The score at 12 weeks minus the score at baseline. A negative number indicates improvement.
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Percentage of patients who had at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from Baseline to Week 12. The CHAQ-DI questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do).
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Percentage of participants who had a rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days prior to the baseline visit but no rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days preceding the Week 12 visit day.
Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Part I: Percentage of patients who had anemia (hemoglobin \<lower level normal based on sex and age) at Baseline and a ≥10 g/L increase in hemoglobin at Week 6 and at Week 12.
Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104Baseline, Week 104The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1)Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2)Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Part II: Number of Active Joints at Week 104Week 104Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The mean number of joints with signs of active arthritis is reported.
Part II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 104Week 104Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The percentage of participants with no signs of active arthritis is reported.
Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR30/50/70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 30%/50%/70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.
Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104Baseline, Week 104Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 104Baseline, Week 104Percentage is based on only those participants who were on oral corticosteroid at baseline and reached a nominal visit day on which dose was calculated.
Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104104 WeeksRate of SAEs, Rate of Serious Infection AEs, Rate of Related SAEs (remotely, possibly, probably) to Tocilizumab (TCZ), Rate of Macrophage Activation Syndrome, Rate of AEs leading to withdrawal and Rate of deaths per 100 patient years (PY) were calculated using the formula: Number of Patient Events / Duration in study (years) \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same AE in one individual are counted.
Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260Percentage of participants with ≥30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260JIA ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.
Part III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsBaseline and Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260Oral corticosteroid values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the the visit of withdrawal and all subsequent visits.
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment. Data presented up to entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsEvery 2 weeks from Week 104 to Week 260Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment.
Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260Participants who previously withdrew are excluded. Responders are participants who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260Patients who previously withdrew are excluded Responders are patients who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at all visits in the 6 months (180 days) prior to and including the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. iv. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.
Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.
Part II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 104Week 104Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1\) No joints with active arthritis, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (\<20 mm/hour), 4) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) indicates no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS).
Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline, Week 12Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is a Visual Analog Scale. The scale is 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. This item is completed by the treating physician.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study consists of 3 parts. Part I: a 12 week double-blind placebo controlled study followed by Part II: a 92 week single arm open-label extension study followed by Part III: a 3 year open label continuation study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (for patients ≥30 kg) or 12 mg/kg (for patients \<30 kg) intravenous (iv) every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in Part 1. Participants remained on their prescribed standard of care treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and corticosteroids if applicable.
75
Placebo
Placebo iv every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in Part 1. Participants remained on their prescribed standard of care treatment with NSAIDs, methotrexate and corticosteroids if applicable.
37
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Part I: 12 Week Double-BlindAdverse Event011000
Part I: 12 Week Double-BlindRefused Treatment100000
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Administrative reason000001
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Adverse Event000076
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Death000003
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Insufficient therapeutic response000034
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Lost to Follow-up000011
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Other000022
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Refused treatment000083
Part III: Open-Label Up to Week 260Withdrawal by Subject000041
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Administrative reasons000100
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Adverse Event420000
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Death010200
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Failure to return010000
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Insufficient therapeutic response230000
Part II: Open-Label Up to Week 92Refused treatment310000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboTocilizumab
Age, Customized
13 to 17
37 years11 years26 years
Age, Customized
2 to 5
27 years11 years16 years
Age, Customized
6 to 12
48 years15 years33 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants17 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants20 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
112 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
48 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Part II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104

Percentage of participants with ≥20 percent, ≥50 percent, ≥75 percent and ≥90 percent decreases in oral corticosteroid dose (mg/kg/day) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: Includes only participants on oral corticosteroids at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104≥20 percent decrease76 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104≥50 percent decrease73 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104≥75 percent decrease62 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Decreases in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Week 104≥90 percent decrease47 Percentage of participants
Primary

Part I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever

Percentage of participants with ≥30% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains. Absence of fever was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding seven days.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all participants who had at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever85.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Improvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set and Absence of Fever24.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12

Participants rated their pain by placing a horizontal line on a Visual Analog Scale on a scale of 0 (no pain)- 100 mm (severe pain). The score at 12 weeks minus the score at baseline. A negative number indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population who had Pain VAS data available at baseline and week 12. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing pain VAS at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12-41.0 mm
PlaceboPart I: Change From Baseline in the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12-1.1 mm
Secondary

Part II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104

Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who withdrew have been excluded at post withdrawal visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPart II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104Baseline (n=112)1.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
TocilizumabPart II: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI) Score at Week 104Week 104 (n=57)0.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Secondary

Part III: Doses of Oral Corticosteroids

Oral corticosteroid values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the the visit of withdrawal and all subsequent visits.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 116 (n=42,46)0.022 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0464
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 164 (n=28,25)0.018 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0349
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 236 (n=17,18)0.018 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0283
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 176 (n=25,23)0.019 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0383
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 128 (n=41,42)0.022 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0449
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 188 (n=21,22)0.020 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0366
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 104 (n=45,48)0.020 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0455
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 200 (n=20,20)0.017 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0284
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 140 (n=34,38)0.031 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0625
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 212 (n=19,19)0.016 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0274
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsBaseline (n=53,59)0.203 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1572
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 248 (n=16,18)0.020 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.029
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 152 (n=28,31)0.021 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0388
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 260 (n=16,18)0.019 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0282
TocilizumabPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 224 (n=18,19)0.017 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0279
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 260 (n=16,18)0.079 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1486
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 224 (n=18,19)0.075 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1399
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 236 (n=17,18)0.077 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1436
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsBaseline (n=53,59)0.356 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1397
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 104 (n=45,48)0.047 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0869
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 116 (n=42,46)0.046 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.0831
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 128 (n=41,42)0.058 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1635
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 140 (n=34,38)0.051 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1112
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 152 (n=28,31)0.060 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1125
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 164 (n=28,25)0.068 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1179
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 176 (n=25,23)0.073 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1327
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 188 (n=21,22)0.075 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1275
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 200 (n=20,20)0.083 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1397
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 212 (n=19,19)0.077 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1449
PlaceboPart III: Doses of Oral CorticosteroidsWeek 248 (n=16,18)0.076 mg/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.1429
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission

Patients who previously withdrew are excluded Responders are patients who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at all visits in the 6 months (180 days) prior to and including the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. iv. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.

Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 260 (n=15,15)13.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 128 (n=40,43)32.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 140 (n=38,40)34.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 152 (n=27,35)25.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 164 (n=27,25)22.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 176 (n=24,22)16.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 188 (n=21,22)14.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 200 (n=19,21)15.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 212 (n=18,18)16.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 224 (n=17,18)29.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 236 (n=16,17)25.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 248 (n=15,17)13.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 116 (n=41,47)14.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 236 (n=16,17)29.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 116 (n=41,47)17.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 260 (n=15,15)6.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 188 (n=21,22)9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 128 (n=40,43)23.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 224 (n=17,18)11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 140 (n=38,40)25.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 200 (n=19,21)4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 152 (n=27,35)25.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 248 (n=15,17)23.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 164 (n=27,25)16.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 212 (n=18,18)5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical RemissionWeek 176 (n=24,22)13.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits

There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day

Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)15.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)5.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)5.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)5.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)12.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)15.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)4.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)4.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)4.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)8.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)9.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)5.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)2.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Off All Arthritis Medications Except Tocilizumab for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260

Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment. Data presented up to entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.

Time frame: Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 140 (n=31,36)68 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 188 (n=18,21)61.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 236 (n=14,18)50.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 200 (n=17,20)59.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 152 (n=25,30)64.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 212 (n=16,19)56.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 128 (n=35,40)69.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 164 (n=25,24)68.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 248 (n=13,18)46.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 260 (n=13,18)46.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 104 (n=38,46)66.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 176 (n=22,22)68.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 116 (n=36,44)67.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 224 (n=15,19)53.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 116 (n=36,44)68.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 224 (n=15,19)63.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 260 (n=13,18)61.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 128 (n=35,40)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 140 (n=31,36)67 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 152 (n=25,30)57.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 164 (n=25,24)58.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 176 (n=22,22)64.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 188 (n=18,21)57.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 200 (n=17,20)60.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 212 (n=16,19)63.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 236 (n=14,18)61.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 248 (n=13,18)61.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline Able to Discontinue Corticosteroids by Weeks 104,116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248, and 260Week 104 (n=38,46)67.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits

There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day

Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)28.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)10.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)18.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)11.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)32.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)23.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)16.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)25.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)18.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)6.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)14.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)6.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)12.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)6.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)17.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)20.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)12.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)4.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)23.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Corticosteroids at Baseline in Clinical Remission Off All Oral Corticosteroids for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)17.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified Visits

There were 4 levels of clinical remission defined while the patient remained on tocilizumab as defined below.. After level 1, each successive level required that all the previous level criteria be met: Level 1: inactive disease criteria have been met at all assessments in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 2: level 1 criteria and no oral corticosteroids received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 3: level 2 criteria and no methotrexate received in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day Level 4: level 3 criteria and no NSAIDs received for sJIA in the last 6 months (180 days) preceding the timepoint assessment day

Time frame: Weeks 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)3.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)5.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)4.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)5.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)18.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)12.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)4.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)3.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)0.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)5.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)7.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 116 (n=41,46)8.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 128 (n=40,43)11.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 140 (n=38,40)5.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 152 (n=27,35)2.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 164 (n=27,25)4.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 176 (n=24,22)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 188 (n=21,22)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 200 (n=19,21)4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 212 (n=18,18)5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 224 (n=17,18)5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 236 (n=16,17)5.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 248 (n=15,17)5.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants on Methotrexate At Baseline in Clinical Remission Off Corticosteroids and Methotrexate for 6 Months Prior to Specified VisitsWeek 260 (n=15,15)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 260

Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.

Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 2600.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies To Tocilizumab During Weeks 104 to 2600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Human antibodies against human antibodies (HAHA), anti-tocilizumab antibodies were assessed by immunogenicity techniques from blood samples drawn every two weeks during Part III of the study.

Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Developed Anti-TCZ Antibodies Associated With The Occurrence of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified Week

JIA ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.

Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260

Population: The Part III ITT3 population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 104 JIA ACR 50 (n=89)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 104 JIA ACR 90 (n=89)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 164 JIA ACR90 (n=51)56.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 176 JIA ACR30 (n=44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 176 JIA ACR70 (n=44)88.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 188 JIA ACR70 (n=42)88.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 212 JIA ACR90 (n=36)55.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 260 JIA ACR70 (n=30)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 104 JIA ACR 70 (n=89)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 104 JIA ACR 30 (n=89)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 116 JIA ACR 30 (n=86)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 116 JIA ACR 50 (n=86)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 116 JIA ACR 70 (n=86)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 116 JIA ACR 90 (n=86)NA percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 128 JIA ACR 90 (n=80)68.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 140 JIA ACR30 (n=71)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 140 JIA ACR50 (n=71)98.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 140 JIA ACR70 (n=71)93.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 140 JIA ACR90 (n=71)66.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 152 JIA ACR30 (n=55)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 152 JIA ACR50 (n=55)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 152 JIA ACR70 (n=55)94.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 128 JIA ACR 30 (n=80)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 152 JIA ACR90 (n=55)60.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 164 JIA ACR30 (n=51)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 164 JIA ACR50 (n=51)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 164 JIA ACR70 (n=51)92.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 128 JIA ACR 50 (n=80)98.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 128 JIA ACR 70 (n=80)91.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 224 JIA ACR50 (n=35)94.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 224 JIA ACR70 (n=35)91.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 224 JIA ACR90 (n=35)68.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 236 JIA ACR30 (n=33)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 236 JIA ACR50 (n=33)93.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 236 JIA ACR70 (n=33)90.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 236 JIA ACR90 (n=33)72.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 248 JIA ACR30 (n=32)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 248 JIA ACR50 (n=32)93.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 248 JIA ACR70 (n=32)87.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 248 JIA ACR90 (n=32)65.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 260 JIA ACR30 (n=30)96.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 260 JIA ACR50 (n=30)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 260 JIA ACR90 (n=30)56.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 176 JIA ACR50 (n=44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 176 JIA ACR90 (n=44)52.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 188 JIA ACR30 (n=42)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 188 JIA ACR50 (n=42)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 188 JIA ACR90 (n=42)50.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 200 JIA ACR30 (n=38)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 200 JIA ACR50 (n=38)97.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 200 JIA ACR70 (n=38)86.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 200 JIA ACR90 (n=38)52.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 212 JIA ACR30 (n=36)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 212 JIA ACR50 (n=36)97.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 212 JIA ACR70 (n=36)88.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants Who Maintain JIA ACR30, JIA ACR50, JIA ACR70, JIA ACR90 Response for 6 Months Previous to the Specified WeekWeek 224 JIA ACR30 (n=35)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at Visits

Values summarized are based on average daily dose on the nominal study day. The prednisone equivalent is used in calculation of oral corticosteroid dose. Participants who withdrew are excluded at the timepoint of this event and at all subsequent visits. Baseline considered first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Every 2 weeks from Week 104 to Week 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >70% decrease (n=17,20)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >50% decrease (n=38,46)94.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >20% decrease (n=35,44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >20% decrease (n=35,39)94.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >20% decrease (n=34,39)94.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >50% decrease (n=34,39)88.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >75% decrease (n=14,18)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >20% decrease (n=37,46)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >50% decrease (n=37,46)91.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >75% decrease (n=37,46)83.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >90% decrease (n=37,46)70.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >20% decrease (n=37,45)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >50% decrease (n=37,45)89.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >75% decrease (n=37,45)81.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >90% decrease (n=37,45)70.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >50% decrease (n=36,44)88.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >75% decrease (n=36,44)80.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >90% decrease (n=36,44)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >50% decrease (n=36,44)88.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >75% decrease (n=36,44)80.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >90% decrease (n=36,44)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >50% decrease (n=36,44)88.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >75% decrease (n=36,44)80.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >90% decrease (n=36,44)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >50% decrease (n=35,44)91.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >75% decrease (n=35,44)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >90% decrease (n=35,44)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >90% decrease (n=35,39)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >50% decrease (n=35,39)88.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >75% decrease (n=35,39)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >90% decrease (n=35,39)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >20% decrease (n=34,39)97.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >50% decrease (n=34,39)91.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >75% decrease (n=34,39)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >90% decrease (n=34,39)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >75% decrease (n=34,39)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >90% decrease (n=34,39)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >75% decrease (n=38,46)84.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >90% decrease (n=38,46)71.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >50% decrease (n=29,36)86.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >75% decrease (n=29,36)72.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >90% decrease (n=29,36)69.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >20% decrease (n=29,36)93.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >50% decrease (n=29,36)86.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >20% decrease (n=28,36)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >75% decrease (n=29,36)72.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >50% decrease (n=28,36)89.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >75% decrease (n=28,36)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >90% decrease (n=28,36)67.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >20% decrease (n=28,36)96.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >90% decrease (n=29,36)72.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >50% decrease (n=28,36)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >75% decrease (n=28,36)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >90% decrease (n=28,36)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >20% decrease (n=27,35)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >50% decrease (n=27,35)96.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >75% decrease (n=27,35)77.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >90% decrease (n=27,35)74.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >20% decrease (n=25,35)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >50% decrease (n=25,35)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >20% decrease (n=29,36)93.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >75% decrease (n=25,35)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >90% decrease (n=25,35)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >20% decrease (n=25,27)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >50% decrease (n=25,27)96.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >75% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >90% decrease (n=25,27)76.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >20% decrease (n=24,24)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >50% decrease (n=24,24)95.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >75% decrease (n=24,24)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >90% decrease (n=24,24)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >20% decrease (n=24,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >50% decrease (n=24,22)95.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >75% decrease (n=24,22)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >50% decrease (n=35,43)88.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >75% decrease (n=35,43)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >90% decrease (n=35,43)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >50% decrease (n=35,43)88.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >75% decrease (n=35,43)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >20% decrease (n=35,43)97.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >50% decrease (n=35,43)88.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122>75% decrease (n=35,43)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >50% decrease (n=35,43)94.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >75% decrease (n=35,43)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >90% decrease (n=35,43)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >50% decrease (n=35,43)94.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >75% decrease (n=35,43)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >90% decrease (n=35,43)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >20% decrease (n=35,39)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >50% decrease (n=35,39)91.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >75% decrease (n=35,39)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >90% decrease (n=35,39)77.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >20% decrease (n=35,39)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >50% decrease (n=35,39)91.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >75% decrease (n=35,39)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >90% decrease (n=35,39)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >90% decrease (n=24,22)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >20% decrease (n=24,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >50% decrease (n=24,22)95.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >75% decrease (n=24,22)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >90% decrease (n=24,22)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >20% decrease (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >50% decrease (n=22,22)95.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >75% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >90% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >20% decrease (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >50% decrease (n=22,22)95.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >75% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >20% decrease (n=35,39)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >50% decrease (n=35,39)91.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >75% decrease (n=35,39)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >90% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >20% decrease (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >50% decrease (n=22,22)95.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >75% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >90% decrease (n=22,22)77.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >20% decrease (n=19,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >50% decrease (n=19,22)94.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >75% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >90% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >20% decrease (n=19,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >50% decrease (n=19,22)94.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >75% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >90% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >75% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >20% decrease (n=19,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >50% decrease (n=19,22)94.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >75% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >90% decrease (n=19,22)73.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >20% decrease (n=18,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >50% decrease (n=18,22)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >75% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >90% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >20% decrease (n=18,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >50% decrease (n=18,22)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >75% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >90% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >20% decrease (n=18,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >50% decrease (n=18,22)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >75% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >90% decrease (n=18,22)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >20% decrease (n=18,21)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >50% decrease (n=18,21)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >75% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >90% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >20% decrease (n=18,21)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >50% decrease (n=18,21)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >75% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >90% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >20% decrease (n=18,21)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >50% decrease (n=18,21)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >75% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >90% decrease (n=18,21)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >20% decrease (n=18,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >50% decrease (n=18,20)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >75% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >90% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >20% decrease (n=18,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >75% decrease (n=15,19)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >75% decrease (n=15,19)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >75% decrease (n=15,19)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >75% decrease (n=15,19)80.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >50% decrease (n=18,20)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >75% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >90% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >20% decrease (n=18,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >50% decrease (n=18,20)94.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >75% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >90% decrease (n=18,20)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >20% decrease (n=17,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >50% decrease (n=17,20)94.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >75% decrease (n=17,20)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >90% decrease (n=17,20)70.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >20% decrease (n=17,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >50% decrease (n=17,20)94.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >75% decrease (n=17,20)76.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >90% decrease (n=17,20)70.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >20% decrease (n=17,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >50% decrease (n=17,20)94.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >20% decrease (n=38,46)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >90% decrease (n=17,20)70.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >20% decrease (n=16,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >50% decrease (n=16,20)93.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >75% decrease (n=16,20)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >90% decrease (n=16,20)68.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >20% decrease (n=16,20)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >50% decrease (n=16,20)93.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >75% decrease (n=16,20)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >90% decrease (n=16,20)68.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >20% decrease (n=16,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >50% decrease (n=16,19)93.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >75% decrease (n=16,19)81.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >90% decrease (n=16,19)75.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >75% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >20% decrease (n=14,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >50% decrease (n=14,19)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >90% decrease (n=14,19)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >20% decrease (n=14,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >50% decrease (n=14,19)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >90% decrease (n=14,19)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >20% decrease (n=14,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >50% decrease (n=14,19)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >90% decrease (n=14,19)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >20% decrease (n=14,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >50% decrease (n=14,18)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >75% decrease (n=14,18)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >90% decrease (n=14,18)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >20% decrease (n=14,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >50% decrease (n=14,18)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >75% decrease (n=14,18)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >90% decrease (n=14,18)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >20% decrease (n=14,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >50% decrease (n=14,18)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >75% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >20% decrease (n=15,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >50% decrease (n=15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >90% decrease (n=14,18)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >20% decrease (n=14,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >50% decrease (n=14,18)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >75% decrease (n=14,18)78.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >90% decrease (n=14,18)71.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >20% decrease (n=13,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >50% decrease (n=13,18)92.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >75% decrease (n=13,18)76.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >90% decrease (n=13,18)69.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >90% decrease (n=17,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >20% decrease (n=38,46)97.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >20% decrease (n=18,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >90% decrease (n=36,44)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >50% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >50% decrease (n=18,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >20% decrease (n=16,20)85.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >75% decrease (n=18,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >20% decrease (n=34,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 182 >90% decrease (n=18,22)63.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >50% decrease (n=16,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >20% decrease (n=18,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >90% decrease (n=38,46)71.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >75% decrease (n=14,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >20% decrease (n=37,46)97.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >50% decrease (n=18,22)86.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >50% decrease (n=37,46)91.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >75% decrease (n=16,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >75% decrease (n=37,46)82.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >75% decrease (n=18,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 106 >90% decrease (n=37,46)71.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >20% decrease (n=37,45)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 184 >90% decrease (n=18,22)63.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >50% decrease (n=37,45)91.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 206 >90% decrease (n=16,20)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >75% decrease (n=37,45)84.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >20% decrease (n=18,22)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 108 >90% decrease (n=37,45)73.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >90% decrease (n=14,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >50% decrease (n=18,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >50% decrease (n=36,44)93.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >20% decrease (n=16,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 110 >75% decrease (n=36,44)84.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >75% decrease (n=18,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >50% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >50% decrease (n=36,44)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 186 >90% decrease (n=18,22)63.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >75% decrease (n=36,44)81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >20% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 112 >90% decrease (n=36,44)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >20% decrease (n=18,21)90.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >20% decrease (n=36,44)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >50% decrease (n=16,20)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >50% decrease (n=36,44)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >50% decrease (n=18,21)90.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >75% decrease (n=36,44)79.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >75% decrease (n=14,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 114 >90% decrease (n=36,44)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >20% decrease (n=35,44)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >75% decrease (n=18,21)71.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >50% decrease (n=35,44)93.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >75% decrease (n=16,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >75% decrease (n=35,44)79.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 188 >90% decrease (n=18,21)61.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 116 >90% decrease (n=35,44)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >50% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >75% decrease (n=35,39)84.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >20% decrease (n=18,21)95.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >90% decrease (n=35,39)71.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >20% decrease (n=35,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >50% decrease (n=35,39)87.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 208 >90% decrease (n=16,20)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >75% decrease (n=35,39)84.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >50% decrease (n=18,21)85.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 134 >90% decrease (n=35,39)71.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >20% decrease (n=34,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >75% decrease (n=18,21)66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >50% decrease (n=34,39)89.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >20% decrease (n=16,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >75% decrease (n=34,39)84.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 190 >90% decrease (n=18,21)61.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 136 >90% decrease (n=34,39)71.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >50% decrease (n=34,39)89.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >75% decrease (n=14,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >75% decrease (n=34,39)84.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >20% decrease (n=18,21)95.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 138 >90% decrease (n=34,39)71.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >50% decrease (n=38,46)91.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >50% decrease (n=16,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 104 >75% decrease (n=38,46)82.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >20% decrease (n=29,36)97.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >90% decrease (n=14,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >50% decrease (n=29,36)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >75% decrease (n=29,36)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 142 >90% decrease (n=29,36)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >20% decrease (n=29,36)97.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >50% decrease (n=29,36)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >75% decrease (n=16,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >20% decrease (n=28,36)97.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 234 >90% decrease (n=14,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >75% decrease (n=29,36)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >50% decrease (n=28,36)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >75% decrease (n=28,36)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 144 >90% decrease (n=28,36)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 210 >90% decrease (n=16,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >20% decrease (n=28,36)97.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 246 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >50% decrease (n=28,36)86.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >75% decrease (n=28,36)80.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 140 >90% decrease (n=29,36)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 146 >90% decrease (n=28,36)66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >20% decrease (n=27,35)97.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >50% decrease (n=27,35)85.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 236 >20% decrease (n=14,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >75% decrease (n=27,35)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 148 >90% decrease (n=27,35)65.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >50% decrease (n=13,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >20% decrease (n=25,35)97.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 248 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >50% decrease (n=25,35)88.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >20% decrease (n=14,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >75% decrease (n=25,35)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 150 >90% decrease (n=25,35)68.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >50% decrease (n=13,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >50% decrease (n=25,27)85.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 152 >90% decrease (n=25,27)63.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 250 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >50% decrease (n=25,27)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >50% decrease (n=18,21)81.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 154 >90% decrease (n=25,27)70.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >75% decrease (n=18,21)66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >50% decrease (n=13,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >50% decrease (n=25,27)85.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 192 >90% decrease (n=18,21)61.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 254 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 156 >90% decrease (n=25,27)70.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >20% decrease (n=18,20)95.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >50% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >50% decrease (n=25,27)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >50% decrease (n=18,20)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 158 >90% decrease (n=25,27)70.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >50% decrease (n=25,27)85.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >50% decrease (n=13,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >50% decrease (n=13,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 160 >90% decrease (n=25,27)70.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >20% decrease (n=25,27)96.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >75% decrease (n=18,20)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >50% decrease (n=25,27)81.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >75% decrease (n=22,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >75% decrease (n=25,27)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 194 >90% decrease (n=18,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 162 >90% decrease (n=25,27)70.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 252 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >20% decrease (n=24,24)95.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >50% decrease (n=24,24)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 258 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >75% decrease (n=24,24)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 164 >90% decrease (n=24,24)70.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >20% decrease (n=14,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >20% decrease (n=24,22)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 218 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >50% decrease (n=24,22)81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >75% decrease (n=14,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >75% decrease (n=24,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >50% decrease (n=35,43)93.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >75% decrease (n=35,43)81.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 118 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 256 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >50% decrease (n=35,43)93.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >75% decrease (n=35,43)83.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 220 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 120 >90% decrease (n=35,43)76.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 212 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >50% decrease (n=35,43)93.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >50% decrease (n=14,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122>75% decrease (n=35,43)81.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 122 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >50% decrease (n=35,43)93.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >75% decrease (n=35,43)83.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 222 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 124 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >20% decrease (n=35,43)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >50% decrease (n=35,43)90.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 238 >90% decrease (n=14,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >75% decrease (n=35,43)81.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 126 >90% decrease (n=35,43)74.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 226 >90% decrease (n=14,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >20% decrease (n=35,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 224 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >50% decrease (n=35,39)89.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 260 >90% decrease (n=13,18)72.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >75% decrease (n=35,39)82.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >20% decrease (n=18,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 128 >90% decrease (n=35,39)71.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >20% decrease (n=14,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >20% decrease (n=35,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >50% decrease (n=18,20)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >50% decrease (n=35,39)89.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >75% decrease (n=35,39)87.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >75% decrease (n=18,20)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >50% decrease (n=14,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 166 >90% decrease (n=24,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 196 >90% decrease (n=18,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >20% decrease (n=24,22)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >50% decrease (n=24,22)81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >20% decrease (n=18,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >75% decrease (n=24,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 168 >90% decrease (n=24,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >50% decrease (n=18,20)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >20% decrease (n=22,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >50% decrease (n=15,19)84.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >50% decrease (n=22,22)81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >75% decrease (n=18,20)70.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >75% decrease (n=22,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 228 >90% decrease (n=14,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 170 >90% decrease (n=22,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 198 >90% decrease (n=18,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >20% decrease (n=22,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 244 >20% decrease (n=13,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >50% decrease (n=22,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >20% decrease (n=17,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 130 >90% decrease (n=35,39)74.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >20% decrease (n=14,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >20% decrease (n=35,39)97.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >50% decrease (n=17,20)85.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 132 >50% decrease (n=35,39)87.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >75% decrease (n=15,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >75% decrease (n=17,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 172 >90% decrease (n=22,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >20% decrease (n=15,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >20% decrease (n=22,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 200 >90% decrease (n=17,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >50% decrease (n=22,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >50% decrease (n=14,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >75% decrease (n=22,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >20% decrease (n=17,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 174 >90% decrease (n=22,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 240 >50% decrease (n=13,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >20% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >50% decrease (n=17,20)85.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >50% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >75% decrease (n=14,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >75% decrease (n=19,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >75% decrease (n=17,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 176 >90% decrease (n=19,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 214 >90% decrease (n=15,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >20% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 202 >90% decrease (n=17,20)65.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >50% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 230 >90% decrease (n=14,19)73.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >75% decrease (n=19,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >20% decrease (n=17,20)90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 178 >90% decrease (n=19,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 242 >75% decrease (n=13,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >50% decrease (n=17,20)85.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >20% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 232 >20% decrease (n=14,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >50% decrease (n=19,22)90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 204 >70% decrease (n=17,20)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >75% decrease (n=19,22)68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 216 >20% decrease (n=15,19)94.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With a >=20/50/75/90% Decrease From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroid Dose at VisitsWeek 180 >90% decrease (n=19,22)63.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACR

Percentage of participants with ≥30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% improvement in ACR core set consisting of 6 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being VAS, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI consisting of 30 questions in 8 domains.

Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 176, 188, 200, 212, 224, 236, 248 and 260

Population: The Part III intent-to-treat (ITT3) population consists of all participants who entered into Part III of the study and received at least one administration of tocilizumab during Part III.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR30 (n=18,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR70 (n=39,41)97.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR50 (n=41,45)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR30 (n=34,37)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR90 (n=18,18)72.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR50 (n=34,37)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR70 (n=34,37)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR70 (n=27,24)92.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR30 (n=27,28)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR30 (n=16,17)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR50 (n=27,28)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR90 (n=39,41)79.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR70 (n=16,17)93.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR30 (n=27,24)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR90 (n=27,24)66.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR30 (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR90 (n=34,37)73.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR30 (n=15,17)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR70 (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR50 (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR90 (n=22,22)63.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR30 (n=20,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR90 (n=15,17)73.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR50 (n=20,22)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR70 (n=27,28)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR70 (n=20,22)95.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR30 (n=19,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR50 (n=19,19)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR30 (n=15,15)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR90 (n=27,28)66.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR90 (n=19,19)63.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR50 (n=15,15)93.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR50 (n=18,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR50 (n=42,47)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR70 (n=18,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR90 (n=20,22)45.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR30 (n=17,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR70 (n=42,47)92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR50 (n=17,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR30 (n=41,45)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR70 (n=17,18)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR90 (n=42,47)81.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR90 (n=17,18)64.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR70 (n=41,45)95.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR50 (n=16,17)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR50 (n=27,24)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR90 (n=16,17)68.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR90 (n=41,45)82.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR50 (n=15,17)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR30 (n=39,41)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR70 (n=15,17)86.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR70 (n=19,19)94.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR70 (n=15,15)86.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR50 (n=39,41)100.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR90 (n=15,15)60.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR30 (n=42,47)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR90 (n=15,15)66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR30 (n=42,47)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR70 (n=42,47)95.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR90 (n=42,47)72.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR50 (n=41,45)97.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR90 (n=41,45)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR90 (n=39,41)82.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR50 (n=34,37)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR70 (n=34,37)94.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR90 (n=27,28)78.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR50 (n=27,24)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR70 (n=27,24)95.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR90 (n=27,24)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR90 (n=22,22)63.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR70 (n=20,22)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR90 (n=20,22)72.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR30 (n=19,19)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR30 (n=18,18)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR90 (n=18,18)77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR30 (n=16,17)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR70 (n=16,17)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR90 (n=16,17)88.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR70 (n=15,17)94.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR90 (n=15,17)70.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR30 (n=15,15)93.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 104 JIA ACR50 (n=42,47)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR30 (n=41,45)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 116 JIA ACR70 (n=41,45)97.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR30 (n=39,41)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR50 (n=39,41)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 128 JIA ACR70 (n=39,41)97.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR30 (n=34,37)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 140 JIA ACR90 (n=34,37)75.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR30 (n=27,28)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR50 (n=27,28)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 152 JIA ACR70 (n=27,28)96.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 164 JIA ACR30 (n=27,24)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR30 (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR50 (n=22,22)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 176 JIA ACR70 (n=22,22)95.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR30 (n=20,22)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 188 JIA ACR50 (n=20,22)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR50 (n=19,19)94.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR70 (n=19,19)89.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 200 JIA ACR90 (n=19,19)78.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR50 (n=18,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 212 JIA ACR70 (n=18,18)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR30 (n=17,18)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR50 (n=17,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR70 (n=17,18)88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 224 JIA ACR90 (n=17,18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 236 JIA ACR50 (n=16,17)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR30 (n=15,17)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 248 JIA ACR50 (n=15,17)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR50 (n=15,15)93.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% Improvement in JIA Core Set According to ACRWeek 260 JIA ACR70 (n=15,15)93.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease

Participants who previously withdrew are excluded. Responders are participants who met all of the following criteria for inactive disease at the visit assessment day: i. Number of active joints = 0. ii. Absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in the nearest non-missing physical examination prior to or after the week assessment day. This could include results outside of the time window. iii. Absence of symptomatic serositis adverse event. iv. In the 14 days preceding the week assessment day no fever (temperature \>=37.5 C) or rash characteristic of sJIA. v. Normal ESR as defined by an ESR \<20 mm/hr regardless of age and sex. vi. Physician global assessment VAS \<=10. LOCF rule applied to missing number of active joints, ESR and Physician global assessment VAS. Data presented up to the point of entry into the Alternative Dosing Schedule.

Time frame: Weeks 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 164, 188, 200, 212, 224,236,248 and 260

Population: ITT3 population; n=number of participants contributing to the specific statistic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 104 (n=42,47)45.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 116 (n=41,46)48.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 128 (n=40,43)55.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 140 (n=38,40)55.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 152 (n=27,35)33.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 164 (n=27,25)37.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 176 (n=24,22)41.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 188 (n=21,22)23.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 200 (n=19,21)42.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 212 (n=18,1855.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 224 (n=17,18)47.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 236 (n=16,17)43.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 248 (n=15,17)26.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 260 (n=15,15)46.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 224 (n=17,18)44.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 104 (n=42,47)46.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 188 (n=21,22)31.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 116 (n=41,46)43.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 248 (n=15,17)41.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 128 (n=40,43)48.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 200 (n=19,21)14.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 140 (n=38,40)45.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 236 (n=16,17)29.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 152 (n=27,35)54.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 212 (n=18,1844.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 164 (n=27,25)28.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 260 (n=15,15)6.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPart III: Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 176 (n=24,22)36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part II: Number of Active Joints at Week 104

Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The mean number of joints with signs of active arthritis is reported.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached this time point. No data imputation is applied and patients with missing data are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPart II: Number of Active Joints at Week 1041.9 Active JointsStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary

Part II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 104

Criteria for Inactive Disease: 1\) No joints with active arthritis, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly (by physical exam) or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 3) Normal Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (\<20 mm/hour), 4) Physician's global assessment of disease activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) indicates no disease activity (where no disease activity is considered to be a score ≤10 mm on a 100 mm VAS).

Time frame: Week 104

Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached time point plus patients who withdrew because of insufficient therapeutic response and are assumed to have been nonresponders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease at Week 10426.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Part II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104

The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1)Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2)Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who reached the time point plus patients who withdrew because of insufficient therapeutic response and are assumed to have been non-responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104JIA ACR90 response61.3 Percentage of Participants
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR70 and JIA ACR90 Responses Week 104JIA ACR70 response76.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Part II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 104

Seventy-one joints were assessed for signs of active arthritis. The percentage of participants with no signs of active arthritis is reported.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: The Intent to Treat population in Part II includes 112 participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Only those participants who reached this time point are included in the analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With no Active Joints at Week 10447.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Part II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 104

Percentage is based on only those participants who were on oral corticosteroid at baseline and reached a nominal visit day on which dose was calculated.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: Participants from the Intent to Treat population who withdrew have been excluded at post withdrawal visits.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Percentage of Participants With Oral Corticosteroid Cessation at Week 10460 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Part II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104

Rate of SAEs, Rate of Serious Infection AEs, Rate of Related SAEs (remotely, possibly, probably) to Tocilizumab (TCZ), Rate of Macrophage Activation Syndrome, Rate of AEs leading to withdrawal and Rate of deaths per 100 patient years (PY) were calculated using the formula: Number of Patient Events / Duration in study (years) \* 100. Multiple occurrences of the same AE in one individual are counted.

Time frame: 104 Weeks

Population: Safety Population- all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had 1 post-baseline safety assessment. Includes all safety data in the database up to the week 104 infusion based on the date of randomization for each patient. (Last date was 31 May 2011)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104SAEs23.3 Events per 100 patient year
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104SAEs related to TCZ7.4 Events per 100 patient year
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104Macrophage activation syndrome1.5 Events per 100 patient year
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104Serious infection AEs10.9 Events per 100 patient year
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104AEs leading to withdrawal3.0 Events per 100 patient year
TocilizumabPart II: Rate of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Infection Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, AEs Leading to Withdrawal and Deaths Per 100 Patient Years to Week 104Deaths1.5 Events per 100 patient year
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)

Functional ability is assessed using the CHAQ-DI. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). The CHAQ-DI score is the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains that have a non-missing score. This overall score ranges from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)-45.6 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)-10.3 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is an acute phase reactant measured in mm/hour.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate-88.2 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate33.6 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis

The maximum number of joints with active arthritis is 71 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with: swelling present or pain present and limitation of motion. The joint assessment is performed by an independent assessor, who is not the treating physician, blinded to all other aspects of the patient's efficacy and safety data.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis-70.6 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Maximum Number of Joints With Active Arthritis-37.2 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement

The maximum number of joints with limitation of movement is 67 and these are defined as those in the joint assessment with 'limitation of motion'.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement-51.6 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Number of Joints With Limitation of Movement-22.5 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being

The Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being is a VAS. The scale is a 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'very well' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis disease activity) and the extreme right end represents 'very poor' (i.e. maximum arthritis disease activity). This item is completed by the patient or parent/guardian as appropriate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. LOCF rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being-65.8 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Parent/Patient Global Assessment of Overall Well-being-1.4 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is a Visual Analog Scale. The scale is 0 to 100 mm horizontal scale, the extreme left end of the line represents 'arthritis inactive' (i.e. symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end represents 'arthritis very active'. This item is completed by the treating physician.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are excluded. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) rule applied to missing JIA ACR core set components at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-69.6 Percentage change
PlaceboPart I: Percentage Change From Baseline in JIA Core Set ACR Score Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-41.1 Percentage change
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12

Percentage of participants with a change from an elevated hsCRP value at baseline to a normal hsCRP value at week 12; a change from anemia (low Hemoglobin) at baseline to a normal hemoglobin value at week 12; a change from thrombocytosis (elevated platelets) at baseline to a normal platelet value at week 12; a change from leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) at baseline to a normal white blood cell count at week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. 'n' in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available at baseline and week 12 for analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Platelets (n=52,26)90.4 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Hemoglobin (n=50,29)80.0 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12hsC-Reactive Protein (n=72,34)98.6 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Leukocytes (n=28,21)75.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12hsC-Reactive Protein (n=72,34)5.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Leukocytes (n=28,21)9.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Hemoglobin (n=50,29)6.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Changes in Laboratory Indicators: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hsCRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Platelets and Leukocytes From Abnormal at Baseline to Normal at Week 12Platelets (n=52,26)3.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction

The percentage of participants receiving oral corticosteroids(CS) with a JIA ACR70 response at week 6 or Week 8 who reduced their oral CS dose by at least 20% without subsequent JIA ACR30 flare or occurrence of systemic symptoms at week 12. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR70 response is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 70% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Week 6 or Week 8, Week 12

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug) who were taking oral corticosteroids.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction24.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroid Reduction3.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 12

Fever free was defined as no diary temperature recording ≥37.5° Celsius in the preceding fourteen days.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug) who had a fever due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 1285.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With Fever Due to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) at Baseline Who Are Free of Fever at Week 1220.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12

The six JIA ACR components consist of: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) Parent/Patient global assessment of overall well-being, 3) Maximum number of joints with active arthritis, 4) Number of joints with limitation of movement, 5) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and 6) CHAQ-DI. At an assessment visit a JIA ACR30/50/70/90 response in comparison to Baseline is defined as: At least three of the six JIA ACR core components improving by at least 30%/50%/70%/90% and no more than one of the remaining JIA ACR core components worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR30 response90.7 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR70 response70.7 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR50 response85.3 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR90 response37.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR90 response5.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR70 response8.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR30 response24.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Participants With JIA Core Set ACR 30/50/70/90 Response at Week 12JIA ACR50 response10.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12

Part I: Percentage of patients who had anemia (hemoglobin \<lower level normal based on sex and age) at Baseline and a ≥10 g/L increase in hemoglobin at Week 6 and at Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population for whom hemoglobin data available. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.~LOCF rule applied to missing hemoglobin values at Week 6 and Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12Week 688.0 Percentage of participants
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12Week 1288.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12Week 63.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Patients With Anemia at Baseline With a ≥10 g/L Increase in Hemoglobin at Week 6 and Week 12Week 123.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 12

Percentage of patients who had at least a 0.13 improvement in CHAQ-DI score from Baseline to Week 12. The CHAQ-DI questionnaire consists of 30 questions referring to eight domains; dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities. Each domain has at least two component questions and if applicable to the patient there are four possible responses (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat Population. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.~LOCF rule applied to missing CHAQ-DI Scores at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 1277.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Patients With Minimally Important Improvement in CHAQ-DI Score at Week 1218.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Part I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 12

Percentage of participants who had a rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days prior to the baseline visit but no rash characteristic of sJIA in the 14 days preceding the Week 12 visit day.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat population for whom data was available. Patients who withdrew, received escape medication, or for whom the endpoint cannot be determined are classified as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPart I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 1263.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPart I: Percentage of Patients With Rash at Baseline Who Are Free From Rash at Week 1211.1 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026