Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Fentanyl (JNS020QD) in Participants With Cancer Pain

A Phase III Study of JNS020QD in Cancer Pain Patients - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of JNS020QD Switched From Opioid Analgesics

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00641667
Enrollment
66
Registered
2008-03-24
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2013-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Pain

Keywords

Pain, Cancer, Fentanyl, JNS020QD

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fentanyl one-day transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug will enter the body through the skin) in participants switched from morphine preparations, oral oxycodone preparations, fentanyl citrate injection or fentanyl patch for cancer pain.

Detailed description

This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multi-center (conducted in more than one center) and non-comparative study of fentanyl one-day transdermal patch. The study consists of 3 periods: Pre-treatment observation period (4-7 days), Treatment period (10 days) and Follow-up period (2 days). Treatment will be initiated at 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) and the initial dose of fentanyl will be determined based on the daily dose of the opioid analgesic taken by the participant before entering the study and will be maintained for 2 days to ensure safety of participants. Dose escalation or reduction will be as per the Investigator's discretion from Day 3 to Day 7 and thereafter dose will be again maintained from Day 7 to Day 9, ranging from 12.5 mcg/hr-100 mcg/hr and the maximum application dose will be 300 mcg/hr. The patch will be applied on areas including the chest, abdomen, upper arm or thigh and will be replaced daily for 10 days (a total of 9 applications; including the day of final patch removal). Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl

Fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch releasing the drug at the rate of 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) to 100 mcg/hr applied once daily, and maintained for 2 days. Dose escalation or reduction is as per Investigator's discretion (maximum applied dose is 300 mcg/hr) up to Day 7 and then dose is fixed for next 3 days that is Day 10 (end of treatment period).

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants receiving any of the following drugs at a stable dose for at least 3 days (or 9 days in case of fentanyl patch) before the start of application of the study drug: Morphine preparations at less than or equal to 314 milligram per day (mg/day) as an oral morphine equivalent dose of less than or equal to 157 mg/day for suppository or less than or equal to 104 mg/day for injection, oral oxycodone preparations at less than or equal to 209 mg/day, fentanyl citrate injection at less than or equal to 2.0 mg/day, fentanyl patch less than or equal to 7.5 mg * Participants assumed to use not more than 2 rescue doses (dose of a fast-acting opioid analgesic except fentanyl preparations used for lack of analgesic effect) daily for at least 3 days before the start of application of the study drug * Participants showing a pain intensity of less than or equal to 34 millimeter (mm) on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) * Participants who have an established diagnosis of cancer and are notified of the disease * Participants who can be hospitalized during the course of application of the study drug

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with impaired respiratory function due to chronic lung disease or others * Participants with asthma (breathing disorder in which there is wheezing and difficulty in breathing or participants with bradyarrhythmia (slow, irregular heartbeats) * Participants with following measurements indicative of hepatic or renal impairment during the pre-treatment observation period: Aspartate transaminase (AST) greater than 5 times the upper limit of reference range, Alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of reference range, serum creatinine greater than 3 times the upper limit of reference range * Participants with any cerebral damage, such as brain tumor, accompanied by increased intracranial pressure, disturbance of consciousness, coma, or respiratory disturbance * Participants with a history of hypersensitivity to fentanyl or other opioid analgesics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain ControlDay 10 or early discontinuation (ED)Pain control was assessed based on change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and number of daily rescue doses during 3 days before completion of study drug from 3 days before start of study drug. For VAS score, a difference of less than or equal to +15 millimeter (mm) and for rescue doses, a difference of less than or equal to 1 was considered significant to achieve pain control. Pain Intensity VAS ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) used for lack of analgesic effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 1 (pre-application), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or EDParticipants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as no pain and the right edge (100 mm) defined as severest pain conceivable.
Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or EDParticipants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain.
Number of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or EDParticipants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied.
Mean Number of Rescue DosesDay 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or EDRescue dose was defined as the dose of a fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) given in case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect.
Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10 or EDThe treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug by 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported.
Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or EDThe participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (\<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day).

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fentanyl
Fentanyl 1-day application transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that was put on the skin so the drug entered the body through the skin) releasing the drug at the rate of 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) to 100 mcg/hr applied once daily, and maintained for 2 days. Dose escalation or reduction was as per Investigator's discretion (maximum applied dose was 300 mcg/hr) up to Day 7 and then dose was fixed for next 3 days that is Day 10 (end of treatment period).
66
Total66

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1
Overall StudyWorsening of underlying disease3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFentanyl
Age Continuous63.80 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.67
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control

Pain control was assessed based on change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and number of daily rescue doses during 3 days before completion of study drug from 3 days before start of study drug. For VAS score, a difference of less than or equal to +15 millimeter (mm) and for rescue doses, a difference of less than or equal to 1 was considered significant to achieve pain control. Pain Intensity VAS ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) used for lack of analgesic effect.

Time frame: Day 10 or early discontinuation (ED)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FentanylPercentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control81.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Mean Number of Rescue Doses

Rescue dose was defined as the dose of a fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) given in case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 1; (n=66)0.2 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 0.47
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 2; (n=65)0.8 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.06
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 3; (n=65)0.7 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.14
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 4; (n=64)0.7 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.04
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 5; (n=63)0.7 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.05
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 6; (n=63)0.7 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.1
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 7; (n=63)0.8 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.42
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 8; (n=62)0.7 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.14
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 9; (n=62)0.8 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 1.33
FentanylMean Number of Rescue DosesDay 10 or ED; (n=66)0.5 Rescue DosesStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain

Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 1; No pain (n=66)12 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 1; Mild pain (n=66)37 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 1; Moderate pain (n=66)17 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 1; Severe pain (n=66)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 2; No pain (n=65)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 2; Mild pain (n=65)34 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 2; Moderate pain (n=65)21 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 2; Severe pain (n=65)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 3; No pain (n=65)14 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 3; Mild pain (n=65)33 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 3; Moderate pain (n=65)15 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 3; Severe pain (n=65)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 4; No pain (n=64)16 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 4; Mild pain (n=64)34 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 4; Moderate pain (n=64)13 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 4; Severe pain (n=64)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 5; No pain (n=63)15 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 5; Mild pain (n=63)36 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 5; Moderate pain (n=63)12 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 5; Severe pain (n=63)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 6; No pain (n=63)16 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 6; Mild pain (n=63)38 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 6; Moderate pain (n=63)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 6; Severe pain (n=63)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 7; No pain (n=63)14 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 7; Mild pain (n=63)38 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 7; Moderate pain (n=63)11 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 7; Severe pain (n=63)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 8; No pain (n=62)13 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 8; Mild pain (n=62)38 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 8; Moderate pain (n=62)11 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 8; Severe pain (n=62)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 9; No pain (n=62)14 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 9; Mild pain (n=62)40 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 9; Moderate pain (n=62)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 9; Severe pain (n=62)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 10 or ED; No pain (n=66)15 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 10 or ED; Mild pain (n=66)40 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 10 or ED; Moderate pain(n=66)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for PainDay 10 or ED; Severe pain(n=66)3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment Scale

Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 2; Satisfied (n=65)31 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1; Extremely satisfied (n=66)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1; Satisfied (n=66)35 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=66)19 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1; Dissatisfied (n=66)4 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 1; Extremely dissatisfied (n=66)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 2; Extremely satisfied (n=65)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 2; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=65)24 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 2; Dissatisfied (n=65)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 2; Extremely dissatisfied (n=65)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 3; Extremely satisfied (n=65)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 3; Satisfied (n=65)25 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 3; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=65)25 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 3; Dissatisfied (n=65)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 3; Extremely dissatisfied (n=65)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 4; Extremely satisfied (n=64)9 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 4; Satisfied (n=64)28 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 4; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=64)24 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 4; Dissatisfied (n=64)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 4; Extremely dissatisfied (n=64)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 5; Extremely satisfied (n=63)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 5; Satisfied (n=63)30 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 5; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)19 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 5; Dissatisfied (n=63)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 5; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 6; Extremely satisfied (n=63)9 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 6; Satisfied (n=63)31 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 6; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)20 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 6; Dissatisfied (n=63)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 6; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 7; Extremely satisfied (n=63)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 7; Satisfied (n=63)31 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 7; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)18 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 7; Dissatisfied (n=63)4 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 7; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 8; Extremely satisfied (n=62)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 8; Satisfied (n=62)30 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 8; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=62)19 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 8; Dissatisfied (n=62)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 8; Extremely dissatisfied (n=62)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 9; Extremely satisfied (n=62)11 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 9; Satisfied (n=62)32 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 9; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=62)17 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 9; Dissatisfied (n=62)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 9; Extremely dissatisfied (n=62)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10/ED; Extremely satisfied (n=66)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10/ED; Satisfied (n=66)30 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10/ED;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=66)20 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10/ED; Dissatisfied (n=66)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment ScaleDay 10/ED; Extremely dissatisfied (n=66)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale

The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug by 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported.

Time frame: Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment ScaleEffective63 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment ScaleIneffective3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day

The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (\<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day).

Time frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 2; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=65)9 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1; < 4 hours (n=66)44 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=66)9 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=66)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1; >= 12 hours (n=66)0 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 1; 24 hours (n=66)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 2; < 4 hours (n=65)44 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 2; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=65)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 2; >= 12 hours (n=65)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 2; 24 hours (n=65)5 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 3; < 4 hours (n=65)41 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 3; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=65)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 3; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=65)9 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 3; >= 12 hours (n=65)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 3; 24 hours (n=65)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 4; < 4 hours (n=64)47 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 4; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=64)8 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 4; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=64)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 4; >= 12 hours (n=64)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 4; 24 hours (n=64)5 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 5; < 4 hours (n=63)45 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 5; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)10 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 5; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 5; >= 12 hours (n=63)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 5; 24 hours (n=63)5 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 6; < 4 hours (n=63)46 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 6; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 6; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 6; >= 12 hours (n=63)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 6; 24 hours (n=63)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 7; < 4 hours (n=63)44 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 7; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 7; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)4 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 7; >= 12 hours (n=63)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 7; 24 hours (n=63)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 8; < 4 hours (n=62)44 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 8; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=62)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 8; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=62)4 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 8; >= 12 hours (n=62)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 8; 24 hours (n=62)7 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 9; < 4 hours (n=62)47 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 9; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=62)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 9; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=62)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 9; >= 12 hours (n=62)1 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 9; 24 hours (n=62)5 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 10 or ED; < 4 hours (n=66)50 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 10 or ED; >=4 to < 8 hours (n=66)6 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 10 or ED; >=8 to <12 hours (n=66)3 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 10 or ED; >= 12 hours (n=66)2 Participants
FentanylNumber of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per DayDay 10 or ED; 24 hours (n=66)5 Participants
Secondary

Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as no pain and the right edge (100 mm) defined as severest pain conceivable.

Time frame: Day 1 (pre-application), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Population: The FAS population included all participants who applied at least 1 study drug patch and had 1 VAS assessment performed after application of the study drug. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 1 pre-application; (n=66)15.6 mmStandard Deviation 11.77
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 2; (n=65)16.1 mmStandard Deviation 11.95
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 3; (n=65)18.6 mmStandard Deviation 15.84
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 4; (n=64)15.1 mmStandard Deviation 13.09
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 5; (n=63)15.2 mmStandard Deviation 14.31
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 6; (n=63)15.3 mmStandard Deviation 12.68
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 7; (n=63)14.7 mmStandard Deviation 13.47
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 8; (n=62)14.9 mmStandard Deviation 14.34
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 9; (n=62)15.1 mmStandard Deviation 13.38
FentanylPain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDay 10 or ED; (n=66)15.5 mmStandard Deviation 13.34

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026