Skip to content

Comparative Performance of PureVision, Acuvue Oasys and O2Optix

Product Performance of Bausch & Lomb PureVision® Contact Lens When Compared to Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys Contact Lens and the Ciba Vision O2Optix Contact Lens Worn Daily.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00640341
Enrollment
510
Registered
2008-03-21
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2011-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the PureVision Contact Lens compared to Acuvue Oasys Contact lens and O2Optix Contact lens when worn on a daily wear basis.

Interventions

contact lens for daily wear

contact lens for daily wear

contact lens for daily wear

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is myopic * VA correctable to 0.3 LogMAR or better (driving vision) * Clear central cornea * Subject uses a lens care system on a regular basis

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease affecting ocular health * Using systemic or topical medications * Wear monovision, multifocal or toric contact lenses * Any grade 2 or greater slit lamp findings

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any Slit Lamp Finding > Grade 2Over all follow-up visits for the 1 month study periodAll dispensed eyes over all follow-up visits. Measured on a scale of 0-4 with 0=no findings and 4=severe findings. Epithelial edema, epithelial microcysts, corneal staining, limbal & bulbar injection, conjunctival abnormalities, corneal neovascularization and infiltrates were measured.
Subjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsOver all follow-up visits for 1 month study periodSubjective ratings of symptoms/complaints using a scale of 0 = Severe Stinging/Burning to 100 = No Stinging/Burning for each eye; 0 represented the least favorable rating and a 100 represented the most favorable rating.
Uncorrected Distance High Contrast Visual AcuityOver all visits for the 1 month study periodlogMAR high contrast visual acuity (VA) over all visits.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

546 subjects (1092 eyes) were planned to be enrolled at 26 investigative sites in the US. First subject enrolled on 2/25/2008 and last subject seen was 4/28/2008.

Pre-assignment details

510 subjects (1020 eyes) were enrolled (all were dispensed). 477 subjects (954 eyes) completed the study. 10 subjects were ineligible at baseline and 23 were discontinued during the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PureVision
Redesigned PureVision Contact Lens. Lenses are to be worn on a daily wear basis.
165
Acuvue Oasys
Currently marketed Acuvue Oasys Contact Lens. Lenses are to be worn on a daily wear basis.
167
O2Optix
Currently marketed O2Optix Contact Lens. Lenses are to be worn on a daily wear basis.
168
Total500

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyAdverse event and positive slit lamp100
Overall StudyFailure to Follow Subject Instructions100
Overall StudyInability to Maintain Wearing Schedule110
Overall StudyIneligable at Baseline532
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up200
Overall StudyPoor fit/Uncomfortable400
Overall StudyPositive Slit Lamp Findings001
Overall StudyStudy Related Symptoms/Complaints212
Overall StudyUnacceptable Lens Movement100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject401

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPureVisionAcuvue OasysO2OptixTotal
Age, Customized
Age 18 to 65 years
165 Participants167 Participants168 Participants500 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
165 Participants167 Participants168 Participants500 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
125 Participants127 Participants124 Participants376 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants40 Participants44 Participants124 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3400 / 3400 / 340
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3400 / 3400 / 340

Outcome results

Primary

Any Slit Lamp Finding > Grade 2

All dispensed eyes over all follow-up visits. Measured on a scale of 0-4 with 0=no findings and 4=severe findings. Epithelial edema, epithelial microcysts, corneal staining, limbal & bulbar injection, conjunctival abnormalities, corneal neovascularization and infiltrates were measured.

Time frame: Over all follow-up visits for the 1 month study period

Population: All dispensed eyes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PureVisionAny Slit Lamp Finding > Grade 22 Eyes
Acuvue OasysAny Slit Lamp Finding > Grade 25 Eyes
O2OptixAny Slit Lamp Finding > Grade 210 Eyes
Primary

Subjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/Complaints

Subjective ratings of symptoms/complaints using a scale of 0 = Severe Stinging/Burning to 100 = No Stinging/Burning for each eye; 0 represented the least favorable rating and a 100 represented the most favorable rating.

Time frame: Over all follow-up visits for 1 month study period

Population: All eligible dispensed eyes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsEnd of Day Comfort76.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.86
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsRedness91.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.93
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsIrritation81.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.15
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsLens Awareness79.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.46
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsDryness81.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.22
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsComfort Throughout the Day82.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.94
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsMorning Comfort85.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.55
PureVisionSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsItching89.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.75
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsLens Awareness89.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsMorning Comfort92.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.97
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsComfort Throughout the Day90.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.47
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsEnd of Day Comfort85.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.69
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsIrritation90.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.42
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsItching93.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.81
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsDryness89.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.42
Acuvue OasysSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsRedness94.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.14
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsLens Awareness86.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.91
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsItching92.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.57
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsMorning Comfort92.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.79
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsRedness91.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.23
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsEnd of Day Comfort81.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.4
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsDryness85.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.46
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsIrritation87.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.89
O2OptixSubjective Responses to Comfort-related Symptoms/ComplaintsComfort Throughout the Day88.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.43
Primary

Uncorrected Distance High Contrast Visual Acuity

logMAR high contrast visual acuity (VA) over all visits.

Time frame: Over all visits for the 1 month study period

Population: All eligible dispensed eyes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PureVisionUncorrected Distance High Contrast Visual Acuity-0.031 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Acuvue OasysUncorrected Distance High Contrast Visual Acuity-0.026 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.071
O2OptixUncorrected Distance High Contrast Visual Acuity-0.024 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.076

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026