Skip to content

Comparison of Loss of Resistance Techniques

Comparison of Loss of Resistance Technique With Air Versus Saline to Identify Epidural Space for Combined Spinal Epidural Labor Analgesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00638274
Enrollment
356
Registered
2008-03-19
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2018-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Relief

Keywords

Quality of pain relief with 2 different methods of identifying epidural space

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in success outcome of the combined spinal epidural labor analgesia between air versus saline when used to identify the epidural space.

Detailed description

When the epidural needle is inserted initially, it is typically connected to a syringe filled with 2-3 ml or air or saline. This is used to help identify the placement of the epidural needle. Both air and saline are commonly used and it is not clear and debatable which is a better method to identify the correct placement of the needle. Some doctors like using air in the syringe because when a drop of clear fluid returned from the smaller spinal needle, it would be clear to indicate the correct space for first dose of medicine since no pre-existing fluid was used. In group Saline, 3 mL of saline will be used. In group Air, 3 mL of air will be used in the syringe during the procedure. The medicine will be administered in the usual manner the doctor has identified the correct location for administration. The amount of pain during labor will be assessed the patient giving a number from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAir

3 mls used for identifying epidural space

PROCEDURESaline

3 mls of saline used to identify epidural space

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant females weighing less than or equal to 250 lbs * Request for neuraxial labor analgesia

Exclusion criteria

* ASA physical status greater than II

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of Spinal Labor Analgesia From Combined Spinal Epidural24 hoursNumber of participants that had successful spinal labor analgesia in each group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Failed Epidural Catheters24 hoursNumber of Participants with Failed Epidural Catheters and that had to be replaced at any time measured from the time of the catheter is placed until the time of delivery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1-AIR
Air 3 ml used to identify epidural space Air: 3 mls used for identifying epidural space
173
2-SALINE
Saline 3 ml used to identify epidural space Saline: 3 mls of saline used to identify epidural space
172
Total345

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1-AIR2-SALINETotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
173 Participants172 Participants345 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
173 participants172 participants345 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
173 Participants172 Participants345 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1730 / 172
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1730 / 172
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1730 / 172

Outcome results

Primary

Success of Spinal Labor Analgesia From Combined Spinal Epidural

Number of participants that had successful spinal labor analgesia in each group.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1-AIRSuccess of Spinal Labor Analgesia From Combined Spinal Epidural163 Participants
2-SALINESuccess of Spinal Labor Analgesia From Combined Spinal Epidural161 Participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Failed Epidural Catheters

Number of Participants with Failed Epidural Catheters and that had to be replaced at any time measured from the time of the catheter is placed until the time of delivery.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1-AIRNumber of Participants With Failed Epidural Catheters5 Participants
2-SALINENumber of Participants With Failed Epidural Catheters9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026