Skip to content

Evaluate Weight Gain Using 2 Different Formulations of Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension for AIDS-related Weight Loss

A Randomized, Open-labeled, Pilot Study Comparing Weight Gain in Adults With AIDS-related Wasting Given Either Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal Dispersion (MA-NCD) or Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension (Megace)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00637572
Enrollment
63
Registered
2008-03-18
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2017-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AIDS Wasting Syndrome, Anorexia, Cachexia, HIV Infections, HIV Wasting Syndrome

Keywords

Weight loss, Cachexia, Anorexia, Megestrol acetate oral suspension, Nanocrystal dispersion, Nanocrystal technology, Body weight changes, AIDS wasting, HIV wasting, Emaciation, Megace ES, Megace, Treatment Experienced

Brief summary

Explore weight gain in HIV-positive patients who have weight loss associated with AIDS-related wasting (anorexia/cachexia). Patients are treated for 12 weeks with either megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion formulation, or megestrol acetate oral suspension original formulation

Interventions

DRUGMegestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion 115 mg/mL

Megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion 115 mg/mL administered as 575 mg once per day (5 mL dose)

DRUGMegestrol acetate oral suspension 40 mg/mL

Megestrol acetate oral suspension 40 mg/mL administered as 800 mg once per day (20 mL dose)

Sponsors

Quintiles, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Capable of and willing to provide informed consent * Evidence of HIV infection (either HIV-seropositive, CD4+ T-cell count of ≤350/mm3 or other clinically accepted indicator) * An unintentional weight loss resulting in a weight 10% less than the lower limit of Ideal Body Weight for frame size, or a recent history of unintentional weight loss of 10% from the subjects baseline * Weight losses was clinically associated with AIDS-related wasting and not related to any other disease process * Women of childbearing potential had to agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for two weeks after the last dose * Clinical laboratory values had to be within normal limits or out-of-range limits must be designated as not clinically significant (some exceptions per protocol) * Able to read and write in the study related documents translated into the primary local language * Capable of and willing to return to the clinic regularly for study visits * Must have been taking a stable regimen of accepted HIV anti-retroviral treatments for at least two weeks prior to study entry * Capable of completing a 3-day food intake diary with instruction * Willing to abstain from any illegal or recreational drug substances for the duration of the trial * Willing to abstain from taking any other medications or substances known to affect appetite or weight gain (eg, steroids \[other than those inhaled for treatment of asthmatic conditions\], nutritional supplements \[other than vitamins or minerals\], dronabinol, recombinant human growth hormone, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

* Weight loss due to factors other than AIDS-related wasting * Enrollment in any other clinical trial * Lack of access to regular meals * Women of childbearing potential could not be pregnant or nursing * Clinically severe depression evidenced by a baseline score of 17 or more on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD-17) * Recent evidence of or history of significant psychiatric illness that may have compromised the subject's ability to comply with the study requirements * Intractable or frequent vomiting that regularly interfered with eating * Clinically significant diarrhea that would have interfered with absorption of foods or medications * Clinically significant oral lesions or dental conditions that would have interfered with eating a regular diet * History or evidence of thromboembolic events or any first degree relative with a history of thromboembolic events * Active AIDS-defining illness or other clinically significant or uncontrolled medical problems * Current evidence of or history of diabetes mellitus or hypoadrenalism * Systemic treatment with glucocorticoids within the 12 months prior to study entry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body WeightBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12Weight gain in adult HIV positive subjects who have weight loss with AIDS related wasting within the first 12 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in ImpedanceBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12Electrical impedance is a method for body composition assessment. The procedure involves sending a small current through the body and measuring the resistance in ohm. High resistance is associated with smaller amounts of fat-free mass. Smaller resistance is associated with large amounts of fat-free mass.
Change From Baseline in Body Fat MassBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Change in Hip CircumferenceBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Change in Waist CircumferenceBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Lean MassBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Change in Mid-arm CircumferenceBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12
Change in Total EnergyBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12Food intake was quantified by the 24-hour recall food diary
Appetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12Baseline (Day 3) to Week 12Appetite was assessed via visual analogue scale (VAS) as part of the Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) (Question 5 only). The question was To what extent has your appetite changed since the start of treatment? The response was captured on a VAS scale in cm with a range from 0 ( much worse) to 10 (much better).
Quality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)Baseline (Day 3) to Week 12The BACRI instrument is used to measure the benefit of weight gain treatment provided to anorexic patients on health related quality of life aspects. The scale is composed of 9 subscales (0 to 10 \[worse to better\]). The response was captured on a VAS scale in cm. The total BACRI score is the sum with a minimum score 0=worse and maximum score 90=better. These subscales are: change in weight impacting health; concern about weight; appearance change; change feeling of appearance; change in appetite; enjoy eating; overall feeling; benefit of treatment; and quality of life.
Change in Tricep SkinfoldBaseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Countries

India, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal Dispersion
Subjects were treated with 575 mg per as single-dose for 12 weeks
32
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized Formulation
Subjects were treated with 800 mg per as single-dose for 12 weeks
31
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyIllicit Drug Use10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMegestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionMegestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationTotal
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.32
36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.22
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants16 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants15 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 3230 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 3214 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Body Weight

Weight gain in adult HIV positive subjects who have weight loss with AIDS related wasting within the first 12 weeks of treatment

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Body WeightOverall5.4 kgStandard Deviation 5.32
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Body WeightMale7.0 kgStandard Deviation 3.16
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Body WeightFemale2.3 kgStandard Deviation 7.18
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Body WeightOverall3.5 kgStandard Deviation 4.03
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Body WeightMale3.5 kgStandard Deviation 4.72
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Body WeightFemale3.5 kgStandard Deviation 3.42
Secondary

Appetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12

Appetite was assessed via visual analogue scale (VAS) as part of the Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) (Question 5 only). The question was To what extent has your appetite changed since the start of treatment? The response was captured on a VAS scale in cm with a range from 0 ( much worse) to 10 (much better).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 3) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 29 subjects were analyzed in the micronized formulation treatment group based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionAppetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12Baseline Day 36.1 cmStandard Deviation 1.81
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionAppetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12Week 128.4 cmStandard Deviation 1.3
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationAppetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12Baseline Day 35.8 cmStandard Deviation 1.16
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationAppetite at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12Week 128.0 cmStandard Deviation 2.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Fat Mass

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 31 subjects were analyzed for the megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion group based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange From Baseline in Body Fat Mass3.2 kgStandard Deviation 4.1
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange From Baseline in Body Fat Mass2.2 kgStandard Deviation 3.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Impedance

Electrical impedance is a method for body composition assessment. The procedure involves sending a small current through the body and measuring the resistance in ohm. High resistance is associated with smaller amounts of fat-free mass. Smaller resistance is associated with large amounts of fat-free mass.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 31 subjects were analyzed for the megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion group based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange From Baseline in Impedance21.6 ohmsStandard Deviation 77.2
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange From Baseline in Impedance12.2 ohmsStandard Deviation 54.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lean Mass

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 31 subjects were analyzed for the megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion group based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange From Baseline in Lean Mass2.1 kgStandard Deviation 3.74
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange From Baseline in Lean Mass1.3 kgStandard Deviation 2.82
Secondary

Change in Hip Circumference

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 31 subjects and 29 subjects were analyzed, respectively based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Hip Circumference2.5 cmStandard Deviation 3.7
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Hip Circumference1.8 cmStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary

Change in Mid-arm Circumference

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Mid-arm Circumference-0.6 cmStandard Deviation 11.5
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Mid-arm Circumference1.1 cmStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Change in Total Energy

Food intake was quantified by the 24-hour recall food diary

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 27 subjects and 22 subjects were analyzed, respectively based on available baseline data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Total Energy215.9 kcalStandard Deviation 830.3
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Total Energy150.6 kcalStandard Deviation 1044.1
Secondary

Change in Tricep Skinfold

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Tricep Skinfold1.0 cmStandard Deviation 2.6
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Tricep Skinfold1.5 cmStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 31 subjects were analyzed for the megestrol acetate oral suspension nanocrystal dispersion group based on available data measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionChange in Waist Circumference7.1 cmStandard Deviation 4.9
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationChange in Waist Circumference5.4 cmStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Quality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)

The BACRI instrument is used to measure the benefit of weight gain treatment provided to anorexic patients on health related quality of life aspects. The scale is composed of 9 subscales (0 to 10 \[worse to better\]). The response was captured on a VAS scale in cm. The total BACRI score is the sum with a minimum score 0=worse and maximum score 90=better. These subscales are: change in weight impacting health; concern about weight; appearance change; change feeling of appearance; change in appetite; enjoy eating; overall feeling; benefit of treatment; and quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 3) to Week 12

Population: Analysis is based on Intent-To-Treat-Population (ITT); all randomized subjects who were dispensed medication and had at least one post-randomization visit. Only 29 subjects were analyzed in the micronized formulation treatment group based on available baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionQuality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)Baseline (Day 3)52.3 cmStandard Deviation 9.38
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Nanocrystal DispersionQuality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)Week 1267.6 cmStandard Deviation 9.53
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationQuality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)Baseline (Day 3)50.1 cmStandard Deviation 7.31
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Micronized FormulationQuality of Life (QoL) Via Bristol-Myers Anorexia/Cachexia Recovery Instrument (BACRI) at Baseline (Day 3) and Week 12 (BACRI)Week 1265.6 cmStandard Deviation 14.78

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026