Skip to content

Growth Hormone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Growth Hormone in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis as add-on Therapy to Riluzole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00635960
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-03-14
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2010-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS, Growth Hormone, IGF-I

Brief summary

Several drugs have been proposed for ALS. These drugs included: Topiramate, Lamotrigine, creatine, Vit. E, Pentoxifylline, etc. Although most of the trials showed a positive trend, none of them reached a statistically significant result. The only exception is the Riluzole trial, that demonstrated a small but significant reduction in mortality between treated and untreated patients. Aim of our study is to determine if the add-on of GH to treatment with Riluzole is able to reduce neuronal loss in the motor cortex of ALS patients.

Detailed description

Several drugs have been proposed for ALS. These drugs included: Topiramate, Lamotrigine, creatine, Vit. E, Pentoxifylline. Although most of the trials showed a positive trend, none of them reached a statistically significant result. The only exception is the Riluzole trial, that demonstrated a small but significant reduction in mortality between treated and untreated patients. When administered to SOD-1 transgenic mice, IGF-I prolongs survival, ameliorates muscular strength, and reduces weight and motor neuron loss, astrocyte gliosis, and ubiquitin positive protein inclusions. Two clinical trials have been performed in ALS patients with s.c. administration of IGF-I indicating a possible beneficial effect, and a third clinical trial is in progress. Methionyl growth hormone (mGH) showed no effect on survival, disease progression and muscular strength. MGH was administered at a fixed dose and peripheral production of IGF-I appeared to be normal. We propose a double-blind trial of Growth Hormone (GH) as add-on therapy to Riluzole, with an individually regulated dose based on the peripheral response of IGF-I. Aim of our study is to determine if the add-on of GH to treatment with Riluzole is able to reduce neuronal loss in the motor cortex of ALS patients. As secondary objectives, effect of GH on mortality, QoL, and motor function will be assessed.

Interventions

The initial dose will be 2U s.c. every other day. The dose will be progressively increased to reach 1.5-2x the normal levels of IGF-I.

DRUGPlacebo

Same as for Growth hormone group

Sponsors

Istituto Biostrutture e Immagini, CNR Naples
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Federico II University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Definite/probable ALS according to El Escorial criteria * Aged \> 40, \< 85 years * Progression from onset * Disease duration ≤3 years * Treatment with Riluzole

Exclusion criteria

* Rapid disease progression in the first 6 months after diagnosis * Patients with tracheostomy and/or Gastrostomy * Disease duration \> 3 years * Patient with exclusive bulbar or 2° motorneuron involvement * Hepatic/renal failure * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Signs of active neoplasia * Complicated Diabetes * Severe hypertension * Unable to undergo MRI exams

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint is the N-acetylaspartate/Creatine ratio in the motor cortex assessed with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.0, 6 and 12 months after treatment start

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in mortality between groups12 months
Difference in the ALS-FRS score (motor function scale)0, 6, and 12 months after treatment start
Difference in the SF-36 score (quality of life )0, 6, and 12 monthst after treatmetn start
Safety and tolerability12 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026