Skip to content

Asthma Study Comparing Anti-Inflammatory Effects of 3 Doses of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate and Medium Dose Mometasone Furoate (Study P05122 AM1)(COMPLETED)

A 2-Week Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Low, Medium, and High Dose Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI Formulation and Medium Dose Mometasone Furoate DPI and MDI Formulations in Adults and Adolescents With Persistent Allergic Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00635882
Enrollment
93
Registered
2008-03-14
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Inflammation, Asthma

Keywords

mometasone, formoterol

Brief summary

This is a 2-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of low, medium, and high dose mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate (MF/F) metered dose inhaler (MDI) formulation and medium dose mometasone furoate (MF) dry powder inhaler (DPI) and MDI formulations in adults and adolescents with persistent allergic asthma.

Detailed description

This is a 2-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of low, medium, and high dose mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate MDI formulation and medium dose mometasone furoate (MF) DPI and MDI formulations in adults and adolescents with persistent allergic asthma. An open-label run in period is to be followed by a double-blind treatment period. A total of 90 subjects (15 per treatment) will be enrolled to ensure 12 subjects per treatment at the Day 14 evaluation, accounting for a 20% drop-out rate. A sample size of 12 subjects per treatment is required to detect a treatment difference of 28% in percent change of eNO at Day 14, assuming a pooled standard deviation of 20% with a power of 90%. These estimates are based on examination of eNO levels in asthmatic vs healthy subjects in an article written by S.A. Kharitonov et. al, 2003. Subjects will be randomized to one of six treatment groups (MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID, MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID, MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID, MF DPI 200 mcg BID, MF MDI 200 mcg BID, or Placebo MDI BID) according to an Schering-Plough Research Institute (SPRI) computer-generated randomization schedule. Randomization will be performed in appropriately sized blocks using random numbers generated by statistical analysis software (SAS).

Interventions

DRUGmometasone furoate/formoterol 100/10 mcg

mometasone furoate/formoterol 100/10 mcg twice daily (BID) (two inhalations of MF/F 50/5 from a metered-dose inhaler) for 14 days

DRUGmometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 mcg

mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 mcg twice daily (BID) (two inhalations of MF/F 100/5 from a metered-dose inhaler) for 14 days

DRUGmometasone furoate/formoterol 400/10 mcg

mometasone furoate/formoterol 400/10 mcg twice daily (BID) (two inhalations of MF/F 200/5 mcg from a metered-dose inhaler) for 14 days

DRUGMF DPI 200 mcg

MF DPI 200 mcg twice daily (BID) (one inhalation of MF DPI 200 mcg) for 14 days

DRUGMF MDI 200 mcg

MF MDI 200 mcg twice daily (BID) (two inhalations of MF MDI 100 mcg) for 14 days

DRUGPlacebo

MF/F MDI placebo twice daily (BID) (2 inhalations)

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To document asthma diagnosis, historical reversibility defined as an increase in absolute forced expiratory volume (in liters) in 1 second (FEV1) of \>= 12% and \>= 200 mL must have been performed within 12 months of Screening. For subjects without historical reversibility, one of the following methods can be used at the Screening Visit or at any time before the Baseline Visit: * Demonstration of an increase in absolute FEV1 of at least 12% and a volume increase of at least 200 mL within 15-20 minutes after administration of 4 inhalations of albuterol/salbutamol (total dose 360 to 400 mcg) or of nebulized short-acting beta agonist (SABA) (2.5 mg), if confirmed as standard office practice, OR * Demonstration of a peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability of more than 20% expressed as a percentage of the mean highest and lowest morning prebronchodilator PEF over at least 1 week, OR * Demonstration of a diurnal variation PEF of more than 20% based on the difference between the prebronchodilator (before taking albuterol/salbutamol) morning value and the postbronchodilator value (after taking albuterol/salbutamol) from the evening before, expressed as a percentage of the mean daily PEF value on any day during the open-label Run-in Period. {The calculation formula: Diurnal PEF Variation = Absolute \[(highest of 3 readings, PM Post-bronchodilator (BD) PEF from prior evening) - (highest of 3 readings, AM Pre-BD from morning value)\]/\[(highest PM Post-BD + highest AM Pre-BD)/2\] \* 100} * At Screening and Baseline Visits, a subject must have persistent allergic asthma with an FEV1 \>65% predicted. * A subject must be allergic to at least one common allergen (grasses, trees, weeds, house dust mites, molds, dog and cat) as demonstrated by clinical symptoms when exposed to the allergen(s), and by skin prick testing or a radioallergosorbent (RAST) class \>1 (excluding modified RAST procedure \[mRAST\]) within 2 years of inclusion in the study. * If, based upon the medical judgment of the investigator, there is no inherent harm in changing the subject's current asthma therapy, the subject and/or parent/guardian) must agree to discontinue prescribed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), anticholinergics, leukotriene receptor inhibitors, and long-acting beta-2 agonists at the Screening Visit as per required washouts, and be transferred to treatment with SABA for relief for 2 weeks before the Baseline/Randomization Visit. * Clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count, blood chemistries, and urinalysis) conducted at the Screening Visit must be within normal limits or clinically acceptable to the investigator. * An electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at the Screening Visit or within 30 days prior to Screening Visit must be clinically acceptable to the investigator and have a QTc interval \<440 milliseconds for males and \<450 msec for females. * At Screening or any time prior to Baseline, a subject must have an eNO level of \>30 parts per billion (ppb) at a flow rate of 50 mL/second. * At Screening or any time before Baseline, a subject must have a sputum eosinophil count \>3% of total cell count. * Willingness to give written informed consent and ability to adhere to dose and visit schedules. A subject 12 to 17 years of age must also provide written assent. * A nonpregnant female subject of childbearing potential (with a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening) must use a medically acceptable, adequate form of birth control. If not currently sexually active she must agree to use a double-barrier method if she becomes sexually active during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of systemic glucocorticosteroids within 3 months before Screening. * Upper or lower respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks before Screening. * Decrease in absolute FEV1 \>20% between Screening and Baseline Visits. * Requirement for \> 8 inhalations per day of SABA MDI, or 2 or more nebulized treatments of 2.5 mg SABA, on any 2 consecutive days between the Screening and Baseline Visits. * A decrease in AM or PM PEF below the Run-in Period stability limit on any 2 consecutive days before Baseline. At Visit 1, the Run-in Period stability limit for PEF will be established based on the subject's personal best. If the subject does not have a historical personal best, the historical PEF measurement will be the PEF predicted based on the subject's sex, age, and height. PEF value to be multiplied by 0.70 to determine stability limit. * A clinical asthma exacerbation defined as a clinical deterioration of asthma that results in emergency treatment, hospitalization for asthma, or treatment with additional, excluded asthma medication (including oral or other systemic corticosteroids but allowing SABA), as per investigator, between Screening and Baseline Visits. * Inability to induce sputum after 1 or 2 trys.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)Baseline to Day 14

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO PpbBaseline to Day 7
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)Baseline to Day 14
Mean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline to Day 15Mannitol challenge (also referred to as PD15) is the provocative dose of mannitol required to produce a 15% reduction in the forced expiratory volume (in liters) in one second (FEV1).
Change From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline and Days 1-15Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary.
Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline and Days 2-15
Change From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline and Days 1-15
Change From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline and Days 2-15Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Baseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)Baseline

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg
Mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate (MF/F) metered dose inhaler (MDI) 100/10 mcg twice daily (BID) for 14 days
20
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcg BID for 14 days
17
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcg BID for 14 days
12
MF DPI 200 mcg
Mometasone furoate (MF) dry powder inhaler (DPI) 200 mcg BID for 14 days
15
MF MDI 200 mcg
MF MDI 200 mcg BID for 14 days
16
Placebo
Placebo MDI BID for 14 days
13
Total93

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMF DPI 200 mcgMF MDI 200 mcgPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
18 to <65 years
20 participants14 participants11 participants15 participants16 participants11 participants87 participants
Age, Customized
> or = to 65 years
0 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants6 Participants8 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants10 Participants5 Participants46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 208 / 171 / 122 / 156 / 162 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 170 / 120 / 150 / 160 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)

Time frame: Baseline to Day 14

Population: All Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)-35.3 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)-45.4 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)-61.4 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
MF DPI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)-51.3 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
MF MDI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)-46.1 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)0.1 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 40.3
Comparison: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: 0.018ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15

Time frame: Baseline and Days 2-15

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline452.6 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-1548.1 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline421.2 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-1546.9 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline468.7 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-1569.8 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline466.3 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-1530.3 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline473.3 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-1530.8 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Baseline413.2 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 112.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AM Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-9.0 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 47
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.002ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15

Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 2-15

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Baseline1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 2-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 2-15-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Comparison: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.018ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.261ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.334ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15

Time frame: Baseline and Days 1-15

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline462.0 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-1547.7 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline437.2 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-1534.5 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline486.7 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-1566.8 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline484.4 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-1520.2 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline472.5 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-1528.3 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Baseline422.7 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 114.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PM PEF at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-154.5 liters/minuteStandard Deviation 42.3
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.057ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.005ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15

Twice daily, participants rated the following asthma symptoms as experienced during the time period since the last evaluation: wheezing, difficulty breathing, and cough on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe, very uncomfortable and interfered with most or all of normal daily activities/sleep). The total asthma symptom score ranged from 0 to 9. The results were recorded in the participant's diary.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 1-15

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MF DPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MF MDI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PM Total Asthma Symptom Score at Days 1-15Mean Change from Baseline to Days 1-15-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.037ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.643ANOVA
Comparison: One-way ANOVA model with treatment effect was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from the one-way ANOVA model with treatment effect.p-value: 0.963ANOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol Challenge

Mannitol challenge (also referred to as PD15) is the provocative dose of mannitol required to produce a 15% reduction in the forced expiratory volume (in liters) in one second (FEV1).

Time frame: Baseline to Day 15

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline102.2 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15176.6 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline48.6 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15153.8 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline67.9 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15162.9 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
MF DPI 200 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline137.6 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
MF DPI 200 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15159.4 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
MF MDI 200 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline126.0 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
MF MDI 200 mcgMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15146.2 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeBaseline159.4 milligramsStandard Deviation 106.7
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Day 15 of Mannitol ChallengeMean Change from Baseline to Day 15-63.7 milligramsStandard Deviation 264
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline PD15 as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline PD15 as a covariate.p-value: 0.12ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline PD15 as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline PD15 as a covariate.p-value: 0.103ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline PD15 as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline PD15 as a covariate.p-value: 0.048ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)

Time frame: Baseline to Day 14

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)21.1 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)-35.5 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)-75.4 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
MF DPI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)-55.3 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
MF MDI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)-33.7 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 14 in Sputum Eosinophil Count (Percentage)71.7 percentage of Sputum Eosinophil CountStandard Deviation 127.6
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eosinophils as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline EOS as a covariate.p-value: 0.024ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eosinophils as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline EOS as a covariate.p-value: 0.051ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eosinophils as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline EOS as a covariate.p-value: 0.336ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb

Time frame: Baseline to Day 7

Population: All Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb-37.9 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb-39.7 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb-45.6 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
MF DPI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb-46.0 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
MF MDI 200 mcgMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb-37.2 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
PlaceboMean Percent Change From Baseline to Day 7 in eNO Ppb4.8 percentage of eNOStandard Deviation 36.3
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: 0.002ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline eNO as a covariate was used.~Standard deviation is a Pooled Standard deviation from ANCOVA Model with treatment effect and baseline eNO as a covariate.p-value: 0.002ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Baseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcgBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)54.8 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8
MF/F MDI 200/10 mcgBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)70.0 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8
MF/F MDI 400/10 mcgBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)77.1 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8
MF DPI 200 mcgBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)102.6 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8
MF MDI 200 mcgBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)66.2 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8
PlaceboBaseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO) Parts Per Billion (Ppb)79.6 ppbStandard Deviation 40.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026