Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Conditions
Keywords
Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Cinquil
Brief summary
This study is an open-label study where all subjects will receive active drug, reslizumab. Subjects are able to enter this trial only through completion of study Res-05-0002 (NCT00538434). The goal of the study is to show longer term safety and efficacy in pediatric subjects who have eosinophilic esophagitis.
Detailed description
Subjects will enter this open-label extension study after completing the placebo-controlled, double-blind study Res-5-0002 (NCT00538434). The end of study visit for Res-05-0002 will serve as the screening visit for this trial. All subjects will receive reslizumab and be followed by their principal investigators in an unblinded fashion. Visits and administration of reslizumab will be monthly.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Informed consent * Received at least two doses of study drug in Study Res-05-0002 (NCT00538434) * Did not withdraw from Study Res-05-0002 due to drug related adverse event * Completed End of Treatment Visit for Study Res-05-0002
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant or nursing females * Concurrent Immunodeficiency * Current use of immunosuppressive drugs * Did not tolerate study drug in Study Res-05-0002
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Number of participants receiving therapeutic classes of concomitant medications. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [standard deviation {SD}] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | An AE was defined as any adverse experience, including side effect, injury, toxicity, sensitivity reaction, intercurrent illness, or sudden death, whether or not it was considered related to the use of study drug. Treatment emergent adverse events were those that started any time after the administration of the first dose of study drug (at baseline of this study) and before the cessation of study drug. Serious adverse events that occurred any time after the administration of the first dose of study drug until 30 days after administration of the last dose of study drug were reported as treatment emergent serious adverse events. |
| Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Hematology laboratory tests performed include: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, mean cell volume, mean cell hemoglobin, mean cell hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, white blood cell count, and differential count and percentage (polymorphonuclear leukocytes \[neutrophils\], lymphocytes, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, platelets). |
| Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results or Urinalysis Abnormality | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Serum chemistry laboratory tests performed include: calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride, creatinine, glucose \[nonfasting\], blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, bicarbonate, creatine kinase, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin. Urinalysis tests performed include: protein, glucose, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite content, pH, specific gravity, white blood cells, microscopic (red blood cells, white blood cells, casts, crystals). |
| Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Low systolic blood pressure: \< 90 and decrease (↓) of 30 mm Hg from baseline (BL) (ages 5-18); high systolic blood pressure: \> 160 and increase (↑) of 30 mm Hg from BL (age 5-12), \> 130 and ↑ of 30 mm Hg from BL (age 13-18). Low diastolic blood pressure: \< 45 and ↓ of 12 mm Hg from BL (age 5-12), \< 55 and ↓ of 12 mm Hg from BL (age 13-18), \< 50 and ↓ of 15 mm Hg from BL; high diastolic blood pressure: \> 85 and ↑ of 12 mm Hg from BL (ages 5-18). Low heart rate: \< 80 and and ↓ of 30 beats per minute (bpm) from BL (age 5-12), \< 60 and and ↓ of 30 bpm from BL (age 13-18), \< 50 and and ↓ of 15 bpm from BL (age \> 18); high heart rate: \> 120 and ↑ of 30 bpm from BL (age 5-12), \> 100 and ↑ of 30 bpm from BL (age 13-18), \> 100 and ↑ of 15 bpm from BL (age \> 18). Low oral body temperature: \< 35.8° Celsius (age 5 to \>18); high oral body temperature: \> 38.1° C and ↑ 2° Celsius from BL (age 5-18). |
| Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | HEENT=head, eyes, ears, nose and throat. |
| Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, endpoint (last visit), any time during study (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | The infusion site was assessed before treatment and within 30 minutes after the end of the infusion at each monthly treatment visit (or at early withdrawal if before Week 16). The infusion site was graded according to a 5-point scale as follows: 0=no tenderness at IV site, no erythema, no swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 1=tender IV site, no erythema, no swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 2=tender IV site with erythema, some degree of swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 3=tender IV site with erythema and swelling, with induration or palpable venous cord, no purulence; 4=frank vein thrombosis, along with all signs of grade 3 with purulence; IV may stop running because of thrombosis. After the 16-week visit, formal infusion site evaluations were not continued. However, any infusion site reactions were recorded as adverse events and graded as other adverse events. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Peak Esophageal Eosinophil Counts | Baseline, Week 16 or early withdrawal (if before Week 16) | The mean change from baseline in esophageal eosinophil levels was described at week 16 or early withdrawal (if before week 16), using descriptive statistics. Baseline was defined as the last assessment before the first dose of reslizumab, which was the baseline of the double-blind study (NCT00538434) for patients who received reslizumab in the double blind study or the baseline of the open-label study for patients who received placebo during the double-blind study. |
| Participant's EoE Predominant Symptoms Over Time | Every 3 weeks from Day 0 up to Week 42 (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | The data from the patient's/parent's eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Symptom Assessment were used to assess the shift from baseline in Predominant Symptom Assessment. The predominant symptom of the participant's/parent's EoE Symptom Assessment was selected at the double-blind baseline visit and remained the same throughout this study. Using the EoE Symptom Assessment, the participant/parent or legal guardian rated the severity of the previous week's EoE symptoms as none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe on a 5-point scale. Only the predominant symptom selected for each participant contributed to the overall analysis of the Predominant Symptom Assessment and the subgroup analyses of individual symptoms. Thus, for the Predominant Symptom Analysis, some patients had dysphagia assessed, while others had either abdominal/chest pain or vomiting/regurgitation assessed. |
| Physician's EoE Global Assessment Over Time | Every 3 weeks from Day 0 up to Week 42 (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | The data from the participant's/parent's EoE Symptom Assessment, in combination with other observations, were used by physicians to determine the Physician's EoE Global Assessment. All components of the patient's EoE Symptom Assessment were used by physicians to determine the Physician's EoE Global Assessment. |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Selected Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Scores | Baseline through Endpoint (last visit; mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | The Child Health Questionnaire comprises 50 items. Specific items are recoded and/or recalibrated. Raw scores for scales (domains calculated over one or more items) are then calculated following set algorithms. The raw scales are then transformed to 0 to 100 scores, except for Change in Health which remains a 1-5 score. Finally two summary measures are calculated based on weighted combinations of selected scales. The Global Health, Physical Summary Score and Psychosocial Summary Score were summarized. For each, scores range from 0 (higher disease activity) to 100 (lower disease activity); higher scores indicate better health. |
| Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint | Study endpoint (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Number of participants answering that they either maintained or changed their diet from the beginning of the double-blind study (ie, NCT00538434). Additionally, for those participants who answered that they changed their diet from the beginning of the double-blind study (column 2), the number of participants in that group who changed by increasing the consistency of their food ('Increased consistency') and the percentage that changed by eating foods that previously worsened EoE ('Added foods'). (Note that these 2 categories are not mutually exclusive, so that someone could have both increased the consistency of the food they were eating AND also eaten foods that previously worsened their EoE symptoms.) |
| Reslizumab Serum Concentrations | Before treatment (within 3 hours) and after treatment (within 3 hours after end of infusion) for doses at Weeks 8 and 12; within 6 days after either dose at Weeks 8 or 12; 2 to 4 weeks after dose at Weeks 8 or 12; and at premature withdrawal. | Reslizumab serum concentrations obtained in this study were included in ongoing and separate population pharmacokinetic analyses. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number of participants who had concentrations measured following that dose level. Since some participants started on 1 mg/kg and later increased to 2 mg/kg (and are therefore represented in more than one column), the number of participants in each column add up to a greater number than the total in the overall column, which reflects the total number of participants with measurable concentration data in this study. The number of concentrations summarized for that dose level represents more than one concentration per participant in most cases. |
| Number of Participants With >/= 1 Confirmed Positive Value for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) | From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months) | Using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the number of participants who had at least 1 confirmed positive value for ADA, either on day 0 after having received reslizumab in the double-blind study Res-05-0002 (NCT00538434) or during the course of the open-label study. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab Open-label reslizumab IV infusion at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg monthly | 190 |
| Total | 190 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 7 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 28 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 8 |
| Overall Study | Other | 31 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Open-Label Reslizumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 12.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97 |
| Age, Customized 12 to 19 years | 109 participants |
| Age, Customized 5 to 11 years | 81 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 42 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 148 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 167 / 190 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 21 / 190 |
Outcome results
Infusion Site Evaluations
The infusion site was assessed before treatment and within 30 minutes after the end of the infusion at each monthly treatment visit (or at early withdrawal if before Week 16). The infusion site was graded according to a 5-point scale as follows: 0=no tenderness at IV site, no erythema, no swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 1=tender IV site, no erythema, no swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 2=tender IV site with erythema, some degree of swelling, no induration, no purulence, no palpable venous cord; 3=tender IV site with erythema and swelling, with induration or palpable venous cord, no purulence; 4=frank vein thrombosis, along with all signs of grade 3 with purulence; IV may stop running because of thrombosis. After the 16-week visit, formal infusion site evaluations were not continued. However, any infusion site reactions were recorded as adverse events and graded as other adverse events.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, endpoint (last visit), any time during study (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: Number of Participants Analyzed= all participants in study (n=190); n=number of participants graded at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0; n=190 | 178 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 12; n=181 | 175 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 8; n=184 | 181 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Endpoint; n=190 | 185 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 16; n=159 | 154 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 4; n=188 | 179 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Infusion Site Evaluations | Any time; n=190 | 190 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 12; n=181 | 4 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0; n=190 | 11 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 4; n=188 | 8 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 8; n=184 | 2 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 16; n=159 | 4 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Endpoint; n=190 | 4 participants |
| Grade 1 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Any time; n=190 | 25 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Endpoint; n=190 | 1 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 12; n=181 | 1 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0; n=190 | 1 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 8; n=184 | 1 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Any time; n=190 | 3 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 16; n=159 | 1 participants |
| Grade 2 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 4; n=188 | 1 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0; n=190 | 0 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Any time; n=190 | 1 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 16; n=159 | 0 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 12; n=181 | 1 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 4; n=188 | 0 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Endpoint; n=190 | 0 participants |
| Grade 3 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 8; n=184 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 16; n=159 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 12; n=181 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Day 0; n=190 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 8; n=184 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Endpoint; n=190 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Week 4; n=188 | 0 participants |
| Grade 4 | Infusion Site Evaluations | Any time; n=190 | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value
Hematology laboratory tests performed include: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, mean cell volume, mean cell hemoglobin, mean cell hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, white blood cell count, and differential count and percentage (polymorphonuclear leukocytes \[neutrophils\], lymphocytes, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, platelets).
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: Participants with a postbaseline result for hematology tests.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | Hemoglobin </= 100 g/L | 1 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | Hematocrit < 0.30 L/L | 1 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | Leukocytes </= 3*10^9/L | 7 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | Neutrophils </= 1*10^9/L | 16 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value | Platelets </= 75*10^9/L | 3 participants |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results or Urinalysis Abnormality
Serum chemistry laboratory tests performed include: calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride, creatinine, glucose \[nonfasting\], blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, bicarbonate, creatine kinase, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin. Urinalysis tests performed include: protein, glucose, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite content, pH, specific gravity, white blood cells, microscopic (red blood cells, white blood cells, casts, crystals).
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results or Urinalysis Abnormality | Abnormal Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results or Urinalysis Abnormality | Urinalysis Abnormalities | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value
Low systolic blood pressure: \< 90 and decrease (↓) of 30 mm Hg from baseline (BL) (ages 5-18); high systolic blood pressure: \> 160 and increase (↑) of 30 mm Hg from BL (age 5-12), \> 130 and ↑ of 30 mm Hg from BL (age 13-18). Low diastolic blood pressure: \< 45 and ↓ of 12 mm Hg from BL (age 5-12), \< 55 and ↓ of 12 mm Hg from BL (age 13-18), \< 50 and ↓ of 15 mm Hg from BL; high diastolic blood pressure: \> 85 and ↑ of 12 mm Hg from BL (ages 5-18). Low heart rate: \< 80 and and ↓ of 30 beats per minute (bpm) from BL (age 5-12), \< 60 and and ↓ of 30 bpm from BL (age 13-18), \< 50 and and ↓ of 15 bpm from BL (age \> 18); high heart rate: \> 120 and ↑ of 30 bpm from BL (age 5-12), \> 100 and ↑ of 30 bpm from BL (age 13-18), \> 100 and ↑ of 15 bpm from BL (age \> 18). Low oral body temperature: \< 35.8° Celsius (age 5 to \>18); high oral body temperature: \> 38.1° C and ↑ 2° Celsius from BL (age 5-18).
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | Low systolic blood pressure | 21 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | High systolic blood pressure | 18 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | Low diastolic blood pressure | 88 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | High diastolic blood pressure | 27 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | Low heart rate | 42 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | High heart rate | 22 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | Low oral temperature | 72 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value | High oral temperature | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint
HEENT=head, eyes, ears, nose and throat.
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | General appearance | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | HEENT | 7 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Neck/thyroid | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Skin | 4 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Lymph nodes | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Heart | 1 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Chest and lungs | 3 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Neurological cranial nerves | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Neurological strength | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Neurological sensation | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Neurological reflexes | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Newly Diagnosed Physical Examination Abnormalities at Endpoint | Other | 9 participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any adverse experience, including side effect, injury, toxicity, sensitivity reaction, intercurrent illness, or sudden death, whether or not it was considered related to the use of study drug. Treatment emergent adverse events were those that started any time after the administration of the first dose of study drug (at baseline of this study) and before the cessation of study drug. Serious adverse events that occurred any time after the administration of the first dose of study drug until 30 days after administration of the last dose of study drug were reported as treatment emergent serious adverse events.
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [standard deviation {SD}] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: Three additional participants experiences anaphylactic reactions that were upgraded to serious AEs after database lock. These 3 participants are not included in this table summary.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Any AEs | 177 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Severe AEs | 38 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Treatment-related AEs | 63 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Deaths | 0 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Other Serious AEs | 21 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, or Discontinuation Due to AEs | Withdrawn from study due to AEs | 7 participants |
Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants
Number of participants receiving therapeutic classes of concomitant medications.
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Cough and cold preparations | 55 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Any concomitant medication | 176 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Analgesics | 93 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antibacterials for systemic use | 117 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antiemetics and antinauseants | 28 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antihistamines for systemic use | 123 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products | 83 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antipruritics, including antihistamine,anesthetic | 26 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Antivirals for systemic use | 24 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Corticosteroids for systemic use | 40 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Corticosteroids, dermatological preparations | 27 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Drugs for acid-related disorders | 59 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Drugs for obstructive airway diseases | 93 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Laxatives | 26 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Mineral supplements | 20 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Nasal preparations | 73 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Ophthalmologicals | 19 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Psychoanaleptics | 49 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Psycholeptics | 33 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Vaccines | 31 participants |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications in at Least 10% of Participants | Vitamins | 36 participants |
Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint
Number of participants answering that they either maintained or changed their diet from the beginning of the double-blind study (ie, NCT00538434). Additionally, for those participants who answered that they changed their diet from the beginning of the double-blind study (column 2), the number of participants in that group who changed by increasing the consistency of their food ('Increased consistency') and the percentage that changed by eating foods that previously worsened EoE ('Added foods'). (Note that these 2 categories are not mutually exclusive, so that someone could have both increased the consistency of the food they were eating AND also eaten foods that previously worsened their EoE symptoms.)
Time frame: Study endpoint (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: Number of Participants Analyzed=all participants (n=190). The denominator for follow-up questions is the number of participants responding 'No' to the question Have you maintained your diet since the beginning of the study? (n=63).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint | 124 participants |
| Grade 1 | Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint | 63 participants |
| Grade 2 | Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint | 21 participants |
| Grade 3 | Dietary Question Responses at Endpoint | 46 participants |
Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Peak Esophageal Eosinophil Counts
The mean change from baseline in esophageal eosinophil levels was described at week 16 or early withdrawal (if before week 16), using descriptive statistics. Baseline was defined as the last assessment before the first dose of reslizumab, which was the baseline of the double-blind study (NCT00538434) for patients who received reslizumab in the double blind study or the baseline of the open-label study for patients who received placebo during the double-blind study.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 or early withdrawal (if before Week 16)
Population: Participants with an assessment at Baseline and Week 16 (or early withdrawal).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Peak Esophageal Eosinophil Counts | -62.0 eosinophils/high power field (hpf) | Standard Deviation 77.97 |
Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Selected Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Scores
The Child Health Questionnaire comprises 50 items. Specific items are recoded and/or recalibrated. Raw scores for scales (domains calculated over one or more items) are then calculated following set algorithms. The raw scales are then transformed to 0 to 100 scores, except for Change in Health which remains a 1-5 score. Finally two summary measures are calculated based on weighted combinations of selected scales. The Global Health, Physical Summary Score and Psychosocial Summary Score were summarized. For each, scores range from 0 (higher disease activity) to 100 (lower disease activity); higher scores indicate better health.
Time frame: Baseline through Endpoint (last visit; mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: n=participants with an assessment for the given score at Baseline and Endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Selected Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Scores | Global Health; n=181 | 4.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.62 |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Selected Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Scores | Physical Summary Scale; n=170 | 3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.26 |
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Selected Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Scores | Psychosocial Summary Scale; n=170 | 3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.83 |
Number of Participants With >/= 1 Confirmed Positive Value for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)
Using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the number of participants who had at least 1 confirmed positive value for ADA, either on day 0 after having received reslizumab in the double-blind study Res-05-0002 (NCT00538434) or during the course of the open-label study.
Time frame: From start of study drug until end of treatment (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: Participants with an assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Number of Participants With >/= 1 Confirmed Positive Value for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) | 6 participants |
Participant's EoE Predominant Symptoms Over Time
The data from the patient's/parent's eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Symptom Assessment were used to assess the shift from baseline in Predominant Symptom Assessment. The predominant symptom of the participant's/parent's EoE Symptom Assessment was selected at the double-blind baseline visit and remained the same throughout this study. Using the EoE Symptom Assessment, the participant/parent or legal guardian rated the severity of the previous week's EoE symptoms as none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe on a 5-point scale. Only the predominant symptom selected for each participant contributed to the overall analysis of the Predominant Symptom Assessment and the subgroup analyses of individual symptoms. Thus, for the Predominant Symptom Analysis, some patients had dysphagia assessed, while others had either abdominal/chest pain or vomiting/regurgitation assessed.
Time frame: Every 3 weeks from Day 0 up to Week 42 (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: The statistical analysis plan only specified that data would be summarized/described graphically for visual inspection and cannot be summarized.
Physician's EoE Global Assessment Over Time
The data from the participant's/parent's EoE Symptom Assessment, in combination with other observations, were used by physicians to determine the Physician's EoE Global Assessment. All components of the patient's EoE Symptom Assessment were used by physicians to determine the Physician's EoE Global Assessment.
Time frame: Every 3 weeks from Day 0 up to Week 42 (mean [SD] duration of treatment was 30.0 [5.89] months)
Population: The statistical analysis plan only specified that data would be summarized/described graphically for visual inspection and cannot be summarized.
Reslizumab Serum Concentrations
Reslizumab serum concentrations obtained in this study were included in ongoing and separate population pharmacokinetic analyses. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number of participants who had concentrations measured following that dose level. Since some participants started on 1 mg/kg and later increased to 2 mg/kg (and are therefore represented in more than one column), the number of participants in each column add up to a greater number than the total in the overall column, which reflects the total number of participants with measurable concentration data in this study. The number of concentrations summarized for that dose level represents more than one concentration per participant in most cases.
Time frame: Before treatment (within 3 hours) and after treatment (within 3 hours after end of infusion) for doses at Weeks 8 and 12; within 6 days after either dose at Weeks 8 or 12; 2 to 4 weeks after dose at Weeks 8 or 12; and at premature withdrawal.
Population: Number of participants with measurable concentration data at each dose level and overall.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Label Reslizumab | Reslizumab Serum Concentrations | 15.747 µg/mL | Standard Deviation 11.293 |
| Grade 1 | Reslizumab Serum Concentrations | 29.507 µg/mL | Standard Deviation 20.592 |
| Grade 2 | Reslizumab Serum Concentrations | 41.360 µg/mL | Standard Deviation 54.952 |
| Grade 3 | Reslizumab Serum Concentrations | 21.202 µg/mL | Standard Deviation 17.684 |