Skip to content

Evaluation of Early Conversion to Everolimus From Cyclosporine in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

A Controlled Randomized Open-label Multicenter Study Evaluating if Early Conversion to Everolimus (Certican) From Cyclosporine (Neoral) in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients Can Improve Long-term Renal Function and Slow Down the Progression of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00634920
Enrollment
204
Registered
2008-03-13
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Function

Keywords

De novo renal transplantation

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate if early conversion to everolimus from cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients can improve long-term renal function and slow down the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy

Interventions

DRUGeverolimus

Everolimus (Certican®) tablets administered orally in two divided doses (b.i.d.) at a starting dose of 4 mg/day adjusted to target a trough blood concentration between 6 and 10 ng/mL in period 2.

DRUGcyclosporine A

CsA (Sandimmun Neoral), based on C0-h levels 75-200 ng/mL or C2-h levels 700 900 ng/mL from randomization to Month 6, or C0-h levels 50-150 ng/mL or C2-h levels 600 800 ng/mL from Month 6 to Month 36, according to local method

Target dose 1440 mg in the control group, target dose 1080 in the everolimus group (higher dose in the CsA group because of interactions of CsA on gastric reabsorption of mycophenolate)

DRUGcorticosteroids

For both groups: minimum corticosteroid dose of 10 mg until week 12, 5-10 mg until month 12, month 12-36 corticosteroid treatment on investigator's descretion.

DRUGBasiliximab

Induction therapy 20 mg basiliximab on Day 0 prior to reperfusion and 20 mg on Day 4 post-TX.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First or second single renal transplant from deceased or living donor

Exclusion criteria

* Recipient of organs other than a renal transplant * Present malignancy (within the last 2 years) other than excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin * Severe liver disease * At the time of randomization 7 weeks after transplantation In addition to the above criteria the following must be met at time of randomization: Inclusion Criteria: * Patients maintained on a triple immunosuppressive regime consisting of cyclosporine, Enteric coated mycophenolate, and corticosteroids * Patients completed the first 7 weeks without experiencing any rejection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measured Glomerular Filtration RateMonth 12To compare the efficacy between treatment regimens by assessing the difference in renal function evaluated by mean measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) 12 months after renal transplantation (TX). The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonths 12, 24, 36
Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonths 12, 24, 36
Measured Glomerular Filtration RateMonth 36Progression of renal function measured by mean mGFR at 36 months after renal TX. The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.
Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateMonths 12, 36The GFR was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD) method, the Cockcroft-Gault method, and the Nankivell formula. cGFR was calculated from blood samples collected at predefined time points.
Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateWeek 7, Week 52, Month 36Change in renal progression measured by mean mGFR from week 7 to Month 36
Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)Month 12, Month 36Assessed by protocol biopsies findings (Banff 1997 lesion scores and morphometry of the interstitial space)
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Months 12, 24, 36A BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III (Banff 97 classification). Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area.
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonths 12, 24, 36The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. Graft loss was considered an SAE (serious adverse event).
Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonths 12, 24, 36
Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonths 12, 24, 36Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.
Time to First MalignancyMonths 12, 24, 36This is the time to first diagnosed malignancy. Malignancies (skin- or solid cancer) were listed whether they reoccurred in situ, were metastatic or de novo. This is shown as mean time.
Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonths 12, 24, 36Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups for Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B.
Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonths 12, 24, 36Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups: HDL-C, LDL-C,Total cholesterol, and triglycerides.
Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonths 12, 24, 36
Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Months 12, 24, 36Proteinuria is when a large amount of protein, that should remain circulating in a person's blood, is spilled into their urine and eliminated from the body.
Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)Month 36Venous blood was drawn for donor specific (DSA) measurements prior to transplantation and at the final visit (36 months). The blood sample was first screened for the presence of PRA i.e. donor specific Immunoglobulin-G antibodies against specific HLA antigens. If PRA antibodies were detected, the blood sample was tested for specific DSAs on single antigen Luminex beads (coated with single HLA class I or II molecules). In this way, the specificity of these antibodies could be determined.
Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DBefore randomization, Months 12, 36Health-related QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system that measures health-related quality of life on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity (no problems/moderate problems/severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-1, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time to Treatment FailureMonths 12, 24, 36Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.Time to treatment failure is shown as mean time to treatment failure.

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of 2 periods, period 1: TX to Week 7 ± 7 days post-TX and period 2: Week 7 ± 7 days post-TX to Month 36. 341 patients were enrolled in this study. 204 randomized to receive study treatment: 104 in the everolimus group, 100 in the control group. 2 patients in everolimus group did not receive at least one dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus (CNI-free)
This investigational drug was provided by Novartis. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the everolimus group (CNI-free regimen) were treated with everolimus (Certican) EC MPS and corticosteroids. Patients randomized to this arm 7 weeks after renal transplantation will do an overnight switch from cyclosporine to everolimus.
104
Control (CsA)
All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the control group continued on the prior immunosuppressive regimen given before randomization. Conventional treatment arm with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate (Myfortic) and corticosteroids continued for the entire 36 months study period.
100
Not Randomized Patients
This group included patients in whom a renal TX was performed but who did not qualify for randomization at Visit 2. This group was to be described with respect to treatment, reason for not randomized and outcome variables calculated or measured GFR, whichever was feasible, BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months (no outcome variables were collected for this population
137
Total341

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationAdverse Event0036
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationNon-Compliance003
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationOther issues006
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationRejections0055
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationWithdrawal by Subject0021
Period 1 - Pre-RandomizationWound healing problems0016
Period 2 - Post-RandomizationAdverse Event3790
Period 2 - Post-Randomizationconsent withdrawal, non compliance9130
Period 2 - Post-RandomizationDeath250
Period 2 - Post-RandomizationPatients did not receive study drug200
Period 2 - Post-RandomizationRejection1150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus (CNI-free)Control (CsA)Not Randomized PatientsTotal
Age, Continuous55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
53.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
101 Participants100 Participants136 Participants337 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants26 Participants43 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants74 Participants94 Participants238 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 10093 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
65 / 10072 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate

To compare the efficacy between treatment regimens by assessing the difference in renal function evaluated by mean measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) 12 months after renal transplantation (TX). The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate51.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14.4
Control (CsA)Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate47.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 15.4
Secondary

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate

The GFR was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD) method, the Cockcroft-Gault method, and the Nankivell formula. cGFR was calculated from blood samples collected at predefined time points.

Time frame: Months 12, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateMDRD M1265.0 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 19.9
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateMDRD M3659.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20.1
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateCockcroft-Gault M1245.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14.6
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateCockcroft-Gault M3643.1 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 16.1
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateNankivel M1266.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 19.2
Everolimus (CNI-free)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateNankivel M3661.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20.9
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateNankivel M1261.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20.5
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateMDRD M1260.1 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 19.7
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateCockcroft-Gault M3642.1 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13.1
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateMDRD M3657.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20.2
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateNankivel M3658.9 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20
Control (CsA)Calculated Glomerular Filtration RateCockcroft-Gault M1245.6 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 15.4
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D

Health-related QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system that measures health-related quality of life on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity (no problems/moderate problems/severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-1, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

Time frame: Before randomization, Months 12, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DBefore Randomization (Week 7)0.8430 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1539
Everolimus (CNI-free)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DMonth 120.8155 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1605
Everolimus (CNI-free)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DMonth 360.8285 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2303
Control (CsA)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DBefore Randomization (Week 7)0.8693 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1583
Control (CsA)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DMonth 120.8470 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2239
Control (CsA)Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5DMonth 360.8422 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1941
Secondary

Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein

Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups for Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 12: Apolipoprotein A11.59 g/LStandard Deviation 0.31
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 24: Apolipoprotein A11.55 g/LStandard Deviation 0.29
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 36: Apolipoprotein A11.70 g/LStandard Deviation 0.39
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 12: Apolipoprotein B0.935 g/LStandard Deviation 0.235
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 24: Apolipoprotein B (1.178 g/LStandard Deviation 0.225
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 36: Apolipoprotein B0.984 g/LStandard Deviation 0.211
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 24: Apolipoprotein B (1.058 g/LStandard Deviation 0.263
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 12: Apolipoprotein A11.46 g/LStandard Deviation 0.26
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 12: Apolipoprotein B0.923 g/LStandard Deviation 0.258
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 24: Apolipoprotein A11.36 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 36: Apolipoprotein B0.934 g/LStandard Deviation 0.206
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for ApolipoproteinMonth 36: Apolipoprotein A11.56 g/LStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides

Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups: HDL-C, LDL-C,Total cholesterol, and triglycerides.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: HDL Cholesterol1.486 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.446
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: HDL Cholesterol1.477 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.437
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: HDL Cholesterol1.495 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.44
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: LDL Cholesterol3.569 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.39
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: LDL Cholesterol3.381 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.139
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: LDL Cholesterol3.206 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.945
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: Total Cholesterol6.091 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.65
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: Total Cholesterol5.823 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.377
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: Total Cholesterol5.595 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.396
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: Triglycerides2.461 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.62
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: Triglycerides2.288 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: Triglycerides2.164 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.256
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: Triglycerides1.757 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.958
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: HDL Cholesterol1.419 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.409
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: Total Cholesterol5.318 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.067
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: HDL Cholesterol1.409 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.411
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: Triglycerides1.868 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.932
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: HDL Cholesterol1.529 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.518
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: Total Cholesterol5.112 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.096
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 12: LDL Cholesterol3.130 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.962
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: Triglycerides1.580 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.853
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 24: LDL Cholesterol2.925 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.043
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: Total Cholesterol4.830 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.166
Control (CsA)Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and TriglyceridesMonth 36: LDL Cholesterol2.822 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.789
Secondary

Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate

Progression of renal function measured by mean mGFR at 36 months after renal TX. The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.

Time frame: Month 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR). Patients who did not provide mGFR assessment at M36 visit were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate48.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14.7
Control (CsA)Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate46.1 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 17
Secondary

Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 122.5 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 242.5 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.3
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 362.0 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.4
Control (CsA)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 122.5 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.1
Control (CsA)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 242.4 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.1
Control (CsA)Number of Antihypertensive Drugs TakenMonth 362.2 Number of antihypertensive dugsStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 120.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 241.0 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 360.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.5
Control (CsA)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 120.8 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.4
Control (CsA)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 240.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.4
Control (CsA)Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs TakenMonth 360.8 Number of lipid-lowering drugsStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 12: No antihypertensive drugs9.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 12: Has antihypertensive drugs90.8 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 24: No antihypertensive drugs4.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 24: Has antihypertensive drugs95.8 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 36: No antihypertensive drugs15.6 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 36: Has antihypertensive drugs84.4 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 36: No antihypertensive drugs12.8 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 12: No antihypertensive drugs3.3 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 24: Has antihypertensive drugs94.7 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 12: Has antihypertensive drugs96.7 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 36: Has antihypertensive drugs87.2 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive DrugsMonth 24: No antihypertensive drugs5.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 1275.0 Percentage of participants 0.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 2478.0 Percentage of participants 0.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 3673.0 Percentage of participants 0.5
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 3663.0 Percentage of participants 0.4
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 1260.0 Percentage of participants 0.4
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering DrugsMonth 2465.0 Percentage of participants 0.4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)

Assessed by protocol biopsies findings (Banff 1997 lesion scores and morphometry of the interstitial space)

Time frame: Month 12, Month 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)Month 121.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)Month 3659.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)Month 121.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)Month 3664.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)

Venous blood was drawn for donor specific (DSA) measurements prior to transplantation and at the final visit (36 months). The blood sample was first screened for the presence of PRA i.e. donor specific Immunoglobulin-G antibodies against specific HLA antigens. If PRA antibodies were detected, the blood sample was tested for specific DSAs on single antigen Luminex beads (coated with single HLA class I or II molecules). In this way, the specificity of these antibodies could be determined.

Time frame: Month 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)ND (not done)7.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)Negative78.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)Positive15.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)ND (not done)9.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)Negative70.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)Positive21.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)

A BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III (Banff 97 classification). Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: lA19.6 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: lB10.9 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: llA2.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: llB2.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 24: lA5.4 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 24: lB1.1 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 36: lA2.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 36: lB1.1 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 36: lB0.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: lA4.4 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 24: lA4.4 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: lB0.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 36: lA1.1 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: llA2.2 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 24: lB3.3 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)Month 12: llB1.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death

The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. Graft loss was considered an SAE (serious adverse event).

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 12: Event First Year0.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 12: No Event First Year100.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 24: Event Second Year1.1 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 24: No Event Second Year98.9 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 36: Event Third Year0.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 36: No Event Third Year100.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 36: Event Third Year2.2 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 12: Event First Year0.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 24: No Event Second Year98.9 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 12: No Event First Year100.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 36: No Event Third Year97.8 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or DeathMonth 24: Event Second Year1.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures

Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 12: No Failure100.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 12: Failure0.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 24: No Failure98.8 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 24: Failure1.2 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 36: No Failure98.8 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (CNI-free)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 36: Failure1.2 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 36: No Failure96.7 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 12: No Failure100.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 24: Failure1.2 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 12: Failure0.0 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 36: Failure3.3 Percentage of participants
Control (CsA)Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailuresMonth 24: No Failure98.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate

Change in renal progression measured by mean mGFR from week 7 to Month 36

Time frame: Week 7, Week 52, Month 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateWeek 746.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13
Everolimus (CNI-free)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateChange from week 7 to Week 525.6 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 11.5
Everolimus (CNI-free)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateWeek 5251.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14.4
Everolimus (CNI-free)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateChange from week 7 to Month 361.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14
Everolimus (CNI-free)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateMonth 3648.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 14.7
Control (CsA)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateChange from week 7 to Month 36-1.7 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 15.4
Control (CsA)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateMonth 3646.1 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 17
Control (CsA)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateWeek 747.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 15
Control (CsA)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateWeek 5247.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 15.4
Control (CsA)Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration RateChange from week 7 to Week 520.0 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 12.9
Secondary

Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))

Proteinuria is when a large amount of protein, that should remain circulating in a person's blood, is spilled into their urine and eliminated from the body.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The safety population (SAF) consists of all patients in whom TX was performed and who were randomized and treated with at least one dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 1217.31 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 29.39
Everolimus (CNI-free)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 2462.83 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 178.62
Everolimus (CNI-free)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 3678.78 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 357.45
Control (CsA)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 1211.27 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 22.92
Control (CsA)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 2424.55 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 52.07
Control (CsA)Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))Month 3680.73 mg/mmolStandard Deviation 534.3
Secondary

Time to First Malignancy

This is the time to first diagnosed malignancy. Malignancies (skin- or solid cancer) were listed whether they reoccurred in situ, were metastatic or de novo. This is shown as mean time.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Time to First Malignancy35.5 MonthsStandard Error 0.63
Control (CsA)Time to First Malignancy35.1 MonthsStandard Error 0.55
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.Time to treatment failure is shown as mean time to treatment failure.

Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus (CNI-free)Time to Treatment Failure972.7 DaysStandard Error 7.76
Control (CsA)Time to Treatment Failure959.5 DaysStandard Error 7.76

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026