Renal Function
Conditions
Keywords
De novo renal transplantation
Brief summary
This study is designed to evaluate if early conversion to everolimus from cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients can improve long-term renal function and slow down the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy
Interventions
Everolimus (Certican®) tablets administered orally in two divided doses (b.i.d.) at a starting dose of 4 mg/day adjusted to target a trough blood concentration between 6 and 10 ng/mL in period 2.
CsA (Sandimmun Neoral), based on C0-h levels 75-200 ng/mL or C2-h levels 700 900 ng/mL from randomization to Month 6, or C0-h levels 50-150 ng/mL or C2-h levels 600 800 ng/mL from Month 6 to Month 36, according to local method
Target dose 1440 mg in the control group, target dose 1080 in the everolimus group (higher dose in the CsA group because of interactions of CsA on gastric reabsorption of mycophenolate)
For both groups: minimum corticosteroid dose of 10 mg until week 12, 5-10 mg until month 12, month 12-36 corticosteroid treatment on investigator's descretion.
Induction therapy 20 mg basiliximab on Day 0 prior to reperfusion and 20 mg on Day 4 post-TX.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* First or second single renal transplant from deceased or living donor
Exclusion criteria
* Recipient of organs other than a renal transplant * Present malignancy (within the last 2 years) other than excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin * Severe liver disease * At the time of randomization 7 weeks after transplantation In addition to the above criteria the following must be met at time of randomization: Inclusion Criteria: * Patients maintained on a triple immunosuppressive regime consisting of cyclosporine, Enteric coated mycophenolate, and corticosteroids * Patients completed the first 7 weeks without experiencing any rejection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Month 12 | To compare the efficacy between treatment regimens by assessing the difference in renal function evaluated by mean measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) 12 months after renal transplantation (TX). The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Months 12, 24, 36 | — |
| Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Months 12, 24, 36 | — |
| Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Month 36 | Progression of renal function measured by mean mGFR at 36 months after renal TX. The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice. |
| Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Months 12, 36 | The GFR was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD) method, the Cockcroft-Gault method, and the Nankivell formula. cGFR was calculated from blood samples collected at predefined time points. |
| Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Week 7, Week 52, Month 36 | Change in renal progression measured by mean mGFR from week 7 to Month 36 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy) | Month 12, Month 36 | Assessed by protocol biopsies findings (Banff 1997 lesion scores and morphometry of the interstitial space) |
| Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Months 12, 24, 36 | A BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III (Banff 97 classification). Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area. |
| Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Months 12, 24, 36 | The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. Graft loss was considered an SAE (serious adverse event). |
| Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Months 12, 24, 36 | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Months 12, 24, 36 | Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death. |
| Time to First Malignancy | Months 12, 24, 36 | This is the time to first diagnosed malignancy. Malignancies (skin- or solid cancer) were listed whether they reoccurred in situ, were metastatic or de novo. This is shown as mean time. |
| Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Months 12, 24, 36 | Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups for Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B. |
| Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Months 12, 24, 36 | Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups: HDL-C, LDL-C,Total cholesterol, and triglycerides. |
| Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Months 12, 24, 36 | — |
| Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Months 12, 24, 36 | Proteinuria is when a large amount of protein, that should remain circulating in a person's blood, is spilled into their urine and eliminated from the body. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | Month 36 | Venous blood was drawn for donor specific (DSA) measurements prior to transplantation and at the final visit (36 months). The blood sample was first screened for the presence of PRA i.e. donor specific Immunoglobulin-G antibodies against specific HLA antigens. If PRA antibodies were detected, the blood sample was tested for specific DSAs on single antigen Luminex beads (coated with single HLA class I or II molecules). In this way, the specificity of these antibodies could be determined. |
| Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Before randomization, Months 12, 36 | Health-related QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system that measures health-related quality of life on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity (no problems/moderate problems/severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-1, in which higher scores reflect better health status. |
| Time to Treatment Failure | Months 12, 24, 36 | Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.Time to treatment failure is shown as mean time to treatment failure. |
Countries
Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The study consisted of 2 periods, period 1: TX to Week 7 ± 7 days post-TX and period 2: Week 7 ± 7 days post-TX to Month 36. 341 patients were enrolled in this study. 204 randomized to receive study treatment: 104 in the everolimus group, 100 in the control group. 2 patients in everolimus group did not receive at least one dose of study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) This investigational drug was provided by Novartis. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the everolimus group (CNI-free regimen) were treated with everolimus (Certican) EC MPS and corticosteroids. Patients randomized to this arm 7 weeks after renal transplantation will do an overnight switch from cyclosporine to everolimus. | 104 |
| Control (CsA) All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the control group continued on the prior immunosuppressive regimen given before randomization. Conventional treatment arm with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate (Myfortic) and corticosteroids continued for the entire 36 months study period. | 100 |
| Not Randomized Patients This group included patients in whom a renal TX was performed but who did not qualify for randomization at Visit 2. This group was to be described with respect to treatment, reason for not randomized and outcome variables calculated or measured GFR, whichever was feasible, BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months (no outcome variables were collected for this population | 137 |
| Total | 341 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 36 |
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Non-Compliance | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Other issues | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Rejections | 0 | 0 | 55 |
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| Period 1 - Pre-Randomization | Wound healing problems | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Period 2 - Post-Randomization | Adverse Event | 37 | 9 | 0 |
| Period 2 - Post-Randomization | consent withdrawal, non compliance | 9 | 13 | 0 |
| Period 2 - Post-Randomization | Death | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Period 2 - Post-Randomization | Patients did not receive study drug | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 2 - Post-Randomization | Rejection | 11 | 5 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Everolimus (CNI-free) | Control (CsA) | Not Randomized Patients | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 53.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 | 56.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 | 55.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 101 Participants | 100 Participants | 136 Participants | 337 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Oriental | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants | 26 Participants | 43 Participants | 103 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 70 Participants | 74 Participants | 94 Participants | 238 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 88 / 100 | 93 / 102 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 65 / 100 | 72 / 102 |
Outcome results
Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
To compare the efficacy between treatment regimens by assessing the difference in renal function evaluated by mean measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) 12 months after renal transplantation (TX). The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | 51.5 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | 47.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate
The GFR was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD) method, the Cockcroft-Gault method, and the Nankivell formula. cGFR was calculated from blood samples collected at predefined time points.
Time frame: Months 12, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | MDRD M12 | 65.0 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | MDRD M36 | 59.4 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Cockcroft-Gault M12 | 45.4 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Cockcroft-Gault M36 | 43.1 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Nankivel M12 | 66.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Nankivel M36 | 61.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Nankivel M12 | 61.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | MDRD M12 | 60.1 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Cockcroft-Gault M36 | 42.1 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | MDRD M36 | 57.4 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Nankivel M36 | 58.9 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Control (CsA) | Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate | Cockcroft-Gault M12 | 45.6 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D
Health-related QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system that measures health-related quality of life on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity (no problems/moderate problems/severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-1, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time frame: Before randomization, Months 12, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Before Randomization (Week 7) | 0.8430 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1539 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Month 12 | 0.8155 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1605 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Month 36 | 0.8285 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2303 |
| Control (CsA) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Before Randomization (Week 7) | 0.8693 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1583 |
| Control (CsA) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Month 12 | 0.8470 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2239 |
| Control (CsA) | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by EuroQoL EQ-5D | Month 36 | 0.8422 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1941 |
Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein
Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups for Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 12: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.59 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 24: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.55 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 36: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.70 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 12: Apolipoprotein B | 0.935 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.235 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 24: Apolipoprotein B ( | 1.178 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.225 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 36: Apolipoprotein B | 0.984 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.211 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 24: Apolipoprotein B ( | 1.058 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.263 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 12: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.46 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 12: Apolipoprotein B | 0.923 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.258 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 24: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.36 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 36: Apolipoprotein B | 0.934 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.206 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for Apolipoprotein | Month 36: Apolipoprotein A1 | 1.56 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides
Blood lipid levels of patients in both groups: HDL-C, LDL-C,Total cholesterol, and triglycerides.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: HDL Cholesterol | 1.486 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.446 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: HDL Cholesterol | 1.477 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.437 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: HDL Cholesterol | 1.495 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: LDL Cholesterol | 3.569 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: LDL Cholesterol | 3.381 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.139 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: LDL Cholesterol | 3.206 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.945 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: Total Cholesterol | 6.091 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.65 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: Total Cholesterol | 5.823 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.377 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: Total Cholesterol | 5.595 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.396 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: Triglycerides | 2.461 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: Triglycerides | 2.288 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: Triglycerides | 2.164 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.256 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: Triglycerides | 1.757 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.958 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: HDL Cholesterol | 1.419 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.409 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: Total Cholesterol | 5.318 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.067 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: HDL Cholesterol | 1.409 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.411 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: Triglycerides | 1.868 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.932 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: HDL Cholesterol | 1.529 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.518 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: Total Cholesterol | 5.112 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.096 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 12: LDL Cholesterol | 3.130 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.962 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: Triglycerides | 1.580 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.853 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 24: LDL Cholesterol | 2.925 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.043 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: Total Cholesterol | 4.830 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.166 |
| Control (CsA) | Lipid Profile for HDL-C, LDL-C,Total Cholesterol, and Triglycerides | Month 36: LDL Cholesterol | 2.822 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.789 |
Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
Progression of renal function measured by mean mGFR at 36 months after renal TX. The mGFR was measured using Iohexol or Cr-EDTA clearance according to local practice.
Time frame: Month 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR). Patients who did not provide mGFR assessment at M36 visit were excluded from the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | 48.2 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Control (CsA) | Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | 46.1 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 17 |
Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 12 | 2.5 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 24 | 2.5 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 36 | 2.0 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 12 | 2.5 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 24 | 2.4 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Antihypertensive Drugs Taken | Month 36 | 2.2 Number of antihypertensive dugs | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 12 | 0.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 24 | 1.0 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 36 | 0.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 12 | 0.8 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 24 | 0.9 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Number of Lipid-lowering Drugs Taken | Month 36 | 0.8 Number of lipid-lowering drugs | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 12: No antihypertensive drugs | 9.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 12: Has antihypertensive drugs | 90.8 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 24: No antihypertensive drugs | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 24: Has antihypertensive drugs | 95.8 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 36: No antihypertensive drugs | 15.6 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 36: Has antihypertensive drugs | 84.4 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 36: No antihypertensive drugs | 12.8 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 12: No antihypertensive drugs | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 24: Has antihypertensive drugs | 94.7 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 12: Has antihypertensive drugs | 96.7 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 36: Has antihypertensive drugs | 87.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Antihypertensive Drugs | Month 24: No antihypertensive drugs | 5.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 12 | 75.0 Percentage of participants | 0.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 24 | 78.0 Percentage of participants | 0.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 36 | 73.0 Percentage of participants | 0.5 |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 36 | 63.0 Percentage of participants | 0.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 12 | 60.0 Percentage of participants | 0.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants on Lipid-lowering Drugs | Month 24 | 65.0 Percentage of participants | 0.4 |
Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy)
Assessed by protocol biopsies findings (Banff 1997 lesion scores and morphometry of the interstitial space)
Time frame: Month 12, Month 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy) | Month 12 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy) | Month 36 | 59.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy) | Month 12 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants Who Developed CAN (Chronic Allograft Nephropathy) | Month 36 | 64.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA)
Venous blood was drawn for donor specific (DSA) measurements prior to transplantation and at the final visit (36 months). The blood sample was first screened for the presence of PRA i.e. donor specific Immunoglobulin-G antibodies against specific HLA antigens. If PRA antibodies were detected, the blood sample was tested for specific DSAs on single antigen Luminex beads (coated with single HLA class I or II molecules). In this way, the specificity of these antibodies could be determined.
Time frame: Month 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | ND (not done) | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | Negative | 78.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | Positive | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | ND (not done) | 9.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | Negative | 70.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants Who Had Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) | Positive | 21.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
A BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III (Banff 97 classification). Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: lA | 19.6 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: lB | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: llA | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: llB | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 24: lA | 5.4 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 24: lB | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 36: lA | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 36: lB | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 36: lB | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: lA | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 24: lA | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: lB | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 36: lA | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: llA | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 24: lB | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | Month 12: llB | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death
The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss. Graft loss was considered an SAE (serious adverse event).
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 12: Event First Year | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 12: No Event First Year | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 24: Event Second Year | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 24: No Event Second Year | 98.9 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 36: Event Third Year | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 36: No Event Third Year | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 36: Event Third Year | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 12: Event First Year | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 24: No Event Second Year | 98.9 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 12: No Event First Year | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 36: No Event Third Year | 97.8 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death | Month 24: Event Second Year | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures
Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 12: No Failure | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 12: Failure | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 24: No Failure | 98.8 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 24: Failure | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 36: No Failure | 98.8 Percentage of participants |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 36: Failure | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 36: No Failure | 96.7 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 12: No Failure | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 24: Failure | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 12: Failure | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 36: Failure | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Control (CsA) | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failures | Month 24: No Failure | 98.8 Percentage of participants |
Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
Change in renal progression measured by mean mGFR from week 7 to Month 36
Time frame: Week 7, Week 52, Month 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Week 7 | 46.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Change from week 7 to Week 52 | 5.6 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Week 52 | 51.5 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Change from week 7 to Month 36 | 1.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Month 36 | 48.2 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Control (CsA) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Change from week 7 to Month 36 | -1.7 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Month 36 | 46.1 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Control (CsA) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Week 7 | 47.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Control (CsA) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Week 52 | 47.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Control (CsA) | Progression of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate | Change from week 7 to Week 52 | 0.0 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol))
Proteinuria is when a large amount of protein, that should remain circulating in a person's blood, is spilled into their urine and eliminated from the body.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The safety population (SAF) consists of all patients in whom TX was performed and who were randomized and treated with at least one dose of randomized treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 12 | 17.31 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 29.39 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 24 | 62.83 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 178.62 |
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 36 | 78.78 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 357.45 |
| Control (CsA) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 12 | 11.27 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 22.92 |
| Control (CsA) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 24 | 24.55 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 52.07 |
| Control (CsA) | Proteinuria (Measured as Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (mg/mmol)) | Month 36 | 80.73 mg/mmol | Standard Deviation 534.3 |
Time to First Malignancy
This is the time to first diagnosed malignancy. Malignancies (skin- or solid cancer) were listed whether they reoccurred in situ, were metastatic or de novo. This is shown as mean time.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Time to First Malignancy | 35.5 Months | Standard Error 0.63 |
| Control (CsA) | Time to First Malignancy | 35.1 Months | Standard Error 0.55 |
Time to Treatment Failure
Treatment failure was defined as graft loss or death.Time to treatment failure is shown as mean time to treatment failure.
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any immunosuppressive therapy after TX and have both baseline and Month 12 assessment of the primary efficacy variable (renal function based on mGFR).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everolimus (CNI-free) | Time to Treatment Failure | 972.7 Days | Standard Error 7.76 |
| Control (CsA) | Time to Treatment Failure | 959.5 Days | Standard Error 7.76 |