Skip to content

Effect of Two Different Fasting Blood Glucose Targets on Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Insulin Detemir Once Daily

Effect of Two Different Fasting Blood Glucose Titration Targets in Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Insulin Detemir Once Daily in Combination With 1-3 Oral Agents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00634842
Acronym
TITRATE™
Enrollment
244
Registered
2008-03-13
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2017-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in the United States of America. The aim of this trial is to explore how different fasting blood glucose targets affect glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes, when patients are empowered to do dose adjustments themselves.

Interventions

DRUGinsulin detemir

Treat-to-target dose titration scheme, s.c. injection, once daily. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) titration target range of 70-90 mg/dL

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes * 1-3 oral treatments * Insulin naive * BMI (Body Mass Index) less than or equal to 45

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Retinopathy * Cardiac disease * Uncontrolled hypertension * Recurrent hypoglycaemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than 7%week 20Percentage (%) of subjects reaching glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than 7% measured after 20 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5%week 20Percentage (%) of participants reaching glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than or equal to 6.5% measured after 20 weeks of treatment
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Percentage From Baselineweek -2, week 20Change in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) percentage from baseline measured from week -2 to week 20
Incidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)weeks 0-20Incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes (all, major, minor and symptoms only) occurring during the treatment period from week 0 to week 20. Classification was as follows: * If subject was unable to treat himself: Major incidence. * If subject could treat himself and plasma glucose was less than 3.1 mmol/l: Minor incidence. * If subject could treat himself and plasma glucose was equal to or greater than 3.1 mmol/l, or there was no plasma glucose measurement: Symptoms only.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

69 sites in the United States of America (USA).

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were randomised 1:1 to 2 FPG (fasting plasma glucose) titration targets. Insulin doses were self-titrated every three days based on self-measured FPG levels as follows: -3 units if FPG was below the lower limit of the target range, no change if FPG was within target range, and +3 units if FPG was above the upper limit of the target range.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FPG 70-90 mg/dL
Aggressive FPG (fasting plasma glucose) titration target range group
122
FPG 80-110 mg/dL
Conventional FPG (fasting plasma glucose) titration target range group
122
Total244

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event23
Overall StudyDiscontinued due to injection02
Overall StudyInclusion criteria were not met10
Overall StudyLack of time and intolerance to drug01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyMove to another state10
Overall StudyNo need of study drug to treat diabetes01
Overall StudyNo wish to keep taking Avandia01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation84
Overall StudySubject off study drug for too long01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFPG 80-110 mg/dLTotalFPG 70-90 mg/dL
Age, Continuous57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)163.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.4
163.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.7
164.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.1
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)7.9 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
8.0 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
8.0 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants98 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
78 Participants146 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 12130 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 1214 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than 7%

Percentage (%) of subjects reaching glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than 7% measured after 20 weeks of treatment

Time frame: week 20

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population with non-missing HbA1c values at end of study, LOCF (last observation carried forward)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FPG 70-90 mg/dLPercentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than 7%64.3 percentage of participants
FPG 80-110 mg/dLPercentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than 7%54.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: To show non-inferiority for the primary endpoint, 100 subjects per group provides 80% power to show that the 95% CI for the difference of proportions between treatments is within the 20% margin under the assumption of equality of proportions. It is also sufficient to show superiority under the assumption that the first proportion is greater than the second by at least 20%. With a predicted withdrawal rate of 15%, 236 subjects were needed based on a treatment ratio of 1:1 for the two treatments.p-value: 0.041195% CI: [1.03, 3.37]Test for Difference in Proportions
Secondary

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Percentage From Baseline

Change in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) percentage from baseline measured from week -2 to week 20

Time frame: week -2, week 20

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT), LOCF (last observation carried forward) population. One Subject in 70-90 group, however, had a missing baseline value, therefore, no change from baseline could be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FPG 70-90 mg/dLChange in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Percentage From Baseline-1.229 percentage point changeStandard Error 0.061
FPG 80-110 mg/dLChange in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Percentage From Baseline-0.958 percentage point changeStandard Error 0.061
p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-0.441, -0.101]ANCOVA
Secondary

Incidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)

Incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes (all, major, minor and symptoms only) occurring during the treatment period from week 0 to week 20. Classification was as follows: * If subject was unable to treat himself: Major incidence. * If subject could treat himself and plasma glucose was less than 3.1 mmol/l: Minor incidence. * If subject could treat himself and plasma glucose was equal to or greater than 3.1 mmol/l, or there was no plasma glucose measurement: Symptoms only.

Time frame: weeks 0-20

Population: The safety population consists of all subjects exposed to study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FPG 70-90 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)All333 number of events
FPG 70-90 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Minor225 number of events
FPG 70-90 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Major1 number of events
FPG 70-90 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Symptoms only107 number of events
FPG 80-110 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Major0 number of events
FPG 80-110 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)All227 number of events
FPG 80-110 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Symptoms only91 number of events
FPG 80-110 mg/dLIncidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes (All, Major, Minor and Symptoms Only)Minor136 number of events
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5%

Percentage (%) of participants reaching glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than or equal to 6.5% measured after 20 weeks of treatment

Time frame: week 20

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population with non-missing HbA1c values at end of study, LOCF (last observation carried forward)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FPG 70-90 mg/dLPercentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5%41.1 percentage of participants
FPG 80-110 mg/dLPercentage of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5%26.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.006495% CI: [1.27, 4.3]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026